книги / 715
.pdf
|
LIST OF REPORTING ORGANISATIONS AND CONTACT PERSONS |
|
|
Jordan |
Jordanian Uranium Mining Company, Amman – Almadina St. No. 269, |
|
P.O.Box 5424, Amman 111391 |
|
Contact person: Mr Kays K. El-Kaysi |
Kazakhstan |
National Atomic Company “Kazatomprom”, 10 D. Kunayev st., |
|
Astana, 010000 |
|
Contact person: Ms Olga Gorbatenko |
Mali |
Direction Nationale de la Géologie et des Mines, BP 223 – |
|
route de Sotuba, Bamako |
|
Contact persons : Emmanuel Thera and Issoumaila Sangare |
Mexico |
Servicio Geológico Mexicano |
|
Boulevard Felipe Ángeles S/N Km. 93.5, Colonia Venta Prieta, 42080, |
|
Pachuca Hidalgo, México |
|
Contact person: Raúl Cruz Rios and Angel David Márquez Medina |
Mongolia |
Mineral Resources and Petroleum Authority, The Implementing Agency, |
|
Government of Mongolia, Building XII, Builders Avenue-3, Chingeltei |
|
District, Ulaanbaatar 15170 |
|
Contact persons: Mrs Tamiraa Altangerel, Mr Chadraabal Mavag |
|
and Mr Munkhtur Batbold |
Namibia |
Ministry of Mines and Energy, Directorate of Mines, P/Bag 13297, |
|
Windhoek |
|
Contact person: Ms Helena Itamba |
Paraguay |
Viceministerio de Minas y Energia, Direcion de Recursos Minerales, |
|
Nangapiry y los Rosales – San Lorenzo, Paraguay |
|
Contact person: Ms Noemi Villalba |
Peru |
Instituto Peruano de Energía Nuclear, Dirección de Servicios/División de |
|
Industria e Hidrología, Av. Canada 1470, San Borja, Lima 41 |
|
Contact person: Mr Jacinto Valencia Herrera |
Russia |
Uranium One, Sredny Ovchninkovsky 4,bld 1, Moscow, Russia, 115184 |
|
Contact person: Mr Alexander Boytsov |
Senegal |
Ministry of Energy and Mining, Division of New Energies, Allée Papa |
|
Gueye Fall, Immeuble Adja Fatou Nourou Diop, Dakar |
|
Contact person: Mr Mamadou Kanoute |
Slovenia |
Slovenian Nuclear Safety Administration, Litostrojska 54, 1000 Ljubljana |
|
Contact person: Mr Igor Osojnik |
Spain |
ENUSA Industrias Avanzadas, S. A., Santiago Rusiñol, 12, |
|
E- 28040, Madrid |
|
Contact person: Mr Francisco Tarin Garcia |
URANIUM 2018: RESOURCES, PRODUCTION AND DEMAND, NEA No. 7413, © OECD 2018 |
429 |
LIST OF REPORTING ORGANISATIONS AND CONTACT PERSONS
Switzerland |
Swiss Federal Office of Energy, Mühlestrasse 4, 3063 Ittigen |
|
Contact person: Mr Ralf Straub |
Thailand |
Bureau of Mineral Resources, 75/10 Rama VI Rd. Ratchathewi, |
|
Bangkok, 10400 |
|
Contact person: Mr Tawatchai Chualaowanich |
Turkey |
Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources, Nuclear Energy Project |
|
Implementation Department, Nasuh Akar Mah. Türkocaği Cad. No: 2, |
|
06520 Çankaya, Ankara |
|
Contact person: Mr Görkem Güngör |
Ukraine |
State Enterprise: “Kirovgeology” State Service of Geology and Resources, |
|
Ministry of Ecology and Natural Resources of Ukraine, 8/9 Kikvidze str., |
|
Kiev 01103 |
|
Contact person: Mr Yuri A. Bakarzhiyev |
|
Ministry of Energy and Coal Industry of Ukraine, 30 Khreschatyk Street, |
|
Kiev 01601, MCP, Ukraine |
|
Contact persons: Mr Grigoriy Plachkov and Mr Vladimir Smovzhenko |
United Kingdom |
Department of Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, 1 Victoria |
|
Street; London, SW1H 0ET |
|
Contact person: Mr Daniel Wylie |
United States |
Energy Information Administration, US Department of Energy, |
|
Washington, D.C. 20585 |
|
Contact person: Mr Michael Scott |
|
US Geological Survey, Box 25046, DFC, MS 939, 80225 Denver CO |
|
Contact person: Ms Susan Hall |
Viet Nam |
Institute for Technology of Radioactive and Rare Elements, 48 Langha |
|
Str., Dongda District, Hanoi |
|
Contact person: Mr Van Lien THAN |
430 |
URANIUM 2018: RESOURCES, PRODUCTION AND DEMAND, NEA No. 7413, © OECD 2018 |
MEMBERS OF THE JOINT NEA-IAEA URANIUM GROUP PARTICIPATING IN 2016-2017 MEETINGS
Appendix 2. Members of the Joint NEA-IAEA Uranium Group participating in 2016-2017 meetings
NEA |
Ms L. Grancea |
Division of Nuclear Technology Development |
|
(Scientific Secretary) |
and Economics, Paris |
IAEA |
Ms A. Hanly |
Division of Nuclear Fuel Cycle and Waste |
|
(Scientific Secretary) |
Technology, Vienna |
|
Mr. Martin Fairclough |
|
Algeria |
Mr A. Khaldi |
Centre de Recherche Nucléaire de Draria, Draria |
Argentina |
Mr Roberto Eugenio Bianchi |
National Atomic Energy Commission |
|
Mr Roberto Enrique Gruner |
|
|
Mr Luis Edourado Lopez |
|
Australia |
Mr Paul Kay |
Geoscience Australia, Canberra |
Austria |
Mr Nikolaus Arnold |
Institute of Safety and Risk Sciences |
Belgium |
Ms F. Renneboog |
Synatom S.A., Brussels |
Brazil |
Mr L. Filipe Da Silva |
Indústrias Núcleares do Brasil INB-S/A, |
|
|
Rio de Janeiro |
Canada |
Mr T. Calvert (Vice-chair) |
Natural Resources Canada, Ottawa |
|
Mr Robert Lojk |
Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission |
China |
Mr Sicong Zou |
China Atomic Energy Authority (CAEA), Beijing |
URANIUM 2018: RESOURCES, PRODUCTION AND DEMAND, NEA No. 7413, © OECD 2018 |
431 |
MEMBERS OF THE JOINT NEA-IAEA URANIUM GROUP PARTICIPATING IN 2016-2017 MEETINGS
Czech Republic |
Mr P. Vostarek |
DIAMO, State Enterprise, Stráž pod Ralskem |
Denmark |
Ms K. Thrane |
Geological Survey of Denmark and |
|
|
Greenland, Copenhagen |
Finland |
Mr E. Pohjolainen |
Geological Survey of Finland, Espoo |
France |
Ms S. Gabriel |
Commissariat à l’énergie atomique et aux |
|
|
énergies alternatives, Gif-sur-Yvette |
|
|
AREVA, Paris |
|
Mme Farahnaz Laldjee |
Electricité de France (EDF) |
|
Mr C. Polak (Vice-chair) |
AREVA MINES, Courbevoie |
Germany |
Mr M. Schauer |
Federal Institute for Geoscience and Natural |
|
|
Resources, Hannover |
Hungary |
Mr András Barabás |
MECSEKERC LTD, Pecs |
India |
Mr Lalit Kumar Nanda |
Department of Atomic Energy, Hyderabad |
|
Mr Ashwini Kumar Rai |
|
Indonesia |
Mr A. Sumaryanto |
National Nuclear Energy Agency, Jakarta |
Iran, Islamic |
Mr Seyed Mohammad Reza |
Atomic Energy Organisation of Iran, Tehran |
Republic of |
Ahmadi |
|
|
Mr Behzad Farahani |
|
|
Mr M. R. Ghaderi |
|
|
Mr Mahdi Teimournia |
|
|
Mr Kambiz Sadeghi |
TAMAS, Tehran |
Kazakhstan |
Ms Aliya Akzholova |
National Atomic Company (KAZATOMPROM), |
|
Mr Yuriy Demekhov |
Astana |
|
Ms O. Gorbatenko (Vice-chair) |
|
Kyrgyzstan |
Ms Aigul Sulaimanova |
Institute of Mining and Mining Technologies, |
|
|
Bishkek |
432 |
URANIUM 2018: RESOURCES, PRODUCTION AND DEMAND, NEA No. 7413, © OECD 2018 |
MEMBERS OF THE JOINT NEA-IAEA URANIUM GROUP PARTICIPATING IN 2016-2017 MEETINGS
Mongolia |
Mr Mavag Chadraabal |
Executive Office of the Nuclear Energy |
|
|
Commission, Ulaanbaatar |
Pakistan |
Mr Muhammad Abbas Qureshi |
Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission, |
|
|
Islamabad |
Peru |
Ms Gabriela Ganoza Vardgas |
Ministry of Energy and Mines, Lima |
|
Machuca |
|
Philippines |
Mr Rolando Reyes |
Philippine Nuclear Research Institute, Quezon |
|
|
City |
Poland |
Ms G. Zakrzewska-Koltuniewicz |
Institute of Nuclear Chemistry and |
|
|
Technology, Warsaw |
Romania |
Ms L. Pop |
National Commission for Nuclear Activities |
|
|
Control, Bucharest |
Russia |
Mr A. Boytsov (Vice-chair) |
Uranium One |
|
Mr A. Tarkhanov |
All-Russian Research Institute of Chemical |
|
|
Technology (Rosatom), Moscow |
Saudi Arabia |
Ms Suzan Katamoura |
King Abdullah City for Atomic and Renewable |
|
|
Energy, Riyadh |
Senegal |
Mr M. Kanoute |
Ministry of Energy et Renewable Energy |
|
|
Development, Dakar |
Spain |
Mr F. T. Garcia |
ENUSA Industrias Avanzadas, S.A., Madrid |
Tajikistan |
Mr J. Misratov |
Nuclear and Radiation Safety Agency of the |
|
|
Academy of Sciences, Dushanbe |
Thailand |
Ms Uthaiwan Injarean |
Thailand Institute of Nuclear Technology, |
|
|
Nakorn Nayok |
URANIUM 2018: RESOURCES, PRODUCTION AND DEMAND, NEA No. 7413, © OECD 2018 |
433 |
MEMBERS OF THE JOINT NEA-IAEA URANIUM GROUP PARTICIPATING IN 2016-2017 MEETINGS
Turkey |
Mr Gorken Gungor |
Nasuh Akar mah. Türkocagi cad, Ankara |
Ukraine |
Mr A. Bakarzhiyev |
The State Geological Enterprise “Kirovgeology”, |
|
Mr Y. Bakarzhiyev |
Kiev |
United States |
Ms S. Hall (Chair) |
US Geological Survey, Denver |
|
Mr Michael Scott |
U.S. Energy Information Administration, |
|
|
Washington, DC |
Viet Nam |
Mr V. L. Than |
Institute for Technology of Radioactive and |
|
|
Rare Elements, Hanoi |
European |
Mr D. Kozak |
Euratom Supply Agency, Luxembourg |
Commission |
|
|
434 |
URANIUM 2018: RESOURCES, PRODUCTION AND DEMAND, NEA No. 7413, © OECD 2018 |
GLOSSARY OF DEFINITIONS AND TERMINOLOGY
Appendix 3. Glossary of definitions and terminology
Units
Metric units are used in all tabulations and statements. Resources and production quantities are expressed in terms of tonnes (t) contained uranium (U) rather than uranium oxide (U3O8).
1 short ton U3O8 |
= |
0.769 tU |
1% U3O8 |
= |
0.848% U |
1 USD/lb U3O8 |
= |
USD 2.6/kg U |
1 tonne |
= |
1 metric ton |
Resource terminology
Resource estimates are divided into separate categories reflecting different levels of confidence in the quantities reported. The resources are further separated into categories based on the cost of production.
Definitions of resource categories
Uranium resources are broadly classified as either conventional or unconventional. Conventional resources are those that have an established history of production where uranium is a primary product, co-product or an important by-product (e.g. from the mining of copper and gold). Very low-grade resources or those from which uranium is only recoverable as a minor by-product are considered unconventional resources.
Conventional resources are further divided, according to different confidence levels of occurrence, into four categories. The correlation between these resource categories and those used in selected national resource classification systems is shown in Figure A3.1.
Reasonably assured resources (RAR) refers to uranium that occurs in known mineral deposits of delineated size, grade and configuration such that the quantities, which could be recovered within the given production cost ranges with currently proven mining and processing technology, can be specified. Estimates of tonnage and grade are based on specific sample data and measurements of the deposits and on knowledge of deposit characteristics. Reasonably assured resources have a high assurance of existence. Unless otherwise noted, RAR are expressed in terms of quantities of uranium recoverable from mineable ore (see: recoverable resources).
Inferred resources (IR) refers to uranium, in addition to RAR, that is inferred to occur based on direct geological evidence, in extensions of well-explored deposits, or in deposits in which geological continuity has been established but where specific data, including measurements of the deposits, and knowledge of the deposit’s characteristics, are considered to be inadequate to classify the resource as RAR. Estimates of tonnage, grade and cost of further delineation and recovery are based on such sampling as is available and on knowledge of the deposit characteristics as determined in the best known parts of the deposit or in similar deposits. Less reliance can be placed on the estimates in this category than on those for RAR. Unless otherwise noted, inferred resources are expressed in terms of quantities of uranium recoverable from mineable ore (see: recoverable resources).
URANIUM 2018: RESOURCES, PRODUCTION AND DEMAND, NEA No. 7413, © OECD 2018 |
435 |
GLOSSARY OF DEFINITIONS AND TERMINOLOGY
Figure A3.1. Approximate correlation of terms used in major resources classification systems
|
|
Identified resources |
|
Undiscovered resources |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
NEA/IAEA |
Reasonably assured |
|
Inferred |
Prognosticated |
Speculative |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Australia |
Demonstrated |
|
Inferred |
Undiscovered |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Measured |
|
Indicated |
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Canada (NRCan) |
Measured |
|
Indicated |
|
Inferred |
Prognosticated |
Speculative |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
United States (DOE) |
Reasonably assured |
|
Estimated additional |
Speculative |
|||||
Russia, Kazakhstan, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A + B + C1 |
|
C2 |
|
C2+P1 |
P1 |
P2 |
|
P3 |
|
Ukraine, Uzbekistan |
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The terms illustrated are not strictly comparable as the criteria used in the various systems are not identical. “Grey zones” in correlation are therefore unavoidable, particularly as the resources become less assured. Nonetheless, the chart presents a reasonable approximation of the comparability of terms.
Work to align the NEA/IAEA and national resource classification systems outlined above with the United Nations Framework Classification system remains under consideration. (For a summary of recent efforts, see: www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/ energy/se/pdfs/egrc/egrc5_apr2014/ECE.ENERGY.GE.3.2014.L1_e.pdf.)
Prognosticated resources (PR) refers to uranium, in addition to inferred resources, that is expected to occur in deposits for which the evidence is mainly indirect and which are believed to exist in well-defined geological trends or areas of mineralisation with known deposits. Estimates of tonnage, grade and cost of discovery, delineation and recovery are based primarily on knowledge of deposit characteristics in known deposits within the respective trends or areas and on such sampling, geological, geophysical or geochemical evidence as may be available. Less reliance can be placed on the estimates in this category than on those for inferred resources. Prognosticated resources are normally expressed in terms of uranium contained in mineable ore, i.e. in situ quantities.
Speculative resources (SR) refers to uranium, in addition to prognosticated resources, that is thought to exist, mostly on the basis of indirect evidence and geological extrapolations, in deposits discoverable with existing exploration techniques. The location of deposits envisaged in this category could generally be specified only as being somewhere within a given region or geological trend. As the term implies, the existence and size of such resources are speculative. SR are normally expressed in terms of uranium contained in mineable ore, i.e. in situ quantities.
Cost categories
The cost categories, in United States dollars (USD), used in this report are defined as: <USD 40/kgU, <USD 80/kgU, <USD 130/kgU and <USD 260/kgU. All resource categories are defined in terms of costs of uranium recovered at the ore processing plant.
Note: It is not intended that the cost categories should follow fluctuations in market conditions.
Conversion of costs from other currencies into USD is done using an average exchange rate for the month of June in that year except for the projected costs for the year of the report.
436 |
URANIUM 2018: RESOURCES, PRODUCTION AND DEMAND, NEA No. 7413, © OECD 2018 |
GLOSSARY OF DEFINITIONS AND TERMINOLOGY
When estimating the cost of production for assigning resources within these cost categories, account has been taken of the following costs:
•the direct costs of mining, transporting and processing the uranium ore;
•the costs of associated environmental and waste management during and after mining;
•the costs of maintaining non-operating production units where applicable;
•in the case of ongoing projects, those capital costs that remain non-amortised;
•the capital cost of providing new production units where applicable, including the cost of financing;
•indirect costs such as office overheads, taxes and royalties where applicable;
•future exploration and development costs wherever required for further ore delineation to the stage where it is ready to be mined;
•sunk costs are not normally taken into consideration.
Relationship between resource categories
Figure A3.2 illustrates the inter-relationship between the different resource categories. The horizontal axis expresses the level of assurance about the actual existence of a given tonnage based on varying degrees of geologic knowledge while the vertical axis expresses the economic feasibility of exploitation by the division into cost categories.
Figure A3.2. NEA/IAEA classification scheme for uranium resources
|
|
<USD 40/kgU |
Decreasing economic attractiveness |
Recoverable at costs |
260/kgU USD 80-130/kgU USD 40-80/kgU |
|
|
USD 130- |
Identified resources |
Undiscovered resources |
||
Reasonably |
Inferred resources |
Prognosticated |
|
|
|||
assured |
|
||
resources |
|
||
resources |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reasonably |
Inferred resources |
Prognosticated |
|
assured |
|
||
resources |
|
||
resources |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Speculative |
|
|
|
resources |
Reasonably |
Inferred resources |
Prognosticated |
|
assured |
resources |
|
|
resources |
|
|
|
Reasonably |
|
Prognosticated |
|
assured |
Inferred resources |
|
|
resources |
|
||
resources |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decreasing confidence in estimates |
|
|
|
Recoverable resources
RAR and IR estimates are expressed in terms of recoverable tonnes of uranium, i.e. quantities of uranium recoverable from mineable ore, as opposed to quantities contained in mineable ore, or quantities in situ, i.e. not taking into account mining and milling losses. Therefore both expected mining and ore processing losses have been
URANIUM 2018: RESOURCES, PRODUCTION AND DEMAND, NEA No. 7413, © OECD 2018 |
437 |
GLOSSARY OF DEFINITIONS AND TERMINOLOGY
deducted in most cases. If a country reports its resources as in situ and the country does not provide a recovery factor, the NEA/IAEA assigns a recovery factor to those resources based on geology and projected mining and processing methods to determine recoverable resources. The recovery factors that have been applied are:
Mining and milling method |
|
Overall recovery factor (%) |
|
|
|
Open-pit mining with conventional milling |
|
80 |
|
|
|
Underground mining with conventional milling |
|
75 |
In situ leaching (acid) |
|
85 |
|
|
|
In situ leaching (alkaline) |
|
70 |
Heap leaching |
|
70 |
|
|
|
Block and stope leaching |
|
75 |
Co-product or by-product |
|
65 |
|
|
|
Unspecified method |
|
75 |
|
|
|
Secondary sources of uranium terminology
Mixed oxide fuel (MOX): MOX is the abbreviation for a fuel for nuclear power plants that consists of a mixture of uranium oxide and plutonium oxide. Current practice is to use a mixture of depleted uranium oxide and plutonium oxide.
Depleted uranium: Uranium where the 235U assay is below the naturally occurring 0.7110%. Natural uranium is a mixture of three isotopes, uranium-238 – accounting for 99.2836%, uranium-235 – 0.7110%, and uranium-234 – 0.0054%. Depleted uranium is a byproduct of the enrichment process, where enriched uranium is produced from initial natural uranium feed material.
Production terminology1
Production centres
A production centre, as referred to in this report, is a production unit consisting of one or more ore processing plants, one or more associated mines and uranium resources that are tributary to these facilities. For the purpose of describing production centres, they have been divided into four classes, as follows:
•Existing production centres are those that currently exist in operational condition. Production projections continue until the identified resources (costs < USD 130/kgU) are exhausted.
•Committed production centres are those that are either under construction or are firmly committed for construction.
•Planned production centres are those for which feasibility studies are completed and regulatory approvals are at advanced stage.
•Prospective production centres are those for which some level of feasibility study has been completed and the centres are supported by tributary RAR and Inferred resources. Indicative start-up dates should have been announced.
1.IAEA (1984), Manual on the Projection of Uranium Production Capability, General Guidelines, Technical Report Series No. 238, IAEA, Vienna.
438 |
URANIUM 2018: RESOURCES, PRODUCTION AND DEMAND, NEA No. 7413, © OECD 2018 |
