Добавил:
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
01 POWER ISLAND / Overview of Light Water.docx
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
01.04.2025
Размер:
8.88 Mб
Скачать

Chapter 5 Operation and Maintenance of PWR Plants

to the synchronous speed and the generator is synchronized with the power transmission grid ("generator tie-in” operation). During the turbine­generator startup operations, excess steam is bypassed to the condenser via the turbine bypass line. When the generator output exceeded the level of station auxiliary loads, power supply to the auxiliary loads is switched over from the off­site power supply (startup transformer) line to the generator (the station auxiliary transformer) line. Typical startup curves of a PWR plant are shown in Figure5.1.2. These are examples where the power increase rate is not restricted to ensure the fuel mechanical integrity. In cases of reactor startups after refueling, or power increases after long periods of low power operation, the power increase rate is restricted so as not to exceed 3%/h during the period of reactor power increase from 20% to 100%. However, if a plant has been operated at a specified power level for more than 72 hours, the restriction is ignored below that power level.

In actual plant operations, the above-mentioned restriction is applied more conservatively, although practices vary plant by plant Figure 5.1.3 shows an example set of startup curves of plants under the restriction.

  1. Plant Normal Operation

The main duty of the operating crew during the plant normal operation is to compensate the reactivity loss of core which increases as fuel burnup proceeds. The reactivity of a PWR plant reactor is controlled by two methods: operation of control rod clusters and adjustment of boron concentration in the reactor coolant. These two methods are used for different purposes. The control rod clusters are used for control of the core reactivity during relatively rapid reactivity changes as required in startup, shutdown or emergency shutdown phases of reactor operation. They are also used for the control of core reactivity during rapid load changes together with the reactor control system. The adjustment of boron concentration is used for the control of core reactivity during slow reactivity changes caused by the fuel burnup, the buildup or decay of fission products which have relatively large neutron absorption cross sections, such as xenon and samarium, the reactivity changes

during the reactor coolant temperature change from room temperature to the zero-power operation temperature due to the moderator temperature coefficient, and so on.

The control rod clusters are classified into two groups, a shutdown group and a control group, according to their purposes. Control rods of the shutdown group are used only for the emergency shutdown of the reactor, and hence, they are fully withdrawn during the plant power operation. The control rods of the control group are automatically controlled by control rod control system signals during the plant normal operation. Both groups of control rod clusters are divided into several subgroups, called banks, for the purpose of restricting reactivity added to the core at one time. Withdrawal operation procedures of each bank of the control group rod clusters are fixed and are not changed throughout the core lifetime. Since all control rod clusters are almost fully withdrawn during the plant normal operation and subsequently the reactor core neutron flux distribution pattern is flat, flux distribution does not need to be adjusted in anyway including computer control.

Adjustment of the reactor coolant boron concentration is conducted by batch operations in the chemical and volume control system, i.e. adding a volume of boric acid solution to increase the concentration and adding a volume of pure water to decrease it

Plant normal operation usually means that the plant is steadily operated with its rated power, except during periodical intermittent power reductions for the turbine stem-free testing operations. In plant normal operation, the main operational procedures which the crew must implement are the dilution and concentration of reactor coolant boron to compensate for core reactivity changes due to fuel burnup and xenon buildup or depletion following reactor power changes. For instance, when reactor core reactivity gradually declines as the core fuel burns up, the average temperature of the reactor coolant gradually decreases, and the control group rod clusters are automatically withdrawn to compensate for this. When control rod clusters are withdrawn and reach certain specified positions, plant operators are required to dilute the boron concentration in the reactor coolant and restore the

5 5

NSRA, Japan

(Shujui) uiutobjV Jasuapuoj o

5

Pressurizer Water Level 100%

(uidj) pija auiqinj

(%) jaMoj otipqg

(jUio/aif) amssajj uieajs

I

8

I I

8

T

H

i o

i

3

& \

a

% \

sl

Achievement of Rated Power

— Automatic Feed Water Control, Automatic Control Rod Control

Turbine Bypass Control Change over toTAVC Control

Tie-in, Low Genereator Load

Turbine Speed up Initiation —* Rated R.P.M

Criticality, Specified Power Level Maintain by Control Rods and Boron Concentration

Steam Supply Initiation (Condenser Vacuum Establish)

Main Steam Pipe Heat up

Zero Power Coolant Average Temperature and Pressure Reached

— Turbine Bypass Control Change over to Pressure Control

Isolation of Residual Heat Removal System

Charging Flow Automatic Control Normal Letdown Line Alignment Establish

Pressurizer Water Level Set at Zero Power Level

Pressurizer Vapor Formation Initiation

Figure 5.1.2 PWR standard startup curve

Residual Heat Removal Pump Shutdown

Hydrogen Blanket Formation in tire Volume Control Tank

Primary Coolant Water Quality Adjustment Complete

Primary Coolant Water Quality Adjustment Initiation (Oxygen Concentration etc.) Primary Coolant Pump Startup

All Pressurizer Heaters Puton Control Rod Shutdown Bank Withdrawal

Charging Pump Startup

Let Down Line Pressure Setpoint Adjustment

I L

8

i

8

(%) pAOq JozrJnsso

8

i

B

CM

. 1

(a) ajnpHodmaxSQH

8

O o

G.UI3/3T arnssay gOH

System Checkup prior to Plant Startup Complete

NSRA, Japan

5~6

§

3

100

(Startup Time)

1. At cold shutdown:

(Suberitical with coolant temperature of 60°F or under)

2. At hot shut down:

(Subcritical with coolant temperature of 286C)

NSRA, Japan

286t

50f 300

200k

RCS Cool down

0

100

Actual Time

Required Time

Procedure

Required Time

Duration Time

® Heat up

Initiation of heat up and pressure raise ~ Rated temperature and pressure

30 h

30 h

® llcat up complete ~ Criticality

0

39

CO Criticality — Tic in

3

42

® Tie-in

— Full Power

(1) Power raise lime

150

200-202

(2) Water quality adjusting time (al 30% power)

8 ~ 10

Procedure

Required Time

Duration Time

(D Critical procedure initiation — Critical!ty

0.5 h

0.5 h

(g) Critiacal i ty ~ Tie-in

1.0

1.5

® Tie-in ~ Full Power

34

36

100$

Initiation of

Coo! down Complete

35

-1U--5-

7h

8h

(Power Change Rate etc.)

7 5$

50-60 r 50-60 TC

i ?i r

50

1. Startup from Long Time (Over 2 weeks) Shutdown.

Power Increase Rule shall be

Hold 75% Electric Power over

Power Increase Rale shall be

RCS Water qua!ity check

[leal up Initiation

80 r

Turbine RPH increase

Turbine 1,800 rpm

Under 10% : Control rod bank D shall be withdrawn over 80% during this period.

= § as

286 r I

. *20

3 %/h from Tie-in to 75% Electric Power.

75h Period of Time.

0.5 %/h from 75% Electric Power or Over.

2. Startup from Short Time (Under 2 weeks) Shutdown.

® Power Increase Rale shall be 3% from Tie-in to Tull Power.

1 Power Decrease Rate shall be 10 %/h.

30h

9h

3$/h

0.5$/h

3h -

* These figures shall be changed depend on the reactor operation time and shutdown

conditions.

Figure 5.1.3 Startup and shutdown curve under restricted power raise conditions

Chapter 5

O

S

I

§

positions of control rod clusters. Through repeating such operations, the boron concentration in the reactor coolant linearly decreases as the reactor core approaches the end of its service life.

The responses of a reactor plant in the case of sudden off-site power rejection due to a system disturbance or some other occurrence are briefly discussed below. When an off-site power rejection occurs two things take place: a power deviation signal based on the discrepancy between the turbine output and the reactor output generates a signal to insert rod clusters at the maximum speed to reduce the reactor output, and a temperature difference signal between the reactor coolant average temperature and a reference temperature initiates rapid opening of the turbine bypass valves to their fully-open positions. When the reactor output and the heat removal rate from the core by the main steam system are equilibrated, the reactor coolant temperature stops rising. Subsequently, the temperature is decreased by automatic movements of control rods based on the temperature difference signal, until eventually the reactor coolant temperature is stabilized. The pressurizer pressure increases due to an in-surge of water caused by the reactor coolant temperature rise. Hie pressure rise is suppressed by the actuation of the pressurizer spray and relief valves. The coolant temperature is lowered by the operation of turbine bypass valves, resulting in out-surging of the pressurizer water and a decrease in the pressurizer pressure. Finally, the system pressure is gradually restored by the pressurizer heaters. In a standard design plant, the turbine bypass control system can dump 40% of the rated steam flow to the condenser and can cope with up to a 50% rapid load reduction without a reactor trip. A house load independent operation plant, has a design which makes if capable of dumping 70% of the rated steam flow. This type plant is not tripped, even if its entire off-site loads are rejected as a result of trouble in the transmission system, and it is switched over to the independent operation mode with only the station house load of approximately 5%.

The main parameters to be monitored during the plant normal operation are the reactor output (not exceeding 100%), positions of the control rod clusters (below the upper limits of withdrawal to

maintain the controllability of the reactor and above the minimum insertion positions determined as a function of output to keep the shutdown margin), and the axial offset i.e. neutron flux deviation in the axial direction (kept within the target range of + 5%).

The reactor operation with the axial offset kept within fixed limits is called constant axial offset control (CAOC) operation. It is adopted to keep the reactor output distribution within limits imposed by loss of coolant accident (LOCA) requirements. Under the CAOC operation, the axial power distribution in the core is kept as uniform as possible during slow load changes as seen in the case of daily load follow operation, by minimizing the fluctuation of axial power distribution due to xenon.

The axial offset (A*O) is a distortion of reactor core axial power distribution, and defined by the following equation.

Pt Pb

A • O x 100

Pt + Pr

Here PT is the power of the top half of the core and PB is the power of the bottom half. In practice AO is obtained from the upper and lower detector signals of the four out-of-core power range channels installed in the vicinity of the outer periphery of the reactor vessel. Figure 5.1.4 illustrates diagrams and the locations of channels related to the CAOC.

Though NPPs are now operated with base-loads, increased nuclear power generation capacity in the future will require that plants are designed to accommodate themselves to varying loads (daily load follow operation, automatic frequency control operation, etc.) and to continue operation in cases of transmission system accidents (operation with only house loads, etc.) for satisfying transmission grid needs. Furthermore, a long-term (long-cycle) continuous operation design for about one year or longer is now being studied to improve plant availability factors.

NSRA, Japan

5-8