
- •Abstract
- •Acknowledgements
- •Highlights
- •Executive summary
- •Findings and recommendations
- •Electric mobility is developing at a rapid pace
- •Policies have major influences on the development of electric mobility
- •Technology advances are delivering substantial cost reductions for batteries
- •Strategic importance of the battery technology value chain is increasingly recognised
- •Other technology developments are contributing to cost cuts
- •Private sector response confirms escalating momentum for electric mobility
- •Outlooks indicate a rising tide of electric vehicles
- •Electric cars save more energy than they use
- •Electric mobility increases demand for raw materials
- •Managing change in the material supply chain
- •Safeguarding government revenue from transport taxation
- •New mobility modes have challenges and offer opportunities
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Electric Vehicles Initiative
- •EV 30@30 Campaign
- •Global EV Pilot City Programme
- •Scope, content and structure of the report
- •1. Status of electric mobility
- •Vehicle and charger deployment
- •Light-duty vehicles
- •Stock
- •Cars
- •Light-commercial vehicles
- •Sales and market share
- •Cars
- •Light-commercial vehicles
- •Charging infrastructure
- •Private chargers
- •Publicly accessible chargers
- •Small electric vehicles for urban transport
- •Stock and sales
- •Two/three-wheelers
- •Low-speed electric vehicles
- •Charging infrastructure
- •Buses
- •Stock and sales
- •Charging infrastructure
- •Trucks
- •Stock and sales
- •Charging infrastructure
- •Other modes
- •Shipping
- •Aviation
- •Energy use and well-to-wheel GHG emissions
- •Electricity demand and oil displacement
- •Well-to-wheel GHG emissions
- •References
- •2. Prospects for electric mobility development
- •Electric mobility targets: Recent developments
- •Country-level targets
- •City-level targets
- •Policy updates: Vehicles and charging infrastructure
- •Charging standards
- •Hardware
- •Communication protocols
- •Supporting policies
- •Canada
- •China
- •Vehicle policies
- •Charging infrastructure policies
- •Industrial policies
- •European Union
- •Vehicle policies
- •Charging infrastructure policies
- •Industrial policy
- •India
- •Vehicle policies
- •Charging infrastructure policies
- •Japan
- •Vehicle policies
- •Charging infrastructure policies
- •Industrial policy
- •Korea
- •Vehicle policies
- •Charging infrastructure
- •Industrial policy
- •United States
- •Vehicle policies
- •Charging infrastructure
- •Industrial policy
- •Other countries
- •The emergence of a Global Electric Mobility Programme
- •Industry roll-out plans
- •Vehicles
- •Light-duty vehicles
- •Two/three-wheelers
- •Buses
- •Trucks
- •Automotive batteries
- •Charging infrastructure
- •References
- •3. Outlook
- •Scenario definitions
- •Electric vehicle projections
- •Policy context for the New Policies Scenario
- •Global results
- •Two/three-wheelers
- •Light-duty vehicles
- •Buses
- •Trucks
- •Regional insights
- •China
- •Europe
- •India
- •Japan
- •United States and Canada
- •Other countries
- •Implications for automotive batteries
- •Capacity of automotive batteries
- •Material demand for automotive batteries
- •Charging infrastructure
- •Private chargers
- •Light-duty vehicles
- •Buses
- •Private charging infrastructure for LDVs and buses
- •Publicly accessible chargers for LDVs
- •Impacts of electric mobility on energy demand
- •Electricity demand from EVs
- •Structure of electricity demand for EVs in the New Policies Scenario
- •Structure of electricity demand for EVs in the EV30@30 Scenario
- •Implications of electric mobility for GHG emissions
- •References
- •4. Electric vehicle life-cycle GHG emissions
- •Context
- •Methodology
- •Key insights
- •Detailed assessment
- •Life-cycle GHG emissions: drivers and potential for emissions reduction
- •Effect of mileage on EV life-cycle GHG emissions
- •Effect of vehicle size and power on EV life-cycle emissions
- •Effect of power system and battery manufacturing emissions on EV life-cycle emissions
- •References
- •5. Challenges and solutions for EV deployment
- •Vehicle and battery costs
- •Challenge
- •EV purchase prices are not yet competitive with ICE vehicles
- •Indications from the total cost of ownership analysis
- •Effect of recent battery cost reductions on the cost gap
- •Impacts of developments in 2018 on the total cost of ownership
- •Solutions
- •Battery cost reductions
- •Reducing EV costs with simpler and innovative design architectures
- •Adapting battery sizes to travel needs
- •Supply and value chain sustainability of battery materials
- •Challenges
- •Solutions
- •Towards sustainable minerals sourcing via due diligence principles
- •Initiatives for better battery supply chain transparency and sustainable extractive activities
- •Bridging the gap between due diligence principles and on-the-ground actions
- •Battery end-of-life management
- •Implications of electric mobility for power systems
- •Challenges
- •Solutions
- •Potential for controlled EV charging to deliver grid services and participate in electricity markets
- •Enabling flexibility from EVs
- •Importance of policy actions to enable EV participation in markets
- •Government revenue from taxation
- •Challenges
- •Solutions
- •Near-term options
- •Long-term solutions
- •Shared and automated mobility
- •Challenges
- •Solutions
- •References
- •Statistical annex
- •Electric car stock
- •New electric car sales
- •Market share of electric cars
- •Electric light commercial vehicles (LCV)
- •Electric vehicle supply equipment stock
- •References
- •Acronyms, abbreviations and units of measure
- •Acronyms and abbreviations
- •Units of measure
- •Table of contents
- •List of Figures
- •List of Boxes
- •List of Tables

Global EV Outlook 2019 |
3. Outlook |
targeted percentage of the OEM sales in a given year. In the first case, the value is used directly. In the second case, the number of EVs corresponding to the announcement is estimated as the product of the number of models by a range of values of EV sales per model. In 2020, this range falls between 10 ooo and 30 000 units in a low and high bound, respectively. For 2025, EV sales per model range between 30 000 and 50 000 units. The increase is consistent with a widening range of models available, increased consumer awareness and improving cost competitiveness. By mean of comparison, 30 000 vehicles per model is a value that is broadly consistent with the vehicle to model ratio announced for 2025 by Volkswagen. Use of 10 000 is a conservative estimate, compatible with the magnitude of the ratio announced by Daimler for 2025. The 50 000 estimate reflects the vehicles to model ratio of successful EV models such as the Nissan Leaf and the Tesla Model S after four/five years on the market. In the third case, the number of EVs is evaluated calculating the market share of the OEM that made the announcement in 2018 and multiplying it by the total PLDV market size projected in the New Policies Scenario. Market shares by each OEM are calculated using data from Marklines (2019) and the share is kept constant over time.
EV sales in years preceding the year targeted by an announcement are determined using an exponential growth that achieves the number of EVs announced (or estimated as outlined above) for the target year. Sales occurring after the year targeted by an announcement are evaluated using both conservative and optimistic development paths. In the conservative case, EV sales by OEM are kept constant. In the optimistic case, the sales follow the rate of growth of the overall EV sales in the New Policies Scenario. For Chinese OEMs, sales in the upper bound case are capped at 6.3 million units per year from 2020 onwards, i.e. at a value that corresponds to 66% of a production capacity of 9.4 million vehicles. This is a rather conservative estimate, based on the collection of information on expected production capacities developed for the Global EV Outlook 2018 (IEA, 2018a), if compared with recent announcements of production capacities of 20 million units by 2020 (Ren, 2019). In the lower bound case, sales of EVs from Chinese OEMs are limited at 2 million from 2020 onwards.
Sources: IEA analysis developed with the IEA Mobility Model (IEA, 2019a) based on the OEM announcements included in Chapter 2 (Table 2.11) and Marklines (2019).
Buses
The electric bus fleet attains 3.2 million in 2025 and 4.8 million in 2030 in the New Policies Scenario, hitting 7% and 10% stock shares respectively. The electrification of the bus fleet occurs primarily for urban buses, given their lower range requirements relative to intercity buses. PHEV (or range extender hybrid) buses also become part of the fleet thanks to their capacity to delivery energy efficiency improvements in regions that regulate fuel economy in heavy-duty vehicles, but their penetration is limited in comparison with urban buses (PHEVs/range extender hybrids account for slightly more than 10% of the electric bus fleet in the New Policies Scenario).
In the EV30@30 Scenario, the deployment of EVs in the bus sector accelerates, reaching 8.2 million in 2030, corresponding to 15% of the stock, primarily in urban buses. This is consistent with stronger commitments from municipalities and public transport operators, and could be enabled by policy instruments such as minimum requirements in public procurement processes, tightening of fuel economy standards for heavy-duty vehicles and their extension to buses.
Trucks
Electric trucks reach 0.9 million units in 2030 in the New Policies Scenario and 3.3 million in the EV30@30 Scenario, corresponding to 1% and 3% of the total truck stock. The penetration of electric heavy trucks is higher in medium size than in heavy truck segments. This is because medium trucks have more applications in urban areas, where vehicle usage profiles are inherently characterised by lower mileage (due to speed and travel time limitations), and regional deliveries, better suited for deliveries taking place with a hub-and-spoke type of operation than long-haul freight transport. Electric trucks are also fit to respond to announced intentions to restrict the circulation of ICE vehicles in major metropolitan areas.
PAGE | 123
IEA. All rights reserved.