
Powerful presentations / Marking Criteria for Seminar Presentation cross cultural psych
.docxMarking Criteria for Seminar Presentation
Student Name:
Content |
/15 |
Introduction |
|
Topic introduced in an interesting manner |
1 |
Purpose / rationale of the topic explained |
1 |
Relevant theory summarised |
1 |
Aims and / or hypotheses of the study outlined |
1 |
Method |
|
Study participants described adequately |
1 |
Materials / Questionnaires / Instruments used described adequately |
1 |
Study design and procedure described adequately |
2 |
Results |
|
Stated the type of analyses used |
1 |
Described the results and explained what it means |
2 |
Discussion |
|
Evaluated the results in relation to the aims and hypotheses |
2 |
Outlined limitations of the study and future research |
2 |
Organisation of the Talk |
|
Slides for outline, introduction, method, results, discussion, and summary |
/1 |
Slide Design |
/5 |
Used relevant audio-visual aids |
1 |
Slides were easy to read |
1 |
Appropriate background design, font type, font size, and font colour |
1 |
No typos and grammatical errors |
2 |
Appearance & Delivery |
/9 |
Presenter was appropriately dressed for a formal presentation |
1 |
Presenter appeared confident, made eye contact with the audience, used presentation space appropriately and smiled |
2 |
Presenter’s voice was clear and loud enough |
1 |
Delivery was well-paced (not too fast and not too slow) |
1 |
Presenter did not read from the notes throughout |
1 |
The group finished their presentation on time |
2 |
Handouts were given to the marker |
1 |
Marks Deducted: 10 marks if paper presented is older than 2007 |
|
Total Marks (out of 30) |
|
Scaled Marks (out of 15) |
|