Добавил:
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

книги / 715

.pdf
Скачиваний:
5
Добавлен:
07.06.2023
Размер:
10 Мб
Скачать
☆

 

LIST OF REPORTING ORGANISATIONS AND CONTACT PERSONS

 

 

Jordan

Jordanian Uranium Mining Company, Amman – Almadina St. No. 269,

 

P.O.Box 5424, Amman 111391

 

Contact person: Mr Kays K. El-Kaysi

Kazakhstan

National Atomic Company “Kazatomprom”, 10 D. Kunayev st.,

 

Astana, 010000

 

Contact person: Ms Olga Gorbatenko

Mali

Direction Nationale de la Géologie et des Mines, BP 223 –

 

route de Sotuba, Bamako

 

Contact persons : Emmanuel Thera and Issoumaila Sangare

Mexico

Servicio Geológico Mexicano

 

Boulevard Felipe Ángeles S/N Km. 93.5, Colonia Venta Prieta, 42080,

 

Pachuca Hidalgo, México

 

Contact person: Raúl Cruz Rios and Angel David Márquez Medina

Mongolia

Mineral Resources and Petroleum Authority, The Implementing Agency,

 

Government of Mongolia, Building XII, Builders Avenue-3, Chingeltei

 

District, Ulaanbaatar 15170

 

Contact persons: Mrs Tamiraa Altangerel, Mr Chadraabal Mavag

 

and Mr Munkhtur Batbold

Namibia

Ministry of Mines and Energy, Directorate of Mines, P/Bag 13297,

 

Windhoek

 

Contact person: Ms Helena Itamba

Paraguay

Viceministerio de Minas y Energia, Direcion de Recursos Minerales,

 

Nangapiry y los Rosales – San Lorenzo, Paraguay

 

Contact person: Ms Noemi Villalba

Peru

Instituto Peruano de Energía Nuclear, Dirección de Servicios/División de

 

Industria e Hidrología, Av. Canada 1470, San Borja, Lima 41

 

Contact person: Mr Jacinto Valencia Herrera

Russia

Uranium One, Sredny Ovchninkovsky 4,bld 1, Moscow, Russia, 115184

 

Contact person: Mr Alexander Boytsov

Senegal

Ministry of Energy and Mining, Division of New Energies, Allée Papa

 

Gueye Fall, Immeuble Adja Fatou Nourou Diop, Dakar

 

Contact person: Mr Mamadou Kanoute

Slovenia

Slovenian Nuclear Safety Administration, Litostrojska 54, 1000 Ljubljana

 

Contact person: Mr Igor Osojnik

Spain

ENUSA Industrias Avanzadas, S. A., Santiago Rusiñol, 12,

 

E- 28040, Madrid

 

Contact person: Mr Francisco Tarin Garcia

URANIUM 2018: RESOURCES, PRODUCTION AND DEMAND, NEA No. 7413, © OECD 2018

429

LIST OF REPORTING ORGANISATIONS AND CONTACT PERSONS

Switzerland

Swiss Federal Office of Energy, Mühlestrasse 4, 3063 Ittigen

 

Contact person: Mr Ralf Straub

Thailand

Bureau of Mineral Resources, 75/10 Rama VI Rd. Ratchathewi,

 

Bangkok, 10400

 

Contact person: Mr Tawatchai Chualaowanich

Turkey

Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources, Nuclear Energy Project

 

Implementation Department, Nasuh Akar Mah. Türkocaği Cad. No: 2,

 

06520 Çankaya, Ankara

 

Contact person: Mr Görkem Güngör

Ukraine

State Enterprise: “Kirovgeology” State Service of Geology and Resources,

 

Ministry of Ecology and Natural Resources of Ukraine, 8/9 Kikvidze str.,

 

Kiev 01103

 

Contact person: Mr Yuri A. Bakarzhiyev

 

Ministry of Energy and Coal Industry of Ukraine, 30 Khreschatyk Street,

 

Kiev 01601, MCP, Ukraine

 

Contact persons: Mr Grigoriy Plachkov and Mr Vladimir Smovzhenko

United Kingdom

Department of Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, 1 Victoria

 

Street; London, SW1H 0ET

 

Contact person: Mr Daniel Wylie

United States

Energy Information Administration, US Department of Energy,

 

Washington, D.C. 20585

 

Contact person: Mr Michael Scott

 

US Geological Survey, Box 25046, DFC, MS 939, 80225 Denver CO

 

Contact person: Ms Susan Hall

Viet Nam

Institute for Technology of Radioactive and Rare Elements, 48 Langha

 

Str., Dongda District, Hanoi

 

Contact person: Mr Van Lien THAN

430

URANIUM 2018: RESOURCES, PRODUCTION AND DEMAND, NEA No. 7413, © OECD 2018

MEMBERS OF THE JOINT NEA-IAEA URANIUM GROUP PARTICIPATING IN 2016-2017 MEETINGS

Appendix 2. Members of the Joint NEA-IAEA Uranium Group participating in 2016-2017 meetings

NEA

Ms L. Grancea

Division of Nuclear Technology Development

 

(Scientific Secretary)

and Economics, Paris

IAEA

Ms A. Hanly

Division of Nuclear Fuel Cycle and Waste

 

(Scientific Secretary)

Technology, Vienna

 

Mr. Martin Fairclough

 

Algeria

Mr A. Khaldi

Centre de Recherche Nucléaire de Draria, Draria

Argentina

Mr Roberto Eugenio Bianchi

National Atomic Energy Commission

 

Mr Roberto Enrique Gruner

 

 

Mr Luis Edourado Lopez

 

Australia

Mr Paul Kay

Geoscience Australia, Canberra

Austria

Mr Nikolaus Arnold

Institute of Safety and Risk Sciences

Belgium

Ms F. Renneboog

Synatom S.A., Brussels

Brazil

Mr L. Filipe Da Silva

Indústrias Núcleares do Brasil INB-S/A,

 

 

Rio de Janeiro

Canada

Mr T. Calvert (Vice-chair)

Natural Resources Canada, Ottawa

 

Mr Robert Lojk

Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission

China

Mr Sicong Zou

China Atomic Energy Authority (CAEA), Beijing

URANIUM 2018: RESOURCES, PRODUCTION AND DEMAND, NEA No. 7413, © OECD 2018

431

MEMBERS OF THE JOINT NEA-IAEA URANIUM GROUP PARTICIPATING IN 2016-2017 MEETINGS

Czech Republic

Mr P. Vostarek

DIAMO, State Enterprise, Stráž pod Ralskem

Denmark

Ms K. Thrane

Geological Survey of Denmark and

 

 

Greenland, Copenhagen

Finland

Mr E. Pohjolainen

Geological Survey of Finland, Espoo

France

Ms S. Gabriel

Commissariat à l’énergie atomique et aux

 

 

énergies alternatives, Gif-sur-Yvette

 

 

AREVA, Paris

 

Mme Farahnaz Laldjee

Electricité de France (EDF)

 

Mr C. Polak (Vice-chair)

AREVA MINES, Courbevoie

Germany

Mr M. Schauer

Federal Institute for Geoscience and Natural

 

 

Resources, Hannover

Hungary

Mr András Barabás

MECSEKERC LTD, Pecs

India

Mr Lalit Kumar Nanda

Department of Atomic Energy, Hyderabad

 

Mr Ashwini Kumar Rai

 

Indonesia

Mr A. Sumaryanto

National Nuclear Energy Agency, Jakarta

Iran, Islamic

Mr Seyed Mohammad Reza

Atomic Energy Organisation of Iran, Tehran

Republic of

Ahmadi

 

 

Mr Behzad Farahani

 

 

Mr M. R. Ghaderi

 

 

Mr Mahdi Teimournia

 

 

Mr Kambiz Sadeghi

TAMAS, Tehran

Kazakhstan

Ms Aliya Akzholova

National Atomic Company (KAZATOMPROM),

 

Mr Yuriy Demekhov

Astana

 

Ms O. Gorbatenko (Vice-chair)

 

Kyrgyzstan

Ms Aigul Sulaimanova

Institute of Mining and Mining Technologies,

 

 

Bishkek

432

URANIUM 2018: RESOURCES, PRODUCTION AND DEMAND, NEA No. 7413, © OECD 2018

MEMBERS OF THE JOINT NEA-IAEA URANIUM GROUP PARTICIPATING IN 2016-2017 MEETINGS

Mongolia

Mr Mavag Chadraabal

Executive Office of the Nuclear Energy

 

 

Commission, Ulaanbaatar

Pakistan

Mr Muhammad Abbas Qureshi

Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission,

 

 

Islamabad

Peru

Ms Gabriela Ganoza Vardgas

Ministry of Energy and Mines, Lima

 

Machuca

 

Philippines

Mr Rolando Reyes

Philippine Nuclear Research Institute, Quezon

 

 

City

Poland

Ms G. Zakrzewska-Koltuniewicz

Institute of Nuclear Chemistry and

 

 

Technology, Warsaw

Romania

Ms L. Pop

National Commission for Nuclear Activities

 

 

Control, Bucharest

Russia

Mr A. Boytsov (Vice-chair)

Uranium One

 

Mr A. Tarkhanov

All-Russian Research Institute of Chemical

 

 

Technology (Rosatom), Moscow

Saudi Arabia

Ms Suzan Katamoura

King Abdullah City for Atomic and Renewable

 

 

Energy, Riyadh

Senegal

Mr M. Kanoute

Ministry of Energy et Renewable Energy

 

 

Development, Dakar

Spain

Mr F. T. Garcia

ENUSA Industrias Avanzadas, S.A., Madrid

Tajikistan

Mr J. Misratov

Nuclear and Radiation Safety Agency of the

 

 

Academy of Sciences, Dushanbe

Thailand

Ms Uthaiwan Injarean

Thailand Institute of Nuclear Technology,

 

 

Nakorn Nayok

URANIUM 2018: RESOURCES, PRODUCTION AND DEMAND, NEA No. 7413, © OECD 2018

433

MEMBERS OF THE JOINT NEA-IAEA URANIUM GROUP PARTICIPATING IN 2016-2017 MEETINGS

Turkey

Mr Gorken Gungor

Nasuh Akar mah. Türkocagi cad, Ankara

Ukraine

Mr A. Bakarzhiyev

The State Geological Enterprise “Kirovgeology”,

 

Mr Y. Bakarzhiyev

Kiev

United States

Ms S. Hall (Chair)

US Geological Survey, Denver

 

Mr Michael Scott

U.S. Energy Information Administration,

 

 

Washington, DC

Viet Nam

Mr V. L. Than

Institute for Technology of Radioactive and

 

 

Rare Elements, Hanoi

European

Mr D. Kozak

Euratom Supply Agency, Luxembourg

Commission

 

 

434

URANIUM 2018: RESOURCES, PRODUCTION AND DEMAND, NEA No. 7413, © OECD 2018

GLOSSARY OF DEFINITIONS AND TERMINOLOGY

Appendix 3. Glossary of definitions and terminology

Units

Metric units are used in all tabulations and statements. Resources and production quantities are expressed in terms of tonnes (t) contained uranium (U) rather than uranium oxide (U3O8).

1 short ton U3O8

=

0.769 tU

1% U3O8

=

0.848% U

1 USD/lb U3O8

=

USD 2.6/kg U

1 tonne

=

1 metric ton

Resource terminology

Resource estimates are divided into separate categories reflecting different levels of confidence in the quantities reported. The resources are further separated into categories based on the cost of production.

Definitions of resource categories

Uranium resources are broadly classified as either conventional or unconventional. Conventional resources are those that have an established history of production where uranium is a primary product, co-product or an important by-product (e.g. from the mining of copper and gold). Very low-grade resources or those from which uranium is only recoverable as a minor by-product are considered unconventional resources.

Conventional resources are further divided, according to different confidence levels of occurrence, into four categories. The correlation between these resource categories and those used in selected national resource classification systems is shown in Figure A3.1.

Reasonably assured resources (RAR) refers to uranium that occurs in known mineral deposits of delineated size, grade and configuration such that the quantities, which could be recovered within the given production cost ranges with currently proven mining and processing technology, can be specified. Estimates of tonnage and grade are based on specific sample data and measurements of the deposits and on knowledge of deposit characteristics. Reasonably assured resources have a high assurance of existence. Unless otherwise noted, RAR are expressed in terms of quantities of uranium recoverable from mineable ore (see: recoverable resources).

Inferred resources (IR) refers to uranium, in addition to RAR, that is inferred to occur based on direct geological evidence, in extensions of well-explored deposits, or in deposits in which geological continuity has been established but where specific data, including measurements of the deposits, and knowledge of the deposit’s characteristics, are considered to be inadequate to classify the resource as RAR. Estimates of tonnage, grade and cost of further delineation and recovery are based on such sampling as is available and on knowledge of the deposit characteristics as determined in the best known parts of the deposit or in similar deposits. Less reliance can be placed on the estimates in this category than on those for RAR. Unless otherwise noted, inferred resources are expressed in terms of quantities of uranium recoverable from mineable ore (see: recoverable resources).

URANIUM 2018: RESOURCES, PRODUCTION AND DEMAND, NEA No. 7413, © OECD 2018

435

GLOSSARY OF DEFINITIONS AND TERMINOLOGY

Figure A3.1. Approximate correlation of terms used in major resources classification systems

 

 

Identified resources

 

Undiscovered resources

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NEA/IAEA

Reasonably assured

 

Inferred

Prognosticated

Speculative

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Australia

Demonstrated

 

Inferred

Undiscovered

 

 

 

 

 

 

Measured

 

Indicated

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Canada (NRCan)

Measured

 

Indicated

 

Inferred

Prognosticated

Speculative

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

United States (DOE)

Reasonably assured

 

Estimated additional

Speculative

Russia, Kazakhstan,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A + B + C1

 

C2

 

C2+P1

P1

P2

 

P3

Ukraine, Uzbekistan

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The terms illustrated are not strictly comparable as the criteria used in the various systems are not identical. “Grey zones” in correlation are therefore unavoidable, particularly as the resources become less assured. Nonetheless, the chart presents a reasonable approximation of the comparability of terms.

Work to align the NEA/IAEA and national resource classification systems outlined above with the United Nations Framework Classification system remains under consideration. (For a summary of recent efforts, see: www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/ energy/se/pdfs/egrc/egrc5_apr2014/ECE.ENERGY.GE.3.2014.L1_e.pdf.)

Prognosticated resources (PR) refers to uranium, in addition to inferred resources, that is expected to occur in deposits for which the evidence is mainly indirect and which are believed to exist in well-defined geological trends or areas of mineralisation with known deposits. Estimates of tonnage, grade and cost of discovery, delineation and recovery are based primarily on knowledge of deposit characteristics in known deposits within the respective trends or areas and on such sampling, geological, geophysical or geochemical evidence as may be available. Less reliance can be placed on the estimates in this category than on those for inferred resources. Prognosticated resources are normally expressed in terms of uranium contained in mineable ore, i.e. in situ quantities.

Speculative resources (SR) refers to uranium, in addition to prognosticated resources, that is thought to exist, mostly on the basis of indirect evidence and geological extrapolations, in deposits discoverable with existing exploration techniques. The location of deposits envisaged in this category could generally be specified only as being somewhere within a given region or geological trend. As the term implies, the existence and size of such resources are speculative. SR are normally expressed in terms of uranium contained in mineable ore, i.e. in situ quantities.

Cost categories

The cost categories, in United States dollars (USD), used in this report are defined as: <USD 40/kgU, <USD 80/kgU, <USD 130/kgU and <USD 260/kgU. All resource categories are defined in terms of costs of uranium recovered at the ore processing plant.

Note: It is not intended that the cost categories should follow fluctuations in market conditions.

Conversion of costs from other currencies into USD is done using an average exchange rate for the month of June in that year except for the projected costs for the year of the report.

436

URANIUM 2018: RESOURCES, PRODUCTION AND DEMAND, NEA No. 7413, © OECD 2018

GLOSSARY OF DEFINITIONS AND TERMINOLOGY

When estimating the cost of production for assigning resources within these cost categories, account has been taken of the following costs:

•the direct costs of mining, transporting and processing the uranium ore;

•the costs of associated environmental and waste management during and after mining;

•the costs of maintaining non-operating production units where applicable;

•in the case of ongoing projects, those capital costs that remain non-amortised;

•the capital cost of providing new production units where applicable, including the cost of financing;

•indirect costs such as office overheads, taxes and royalties where applicable;

•future exploration and development costs wherever required for further ore delineation to the stage where it is ready to be mined;

•sunk costs are not normally taken into consideration.

Relationship between resource categories

Figure A3.2 illustrates the inter-relationship between the different resource categories. The horizontal axis expresses the level of assurance about the actual existence of a given tonnage based on varying degrees of geologic knowledge while the vertical axis expresses the economic feasibility of exploitation by the division into cost categories.

Figure A3.2. NEA/IAEA classification scheme for uranium resources

 

 

<USD 40/kgU

Decreasing economic attractiveness

Recoverable at costs

260/kgU USD 80-130/kgU USD 40-80/kgU

 

 

USD 130-

Identified resources

Undiscovered resources

Reasonably

Inferred resources

Prognosticated

 

 

assured

 

resources

 

resources

 

 

 

 

 

Reasonably

Inferred resources

Prognosticated

 

assured

 

resources

 

resources

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Speculative

 

 

 

resources

Reasonably

Inferred resources

Prognosticated

 

assured

resources

 

resources

 

 

 

Reasonably

 

Prognosticated

 

assured

Inferred resources

 

resources

 

resources

 

 

 

 

 

Decreasing confidence in estimates

 

 

Recoverable resources

RAR and IR estimates are expressed in terms of recoverable tonnes of uranium, i.e. quantities of uranium recoverable from mineable ore, as opposed to quantities contained in mineable ore, or quantities in situ, i.e. not taking into account mining and milling losses. Therefore both expected mining and ore processing losses have been

URANIUM 2018: RESOURCES, PRODUCTION AND DEMAND, NEA No. 7413, © OECD 2018

437

GLOSSARY OF DEFINITIONS AND TERMINOLOGY

deducted in most cases. If a country reports its resources as in situ and the country does not provide a recovery factor, the NEA/IAEA assigns a recovery factor to those resources based on geology and projected mining and processing methods to determine recoverable resources. The recovery factors that have been applied are:

Mining and milling method

 

Overall recovery factor (%)

 

 

 

Open-pit mining with conventional milling

 

80

 

 

 

Underground mining with conventional milling

 

75

In situ leaching (acid)

 

85

 

 

 

In situ leaching (alkaline)

 

70

Heap leaching

 

70

 

 

 

Block and stope leaching

 

75

Co-product or by-product

 

65

 

 

 

Unspecified method

 

75

 

 

 

Secondary sources of uranium terminology

Mixed oxide fuel (MOX): MOX is the abbreviation for a fuel for nuclear power plants that consists of a mixture of uranium oxide and plutonium oxide. Current practice is to use a mixture of depleted uranium oxide and plutonium oxide.

Depleted uranium: Uranium where the 235U assay is below the naturally occurring 0.7110%. Natural uranium is a mixture of three isotopes, uranium-238 – accounting for 99.2836%, uranium-235 – 0.7110%, and uranium-234 – 0.0054%. Depleted uranium is a byproduct of the enrichment process, where enriched uranium is produced from initial natural uranium feed material.

Production terminology1

Production centres

A production centre, as referred to in this report, is a production unit consisting of one or more ore processing plants, one or more associated mines and uranium resources that are tributary to these facilities. For the purpose of describing production centres, they have been divided into four classes, as follows:

•Existing production centres are those that currently exist in operational condition. Production projections continue until the identified resources (costs < USD 130/kgU) are exhausted.

•Committed production centres are those that are either under construction or are firmly committed for construction.

•Planned production centres are those for which feasibility studies are completed and regulatory approvals are at advanced stage.

•Prospective production centres are those for which some level of feasibility study has been completed and the centres are supported by tributary RAR and Inferred resources. Indicative start-up dates should have been announced.

1.IAEA (1984), Manual on the Projection of Uranium Production Capability, General Guidelines, Technical Report Series No. 238, IAEA, Vienna.

438

URANIUM 2018: RESOURCES, PRODUCTION AND DEMAND, NEA No. 7413, © OECD 2018

Соседние файлы в папке книги