
- •Abstract
- •Foreword
- •Acknowledgements
- •Executive summary
- •Many models of multilateral power trade
- •Minimum requirements
- •Proposed trade models for ASEAN
- •Findings and recommendations
- •Highlights
- •Overview of study
- •Categories of multilateral power trade
- •International experiences in multilateral power trading
- •Minimum requirements for establishing multilateral power trading
- •Political requirements
- •Technical requirements
- •Institutional requirements
- •Building upon existing efforts
- •LTMS–PIP
- •Proposed trade models for ASEAN
- •Harmonised bilateral trading
- •Secondary trading model
- •Primary trading model
- •Conclusion
- •1. Introduction
- •Models of cross-border power trade
- •ASEAN principles for developing multilateral power trade
- •Overview of ASEAN’s energy sector
- •References
- •2. AMS perspectives
- •APG region: North
- •Cambodia
- •Planned development, including cross-border integration
- •Planned development, including cross-border integration
- •Myanmar
- •Planned development, including cross-border integration
- •Thailand
- •Planned development, including cross-border integration
- •Viet Nam
- •Planned development, including cross-border integration
- •APG region: South
- •Indonesia (Sumatra)
- •Planned development, including cross-border integration
- •Malaysia (Peninsular)
- •Planned development, including cross-border integration
- •Singapore
- •Planned development, including cross-border integration
- •Malaysia (Sarawak and Sabah)
- •Planned development, including cross-border integration
- •APG region: East
- •Brunei Darussalam
- •Planned development, including cross-border integration
- •Indonesia (West Kalimantan)
- •Planned development, including cross-border integration
- •The Philippines
- •Planned development, including cross-border integration
- •References
- •3. Regional perspectives
- •Existing regional integration efforts among AMS
- •LTMS–PIP
- •BIMP–EAGA interconnectivity project
- •Building off existing efforts: The GMS grid codes
- •References
- •4. International case studies
- •Primary power trading arrangements
- •Power pooling in PJM’s eastern territory
- •The measurable value of markets in the PJM region
- •ISO New England
- •Market overview
- •Market structure
- •Nord Pool
- •Governing agreements and regulation
- •Market overview
- •Market structure
- •Policy and regulation
- •Secondary power trading arrangements
- •SAPP
- •SIEPAC
- •Market overview
- •Nascent power trading arrangements
- •SARI/EI
- •Market overview
- •Market structure
- •Key findings: Lessons for ASEAN
- •Drivers and benefits
- •Design options and minimum requirements
- •The need for enabling institutions
- •Financial implications of regional institutions
- •References
- •5. Establishing multilateral power trade in an ASEAN context
- •Minimum requirements for establishing multilateral power trade
- •Harmonised technical standards (grid codes)
- •Summary of minimum level of grid code harmonisation
- •Building off existing efforts: The GMS grid codes
- •External (third-party) access to domestic grids
- •Wheeling charge methodology
- •Data and information sharing requirements
- •Dispute resolution mechanism
- •Other minimum requirements
- •Funding implications of stepwise implementation
- •Role of institutions
- •Overview of existing ASEAN regional institutions
- •ASEAN Secretariat
- •HAPUA
- •AERN
- •Mechanism for settling transactions
- •Potential role of a CCP
- •Optional requirement: Trading currency or currencies
- •Potential options for regional institutions in ASEAN
- •References
- •6. Models for establishing multilateral power trade in ASEAN
- •Overview of proposed models
- •Establishing harmonised bilateral trade with wheeling
- •Overview of trade model
- •Additional requirements and analytical gaps
- •Potential role of institutions
- •Example transaction
- •Establishing a secondary trading model
- •Overview of trade model
- •Additional requirements and analytical gaps
- •Potential role of institutions
- •Example transaction
- •Establishing a primary trading model
- •Overview of trade model
- •Additional requirements and analytical gaps
- •Potential role of institutions
- •Example transaction
- •7. Implications for ASEAN stakeholders
- •Utilities
- •Regulators
- •Investors
- •Consumers
- •Acronyms and abbreviations
- •Table of contents
- •List of figures
- •List of tables

Establishing Multilateral Power Trade in ASEAN |
AMS perspectives |
generating electricity for the country. In addition, various IPPs and leased power producers also participate in the power system. Indonesia’s electricity system is a highly regulated market, where PLN determines the price and retails the electricity to the consumers in industry, residential, commercial and other sectors.
In terms of international interconnectors, a 600 MW HVDC transmission line connecting Sumatra and Peninsular Malaysia was to be commissioned by 2015. However, Indonesia has postponed the project in order to focus on domestic priorities.
Planned development, including cross-border integration
Indonesia’s PDP – the Electricity Supply Business Plan, with the Indonesian abbreviated RUPTL
– is updated on an annual basis. Under the most recent RUPTL (2018-27), more than a third of new capacity will be coal generation (26.8 GW), while a quarter of total installed capacity will come from natural gasand oil-fired generation. In addition, Indonesia plans to develop renewable energy sources, in particular hydro (15%) and geothermal (8%). Only a small fraction of new capacity will come in the form of wind and solar PV (PT PLN, 2017).
Figure 21. Capacity additions in Indonesia, 2018-27, based on RUPTL
Source: ASEAN Centre for Energy.
Most of the capacity addition will come from fossil fuels, though Indonesia also has plans to build hydro capacity.
Interconnection targets are explicitly included in the RUPTL, including, for example, a 500 kV, 600 MW HVDC submarine interconnection connecting Sumatra to Peninsular Malaysia. This interconnection, if developed, would take advantage of the two regions’ different demand patterns, with Indonesia expected to be a net exporter. However, at present Indonesia is focusing on developing domestic generation (in particular, its 35 GW target) and interconnector development is not a priority.
Malaysia (Peninsular)
Peninsular Malaysia is the centre of the country’s economy, making up about 80% of Malaysia’s total power demand. Demand is also growing rapidly, having increased 20 TWh in only six years, to 116.5 TWh in 2016. This demand is met by 25.4 GW of generating capacity, primarily based on natural gas.
34

Establishing Multilateral Power Trade in ASEAN |
AMS perspectives |
Figure 22. Power mix total generation and demand in Peninsular Malaysia, 2011-16
Source: ASEAN Centre for Energy.
Fossil fuels make up the majority of Peninsular Malaysia’s power generation, which serves a rapidly growing power demand.
Coal is the second-largest source of generation. In addition, a feed-in tariff for solar PV has encouraged investment in a growing portion of renewables, in particular solar PV, which reached around 264 MW (Figure 22).
The electricity supply industry in Peninsular Malaysia is served by a single vertically integrated utility, Tenaga Nasional Berhad (TNB), which is regulated by Suruhanjaya Tenaga (ST) or Energy Commission (EC). IPPs also take part in Malaysia’s electricity market structure, and their quantity is roughly 50% of electricity generation. TNB is also the main distributor for Peninsular Malaysia, but the government also issues licences to local distributors in certain designated areas (i.e. hill resorts, shopping complexes, industrial parks).
There are existing interconnections between Peninsular Malaysia and its neighbours, Thailand (the 300 MW Khlong Ngae–Gurun interconnection, commissioned in 2002) and Singapore (a 250 megavolt ampere [MVA], 230 kV high-voltage alternating current [HVAC] line commissioned in 1985). These are primarily used for imports. On 24 January 2018, Malaysia imported power for the first time from Lao PDR, via Thailand.
Planned development, including cross-border integration
Power development plans are mandated under the 11th Malaysia Plan. The most recent plan was developed by the EC for a 2026 planning horizon, and approved by the Committee on Planning and Implementation of Electricity Supply and Tariff (JPPPET). The proposed generation mix is detailed in Figure 23.
35