- •Abstract
- •Foreword
- •Acknowledgements
- •Executive summary
- •Many models of multilateral power trade
- •Minimum requirements
- •Proposed trade models for ASEAN
- •Findings and recommendations
- •Highlights
- •Overview of study
- •Categories of multilateral power trade
- •International experiences in multilateral power trading
- •Minimum requirements for establishing multilateral power trading
- •Political requirements
- •Technical requirements
- •Institutional requirements
- •Building upon existing efforts
- •LTMS–PIP
- •Proposed trade models for ASEAN
- •Harmonised bilateral trading
- •Secondary trading model
- •Primary trading model
- •Conclusion
- •1. Introduction
- •Models of cross-border power trade
- •ASEAN principles for developing multilateral power trade
- •Overview of ASEAN’s energy sector
- •References
- •2. AMS perspectives
- •APG region: North
- •Cambodia
- •Planned development, including cross-border integration
- •Planned development, including cross-border integration
- •Myanmar
- •Planned development, including cross-border integration
- •Thailand
- •Planned development, including cross-border integration
- •Viet Nam
- •Planned development, including cross-border integration
- •APG region: South
- •Indonesia (Sumatra)
- •Planned development, including cross-border integration
- •Malaysia (Peninsular)
- •Planned development, including cross-border integration
- •Singapore
- •Planned development, including cross-border integration
- •Malaysia (Sarawak and Sabah)
- •Planned development, including cross-border integration
- •APG region: East
- •Brunei Darussalam
- •Planned development, including cross-border integration
- •Indonesia (West Kalimantan)
- •Planned development, including cross-border integration
- •The Philippines
- •Planned development, including cross-border integration
- •References
- •3. Regional perspectives
- •Existing regional integration efforts among AMS
- •LTMS–PIP
- •BIMP–EAGA interconnectivity project
- •Building off existing efforts: The GMS grid codes
- •References
- •4. International case studies
- •Primary power trading arrangements
- •Power pooling in PJM’s eastern territory
- •The measurable value of markets in the PJM region
- •ISO New England
- •Market overview
- •Market structure
- •Nord Pool
- •Governing agreements and regulation
- •Market overview
- •Market structure
- •Policy and regulation
- •Secondary power trading arrangements
- •SAPP
- •SIEPAC
- •Market overview
- •Nascent power trading arrangements
- •SARI/EI
- •Market overview
- •Market structure
- •Key findings: Lessons for ASEAN
- •Drivers and benefits
- •Design options and minimum requirements
- •The need for enabling institutions
- •Financial implications of regional institutions
- •References
- •5. Establishing multilateral power trade in an ASEAN context
- •Minimum requirements for establishing multilateral power trade
- •Harmonised technical standards (grid codes)
- •Summary of minimum level of grid code harmonisation
- •Building off existing efforts: The GMS grid codes
- •External (third-party) access to domestic grids
- •Wheeling charge methodology
- •Data and information sharing requirements
- •Dispute resolution mechanism
- •Other minimum requirements
- •Funding implications of stepwise implementation
- •Role of institutions
- •Overview of existing ASEAN regional institutions
- •ASEAN Secretariat
- •HAPUA
- •AERN
- •Mechanism for settling transactions
- •Potential role of a CCP
- •Optional requirement: Trading currency or currencies
- •Potential options for regional institutions in ASEAN
- •References
- •6. Models for establishing multilateral power trade in ASEAN
- •Overview of proposed models
- •Establishing harmonised bilateral trade with wheeling
- •Overview of trade model
- •Additional requirements and analytical gaps
- •Potential role of institutions
- •Example transaction
- •Establishing a secondary trading model
- •Overview of trade model
- •Additional requirements and analytical gaps
- •Potential role of institutions
- •Example transaction
- •Establishing a primary trading model
- •Overview of trade model
- •Additional requirements and analytical gaps
- •Potential role of institutions
- •Example transaction
- •7. Implications for ASEAN stakeholders
- •Utilities
- •Regulators
- •Investors
- •Consumers
- •Acronyms and abbreviations
- •Table of contents
- •List of figures
- •List of tables
Establishing Multilateral Power Trade in ASEAN |
Establishing multilateral power trade in an ASEAN context |
5. Establishing multilateral power trade in an ASEAN context
The previous sections summarised the reasons to establish multilateral power trading across ASEAN, the existing situation within the various AMS and the region as a whole, and a set of international examples. This section will seek to lay out a foundation for establishing multilateral power trade in the ASEAN region. It will discuss minimum requirements, the role of regional institutions and the potential to build off existing efforts. Using this as a starting point, the next section will suggest a specific set of steps for establishing multilateral power trade among the AMS.
Minimum requirements for establishing multilateral power trade
As briefly summarised in Section 4 on international case studies, there are certain minimum requirements necessary for the establishment of secure, transparent and efficient multilateral trading. These minimum requirements span multiple areas, including technical and operational standards, regulations and laws, and financial and commercial terms.
As a first initial step towards greater regional co-operation, though, it is important to establish political support for regional integration. To this end, the relevant countries should consider developing and entering into relevant intergovernmental agreements. It is beyond the scope of this study to provide specific recommendations for which agreements may be necessary, if any. At a minimum, however, there may be a benefit in an agreement that states the ambition to establish multilateral trading in a voluntary and stepwise manner. This agreement would provide the national utilities and other relevant stakeholders the authority to move forward with any necessary developments. Without this political driver, it may be difficult to undertake some of the needed changes, which may require exemptions or changes to existing laws and regulations.
From a technical and operational standards perspective, there is a need for some harmonisation among interconnected countries to ensure co-ordinated and secure operations. In addition, it will also be important to agree on a common working language and to develop a secure method for data and information sharing. The level of needed technical and operational harmonisation and data sharing will depend on the level of system co-operation and co-ordination requested by the involved member countries.
To support the commercial trading of electricity across multiple countries, it is important that the AMS develop a transparent wheeling methodology and loss compensation regime to compensate grid owners for their transmission services. This should ideally be developed and defined on an ASEAN level, ensuring transparency and providing a common transmission pricing methodology for the region as a whole. However, as a first step it is possible to develop a methodology that involves only a subset of AMS.
71
