Добавил:
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

книги / 771

.pdf
Скачиваний:
2
Добавлен:
07.06.2023
Размер:
11.9 Mб
Скачать

5. RENEWABLE ENERGY

Figure 5.15 Biomass versus oil heating in new installations in Germany, 2008-18

130

 

Indexed 2008 = 100

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Residential

120

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

heating oil price

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

110

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Biomass heating

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

100

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

installations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

90

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oil heating

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

80

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

installations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

70

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

60

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

50

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

40

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018 IEA 2019. All rights reserved.

Heating fuel oil prices are the key parameter determining sales of biomass versus oil heating installations.

Sources: IEA (2019c), Energy Prices and Taxes First Quarter 2019; BDH (2019) Marktentwicklung Wärmeerzeuger 2008-2018 [Market Development of Heating 2008-2018].

In line with Germany’s dual strategy for decarbonisation of the heating sector, which aims to maximise energy efficiency gains while simultaneously increasing the role of renewables, policies are aligned accordingly. Energy-saving requirements for buildings are set out in the EEWärmeG, EnEG and EnEV.

Going forward, the energy conservation law for buildings will be simplified and streamlined during the current legislative term. The regulations of the EnEV, EnEG and EEWärmeG will be merged into a new Act on Energy in Buildings, thereby transposing the requirements of EU law for public non-residential buildings with effect from 1 January 2019 and for all buildings with effect from 1 January 2021. The current energy-related requirements for existing buildings and new buildings will continue to apply.

District heating

District heating accounts for only around 8% of total residential energy demand in Germany. While this is a relatively minor level compared with several other European countries, the share is increasing thanks to developments in urban areas. More than 20% of new apartments are connected to district heating. District heating is considered for its potential to integrate renewable heat and contribute to sector coupling. As shown in Figure 5.16, however, fossil fuels dominate district heat production, with renewables (essentially bioenergy and waste) representing only 14.4% in 2017, i.e. half of coal (28%). (See also Chapter 3 on energy and climate change for a more detailed discussion on district heating and co-generation.)

The funding programme Heat Networks 4.0 (Modellvorhaben Wärmenetzsysteme 4.0) was implemented on 1 July 2017, to incentivise the planning and implementation of modern, high-efficiency networks with high shares (>50%) of renewable energy and waste heat supply. The rate of funding under this scheme depends on the share of renewables and waste heat in the network (it increases for each additional percentage point in renewables share), and applies to the entire network system (including heat production, distribution and storage infrastructures).

100

5. RENEWABLE ENERGY

Figure 5.16 Fuel shares in district heating in Germany, 2017

Total 470 TJ

...of which renewables

Oil, 1%

Non-renewable waste, 8%

 

 

Other, 2%

Coal, 28%

 

 

Renewable waste, 7%

 

 

 

 

 

 

Renewables

 

 

 

14%

 

 

Primary solid biofuels, 5%

Natural gas, 47%

 

 

 

 

 

 

Biogas, 2%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

IEA 2019.

 

 

 

 

All rights reserved.

District heating is expanding, particularly in new buildings, but energy supply is still dominated by fossil fuels.

Note: TJ = terajoule.

In principle, district heating could provide a short-term opportunity for fuel switching (in particular from coal) and scale up the use of renewables, especially of biomass and waste. This successfully occurred in Slovakia, Denmark and other Nordic countries, triggered by taxes on carbon and on fossil fuels. Exploiting scale effects, it is easier, faster and more cost-effective to intervene on centralised heat generators than replace multiple individual boilers in buildings. Business stakeholders make investment decisions, and fuel switching does not represent any disruption in usage for households and consumers.

In practice, however, supporting a larger role for renewables in district heating would require decreasing the operating temperature of networks, which are currently running at relatively high temperatures (100°C to 120°C). As such, a shift to renewables would need to be complemented by strong improvements in energy efficiency, including stricter insulation measures.

Electric heating and sector coupling

While an official strategy for the decarbonisation of heating and cooling has not been published yet, the government considers sector coupling, i.e. using efficient electric heating devices, as a central instrument for decarbonising heating (and cooling) in buildings and industry.

Heat pumps offer a valuable route for sector coupling, as well as CO2 emissions reduction from the displacement of fossil heating fuels. For example, an electrically driven heat pump with a seasonal performance factor (SPF)10 of 3.5 emits around 155 grammes of CO2 per kWh of heat, given the current carbon intensity of Germany’s electricity generation. By comparison, emissions from a natural gas boiler are around 50% higher, and 65% higher for an oil heating boiler. With the increasing share of renewables in Germany’s electricity generation and planned phase-out of coal

10 SPF = the average efficiency of a heat pump over a heating season.

101

ENERGY SYSTEM TRANSFORMATION

5. RENEWABLE ENERGY

generation (see Chapter 7 on electricity), the potential of heat pumps to decrease buildings CO2 emissions will increase substantially over the long term.

According to European Heat Pump Association data, the number of cumulatively installed heat pumps in Germany tripled from 350 000 in 2008 to one million in 2018. This growth in installations has been supported via investment support from the MAP for building renovations, and the Energy Efficiency Incentive Program (APEE). With a 12% market share, since 2017, heat pumps have overtaken oil boilers to become the second- highest-selling heating system after gas boilers. This is also the consequence of the EEWärmeG, stipulating that construction of new buildings will be permitted only if they use renewable sources for space and water heating. Since January 2016, oil burners are no longer permitted as a means of heating in new buildings.

While these are all positive trends, they concern only a minority of buildings and installations. Taking into account the whole building stock, both sales and cumulative installations were still dominated by fossil fuels in 2018. Gas boilers accounted for more than three-quarters of total sales, while oil condensing boilers (allowed only in old buildings) represented 8% of the market (Figure 5.17). Most importantly, in cumulative terms, heat pumps still represent only 2.5% of energy consumption for heating and cooling, while fuel oil heating supplies more than 25% of the total. A major reason for this situation is the different taxation regime for different fuels for heating.

Figure 5.17 Fuel shares in sales and energy consumption for residential space heating in Germany

100%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3%

Electricity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Biofuels 6%

3%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1%

District heat

 

75%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

50%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Coal 2%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

67%

 

25%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oil and oil

Natural gas

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

products

53%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

26%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2008

2010

2012

2014

2016

2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

Natural gas condensing boiler

 

Natural gas conventional

 

Oil condensing boiler

 

 

 

 

Oil conventional boiler

 

Heat pump

 

Biomass

 

 

 

 

 

 

IEA 2019. All rights reserved.

Source: BDH (2019) Marktentwicklung Wärmeerzeuger 2008-2018 [Heating Market Developments 2008-2018].

As of January 2019, statutory tax rates in Germany were EUR 61.35/1 000 litres (L) (~EUR 5.3/MWh) for heating oil and EUR 5.50/MWh for natural gas, compared with EUR 20.50/MWh for electricity. These levels have not significantly evolved since the last IDR. This positions Germany as the country with one of the lowest heating oil prices among all IEA countries (Figure 5.18).

102

5. RENEWABLE ENERGY

Figure 5.18 Heat oil fuel prices in IEA in Q1 2019

2.5

USD/L

Tax component

2.0

 

 

1.5

 

 

1.0

 

 

0.5

 

 

0.0

 

 

IEA 2019.

All rights reserved.

Germany has one of the lowest price and a low taxation rate for heating oil fuel among IEA countries. This is a strong barrier against renewable heat and sector coupling.

Source: IEA (2019c), Energy Prices and Taxes First Quarter 2019, www.iea.org/statistics/.

Even considering the higher efficiency of heat pumps, the current taxation regime acts as a significant barrier to sector coupling in the heating sector in Germany. Figure 5.19 compares the different operating costs for households for different heating appliances, including heat pumps with different SPF levels.

While the fuel costs (excluding tax) associated with heat pumps with a SPF of 3.5 or higher are lower than oil boiler and gas boiler costs, the higher taxation on electricity relative to heating oil and natural gas results in total fuel costs above oil and gas boilers for all but the most efficient heat pump systems. Most importantly, heat pumps with an SPF of 2.5, indicative of an air-water heat pump, have far higher running costs when taxation is factored in. This particularly affects air source heat pumps in colder climates, which have wider building suitability than more efficient ground source heat pumps.

Figure 5.19 Household delivered heat costs for different heating appliances, 2018

140 EUR/MWh

120

100

80

60

40

20

0

 

 

 

HP SPF 2.5 HP SPF 3.5 HP SPF 4.5 Oil boiler

Gas boiler

HP SPF 2.5 HP SPF 3.5 HP SPF 4.5 Oil boiler Gas boiler

 

 

No tax

 

With tax

 

 

 

IEA 2019. All rights reserved.

Low heating oil taxation in Germany creates an economic barrier to the adoption of all but the most efficient heat pump systems, challenging sector-coupling opportunities.

Notes: HP = heat pump. Assumed efficiency of oil boiler 93%, assumed efficiency of natural gas boiler 88%. Domestic heating oil prices correlate closely to crude oil price and are therefore variable over time.

Source: IEA (2019a), Energy Prices and Taxes, www.iea.org/statistics/.

103

ENERGY SYSTEM TRANSFORMATION

5. RENEWABLE ENERGY

In the context of heat, it is also important to note that the APEE may lead to an unintended consequence of locking-in fossil fuel consumption for heating, as it also provides financial support to upgrades from older oil and gas boilers to newer boilers.

Prospects for renewable heat

In the draft NECP submitted to the European Commission at the end of 2018, Germany proposed a 27% target for the share of renewables in heating and cooling in 2030, with a 24-32% range for the buildings sector. However, according to the baseline scenario discussed in the NECP, renewable energy would account for only 17.3% of the heat consumption in 2030 – well below the indicative target – if current policies were to remain unchanged.

While current policies have brought progress in renewable heat, much stronger efforts are needed to achieve the necessary step change in the pace of renewable heat technology deployment to achieve Germany’s ambitious 2030 targets. This includes removing the tax advantage for fossil fuels as discussed above, and significantly increasing financial support. For comparison, the total amount of incentives in the buildings sector in 2018 was around EUR 2.5 billion per year, which is only 10% of the amount German consumers pay annually for the EEG surcharge.

Changing the existing distortions across taxation of different fuels for heating and cooling will be necessary if Germany effectively wants to implement sector coupling at scale in buildings and industry. At the same time, Germany may consider introducing a carbon tax or a carbon price, which have proven to be effective instruments in Nordic countries, for triggering a fuel shift towards low-carbon sources of energy for heating and cooling. In addition, tax breaks for building renovations have proven to be an effective and costefficient instrument to foster both energy efficiency and renewables in existing buildings in other European countries, most notably Italy.

Renewable transport

Transport accounted for 25% of TFC in Germany in 2017 and 22% of energy-related CO2 emissions. However, the sector has proven to be the most challenging to deliver GHG emissions reduction, not only in Germany. Transport has a lower share of renewable energy consumption than electricity and heat.

Biofuels account for most renewable energy in transport in Germany. However, similar to many other countries, Germany’s share of renewables in transport is relatively low at around 5% (Figure 5.22). This is because most biofuels are currently consumed through blending at low percentages (typically 10% or less by volume or energy) with fossil fuels.

In 2015, Germany switched from a 6.25% energy-based biofuels mandate to the climate protection quota (CPQ) policy. This places annual GHG emissions reduction targets on transport fuel suppliers. The CPQ was initially set to deliver a 3.5% reduction, before increasing to 4% in 2017. Biofuels, electricity and upstream efficiency savings can be used for compliance under the policy. Tax incentives for biofuels expired on 1 January 2016, leaving the CPQ as the sole means of biofuel policy support. The introduction of the CPQ provides a direct mechanism to meet the requirement of the EU Fuel Quality Directive that fuel suppliers reduce the GHG emission intensity of automotive fuels marketed in 2020 by 6% compared with 2010 levels. The CPQ has stimulated annual increases in the emissions

104

5. RENEWABLE ENERGY

reduction (relative to fossil fuels) offered by the biofuels used for compliance (Figure 5.21). This is because under the CPQ, biofuels produced from waste and residues, which can offer significant levels of GHG reduction for a given volume, are attractive for compliance purposes. In 2017, the average GHG reduction from all biofuels used for compliance versus gasoline was over 80%.

Fig 5.20 Renewable energy in transport by source in selected countries, 2016

5

Mtoe

 

 

 

 

 

 

25%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Biofuels

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

20%

Renewable electricity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

15%

Share of renewable

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10%

transport (right axis)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5%

 

0

Argentina

China

France

India

Indonesia

Sweden

Germany

0%

IEA 2019. All rights reserved.

 

 

Germany, like many other countries, has a low share of renewable energy in transport, falling short of EU targets.

Source: IEA (2018a), Renewables 2018.

Nevertheless the current (4%) CPQ target level has not stimulated an increase in ethanol or biodiesel consumption volumes. These have fallen relative to consumption under the mandate, and in energy terms are below 2012 levels. The GHG emissions reduction required in the CPQ is set to increase to 6% in 2020. However, in the context of increasing transport energy demand and electric mobility from a low base, it is unlikely that this will be sufficient to ensure that the EU RED 10% target for 2020 will be met. Even taking into account the double-counting rules, Germany’s share of renewable transport was just 7% in 2017.11

The updated RED for the 2021-30 period requires a 14% share of renewable energy in transport, comprising a maximum share of conventional crop-based biofuels of 7%. The CPQ is anticipated to be the key policy mechanism used to meet this target. Germany’s draft NECP outlines that it will comply with the 14% target but will limit consumption of conventional biofuels to current levels (5.3%). As such, consumption of conventional biodiesel and ethanol in Germany is anticipated to stabilise and potentially decrease slightly due to the increasing efficiency of the European vehicle fleet.

In 2017, just over a fifth of biofuels consumption was supplied domestically. The draft NECP commits to meeting the 3.5% sub-target for advanced biofuels (including doublecounting, corresponding to 1.75% in energy terms) required by 2030. Therefore, there is a clear role for policies to facilitate innovation, technology learning and a production scaleup of advanced biofuels necessary to reduce costs and increase consumption. Relevant policies include advanced biofuel quotas and financial de-risking measures, such as loan guarantees from development banks. Technically mature biofuels produced from used cooking oil and animal fats can separately contribute up to 3.4% (includes double counting, 1.7% in energy terms, more details in the final NECP).

11 Under the EU RED methodology, renewable electricity and certain biofuels from waste and residues are eligible for double-counting against the EU target.

105

ENERGY SYSTEM TRANSFORMATION

5. RENEWABLE ENERGY

Figure 5.21 GHG emissions reductions from biofuels used for CPQ compliance 2014-17, compared with gasoline and diesel

100%

GHG reduction

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

80%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

60%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

40%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

20%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0%

2014

2015

2016

2017

2014

2015

2016

2017

2014

2015

2016

2017

 

 

 

Ethanol

 

 

Biodiesel

 

 

Biomethane

 

IEA 2019. All rights reserved.

The German CPQ has been effective in improving GHG emissions reductions per litre of all forms of biofuels compared with fossil transport fuels.

Notes: In 2014, a 6.25% energy-based mandate was in place; over 2015-16 the CPQ was in place with 3.5% GHG emission reduction target, increasing in 2017 to a 4% GHG emission reduction target.

Source: F.O. Licht (2018), “Germany – Biofuels' GHG savings rise to over 80%”.

Increased uptake of electric mobility is also likely to be needed if Germany’s 2030 target is to be achieved. Electricity used in road transport is eligible to be multiplied fourfold. The government targets 1 million electric vehicles (EVs) by 2020 and 6 million by 2030 (BMU, 2019). Recently, an aspirational target of 10 million EVs by 2030 was mentioned.

The increasing penetration of renewable energy in Germany’s electricity generation portfolio, reaching 36% in 2018, has supported a 17% reduction in the carbon intensity of electricity supply, from 490 tonnes of CO2 (tCO2) per MWh in 2008 to just over 400 tCO2/MWh in 2018. The continuation of this trend, alongside the higher efficiency of electric motors compared with internal combustion engines, supports the potential for EVs to contribute towards Germany’s renewable energy and emissions reduction policy commitments for 2030 and beyond (see Chapter 4 on energy efficiency).

Germany’s draft NECP acknowledges that the European Union’s minimum requirements for conventional biofuels and new renewable technologies will not be enough to meet Germany’s energy and climate goals. Germany is also at the forefront of the development of synthetic fuels produced from renewable electricity, CO2 and water via power-to-liquid processes that may offer an alternative fuel source for transportation in the long term.

Assessment

Renewables have made significant progress in Germany in recent years, driven by robust policy support underpinning a strong increase in renewable electricity. For the first time in 2017, the total installed capacity of renewables (112 GW) surpassed that of fossil fuels and nuclear combined (105 GW). The share of renewables in electricity generation increased from 25% in 2013 to nearly 38% in 2018.

At the same time, significant progress was achieved in limiting the costs of the EEG surcharge, in line with the IDR 2013 recommendation. Owing to reforms in 2014 and 2017,

106

5. RENEWABLE ENERGY

the EEG surcharge remained relatively stable from 2014 to 2018, while the amount of renewable electricity increased by 50%. The IEA commends these trends, as well as the government’s commitment to accelerate progress in grid planning and construction.

However, so far the energy transition has mostly been limited to the electricity sector. The vast majority of transition costs have been covered by electricity consumers, in particular households, due to large exemptions enjoyed by substantial parts of industry. Moreover, electricity only accounts for less than a quarter of total final energy consumption. Consequently, strong progress in renewable electricity has not been enough and Germany is likely to miss its 2020 renewable target. Final heat generation based on renewable energy sources in 2017 was slightly lower than in 2012, while the consumption of renewable energy sources in the transport sector has remained basically stable since 2009. In line with 2013 IDR recommendations, going forward it is crucial that both the costs and benefits of the transition are more equitably distributed across energy sectors and stakeholder groups.

Looking ahead, much stronger effort will be needed for heating and cooling in building and industry and in transport to achieve the 30% target share of renewables in TFC by 2030 as indicated in the draft NECP and in line with long-term 2050 objectives. Accelerating progress in energy efficiency will be critical for achieving a higher renewable energy share. The IEA commends the government’s approach prioritising energy efficiency first, then exploring cost-effective renewable heat options and finally promoting sector coupling, as well as the recent dialogue on the role of gas in the energy transition. The government should work in close collaboration with industry to elaborate roadmaps and measures to support innovation and competition across renewable fuels, including biogas, advanced biofuels, renewable-based hydrogen, and synthetic fuels and feedstocks.

Renewable heat faces several barriers, reflecting the complexity of the sector. According to the draft NECP, the share of renewable heat needs to double from 14% to 27% by 2030. Achieving this ambitious target will require sub-sector strategies for different end uses in buildings and industry. Today, renewables supply only 6% of residential heat, as opposed to 26% from heating oil. Several policy instruments supporting renewables in buildings are in place, but their ambition needs to be significantly strengthened. For instance, the total amount of financial incentives is around EUR 2.5 billion per year, i.e. ten times less than the annual EEG surcharges. Moreover, most support measures focus on new buildings, but those represent only 0.5% of the total building stock. A number of options could be considered to accelerate renewable heat expansion, including tax deductions for deep renovations, a carbon price on sectors that are not part of the EU Emissions Trading System, redistributing revenues to incentivise energy efficiency and renewables, and imposing quota obligations.

The share of renewables in final energy consumption for transport in 2017 was only 5.2% in energy terms – the same value as in 2016. Even taking into account double-counting rules for EVs, which increase the share to 7%, the latter is well below the mandatory target of 10% by 2020 of the European RED. The draft NECP states that the federal government will implement the minimum requirements of the new RED – at least 14% by 2030 (mandatory target, double-counting permitted) – i.e. a tripling of the share in energy terms in the next 11 years. This target is to be achieved through, among other things, stricter GHG reduction quotas, to be fulfilled by companies placing transport fuels on the market.

107

ENERGY SYSTEM TRANSFORMATION

5. RENEWABLE ENERGY

Currently the quota is 4% and will increase to 6% in 2020. Biofuels, renewable electricity and upstream emissions reductions are all eligible for reaching the quota. A holistic strategy considering EVs for urban mobility and other options such as biofuels or synthetic fuels for long-haul transportation will be needed.

In 2017, renewable electricity accounted for only 0.7% of final energy consumption in transport, but recently new momentum has emerged from the German car industry. Informal targets currently under discussion are 1 million EVs by 2022, 6 million by 2025 and 10 million by 2030. Reaching these ambitious targets will require a massive effort including in planning smart charging infrastructure and managing the possible impacts on distribution grids.

Sector coupling can, in principle, play a very important role in the energy transition. The use of renewable electricity for transport with EVs and for heating and cooling in buildings and industry – e.g. with heat pumps – can at the same time increase end-use efficiency, reduce emissions and provide additional flexibility for the power system and thereby facilitate integration of variable renewables. However, sector coupling faces formidable barriers as taxes and other levies on electricity – and therefore end prices – are much higher than for fossil fuels, in particular heating oil. Even taking into account the much higher efficiency of heat pumps, this difference in charges and pricing is a strong barrier against the deployment of this technology, which today accounts for only 2% of energy consumption for heating. The German government should consider options for removing barriers to sector coupling and creating a level playing field across sectors, otherwise sector coupling will be very difficult to materialise.

To date, not enough attention has been devoted to the electricity distribution sector, which faces important barriers both in terms of physical infrastructure development and regulatory frameworks. Based on a cost-benefit assessment in line with EU Directive 2009/72/EG, Germany has chosen a modular approach requiring mandatory roll-out of smart meters by 2020 only for customers consuming more than 6 000 kWh per year. In addition, the current regulatory framework and remuneration model of network charges do not incentivise DSOs to be more proactive. Going forward, Germany needs to both accelerate the deployment of physical infrastructure and the reform of regulations in order to foster competition and new business models that can unlock the vast potential of demand-side response, and follow the example of other countries, which have implemented a faster roll-out of smart meters on a voluntary basis.

Important progress has been made in the recent EEG reforms, including achieving significant cost reductions thanks to competitive auctions. However, going forward much more additional capacity from wind and solar will be required. The phase-out of nuclear electricity generation is to be completed by 2022. The government coalition has announced a target of 65% of renewables by 2030. The government-appointed commission on coal has proposed a progressive phase-out of coal by 2038, with significant intermediate decommissioning milestones in 2022 and 2030. In this context, the issue of more system-friendly auctions has been discussed thoroughly and several concepts were tested, with the government concluding that grid extensions are the most economic measure. The government has decided that renewable resources should primarily determine the location of renewable installations, but at the same time introduced administrative auction caps in congested zones. Going forward, the government may also want to consider possible alternative and more market-oriented solutions.

108

5. RENEWABLE ENERGY

The extension and reinforcement of grids will play a critical role towards the achievement of the ambitious 65% renewable share in electricity by 2030. Grids are important in three different respects: smoothing the variability of renewables over a larger balancing area, providing flexibility by connecting renewable supply with demand centres, and enabling additional flexibility by connecting storage, demand-side response and dispatchable supply. The planned 7 700 kilometres of grids to be built or reinforced by the mid-2020s will certainly bring benefits in terms of increasing flexibility, reducing curtailment and enabling a more secure and cost-effective deployment of wind and solar. This can already be seen, as the frequency of negative prices at the electricity exchange has remained stable, despite the increase of renewable electricity installations. However, towards the second half of the decade, TSOs and the government will need to reassess the costeffectiveness of further grid expansion versus other flexibility options, taking into account technological progress in storage and demand-side response technologies by that time.

In the longer term, all forms of flexibility will need to be unlocked, including demand-side response, affordable storage and more flexible operation of residual fossil fuel plants. Today, the German power system has around 80 GW of peak demand and 200 GW of total installed capacity; thus, energy-only market signals are not enough to trigger investment in flexibility. The market is expected to be shorter in the period 2022-25 and, therefore, to foster investment in flexible resources. However, market prices will also depend on changes in other countries in the European integrated market. The government and the regulator should carefully monitor progress on investment in all forms of flexibility and consider other complementary options to unlock their potential if needed.

Given the scale of required deployment – most notably of wind – the German government should not underestimate other barriers, as shown by recent undersubscribed onshore wind auctions. Those were due to a combination of an empty investment pipeline after the installation rush in 2016-17, along with mounting social acceptance and long permitting procedure issues. These barriers are expected to increase in view of further significant deployment of renewables. They will need to be addressed with inclusive and transparent stakeholder consultation processes, also with the aim of allocating some benefits of the energy transition to local communities. Measures to overcome the situation are currently being discussed within the “AG Akzeptanz” of the German parliament. The measures discussed comprise social acceptance measures and stronger community involvement.

Recommendations

The government of Germany should:

Develop a strong strategy supporting the use of renewables in transport, buildings and industry in line with the 2030 targets. Propose measures that support innovation and competition across renewable fuels, including biogas, biomethane, advanced biofuels, and renewable hydrogen-based fuels and feedstocks.

Remove the barriers that hinder efficient sector coupling by fostering a level playing field across end-use sectors, including by removing fossil fuel subsidies, introducing carbon pricing in non-ETS sectors, and rebalancing taxes, levies and incentives, while fairly allocating costs and benefits across customer groups.

109

ENERGY SYSTEM TRANSFORMATION

Соседние файлы в папке книги