Добавил:
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
LAW / Legal Writing and Styles / Grammatical Lawyer.ppt
Скачиваний:
1
Добавлен:
28.01.2025
Размер:
609.28 Кб
Скачать
Strunk and White, The Elements of Style (4th Ed.) at 23. See
The Elements of Style (4th Ed.) at 23-24 for an extremely useful discussion on how to pare down your writing.

phrasing of Strunk and White’s Most Famous Rule: “Omit Needless Words”

Strunk and White explain:

“Vigorous writing is concise. A sentence should contain no unnecessary words, a paragraph no unnecessary sentences, for the same reason that a drawing should have no unnecessary lines and a machine no unnecessary parts. This requires not that the writer make all sentences short, but that every word tell.”

81

5. “Omit Needless Words”

(cont’d)

A big culprit is compound prepositions, such as “by virtue of”, “in order to”, “in relation to”, “in terms of”, and “with respect to”.

Compare:

“The plaintiff succeeded with respect to his negligence action.”

Why not say: “The plaintiff succeeded in his negligence action.”

Taken from Plain English in Legal Writing: A Computer- based exercise devised by Julie Cassidy, Donna Brownrigg, Joy Kent, Jim Corkery and John Barrett, Bond University School of Law, 1989, citing Richard Wydick 82 (University of California at Davis), Plain English for

5. “Omit Needless Words”

(cont’d)

Source: Ibid. at Frame 31.

Compound

Simple composition

 

phrase

 

 

At that time

Then

 

Now and again

Sometimes

 

By virtue of

under

 

For the purpose

To

 

of

 

 

For the reason

Because

 

that

 

 

In accordance

Under

 

with

 

 

By means of

By

 

In connection

About, concerning

 

with

 

 

In order to

To

 

In the event that

If

83

In the nature of

Like

 

5. “Omit Needless Words”

(cont’d)

Similarly, replace verbose word clusters with appropriate

 

common, simpler word or omit them entirely. Watch for

 

phrases like

 

these:

 

[never use this

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The fact that

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

phrase]

 

 

 

 

In some cases

 

Sometimes

 

 

 

 

In many instances

 

Often

 

 

 

 

In the case of

 

When

 

 

 

 

Than was formerly

 

Now

 

 

 

 

the case

 

 

 

 

 

 

Despite the fact

 

Although

 

 

 

 

For the period of

 

For

 

 

 

 

The question as to

 

Whether

 

 

 

 

whether

 

 

 

 

 

 

Until such time as

 

Until

 

 

 

 

In the event that

 

if

 

84

Source: Ibid. at Frame 37, citing from Wydick.

5. “Omit Needless Words”

(cont’d)

Similarly, avoid over-relying on “glue words” – words that

do no more than hold the working words together. Too many glue words can make a sentence unnecessarily long.

Sentences that are too long may become unintelligible if they are too hard to follow. As you will notice in the example below, we often see problems when writers pile on phrases linked by prepositions. That is a lazy way to write.

Compare: “An application for a trial by jury was made by counsel for the plaintiff.”

Why not instead write: “Plaintiff’s counsel applied for a jury trial”.

Which of these two sentences is easier to read? Which do you think is more effective?

Source: Plain English in Legal Writing, Frames 43 and

 

46, citing Wydick.

85

5. “Omit Needless Words”

(cont’d)

Sometimes surplus words can be cut by replacing a clause with an adjective or an adverb:

Compare: “The barrister rejected the offer made by the defendant to settle the case for $40,000.”

With: “The barrister rejected the defendant’s settlement offer of $40,000.”

Compare: “The order which was made in 1998 was reversed by the new statute.”

With: “The new statute reversed the 1998 order.”

Again, which is punchier? We suspect you’ll agree that the second sentences are shorter, tighter and stronger than the originals.

Source: Plain English in Legal Writing, Frame 52.

86

5. “Omit Needless Words”

(Cont’d)

Real example:

“Skerrigan’s Towing business is carrying on a business in partnership business entity.”

Better: “Skerrigan’s Towing is carrying on business as a partnership.”

87

6. Proper

Paragraphing

• There is no absolute rule regarding length of paragraphs. However, a paragraph should contain within it one developed idea.

• In doing so it is best to commence with a topic sentence that sets the up what the paragraph will cover. The balance of the paragraph enhances, clarifies or explores that topic.

88

6. Proper Paragraphing

(cont’d)

Here is an example of a topic sentence:

Mr Smith was away from work for 7 months after the accident and after discharge from

hospital arranged for 24 hour nursing care.”

The remainder of the paragraph will flesh out what happened during Mr Smith’s recovery.

89

6. Proper Paragraphing

(cont’d)

Have logic to your paragraphs. Each one should build on the previous and lay the basis for what comes next. Structure

Structure Structure !!!!

Focus on writing topic sentences that connect your new paragraph to what came before. Smooth transitions are a hallmark of good writing.

90

Соседние файлы в папке Legal Writing and Styles