
- •Abstract
- •Foreword
- •Acknowledgements
- •Executive summary
- •Many models of multilateral power trade
- •Minimum requirements
- •Proposed trade models for ASEAN
- •Findings and recommendations
- •Highlights
- •Overview of study
- •Categories of multilateral power trade
- •International experiences in multilateral power trading
- •Minimum requirements for establishing multilateral power trading
- •Political requirements
- •Technical requirements
- •Institutional requirements
- •Building upon existing efforts
- •LTMS–PIP
- •Proposed trade models for ASEAN
- •Harmonised bilateral trading
- •Secondary trading model
- •Primary trading model
- •Conclusion
- •1. Introduction
- •Models of cross-border power trade
- •ASEAN principles for developing multilateral power trade
- •Overview of ASEAN’s energy sector
- •References
- •2. AMS perspectives
- •APG region: North
- •Cambodia
- •Planned development, including cross-border integration
- •Planned development, including cross-border integration
- •Myanmar
- •Planned development, including cross-border integration
- •Thailand
- •Planned development, including cross-border integration
- •Viet Nam
- •Planned development, including cross-border integration
- •APG region: South
- •Indonesia (Sumatra)
- •Planned development, including cross-border integration
- •Malaysia (Peninsular)
- •Planned development, including cross-border integration
- •Singapore
- •Planned development, including cross-border integration
- •Malaysia (Sarawak and Sabah)
- •Planned development, including cross-border integration
- •APG region: East
- •Brunei Darussalam
- •Planned development, including cross-border integration
- •Indonesia (West Kalimantan)
- •Planned development, including cross-border integration
- •The Philippines
- •Planned development, including cross-border integration
- •References
- •3. Regional perspectives
- •Existing regional integration efforts among AMS
- •LTMS–PIP
- •BIMP–EAGA interconnectivity project
- •Building off existing efforts: The GMS grid codes
- •References
- •4. International case studies
- •Primary power trading arrangements
- •Power pooling in PJM’s eastern territory
- •The measurable value of markets in the PJM region
- •ISO New England
- •Market overview
- •Market structure
- •Nord Pool
- •Governing agreements and regulation
- •Market overview
- •Market structure
- •Policy and regulation
- •Secondary power trading arrangements
- •SAPP
- •SIEPAC
- •Market overview
- •Nascent power trading arrangements
- •SARI/EI
- •Market overview
- •Market structure
- •Key findings: Lessons for ASEAN
- •Drivers and benefits
- •Design options and minimum requirements
- •The need for enabling institutions
- •Financial implications of regional institutions
- •References
- •5. Establishing multilateral power trade in an ASEAN context
- •Minimum requirements for establishing multilateral power trade
- •Harmonised technical standards (grid codes)
- •Summary of minimum level of grid code harmonisation
- •Building off existing efforts: The GMS grid codes
- •External (third-party) access to domestic grids
- •Wheeling charge methodology
- •Data and information sharing requirements
- •Dispute resolution mechanism
- •Other minimum requirements
- •Funding implications of stepwise implementation
- •Role of institutions
- •Overview of existing ASEAN regional institutions
- •ASEAN Secretariat
- •HAPUA
- •AERN
- •Mechanism for settling transactions
- •Potential role of a CCP
- •Optional requirement: Trading currency or currencies
- •Potential options for regional institutions in ASEAN
- •References
- •6. Models for establishing multilateral power trade in ASEAN
- •Overview of proposed models
- •Establishing harmonised bilateral trade with wheeling
- •Overview of trade model
- •Additional requirements and analytical gaps
- •Potential role of institutions
- •Example transaction
- •Establishing a secondary trading model
- •Overview of trade model
- •Additional requirements and analytical gaps
- •Potential role of institutions
- •Example transaction
- •Establishing a primary trading model
- •Overview of trade model
- •Additional requirements and analytical gaps
- •Potential role of institutions
- •Example transaction
- •7. Implications for ASEAN stakeholders
- •Utilities
- •Regulators
- •Investors
- •Consumers
- •Acronyms and abbreviations
- •Table of contents
- •List of figures
- •List of tables

Establishing Multilateral Power Trade in ASEAN |
International case studies |
The network codes have higher legal status than Nord Pool’s market rules and must therefore be adapted accordingly.
One important category of market participant is the balancing responsible party (BRP). A BRP is financially responsible for any imbalances created. Within Europe there are different
requirements for BRPs. Some countries require BRPs |
be balanced and others do not. |
general principles set by the balancing |
arket rules, all legal entities owning |
units connected to the grid above a threshold (set by the TSO and ational regulator), are obliged to become a BRP or have their assets BRP. The TSO sets the terms and conditions for each BRP on a case-by-
are regulated via an agreement between the BRP and the TSO.
Market overview
India is the second-most-populous country in the world, with an estimated 1.34 billion citizens in 2017. It is also the third-largest economy in the world, though low GDP per capita puts the country in the World Bank’s Lower Middle Income category
Figure 38. Overview of India, including key statistics
Capacity mix
2%
8% |
13% |
|
Hydro |
|
|||
|
Coal
20%
Renewables
Nuclear
Gas and diesel
57%
Indicator |
Value |
Population millions |
1 340 |
GDP/capita USD 000s |
1 980 |
|
|
# States, core market |
36 |
Electrification rate |
85% |
|
|
Peak demand MW |
164 000 |
Installed capacity MW |
344 000 |
|
|
Note:This map is without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area.
Source: Charts and tables prepared by Delphos International. Data: Indian Ministry of Power (2018), Power Sector at a Glance;World Bank (2019a), Population, Total; World Bank (2019b), GDP per Capita (current LCU); Economist Intelligence Unit (2018), EIU India Fact Sheet.
India has a large power system dominated by coal generation and growing shares of renewables.
The Indian power grid is fully interconnected and synchronised across all states. India’s nationwide household electrification rate was 85% as of March 2018. The current government has implemented a USD 2.5 billion programme aiming to electrify every rural household by 2019; however, as of September 2018, 45% of rural villages were still undergoing the electrification process, with some states in the North and Northeast regions remaining well below the national electrification rate.
Market structure
India’s power market is fully unbundled, with separate generation, transmission and distribution entities. The market is open access for licensed entities, allowing licensed parties to compete
60