- •Abstract
- •Foreword
- •Acknowledgements
- •Executive summary
- •Many models of multilateral power trade
- •Minimum requirements
- •Proposed trade models for ASEAN
- •Findings and recommendations
- •Highlights
- •Overview of study
- •Categories of multilateral power trade
- •International experiences in multilateral power trading
- •Minimum requirements for establishing multilateral power trading
- •Political requirements
- •Technical requirements
- •Institutional requirements
- •Building upon existing efforts
- •LTMS–PIP
- •Proposed trade models for ASEAN
- •Harmonised bilateral trading
- •Secondary trading model
- •Primary trading model
- •Conclusion
- •1. Introduction
- •Models of cross-border power trade
- •ASEAN principles for developing multilateral power trade
- •Overview of ASEAN’s energy sector
- •References
- •2. AMS perspectives
- •APG region: North
- •Cambodia
- •Planned development, including cross-border integration
- •Planned development, including cross-border integration
- •Myanmar
- •Planned development, including cross-border integration
- •Thailand
- •Planned development, including cross-border integration
- •Viet Nam
- •Planned development, including cross-border integration
- •APG region: South
- •Indonesia (Sumatra)
- •Planned development, including cross-border integration
- •Malaysia (Peninsular)
- •Planned development, including cross-border integration
- •Singapore
- •Planned development, including cross-border integration
- •Malaysia (Sarawak and Sabah)
- •Planned development, including cross-border integration
- •APG region: East
- •Brunei Darussalam
- •Planned development, including cross-border integration
- •Indonesia (West Kalimantan)
- •Planned development, including cross-border integration
- •The Philippines
- •Planned development, including cross-border integration
- •References
- •3. Regional perspectives
- •Existing regional integration efforts among AMS
- •LTMS–PIP
- •BIMP–EAGA interconnectivity project
- •Building off existing efforts: The GMS grid codes
- •References
- •4. International case studies
- •Primary power trading arrangements
- •Power pooling in PJM’s eastern territory
- •The measurable value of markets in the PJM region
- •ISO New England
- •Market overview
- •Market structure
- •Nord Pool
- •Governing agreements and regulation
- •Market overview
- •Market structure
- •Policy and regulation
- •Secondary power trading arrangements
- •SAPP
- •SIEPAC
- •Market overview
- •Nascent power trading arrangements
- •SARI/EI
- •Market overview
- •Market structure
- •Key findings: Lessons for ASEAN
- •Drivers and benefits
- •Design options and minimum requirements
- •The need for enabling institutions
- •Financial implications of regional institutions
- •References
- •5. Establishing multilateral power trade in an ASEAN context
- •Minimum requirements for establishing multilateral power trade
- •Harmonised technical standards (grid codes)
- •Summary of minimum level of grid code harmonisation
- •Building off existing efforts: The GMS grid codes
- •External (third-party) access to domestic grids
- •Wheeling charge methodology
- •Data and information sharing requirements
- •Dispute resolution mechanism
- •Other minimum requirements
- •Funding implications of stepwise implementation
- •Role of institutions
- •Overview of existing ASEAN regional institutions
- •ASEAN Secretariat
- •HAPUA
- •AERN
- •Mechanism for settling transactions
- •Potential role of a CCP
- •Optional requirement: Trading currency or currencies
- •Potential options for regional institutions in ASEAN
- •References
- •6. Models for establishing multilateral power trade in ASEAN
- •Overview of proposed models
- •Establishing harmonised bilateral trade with wheeling
- •Overview of trade model
- •Additional requirements and analytical gaps
- •Potential role of institutions
- •Example transaction
- •Establishing a secondary trading model
- •Overview of trade model
- •Additional requirements and analytical gaps
- •Potential role of institutions
- •Example transaction
- •Establishing a primary trading model
- •Overview of trade model
- •Additional requirements and analytical gaps
- •Potential role of institutions
- •Example transaction
- •7. Implications for ASEAN stakeholders
- •Utilities
- •Regulators
- •Investors
- •Consumers
- •Acronyms and abbreviations
- •Table of contents
- •List of figures
- •List of tables
Establishing Multilateral Power Trade in ASEAN |
Establishing multilateral power trade in an ASEAN context |
grid connection and access), to ensure there are no discriminatory practices. This authority could lie entirely with the national regulators. Some regional authority, however, may be necessary to settle disputes related to the connection and/or access to and operation of the APG.
Topics related to TPA will involve many stakeholders such as generator owners (including IPPs), transmission owners and TSOs, as well as national regulators and ministries. This topic will therefore also require close co-ordination and facilitation. This includes commercial arrangements such as the wheeling charge methodology.
Finally, some degree of training and capacity building will be required across the AMS. This will also require co-ordination, both to ensure capacities are aligned throughout the region and to reduce any existing knowledge gaps.
Mechanism for settling transactions
When establishing multilateral power trade, a key focus will need to be on ensuring the efficient and secure handling of the financial aspects of trading. Most of the markets in existence have a CCP, also called central clearinghouse, that plays an intermediary role in these transactions in order to reduce overall counterparty risk in the market.
Any future multilateral trading among the AMS will need to consider the financial elements of wheeling and loss settlements, settlement of traded volumes through organised markets, and other trading and currency-related monetary flows. To reduce market risk further, it is also common to require collateral be posted by the market participants before they are allowed to participate in regional trading. Collateral calculations and related operations are also often handled by a central clearinghouse.
Minimum requirements with regard to settlement and clearing functions should be agreed upon at the start between all relevant parties. This type of financial operation may involve a larger volume of transactions that require timely (i.e. rapid) settlement, so it may also be necessary to establish minimum requirements for any banks involved in the settlement process.
Potential role of a CCP
There are a number of relevant functions that could or should be centralised to ensure that multilateral trading is efficient and financially secure. The main roles of a CCP should include at least the following:
responsibility for all clearing-related operations for electricity wholesale markets
interface to the market participants
interface to the market operator settlement team (if separate entity)
internal data provider for financial reporting services
partial owner of the operational procedures for wholesale electricity markets clearing (with ownership shared with the relevant transmission owners, which provide relevant data and retain ownership of that data).
The aim of a CCP is to establish a transparent and efficient flow of funds while overseeing the financial settlement and clearing of all trades in the organised market(s). In addition, a CCP can reduce counterparty risk. For example, if one market participant fails to settle its obligations, the CCP will step in to honour the obligations and cover any monetary shortfall. An overview of markets with and without a CCP is provided in Figure 47.
89
