
- •Contents
- •Series Preface
- •Acknowledgments
- •Purposes and Uses of Achievement Tests
- •Diagnosing Achievement
- •Identifying Processes
- •Analyzing Errors
- •Making Placement Decisions and Planning Programs
- •Measuring Academic Progress
- •Evaluating Interventions or Programs
- •Conducting Research
- •Screening
- •Selecting an Achievement Test
- •Administering Standardized Achievement Tests
- •Testing Environment
- •Establishing Rapport
- •History and Development
- •Changes From KTEA-II to KTEA-3
- •Subtests
- •Mapping KTEA-3 to Common Core State Standards
- •Standardization and Psychometric Properties of the KTEA-3
- •Standardization
- •Reliability
- •Validity
- •Overview of the KTEA-3 Brief Form
- •Brief Form Standardization and Technical Characteristics
- •How to Administer the KTEA-3
- •Starting and Discontinuing Subtests
- •Sample, Teaching, and Practice Items
- •Recording Responses
- •Timing
- •Queries and Prompts
- •Subtest-by-Subtest Notes on Administration
- •How to Score the KTEA-3
- •Types of Scores
- •Subtest-by-Subtest Scoring Keys
- •How to Interpret the KTEA-3
- •Introduction to Interpretation
- •Step 1: Interpret the Academic Skills Battery (ASB) Composite
- •Step 2: Interpret Other Composite Scores and Subtest Scores
- •Subtest Floors and Ceilings
- •Interpretation of Composites
- •Clinical Analysis of Errors
- •Qualitative Observations
- •Using the KTEA-3 Across Multiple Administrations
- •Repeated Administrations of the Same Form
- •Administering Alternate Forms
- •Using the KTEA-3 Brief Form
- •Progress Monitoring
- •Screening for a Comprehensive Evaluation
- •KTEA-3 Score Reports
- •History and Development
- •Changes From WIAT-II to WIAT-III
- •Age Range
- •New and Modified Subtests
- •Composites
- •Administration and Scoring Rules
- •Skills Analysis
- •Intervention Goal Statements
- •New Analyses
- •New Scores
- •Validity Studies
- •Materials
- •Scoring and Reporting
- •Description of the WIAT-III
- •Subtests With Component Scores
- •Mapping WIAT-III to Common Core State Standards
- •Standardization and Psychometric Properties of the WIAT-III
- •Standardization
- •Reliability
- •Validity
- •Starting and Discontinuing Subtests
- •Sample, Teaching, and Practice Items
- •Recording Responses
- •Timing
- •Queries and Prompts
- •Subtest-by-Subtest Notes on Administration
- •How to Score the WIAT-III
- •Types of Scores
- •Score Reports
- •Subtest-by-Subtest Scoring Keys
- •Listening Comprehension
- •Early Reading Skills
- •Reading Comprehension
- •Sentence Composition
- •Word Reading and Pseudoword Decoding
- •Essay Composition
- •Numerical Operations
- •Oral Expression
- •Oral Reading Fluency
- •Spelling
- •Math Fluency—Addition, Subtraction, and Multiplication
- •Introduction to Interpretation
- •Step 1: Interpret the Composite Scores
- •Subtest Floors and Ceilings
- •Skills Analysis
- •Intervention Goal Statements
- •Qualitative Data
- •Using the WIAT-III Across Multiple Administrations
- •Linking Studies
- •Overview of the WISC-V, WISC-V Integrated, and KABC-II
- •Qualitative/Behavioral Analyses of Assessment Results
- •Identification of Specific Learning Disabilities
- •Interpretation and Use of Three New Composite Scores
- •Accommodations for Visual, Hearing, and Motor Impairments
- •Ongoing Research on Gender Differences in Writing and the Utility of Error Analysis
- •Female Advantage in Writing on KTEA-II Brief and Comprehensive Forms
- •Strengths and Weaknesses of the KTEA-3
- •Assets of the KTEA-3
- •Test Development
- •Two Forms
- •Standardization
- •Reliability and Validity
- •Administration and Scoring
- •Interpretation
- •Phonological Processing
- •KTEA-3 Flash Drive
- •Limitations of the KTEA-3
- •Test Development
- •Standardization
- •Reliability and Validity
- •Administration and Scoring
- •Test Items
- •Interpretation
- •Final Comment
- •Strengths and Weaknesses of the WIAT-III
- •Assets of the WIAT-III
- •Test Development
- •Normative Sample
- •Reliability and Validity
- •Administration and Scoring
- •Interpretation
- •Better Listening Comprehension Measure
- •Technical Manual
- •Limitations of the WIAT-III
- •Floor and Ceiling
- •Test Coverage
- •Poor Instructions for Scoring Certain Tasks
- •Item Scoring
- •Audio Recorder
- •Final Comment
- •Content Coverage of the KTEA-3 and WIAT-III
- •Case Report 1: Jenna
- •Reason for Evaluation
- •Background Information
- •Behavioral Observations
- •Assessment Procedures and Tests Administered
- •Test Results
- •Neuropsychological Implications and Diagnostic Impressions
- •Recommendations
- •Psychometric Summary for Jenna
- •Case Report 2: Oscar
- •Reason for Evaluation
- •Background Information
- •Behavioral Observations
- •Assessment Procedures and Tests Administered
- •Test Results
- •Diagnostic Summary
- •Recommendations
- •Resources
- •Psychometric Summary for Oscar
- •Case Report 3: Rob
- •Purpose of the Evaluation
- •History and Background
- •Behavioral Observations
- •Assessment Procedures and Tests Administered
- •Results
- •Summary and Diagnostic Impressions
- •Recommendations
- •Psychometric Summary for Rob
- •Q-interactive Versus Q-global
- •Equivalency Studies
- •Essential Features of Q-interactive
- •Key Terminology
- •Central Website
- •Assess Application
- •References
- •Annotated Bibliography
- •About the Authors
- •About the Digital Resources
- •Index

Six
ILLUSTRATIVE CASE REPORTS
This chapter presents case studies of three students who were referred for psychoeducational evaluation. The first student, Jenna, age 9, was referred for a re-evaluation for attention, math, and reading comprehension and
fluency di culties. She was administered the WIAT–III and WISC-V, as well as measures of her neuropsychological and behavioral functioning. The second student, Oscar, age 11, was administered the KTEA-3 and WISC-V, as well as additional measures of language and processing abilities and behavioral functioning, to evaluate concerns regarding his attentional and emotional di culties along with his oral language, reading, spelling, and written expression problems. The third student,
111111111
Rob, age 15, demonstrated di culties in the areas of academic fluency and visual motor integration. He was administered the KTEA-3 and KABC-II along with supplemental measures to assess his di culties. A summary of the key attributes of these three case studies is provided in Table 6.1.
The goals of this chapter are to bring all other facets of this book together to demonstrate how the KTEA-3 and WIAT–III may be used as part of a comprehensive battery, and to demonstrate the cross-validation of hypotheses with behavioral observations, background information, and supplemental test scores. The basic outline for each report includes the following: reason for referral, background information, appearance of client and behavioral observations, tests administered, test results and interpretation, summary and diagnostic impression, and recommendations. All of the test data are presented in a psychometric summary at the end of each report.
As in all illustrative cases presented throughout this book, the personally identifying information of the clients have been changed to protect their confidentiality.
CASE REPORT 1: JENNA
Age at Evaluation: 9 years, 1 month
Grade: 3
Norms Reported: Age-Based
333

334 ESSENTIALS OF KTEA™-3 AND WIAT®-III ASSESSMENT
Table 6.1 Overview of Case Studies
|
|
Primary |
|
|
|
Achievement |
|
|
Referral Concern |
and Cognitive |
|
|
Ability Tests |
Diagnoses |
|
|
|
|
|
Case 1: Jenna, |
Re-evaluation for |
WIAT–III, |
ADHD Predominately Inattentive |
age 9 |
Attention, Math, |
WISC-V |
Type Specific Learning Disorder: |
|
Reading |
|
Reading, Written Expression, and |
|
|
|
Mathematics Language Disorder |
Case 2: Oscar, |
Attention, Reading, |
KTEA-3, |
Oral and Written Language Learning |
age 11 |
Spelling, Writing |
WISC-V |
Disability Dysgraphia |
Case 3: Rob, |
Academic Fluency, |
KTEA-3, |
Specific Learning Disorder: Reading |
age 15 |
Visual Motor |
KABC-II |
and Mathematics Dysgraphia |
|
Integration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reason for Evaluation
Jenna Bronson is a 9-year-old girl who lives with her parents and her 12-year-old brother. Jenna is entering the third grade at a special education school in a major metropolitan city. Jenna was tested by this examiner at age 6. The results of this prior evaluation indicated developmental111111111 reading disorder, mathematics disorder, and mixed receptive-expressive language disorder, along with possible attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Mr. and Mrs. Bronson requested this current evaluation in order to obtain an updated assessment of Jenna’s neurocognitive and psychological functioning.
Background Information
Jenna is the product of a high-risk pregnancy complicated by preeclampsia. Jenna was delivered at 34 weeks and she weighed 7 lbs. She remained in the NICU for 21∕2 weeks due to breathing di culties. All motor milestones were reached within appropriate limits. Surgeries and hospitalizations include ear tubes at age 2. Jenna’s vision and hearing are described as intact.
She struggles with ongoing sensory integration issues, including sensitivity to sounds and food textures. Jenna is a picky eater who eats mainly carbohydrates. She was treated with occupational therapy and physical therapy from ages 3 to 6 to address these struggles. She also participated in speech therapy due to a lisp. Jenna evidenced a tic in the form of a head jerk last school year.
Jenna is a very athletic girl with a tall and skinny build who loves sports and is a gifted baseball player. She also excels in soccer and basketball. She falls asleep easily at night and sleeps well.

ILLUSTRATIVE CASE REPORTS 335
Regarding her academic history, Jenna evidenced di culties with attention and response control at age 3 and di culties with phonics at age 4. She struggled with increasing academic di culties in kindergarten and was diagnosed with significant learning, language, and anxiety struggles, as well as possible attentional deficits.
There is a maternal family history of |
|
|
|
ADHD, anxiety, and depression. Jenna |
|
|
|
began stimulant medication under the |
|
Don’t Forget |
|
care of a psychiatrist in first grade, which |
|
||
was reported to be very beneficial. |
.......................................................... |
||
|
Jenna’s recent background indicates |
||
At present, Jenna is described as |
|
||
|
“strong” reading skills, which will be |
||
having strong reading skills, particularly |
|
||
|
examined carefully in contrast to her |
||
in terms of her recognition of sight |
|
||
|
previously diagnosed reading disorder. |
||
words. Her reading comprehension is |
|
From a psychosocial perspective, |
|
reportedly intact, although she does |
|
Jenna is a sweet and happy girl who |
|
not read for pleasure. Jenna experiences |
|
wants to please others and is highly |
|
great di culty in math. She struggles |
|
cooperative. However, Mrs. Bronson is |
|
with the concepts of time and money, |
|
concerned about Jenna’s high anxiety, as |
|
and some visual-spatial |
di culties |
|
well as her self-esteem and attitude |
are apparent in terms of |
lining up |
|
towards school. Jenna has no social |
numbers and regrouping. Homework is |
|
struggles. She is well-liked by her peers |
|
|
and has good relationships with family |
||
a struggle for Jenna, especially her math |
|
||
22222222 |
members, although Mrs. Bronson |
||
|
|
111111111 |
|
worksheets. Mrs. Bronson |
noted that |
|
reported that Jenna does not play well |
Jenna does not appear to recall the math |
|
||
|
alone and spends too much time on |
||
lesson she has learned that same day. |
|
||
|
electronics. In addition to sports, Jenna |
||
Jenna finds the timed computerized |
|
participates in Girl Scouts and regular |
|
math exercises particularly |
frustrating |
|
playdates. |
and anxiety-provoking. |
|
|
|
Behavioral Observations
Jenna presented as a happy and friendly young girl. Her cute smile was contagious and rapport was very easily established. Jenna separated easily from her mother. She never complained about tasks, and for the most part, even when it was clear that Jenna was fatigued or challenged, she persevered. Jenna was a little reluctant to attempt more challenging math computation problems involving two-digit addition. However, with the promise that she would be able to choose one sports trading card for each problem she attempted, Jenna was a little more willing to persist with the task. Her mood and a ect were normal although some tasks were somewhat frustrating for her. At no time was Jenna observed to be anxious or overtly upset by the testing.
Jenna was talkative, and no expressive or receptive language deficits were noted. Jenna’s attentional stamina and endurance were somewhat poor for her age. Although

336 ESSENTIALS OF KTEA™-3 AND WIAT®-III ASSESSMENT
she was alert both mornings as testing began, she became fatigued after working for a short period of time. Nonetheless, with support from the examiner, Jenna was able to work for at least an hour before needing a short break. Jenna was not observed to be restless or distractible. However, at times Jenna appeared to rush through tasks, and she was reminded to slow down and respond carefully. Her rushing was most evident on reading comprehension tasks.
Jenna took one or two breaks on each day of testing. During her breaks she played with Legos but refused snacks. She transitioned back to structured testing with no di culty. Testing results, along with these behavioral observations, indicate that the test results appear to be valid measures of Jenna’s current functioning.
For this evaluation, Jenna was assessed without stimulant medication on the first day of testing but with stimulant medication (Focalin XR) on the second day to assess the e ects of her medication on neurocognitive symptoms related to attention and learning.
Assessment Procedures and Tests Administered111111111
Clinical interviews with Mr. and Mrs. Bronson and Jenna Bronson Exchange of information with Jenna’s tutor and psychiatrist
Intellectual Functioning and Executive Functions
California Verbal Learning Test–Children Version (CVLT-C) Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing–Second Edition (CTOPP-2) Integrated Visual & Auditory Continuous Performance Test (IVA+Plus CPT) Medical Symptom Validity Test (MSVT)
NEPSY: A Developmental Neuropsychological Assessment–Second Edition (NEPSY-II), Selected Subtests
Test of Everyday Attention for Children (TEA-Ch), Selected Subtests
|
Wechsler Intelligence Scale for |
|
|
||
Don’t Forget |
Children–Fifth Edition (WISC-V) |
|
Wisconsin Card Sorting Test-64: |
||
.......................................................... |
||
With a wide variety of tests admin- |
Computer Version 2 (WCST-64) |
|
istered, it can be beneficial to the reader |
Behavioral and Socioemotional |
|
to organize them thematically (e.g., intel- |
||
Functioning |
||
lectual functioning, behavioral and socio- |
||
Beck Youth Inventories–Second |
||
emotional functioning, and so forth). |
||
Edition (BYI-II) |
||
|