
- •Abstract
- •Foreword
- •Acknowledgements
- •Executive summary
- •Many models of multilateral power trade
- •Minimum requirements
- •Proposed trade models for ASEAN
- •Findings and recommendations
- •Highlights
- •Overview of study
- •Categories of multilateral power trade
- •International experiences in multilateral power trading
- •Minimum requirements for establishing multilateral power trading
- •Political requirements
- •Technical requirements
- •Institutional requirements
- •Building upon existing efforts
- •LTMS–PIP
- •Proposed trade models for ASEAN
- •Harmonised bilateral trading
- •Secondary trading model
- •Primary trading model
- •Conclusion
- •1. Introduction
- •Models of cross-border power trade
- •ASEAN principles for developing multilateral power trade
- •Overview of ASEAN’s energy sector
- •References
- •2. AMS perspectives
- •APG region: North
- •Cambodia
- •Planned development, including cross-border integration
- •Planned development, including cross-border integration
- •Myanmar
- •Planned development, including cross-border integration
- •Thailand
- •Planned development, including cross-border integration
- •Viet Nam
- •Planned development, including cross-border integration
- •APG region: South
- •Indonesia (Sumatra)
- •Planned development, including cross-border integration
- •Malaysia (Peninsular)
- •Planned development, including cross-border integration
- •Singapore
- •Planned development, including cross-border integration
- •Malaysia (Sarawak and Sabah)
- •Planned development, including cross-border integration
- •APG region: East
- •Brunei Darussalam
- •Planned development, including cross-border integration
- •Indonesia (West Kalimantan)
- •Planned development, including cross-border integration
- •The Philippines
- •Planned development, including cross-border integration
- •References
- •3. Regional perspectives
- •Existing regional integration efforts among AMS
- •LTMS–PIP
- •BIMP–EAGA interconnectivity project
- •Building off existing efforts: The GMS grid codes
- •References
- •4. International case studies
- •Primary power trading arrangements
- •Power pooling in PJM’s eastern territory
- •The measurable value of markets in the PJM region
- •ISO New England
- •Market overview
- •Market structure
- •Nord Pool
- •Governing agreements and regulation
- •Market overview
- •Market structure
- •Policy and regulation
- •Secondary power trading arrangements
- •SAPP
- •SIEPAC
- •Market overview
- •Nascent power trading arrangements
- •SARI/EI
- •Market overview
- •Market structure
- •Key findings: Lessons for ASEAN
- •Drivers and benefits
- •Design options and minimum requirements
- •The need for enabling institutions
- •Financial implications of regional institutions
- •References
- •5. Establishing multilateral power trade in an ASEAN context
- •Minimum requirements for establishing multilateral power trade
- •Harmonised technical standards (grid codes)
- •Summary of minimum level of grid code harmonisation
- •Building off existing efforts: The GMS grid codes
- •External (third-party) access to domestic grids
- •Wheeling charge methodology
- •Data and information sharing requirements
- •Dispute resolution mechanism
- •Other minimum requirements
- •Funding implications of stepwise implementation
- •Role of institutions
- •Overview of existing ASEAN regional institutions
- •ASEAN Secretariat
- •HAPUA
- •AERN
- •Mechanism for settling transactions
- •Potential role of a CCP
- •Optional requirement: Trading currency or currencies
- •Potential options for regional institutions in ASEAN
- •References
- •6. Models for establishing multilateral power trade in ASEAN
- •Overview of proposed models
- •Establishing harmonised bilateral trade with wheeling
- •Overview of trade model
- •Additional requirements and analytical gaps
- •Potential role of institutions
- •Example transaction
- •Establishing a secondary trading model
- •Overview of trade model
- •Additional requirements and analytical gaps
- •Potential role of institutions
- •Example transaction
- •Establishing a primary trading model
- •Overview of trade model
- •Additional requirements and analytical gaps
- •Potential role of institutions
- •Example transaction
- •7. Implications for ASEAN stakeholders
- •Utilities
- •Regulators
- •Investors
- •Consumers
- •Acronyms and abbreviations
- •Table of contents
- •List of figures
- •List of tables

Establishing Multilateral Power Trade in ASEAN |
International case studies |
Another key difference from the primary models discussed above is that, under the SAPP market framework, only excess generation is traded. In other words, member states first ensure that they are able to cover their own demand before offering generation capacity to the SAPP regional market. In addition, power can also be traded through SAPP on an emergency basis, to help meet unexpected shortfalls.
SIEPAC
Focused efforts began in the late 1980s to create a regional electricity market spanning the six Spanish-speaking Central American countries of Guatemala, Honduras, El Salvador, Nicaragua, Costa Rica and Panama, though initial regional market integration steps began 30 years earlier.10 SIEPAC, the organised regional market that eventually emerged in the early 2000s is the purpose-built 230 kV transmission line and associated infrastructure to support the regional market, the Regional Electricity Market (Mercado Eléctrico Regional [MER]).11 The two terms – SIEPAC and MER – are used interchangeably in this case study to refer to the regional market, unless otherwise clear from context. 12
Market overview
The MER is sometimes referred to as the “seventh market”, operating on top of the six national markets. That is, all six of the member countries have their own national markets – several of them advanced markets in their own right – and there is significant structural variation across these markets. Participation in the MER at the national level depends on national-level laws and regulations. Thus, Honduras and Costa Rica participate in the MER through their vertically integrated national utilities, while generators, marketers, distributors and large customers from the remaining four countries participate directly in the MER.
Figure 39. SIEPAC (MER) overview and context
|
|
Capacity mix |
9% |
4% |
Hydro |
|
|
9% |
Thermal |
|
41% |
||
|
||
|
Biomass |
|
|
Wind and solar |
|
|
Geothermal |
|
|
37% |
Indicator |
Value |
|
|
Population millions |
47 |
GDP/capita USD 000s |
5 |
|
|
# States, core market |
6 |
Electrification rate |
91% |
|
|
Peak demand MW |
8 900 |
Installed capacity MW |
15 000 |
Note:This map is without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area.
Source: World Bank (2019a), Population, Total; World Bank (2019b), GDP per Capita (current LCU); IDB (2017), Central American Electrical Integration: Genesis, Benefits and Prospects of the SIEPAC Project; EOR (2016), Operational Planning for Central America 2016-2017.
SIEPAC is made up of a diverse set of countries from Central America.
10 The seventh Central American country, Belize, is English-speaking, with population more than ten times smaller than that of Panama, the country with the next-smallest population in Central America Belize’s transmission system is not interconnected with any other Central American transmission system; its only international interconnection is with Mexico.
11 SIEPAC is often referred to as Proyecto SIEPAC, or the SIEPAC Project. |
|
12 The following report provides a useful history and details in English of |
financing of the SIEPAC line: IEA (2016), Large-Scale |
Electricity Interconnection: Technology and Prospects for Cross-Regional Networks. More detail, in Spanish, can be found in IDB (2017), Integración Eléctrica Centroamericana: Génesis, Beneficios y Prospectiva del Proyecto SIEPAC [Central American Electrical Integration: Genesis, Benefits and Prospects of the SIEPAC Project].
62