
- •Foreword
- •Table of contents
- •1. Executive summary
- •India is making great strides towards affordable, secure and cleaner energy
- •Major energy reforms lead to greater efficiency
- •India is making energy security a priority
- •Significant progress in sustainable development
- •Energy technology and innovation enables “Make in India”
- •Key recommendations
- •2. General energy policy
- •Country overview
- •Major energy supply and demand trends
- •Energy consumption
- •Primary energy supply
- •Energy production and self-sufficiency
- •Political system and energy sector governance
- •Electricity sector
- •Coal sector
- •Oil and natural gas sectors
- •Climate and environment
- •Other ministries
- •Governance of public companies in the energy sector
- •Economy and the energy sector
- •Financial health of the power sector
- •Energy and climate policy
- •Energy taxation and subsidies
- •Goods and Services Tax
- •Subsidies
- •Electricity access
- •Clean cooking
- •The way towards a national energy policy
- •Energy data and statistics in India
- •Assessment
- •A co-ordinated national energy policy
- •Access to electricity and clean cooking
- •Economic efficiency
- •Energy security
- •Sustainability
- •Energy data and statistics
- •Recommendations
- •3. Energy and sustainable development
- •Overview
- •Energy, environment and sustainable development: An integrated policy response in the context of SDGs
- •Ensuring sustainable energy for all: SDG 7
- •Access to electricity and clean cooking: SDG 7.1 progress and outlook
- •Electricity access
- •Clean cooking
- •Renewables: SDG 7.2 progress and outlook
- •Energy efficiency: SDG 7.3
- •Energy and air quality: SDG 3
- •Current status of air pollutants
- •Air quality policy framework
- •Transport sector
- •Power sector
- •Industrial sector
- •The outlook for air quality
- •Energy-related CO2 emissions and carbon intensity: SDG 13
- •Sectoral GHG status and stated policy outlook
- •Energy sector role in GHG mitigation policy
- •Pricing of energy sector externalities
- •Energy sector climate change adaption and resilience
- •Assessment
- •Energy access
- •Energy sector and air quality
- •Energy and climate adaptation and resilience
- •Energy sector cost-effective response to climate change
- •Recommendations
- •4. Energy efficiency
- •Overview
- •Supply and demand trends
- •Energy consumption by sector
- •Industry
- •Residential
- •Services and agriculture
- •Transport
- •Policy framework and institutions
- •Policies and programmes
- •Industry
- •Buildings
- •Appliances and equipment
- •Municipalities
- •Agriculture
- •Transport
- •Assessment
- •Co-ordination, institutional capacity and data
- •Leveraging private-sector investments
- •Industry
- •Buildings
- •Appliances and equipment
- •Municipalities
- •Agriculture
- •Transport
- •Recommendations
- •5. Renewable energy
- •Overview
- •Supply and demand trends
- •Renewable energy in TPES
- •Electricity from renewable energy
- •Institutions
- •Policy and regulation
- •Electricity
- •Utility-scale renewables
- •Rooftop solar PV
- •Offshore wind
- •Off-grid solar PV
- •Bioenergy and waste
- •Barriers to investment in renewable energy projects
- •Transport
- •Industry
- •Assessment
- •Electricity
- •Transport
- •Industry
- •Recommendations
- •6. Energy technology innovation
- •Overview
- •Energy technology RD&D and innovation policies
- •Energy technology RD&D landscape
- •Public-sector RD&D actors
- •Public-sector RD&D priorities and co-ordination
- •Public-sector funding for energy RD&D
- •Private-sector energy RD&D landscape
- •International collaboration
- •Assessment framework
- •Non-financial support and policies
- •Direct and indirect financial support
- •Assessment
- •Strategic planning of energy RD&D activities
- •Inter-ministerial RD&D programme co-ordination
- •MI RD&D goals
- •Private-sector engagement to spur energy RD&D investment
- •Leadership in energy RD&D international collaboration
- •Recommendations
- •7. Electricity
- •Overview
- •Supply and demand trends
- •Electricity generation
- •Imports and exports
- •Consumption
- •Electricity access
- •Institutions
- •Market structure
- •Transmission
- •Captive producers
- •System operation
- •Power market reforms
- •Assessment framework
- •A. India’s power system transformation
- •Policies for decarbonisation
- •The role of nuclear power
- •B. Electricity markets to maximise investments and consumer outcomes
- •The wholesale market
- •Wholesale market reforms
- •Investment in the power sector
- •Power assets under financial stress
- •The retail markets in India
- •Retail market rules and regulations
- •Metering and smart meters
- •The financial health of the DISCOMs
- •Tariff reforms
- •Electricity retail pricing
- •C. Ensure power system security
- •Reliability
- •Generation adequacy
- •Network adequacy
- •Quality of supply
- •Flexibility of the power system
- •Assessment
- •Recommendations
- •8. System integration of variable renewable energy
- •Overview
- •Supply and demand trends
- •Penetration of VRE at the state level
- •India’s system integration challenges
- •General considerations for system integration
- •Different timescales of system flexibility requirements
- •System operation and electricity markets
- •System operation – generation dispatch
- •System operation – forecasting of wind and solar output
- •Power market design to support system integration of renewables
- •Flexibility resources in India
- •Power plants
- •Thermal plants
- •VRE sources
- •Electricity networks and grid infrastructure
- •Case study – Green Energy Corridors
- •Distributed resources
- •Demand response and retail pricing
- •Storage
- •Battery storage
- •Future sector coupling, hydrogen (ammonia)
- •IEA flexibility analysis – A scenario outlook to 2040
- •Assessment
- •Advanced system operation
- •Improving electricity market design
- •Flexibility resources
- •Recommendations
- •9. Coal
- •Overview
- •Supply and demand
- •Resoures and reserves
- •Domestic production
- •Imports
- •Coal consumption
- •Institutional framework
- •The public sector
- •The private sector
- •Government policies
- •Royalties and levies
- •Commercial mining
- •Coal and railways
- •Coal supply allocation and pricing
- •Coal washing
- •Local air quality policies
- •India’s climate commitments and the role of coal
- •Carbon capture and storage
- •Assessment
- •Recommendations
- •Overview
- •Supply and demand
- •Oil supply
- •Oil demand
- •Oil trade: imports and exports
- •Crude oil imports
- •Oil products imports and exports
- •Institutions
- •Retail market and prices
- •Market structure
- •Pricing
- •Upstream: Exploration and production policies
- •Infrastructure
- •Refineries
- •Ports and pipelines
- •Storage
- •Security of supply
- •Emergency response policy and strategic stocks
- •Demand restraint
- •Assessment
- •Recommendations
- •11. Natural gas
- •Overview
- •Supply and demand
- •Gas production and reserves
- •Institutions
- •Gas infrastructure
- •Gas policy
- •Markets and regulation
- •Upstream
- •Midstream
- •Downstream
- •Security of gas supply
- •Domestic gas production
- •Diversity of the LNG import portfolio
- •Pipeline import options
- •Availability of additional LNG volumes
- •Availability of seasonal storage
- •Assessment
- •Recommendations
- •ANNEX A: Organisations visited
- •ANNEX B: Energy balances and key statistical data
- •ANNEX C: Acronyms, abbreviations and units of measure

8. SYSTEM INTEGRATION OF VARIABLE RENEWABLE ENERGY
Advanced flexibility resources may include those provided by solar, wind and demand response, including from electric vehicles (EVs), battery storage, hydrogen and sector coupling.
India’s complex power system structure, power markets and regulations require a vision for the system as a whole and milestones for a reform roadmap. The Government of India (GoI) aims to create a 2030 vision for power market reform and an optimal power mix, bringing together the central government, states, regulators and market participants. The existing Central Energy Regulatory Commission (CERC) proposals form a strong basis, but will require an extensive stakeholder engagement process for implementation, notably at state level.
Supply and demand trends
India has seen a rapid increase in electricity generation from variable renewable energy (VRE) in recent years (Figure 8.1). Wind power capacity started to increase in the early 2000s and has grown at an annual average rate of 17% in the last decade, according to IEA data. Generation from solar power has only recently started to grow. In the five years 2012-16, solar power production increased by 44% on average every year.
Figure 8.1 VRE electricity generation by source and by share of total generation, 2001-17
TWh |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6% |
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wind |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5% |
Solar |
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3% |
VRE share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(right axis) |
|||
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2% |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0% |
IEA 2019. |
|
2001 |
2003 |
2005 |
2007 |
2009 |
2011 |
2013 |
2015 |
2017 |
||
All rights reserved. |
Wind and solar power generation have increased rapidly in recent years, together accounting for 5% of total electricity generation in 2017 and continue to grow towards India’s 2022 target.
Source: IEA (2019a), World Energy Balances 2019, www.iea.org/statistics/.
In 2017 wind and solar power together accounted for 5% of total electricity generation. Compared to IEA member countries, this was at the low end of variable renewables in power generation (Figure 8.2). However, the share continues to increase as India pursues its ambitious targets for 100 GW of installed solar power and 60 GW of installed wind power by 2022.
196
IEA. All rights reserved.

8. SYSTEM INTEGRATION OF VARIABLE RENEWABLE ENERGY
Figure 8.2 Electricity generation from VRE sources as a percentage of all generation, India and IEA member countries, 2017
60%
50% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share solar |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share wind |
|
40% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
30% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
India* Canada Hungary Mexico |
RepublicCzech Switzerland |
RepublicSlovak Korea Norway |
|
|
IEA 2019. |
|||||
Denmark Luxembourg Ireland Spain Portugal Germany KingdomUnited Greece Italy Austria Belgium Netherlands Sweden Poland Australia UnitedStates Japan Finland Turkey France Estonia ZealandNew |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
India |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All rights reserved.
India has the eighth lowest share of VRE in electricity generation in an IEA comparison, with the potential for integrating more wind and solar in the grid.
Source: IEA (2019a), World Energy Balances 2019, www.iea.org/statistics/.
Penetration of VRE at the state level
In 2018 VRE generation reached 101 TWh, accounting for 8% of the total electricity generation of the country (CEA, 2019d). In the states of Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, Rajasthan and Andhra Pradesh, VRE generation has already surpassed 15% of total electricity generation, mainly due to early wind deployment and lately solar (since 2016). In the states of Gujarat, Telangana, Maharashtra and Madhya Pradesh, VRE generation is between 5% and 15% of total electricity generation (left axis in Figure 8.3).
Figure 8.3 Electricity generation from VRE as a percentage of all generation in VRE-rich Indian states, 20118
|
% VRE share of total |
TWh |
|
25% |
electricity generation |
Wind |
|
|
160 |
|
|
20% |
|
120 |
Solar |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
15% |
|
80 |
Total electricity generation |
|
|
||
10% |
|
|
of the state (right axis) |
5% |
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
0% |
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
IEA 2019. |
|
|
|
All rights reserved. |
Source: CEA (2019a), Renewable Energy Generation Report, March 2019, http://cea.nic.in/reports.html.
India’s system integration challenges
The impact of and issues associated with the integration of VRE depend largely on its level of deployment and the context of the power system, such as the size of the system, its operational and market design, its regulation and its fundamentals of supply and demand. VRE generation can affect the planning and operation of the power system at all levels,
197
ENERGY SECURITY
IEA. All rights reserved.

8. SYSTEM INTEGRATION OF VARIABLE RENEWABLE ENERGY
from generation to transmission and distribution. Integrating VRE, particularly at higher shares, in a reliable and cost-effective manner requires different approaches compared to traditional power system planning and operation.
The IEA has developed a phased categorisation to capture the evolving impacts that VRE may have on power systems, as well as related integration issues. It categorises the integration of VRE into six different phases (see IEA and 21CPP [2018] for further details). This framework can be used to prioritise different measures to support system flexibility, identify relevant challenges and implement appropriate measures to support the system integration of VRE.
These phases also provide an assessment framework to understand current and future trends in system integration of renewables in India. Challenges depend on different phases of VRE deployment.1
Figure 8.4 Key characteristics and challenges in the different phases of system integration of VRE
IEA 2019.All rights reserved.
Source: Adapted from IEA (2018a), World Energy Outlook 2018.
The main characteristics of different phases of VRE deployment are briefly described as follows (Figure 8.4) (IEA, 2017a, 2017b, 2017c):
Phase 1: The impact of VRE generation is essentially insignificant at the system level; integration effects are highly localised, for example at the grid connection point of plants.
Phase 2: Differences between load and net load become noticeable. Upgrades to operating practices and making better use of existing power system flexibility resources are usually sufficient to achieve system integration.
Phase 3: Greater swings in the supply–demand balance tend to require a degree of power system flexibility that goes beyond what can be fairly easily supplied by existing assets and operational practices.
Phase 4: VRE output is sufficient to provide a large majority of electricity demand during certain periods (e.g. high VRE generation during periods of low demand); this requires changes to both operational and regulatory approaches to preserve power system stability.
Phase 5: Without additional power system flexibility measures, adding more VRE plants in this phase may mean that aggregate VRE output frequently exceeds power demand and
1 This section is derived from a discussion developed in IEA 2017a, 2017b, and 2017c.
198
IEA. All rights reserved.

8. SYSTEM INTEGRATION OF VARIABLE RENEWABLE ENERGY
structural surpluses of VRE appear. This leads to an increased risk of curtailment2 of VRE output and could limit further deployment.
Phase 6: Once this phase is reached, the remaining obstacle to achieving even higher shares of VRE becomes meeting demand during periods of low wind and sun availability over extended periods (e.g. weeks), as well as supplying uses that cannot be easily electrified. This phase can thus be characterised by the potential need for seasonal storage and use of synthetic fuels such as hydrogen.
Figure 8.5 Overview of VRE system integration phases for selected countries and regions, 2018
% VRE of annual 60% electricity generation
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Singapore |
RepublicSlovak |
Switzerland |
RepublicCzech |
South |
ZealandNew |
|
|
France |
Poland |
UnitedStates |
Finland |
Australia |
|
|
Netherlands |
Belgium |
KingdomUnited |
|
Germany |
Luxembourg |
||||||||||||||||
Indonesia |
Korea |
Norway |
Thailand |
Hungary |
Mexico |
Canada |
|
|
Japan |
China |
Brazil |
Turkey |
Sweden |
Morocco |
Italy |
Greece |
|
Portugal |
Ireland |
Denmark |
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Africa |
|
|
Estonia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Austria |
|
|
|
|
|
Spain |
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
India |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Phase 1 - No relevant impact on system
Phase 2 - Minor to moderate impact on system operation
Phase 3 - VRE determines the operation pattern of the system
Phase 4 - VRE makes up almost all generation in some periods
IEA 2019.
All rights reserved.
Countries around the world are at different levels of system integration. Regions within one country can be at a higher or lower phase than the national average.
Source: IEA (2019b), Renewables 2019.
It should be noted that the transition between phases does not occur abruptly from one to another. Rather, the phases are a conceptualisation intended to identify the main experiences. Issues related to flexibility will gradually emerge in Phase 2, before becoming the hallmark of Phase 3. In turn, certain issues related to system stability may already become apparent in Phase 3. The challenges faced by the power system are contextspecific and depend not only on the share of VRE generation, but also on a number of other factors. These include the size of the system, the transmission infrastructure (including interconnectors), existing operational practices and existing levels of flexibility (for instance, access to hydropower and pumped hydropower facilities, and connection to heating networks). The IEA groups countries together to illustrate the different phases of system integration.
India as a whole can be classified as being in Phase 2 of system integration (Figure 8.5). However, at state level the Indian power system shows a very diverse picture, with many states already having much higher shares of renewable energy than the country’s average. As shown in Figure 8.6, several Indian states are already facing significant system integration challenges characterised by Phase 3, while some are in Phase 2 and the majority are in Phase 1. The following section takes a closer look at the top ten Indian states with the highest levels of VRE generation (as a percentage of total generation) in 2018, often referred to as VRE-rich states.
2 Curtailment is a reduction in the output of a generator from what it could otherwise produce given available resources.
199
ENERGY SECURITY
IEA. All rights reserved.

8. SYSTEM INTEGRATION OF VARIABLE RENEWABLE ENERGY
These VRE-rich states (Figure 8.6) together accounted for 96% of VRE capacity deployment and 97% of total VRE generation in the country. Figure 8.6 shows installed VRE capacity as a percentage of total electricity capacity in each state (x-axis), VRE generation as a percentage of total electricity generation in each state (y-axis) and the phases of system integration. Table 8.1 highlights VRE capacity and generation data in renewables-rich states. Based on this analysis:
six of the high VRE states are in Phase 3 (Tamil Nadu, Gujarat, Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Rajasthan and Telangana).
three are in Phase 2 (Maharashtra, Madhya Pradesh and Punjab).
all other states, including Kerala, are in Phase 1.
Figure 8.6 VRE share of installed capacity and annual generation, top 10 VRE generating states grouped by system integration phase, 2018
VRE share of energy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
30% |
generated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Phase 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Karnataka |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Phase 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tamil Nadu |
|
|
|
|
20% |
|
|
|
Andhra Pradesh |
|
Rajasthan |
|
Phase 1 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
Gujarat |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10% |
|
Maharashtra |
|
|
|
Telangana |
|
|
|
|
|
Punjab |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kerala |
|
|
Madhya Pradesh |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0% |
5% |
10% |
15% |
20% |
25% |
30% |
35% |
40% |
45% |
IEA 2019. |
|
|
|
VRE share of installed capacity |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All rights reserved. |
Note: The size of the bubble corresponds to the total electricity generated in the state.
Sources: CEA (2019a), Renewable Energy Generation Report, March 2019, http://cea.nic.in/reports.html (actual VRE electricity generation from April 2018-March 2019); MNRE (2019), Total Installed Capacity, https://mnre.gov.in/physical-progress-achievements (VRE installed capacity as of 31 March 2019).
The six states in Phase 3 (Tamil Nadu, Gujarat, Andhra Pradesh, Telangana, Karnataka and Rajasthan) are responsible for 78% of total VRE generation of India. They have a high VRE deployment as a share of total capacity (between 20% and 40%), but show relatively low VRE generation as a share of the total (between 10% and 25%). This is due to the low capacity factors of wind and solar compared to thermal generation, but it is also an indicator of curtailment of renewables due to power system flexibility problems, including frequency, voltage and inertia issues, as well as transmission bottlenecks.
In Phases 1 and 2, VRE has a minor to moderate impact on system operation; however, the importance of power system flexibility will increase significantly in Maharashtra, Madhya Pradesh and Punjab in the coming years as they transit into Phase 3.
200
IEA. All rights reserved.