- •Abstract
- •Foreword
- •Acknowledgements
- •Executive summary
- •Many models of multilateral power trade
- •Minimum requirements
- •Proposed trade models for ASEAN
- •Findings and recommendations
- •Highlights
- •Overview of study
- •Categories of multilateral power trade
- •International experiences in multilateral power trading
- •Minimum requirements for establishing multilateral power trading
- •Political requirements
- •Technical requirements
- •Institutional requirements
- •Building upon existing efforts
- •LTMS–PIP
- •Proposed trade models for ASEAN
- •Harmonised bilateral trading
- •Secondary trading model
- •Primary trading model
- •Conclusion
- •1. Introduction
- •Models of cross-border power trade
- •ASEAN principles for developing multilateral power trade
- •Overview of ASEAN’s energy sector
- •References
- •2. AMS perspectives
- •APG region: North
- •Cambodia
- •Planned development, including cross-border integration
- •Planned development, including cross-border integration
- •Myanmar
- •Planned development, including cross-border integration
- •Thailand
- •Planned development, including cross-border integration
- •Viet Nam
- •Planned development, including cross-border integration
- •APG region: South
- •Indonesia (Sumatra)
- •Planned development, including cross-border integration
- •Malaysia (Peninsular)
- •Planned development, including cross-border integration
- •Singapore
- •Planned development, including cross-border integration
- •Malaysia (Sarawak and Sabah)
- •Planned development, including cross-border integration
- •APG region: East
- •Brunei Darussalam
- •Planned development, including cross-border integration
- •Indonesia (West Kalimantan)
- •Planned development, including cross-border integration
- •The Philippines
- •Planned development, including cross-border integration
- •References
- •3. Regional perspectives
- •Existing regional integration efforts among AMS
- •LTMS–PIP
- •BIMP–EAGA interconnectivity project
- •Building off existing efforts: The GMS grid codes
- •References
- •4. International case studies
- •Primary power trading arrangements
- •Power pooling in PJM’s eastern territory
- •The measurable value of markets in the PJM region
- •ISO New England
- •Market overview
- •Market structure
- •Nord Pool
- •Governing agreements and regulation
- •Market overview
- •Market structure
- •Policy and regulation
- •Secondary power trading arrangements
- •SAPP
- •SIEPAC
- •Market overview
- •Nascent power trading arrangements
- •SARI/EI
- •Market overview
- •Market structure
- •Key findings: Lessons for ASEAN
- •Drivers and benefits
- •Design options and minimum requirements
- •The need for enabling institutions
- •Financial implications of regional institutions
- •References
- •5. Establishing multilateral power trade in an ASEAN context
- •Minimum requirements for establishing multilateral power trade
- •Harmonised technical standards (grid codes)
- •Summary of minimum level of grid code harmonisation
- •Building off existing efforts: The GMS grid codes
- •External (third-party) access to domestic grids
- •Wheeling charge methodology
- •Data and information sharing requirements
- •Dispute resolution mechanism
- •Other minimum requirements
- •Funding implications of stepwise implementation
- •Role of institutions
- •Overview of existing ASEAN regional institutions
- •ASEAN Secretariat
- •HAPUA
- •AERN
- •Mechanism for settling transactions
- •Potential role of a CCP
- •Optional requirement: Trading currency or currencies
- •Potential options for regional institutions in ASEAN
- •References
- •6. Models for establishing multilateral power trade in ASEAN
- •Overview of proposed models
- •Establishing harmonised bilateral trade with wheeling
- •Overview of trade model
- •Additional requirements and analytical gaps
- •Potential role of institutions
- •Example transaction
- •Establishing a secondary trading model
- •Overview of trade model
- •Additional requirements and analytical gaps
- •Potential role of institutions
- •Example transaction
- •Establishing a primary trading model
- •Overview of trade model
- •Additional requirements and analytical gaps
- •Potential role of institutions
- •Example transaction
- •7. Implications for ASEAN stakeholders
- •Utilities
- •Regulators
- •Investors
- •Consumers
- •Acronyms and abbreviations
- •Table of contents
- •List of figures
- •List of tables
Establishing Multilateral Power Trade in ASEAN |
International case studies |
for the ability to sell electricity into the system, and since 2008, power exchanges have allowed for exchange-based trading of electricity via the Indian Energy Exchange (IEX).
Policy and regulation
The Indian power sector has governing bodies at two levels: central (or federal) and state. The central-level power market is divided into five regions: Northern, Western, Southern, Eastern, and Northeastern (Central Electricity Authority of India, 2019). The Ministry of Power is the highest central governing body and is responsible for policy, planning, and project development and implementation. It shares the policy and planning responsibility with the Central Electricity Authority and state governments.
Regulation is handled by the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (CERC), which regulates tariffs of centrally owned generating companies and other generating companies that sell electricity in more than one state as well as regulating and determining the tariffs for interstate transmission, and by State Electricity Regulatory Commissions, which handle electricity generated by individual states and electricity that is sold within a single state (Ministry of Law and Justice, 2003). The Central Advisory Committee (CAC) is in place to advise CERC on policy questions, compliance of power market licensees and standards of performance by utilities; however, CAC has no direct policy or regulatory control.
Secondary power trading arrangements
Two of the case studies in this section can be characterised as secondary power trading arrangements: SAPP and SIEPAC. These are detailed in the following sections.
SAPP
SAPP was created on 28 August 1995, with the primary aim of providing reliable and economical electricity supply to consumers in each of the SAPP member countries, consistent with reasonable utilisation of natural resources and minimised negative impact on the environment. SAPP consists of 12 countries totalling a population of approximately 300 million people. As of 2018, SAPP had 16 members active in cross-border power trade. The approximate consumption in the SAPP area is 400 TWh, though traded volumes are significantly lower at only 1 TWh (Table 9).
Table 9. |
Statistical information about SAPP |
|
|
|
|
Population |
|
277 million |
|
|
|
Electricity consumption |
Approx. 400 TWh (2017) |
|
|
|
|
Traded volumes (SAPP) |
1 TWh (2017) |
|
|
|
|
Source: Southern African Power Pool (2017), SAPP Annual Report 2017.
One important lesson from the development of SAPP is that the national markets have not been deregulated. In each of the participating countries, national incumbent power companies act as single buyers (and sellers) of electricity. However, this has not hindered the development of a market model to support the better utilisation of power resources on a regional basis. In some of the countries, IPPs have been allowed to participate directly in SAPP.
61
