
- •Contents
- •Series Preface
- •Acknowledgments
- •Purposes and Uses of Achievement Tests
- •Diagnosing Achievement
- •Identifying Processes
- •Analyzing Errors
- •Making Placement Decisions and Planning Programs
- •Measuring Academic Progress
- •Evaluating Interventions or Programs
- •Conducting Research
- •Screening
- •Selecting an Achievement Test
- •Administering Standardized Achievement Tests
- •Testing Environment
- •Establishing Rapport
- •History and Development
- •Changes From KTEA-II to KTEA-3
- •Subtests
- •Mapping KTEA-3 to Common Core State Standards
- •Standardization and Psychometric Properties of the KTEA-3
- •Standardization
- •Reliability
- •Validity
- •Overview of the KTEA-3 Brief Form
- •Brief Form Standardization and Technical Characteristics
- •How to Administer the KTEA-3
- •Starting and Discontinuing Subtests
- •Sample, Teaching, and Practice Items
- •Recording Responses
- •Timing
- •Queries and Prompts
- •Subtest-by-Subtest Notes on Administration
- •How to Score the KTEA-3
- •Types of Scores
- •Subtest-by-Subtest Scoring Keys
- •How to Interpret the KTEA-3
- •Introduction to Interpretation
- •Step 1: Interpret the Academic Skills Battery (ASB) Composite
- •Step 2: Interpret Other Composite Scores and Subtest Scores
- •Subtest Floors and Ceilings
- •Interpretation of Composites
- •Clinical Analysis of Errors
- •Qualitative Observations
- •Using the KTEA-3 Across Multiple Administrations
- •Repeated Administrations of the Same Form
- •Administering Alternate Forms
- •Using the KTEA-3 Brief Form
- •Progress Monitoring
- •Screening for a Comprehensive Evaluation
- •KTEA-3 Score Reports
- •History and Development
- •Changes From WIAT-II to WIAT-III
- •Age Range
- •New and Modified Subtests
- •Composites
- •Administration and Scoring Rules
- •Skills Analysis
- •Intervention Goal Statements
- •New Analyses
- •New Scores
- •Validity Studies
- •Materials
- •Scoring and Reporting
- •Description of the WIAT-III
- •Subtests With Component Scores
- •Mapping WIAT-III to Common Core State Standards
- •Standardization and Psychometric Properties of the WIAT-III
- •Standardization
- •Reliability
- •Validity
- •Starting and Discontinuing Subtests
- •Sample, Teaching, and Practice Items
- •Recording Responses
- •Timing
- •Queries and Prompts
- •Subtest-by-Subtest Notes on Administration
- •How to Score the WIAT-III
- •Types of Scores
- •Score Reports
- •Subtest-by-Subtest Scoring Keys
- •Listening Comprehension
- •Early Reading Skills
- •Reading Comprehension
- •Sentence Composition
- •Word Reading and Pseudoword Decoding
- •Essay Composition
- •Numerical Operations
- •Oral Expression
- •Oral Reading Fluency
- •Spelling
- •Math Fluency—Addition, Subtraction, and Multiplication
- •Introduction to Interpretation
- •Step 1: Interpret the Composite Scores
- •Subtest Floors and Ceilings
- •Skills Analysis
- •Intervention Goal Statements
- •Qualitative Data
- •Using the WIAT-III Across Multiple Administrations
- •Linking Studies
- •Overview of the WISC-V, WISC-V Integrated, and KABC-II
- •Qualitative/Behavioral Analyses of Assessment Results
- •Identification of Specific Learning Disabilities
- •Interpretation and Use of Three New Composite Scores
- •Accommodations for Visual, Hearing, and Motor Impairments
- •Ongoing Research on Gender Differences in Writing and the Utility of Error Analysis
- •Female Advantage in Writing on KTEA-II Brief and Comprehensive Forms
- •Strengths and Weaknesses of the KTEA-3
- •Assets of the KTEA-3
- •Test Development
- •Two Forms
- •Standardization
- •Reliability and Validity
- •Administration and Scoring
- •Interpretation
- •Phonological Processing
- •KTEA-3 Flash Drive
- •Limitations of the KTEA-3
- •Test Development
- •Standardization
- •Reliability and Validity
- •Administration and Scoring
- •Test Items
- •Interpretation
- •Final Comment
- •Strengths and Weaknesses of the WIAT-III
- •Assets of the WIAT-III
- •Test Development
- •Normative Sample
- •Reliability and Validity
- •Administration and Scoring
- •Interpretation
- •Better Listening Comprehension Measure
- •Technical Manual
- •Limitations of the WIAT-III
- •Floor and Ceiling
- •Test Coverage
- •Poor Instructions for Scoring Certain Tasks
- •Item Scoring
- •Audio Recorder
- •Final Comment
- •Content Coverage of the KTEA-3 and WIAT-III
- •Case Report 1: Jenna
- •Reason for Evaluation
- •Background Information
- •Behavioral Observations
- •Assessment Procedures and Tests Administered
- •Test Results
- •Neuropsychological Implications and Diagnostic Impressions
- •Recommendations
- •Psychometric Summary for Jenna
- •Case Report 2: Oscar
- •Reason for Evaluation
- •Background Information
- •Behavioral Observations
- •Assessment Procedures and Tests Administered
- •Test Results
- •Diagnostic Summary
- •Recommendations
- •Resources
- •Psychometric Summary for Oscar
- •Case Report 3: Rob
- •Purpose of the Evaluation
- •History and Background
- •Behavioral Observations
- •Assessment Procedures and Tests Administered
- •Results
- •Summary and Diagnostic Impressions
- •Recommendations
- •Psychometric Summary for Rob
- •Q-interactive Versus Q-global
- •Equivalency Studies
- •Essential Features of Q-interactive
- •Key Terminology
- •Central Website
- •Assess Application
- •References
- •Annotated Bibliography
- •About the Authors
- •About the Digital Resources
- •Index

188 ESSENTIALS OF KTEA™-3 AND WIAT®-III ASSESSMENT
(Continued)
Scoring Guide Tips
•Reasons Why and Elaborations are scored concurrently, so selecting the Scoring Guide for either Reasons Why or Elaborations will result in scores for both criteria.
•If you already know the raw scores for one or more criteria, you may enter those scores manually rather than using the Scoring Guide.
•To review or rescore a section, reopen the scoring guide by selecting the icon next to the criterion that was previously scored. A warning message will appear to verify that you want to override the previous score. Select “Yes,” and the scoring guide will open. You may review your previous responses or change them as needed.
Don’t Forget
.....................................................................................................................
Many of the following tips were adapted from the WIAT-III Scoring Guide (Pearson, 2009b):
Scoring Reasons Why
•Reasons Why and Elaborations are separate scores, but they are scored concurrently. 22222222111111111
•If you reach the maximum score for Reasons Why but have not yet reached the maximum score for Elaborations, continue highlighting additional reasons as instructed.
•Do not highlight or score a thesis statement in the introduction or conclusion as a reason.
•Do not highlight or score a restatement of the thesis statement as a reason.
•A statement can count as only one reason.
•If a reason is repeated, it can count only as one reason (i.e., 1 point).
•A statement must be an independent clause or complete sentence to receive credit as a reason.
•Fragments and incomplete thoughts do not receive credit as reasons.
•A response that uses “cuz” instead of because may still count as a reason (misspelling is not penalized when scoring Reasons Why).
Numerical Operations
All acceptable correct responses for the Numerical Operations items are printed in the record form. For early items, the mode of response for correct answers is designated

WIAT®–III 189
as (W) for written, (O) for oral, and (P) for pointing. Encourage the examinee to respond accordingly. On later items, if you allow the examinee to attempt all items or work beyond the discontinue point to gather additional qualitative information, do not award credit for any items completed after the first four consecutive scores of 0.
Don’t Forget
.....................................................................................................................
Scoring Numerical Operations Items
The following items tend to raise questions for examiners about how the scoring rules were determined. Additional explanation is provided here.
Item 1: Item 1 asks the examinee to count the number of balls and tell how many there are, and then Item 2 asks the examinee to write the number of balls counted. If the examinee miscounted the number of balls for Item 1 (e.g., says 4 instead of 5), which would be scored 0, and then writes that number for Item 2 (writes “4”), Item 2 is also scored 0. Why is the response for Item 2 incorrect even though the examinee followed the directions correctly? Numerical Operations
is primarily a test of written math computation, so writing the correct answer is required on Item 2; however, these early items were designed to provide
22222222111111111
additional information about how the examinee arrived at his or her answer by asking the examinee to provide an oral response first.
Item 52: The answer is 5.375. If the examinee wrote 5.3, is it scored as correct? No, the answer must be 5.375 because the purpose of this item is division of a number with a decimal point.
Item 53: The answer is 17. If the examinee wrote the square root of 289, is it scored as correct? Yes, this is an equivalent answer that reflects an understanding of how to work the problem.
Oral Expression
All acceptable correct responses for the Expressive Vocabulary items are printed in the record form. Queries that result in a correct response are scored 1 point. If the examinee mispronounces a correct response, such as “cestenarian” for centenarian, score 0 points. Providing a similar sounding, related, or mispronounced word may indicate di culties with word retrieval and should be described when reporting results.
For Oral Word Fluency, scoring rules are detailed in Appendix B.8 of the Examiner’s Manual. To calculate the raw score, count the responses that receive credit for Items 1 and 2, and then sum the scores from Items 1 and 2.

190 ESSENTIALS OF KTEA™-3 AND WIAT®-III ASSESSMENT
C A U T I O N
....................................................
Scoring Oral Word Fluency
The most common scoring error for Oral Word Fluency is giving credit for the sample responses. As a first step, go through all responses to look for instances where the examinee provided one of the sample responses and mark these as incorrect (no credit).
For Sentence Repetition, count one error for each addition and one error for each transposition—regardless of the number of words added or transposed. However, for omitted or substituted words, count one error for each word omitted. The following deviations from print are not scored as errors: repetitions of words, forming or separating correct contractions, and self-corrections. The most common scoring errors are illustrated in the following text and are organized by scoring rule:
1.Scoring rule: Forming or separating contractions are not scored as errors.
(a)Example: Saying “you’re” for “you are” is not an error. It is acceptable to either record “you’re” in parentheses above the item, as in the following example, or to not record it at all.
(You’re) you are not
2.Scoring Rule: Changing verb form/tense is scored as one error.
Example: Changing the verb “wanted”111111111 to “had hoped” is one error.
(had hoped)
man wanted to keep
3.Scoring Rule: Adding two or more words is scored as one error.
(a)Example: Adding the words “from the” is scored as one error.
(from the)
stop her ^ crying
4.Scoring Rule: Each omitted/substituted word is scored as one error. Example: If the examinee says, “I don’t remember the rest” or “something
about a bus” or “they couldn’t move” instead of “when the bus got stuck,” simply count the number of words omitted from the item. In this case, “when the bus got stuck” is five words, so this would be scored as five errors.
Oral Reading Fluency
The scoring rules for Oral Reading Fluency are very similar to the scoring rules for Sentence Repetition. When counting errors, count one error for each addition and one error for each transposition—regardless of the number of words added or transposed. However, for omitted, substituted, or given (supplied) words, count one error for each word omitted or given. The following deviations from print are not

WIAT®–III 191
scored as errors: repetitions of words, forming or separating correct contractions, and self-corrections.
Using Q-global or the Scoring Assistant is helpful for scoring Oral Reading Fluency. Simply enter the following information for each passage in the item set: Elapsed time (in seconds), the number of Addition errors, and the number of Other errors (which includes Supplied Words and Substitution/ Omission and Transposition errors). If scoring by hand, you must incorporate the preceding information into the formulas provided in the record form in order to calculate the Fluency and Accuracy raw scores.
C A U T I O N
........................................................................................................
Hand Scoring Oral Reading Fluency
Calculate the three total raw scores using the formulas in the record form, and then round to the nearest whole number. Preserve all decimal places in each step of the calculation and round only the final raw score. A calculator is recommended to avoid calculation error.
111111111
Don’t Forget
.....................................................................................................................
Qualitative Data From Oral Reading Fluency
The comprehension questions and the prosody scale are for qualitative evaluation purposes only and do not contribute to the subtest score.
C A U T I O N
........................................................................................................
Scoring Oral Reading Fluency Passage “The Moon”
The comprehension question asks, “What does the author like to do by moonlight?” The first sentence of the passage reads, “I like to watch the moon as it shines at night.” “Watch the moon” is not listed as a correct response (and was not given as a response during tryout or standardization); however, this response is well supported by the first sentence of the passage and should be considered as an alternate correct response. Since the comprehension questions are for qualitative purposes only, accepting this alternate response will not alter standardized procedures or affect the validity of the scores.