- •Foreword
- •Table of Contents
- •List of Figures, Tables and Boxes
- •Figures
- •Boxes
- •Tables
- •The 2016 Framework Agreement on Energy Policy
- •Moving to a fully renewables-based electricity system
- •Targeting energy efficiency
- •Ensuring oil and gas security
- •Key recommendations
- •2. General energy policy
- •Country overview
- •Supply and demand
- •Primary energy supply
- •Energy consumption is relatively stable
- •Main institutions
- •Policy
- •2016 Energy Agreement
- •2017 Climate Policy Framework
- •2019 January Agreement
- •Long-term scenarios
- •Demand
- •Supply
- •Assessment
- •Recommendations
- •3. Energy, climate change and transport
- •Overview
- •Climate policy framework
- •The EU climate framework
- •Sweden’s new National Climate Framework
- •The climate targets
- •The Climate Act
- •The Climate Policy Council
- •Climate investment support programme – Climate Leap
- •Transport emissions and policies
- •Energy consumption in transport
- •Policies introduced to reduce emissions from road transport
- •Emission reduction obligation
- •The bonus-malus system (“feebate”) within light-vehicle taxation
- •National transport infrastructure plan 2018-29
- •Energy efficiency in transport
- •Electromobility
- •EV market
- •EV infrastructure and charging
- •Other types of electrified transport
- •Assessment
- •Transport emissions in focus for new targets and policy
- •Electric vehicles require new infrastructure
- •Sweden should keep a broad approach to transport policy
- •Recommendations
- •4. Energy efficiency
- •Overview
- •Energy intensity per capita and GDP
- •Energy intensity target
- •Energy consumption by sector
- •Industry sector consumption
- •Residential and commercial consumption
- •Regulatory framework
- •The Energy Efficiency Directive
- •Other EU directives on energy efficiency
- •National institutions
- •National policies and measures
- •Policies for energy efficiency in buildings
- •Performance standards for new buildings
- •Support for the increased energy efficiency of rental houses
- •Tax reduction for renovations
- •Increased competence in energy-efficient building techniques
- •Policies for energy efficiency in industry
- •Public procurement for energy efficiency
- •Assessment
- •Sweden is on track to meet its energy intensity targets
- •Sectoral strategies should align with the intensity target
- •Buildings remain an important area for energy efficiency
- •Recommendations
- •5. Heat and district heating
- •Overview
- •Supply and demand
- •Heat sources in buildings
- •DH supply
- •Co-generation in DH
- •District cooling
- •DH markets and regulation
- •The liberalised DH market
- •DH prices
- •The “Price Dialogue”
- •Market development
- •Future heat demand
- •Future fuel supply
- •Integration of heat and power systems
- •Assessment
- •Biomass and waste has decarbonised district heating
- •The price dialogue brings more transparency on the market
- •District heating is facing changing market conditions
- •Recommendations
- •6. Energy technology research, development and demonstration
- •Overview
- •Strategies and programmes
- •Research areas in more detail
- •Sustainable power system and renewable energy resources
- •Bioenergy
- •Transport system
- •Industrial processes
- •Buildings in the energy system
- •General energy system studies with social and interdisciplinary perspectives
- •Business development and commercialisation
- •Sustainable society
- •International partnerships
- •Funding
- •Monitoring and evaluation
- •International collaboration
- •Assessment
- •Recommendations
- •7. Electricity
- •Overview
- •Supply and demand
- •Electricity generation and trade are increasing
- •Large increase in wind power capacity projected to continue
- •Electricity consumption is stable
- •Institutions and legal framework
- •Institutions
- •A liberalised low-carbon energy-only market
- •Support for renewable electricity
- •The electricity certificate system
- •Wind power licensing and siting
- •Small-scale renewables receive additional support
- •Transmission and distribution networks
- •Transmission
- •Congestion management
- •Cross-border connections
- •Cross-border TSO collaboration
- •Distribution
- •Allocation of grid connection costs
- •Generation
- •Market design
- •Wholesale market
- •Nordic balancing market
- •Retail market and prices
- •Security of supply
- •Strategic reserve
- •Regional security collaboration
- •Assessment
- •Wholesale electricity market
- •Security of supply
- •Retail market
- •Increasing renewable electricity supply
- •Recommendations
- •8. Nuclear energy
- •Overview
- •Nuclear policy
- •Taxation
- •Institutions
- •Nuclear safety
- •Incidents of note
- •Fuel cycle, waste management and decommissioning
- •Front end of the fuel cycle
- •Waste management: Very-low, low and intermediate waste
- •Waste management: High-level waste
- •Decommissioning
- •Funding
- •Communication to stakeholders
- •Assessment
- •Recommendations
- •9. Oil and biofuels
- •Overview
- •Supply and demand
- •Oil consumption is declining
- •Sweden imports all its crude oil; oil products are net export
- •Biofuels have rapidly increased, mostly through imports
- •Infrastructure
- •Refineries
- •Ports
- •Storage
- •Retail market and prices
- •Security of supply
- •Emergency response policy
- •Emergency stocks
- •Compliance and monitoring
- •Drawdown procedures
- •Demand restraint
- •Assessment
- •Recommendations
- •10. Natural gas and biogas
- •Overview
- •Supply and demand
- •Support for biogas production
- •Regulatory framework
- •Infrastructure
- •Industry and market structure
- •Prices
- •Security of supply
- •Assessment
- •Recommendations
- •ANNEX A: Organisations visited
- •Review criteria
- •Review team and preparation of the report
- •Organisation visited
- •ANNEX B: Energy balances and key statistical data
- •Footnotes to energy balances and key statistical data
- •ANNEX C: International Energy Agency “Shared Goals”
- •ANNEX D: Glossary and list of abbreviations
- •Acronyms and abbreviations
- •Units of measure
3. Energy, climate change and transport
Key data
(2017)
GHG emissions without LULUCF:* 52.7 MtCO2-eq, -26% since 1990 GHG emissions with LULUCF:* 8.9 MtCO2-eq, -76% since 1990
Energy-related CO2 emissions:
CO intensity per GDP:** 82.8 gCO /USD (IEA average 237 gCO /USD in 2016)
CO emissions from fuel combustion: 37.6 MtCO , -28% since 1990
CO emissions by fuel: oil 69.3%, coal 18.2%, natural gas 4.0%, other 8.5%
CO emissions by sector: transport 52.5%, power and heat generation 18.8%, industry 17.2%, other energy industries 7.2%, commercial 3.8%, residential 0.4%
Final energy consumption in transport: 8.2 Mtoe (oil 79.2%, biofuels 18.0%, electricity 2.6%, natural gas 0.2%), +1% since 2007
Exchange rates: Swedish kronor (SEK) 1 = USD 0.117 = EUR 0.104
*Land use, land-use change, and forestry. Source: SEPA (2018a).
**In USD 2010 PPP.
Overview
Sweden has managed to reduce its total greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in recent decades, while maintaining strong economic growth. In 2017, Sweden’s GHG emissions were 21% lower than in 2005 and 26% lower than in 1990 (without land use, land-use change, and forestry [LULUCF]). Energy-related carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions represent the largest share of total GHG emissions. As a result of the decarbonisation of energy systems in Sweden, energy-related emissions have declined faster than the overall GHG emissions, and their share in total emissions decreased from 74% in 1990 to 71% in 2016 (Figure 3.1). Sweden’s CO2 tax has been an important driver for reducing emissions in the energy sector.
In 2017, the government decided on a new climate framework that stipulates national emission targets and a new climate law that obliges the government to take these targets into account when introducing policies. The long-term target is that Sweden should have zero-net emissions by 2045. With the climate framework in place, Sweden now needs to develop pathways to reach this ambitious target.
33
ENERGY SYSTEM TRANSFORMATION
IEA. All rights reserved.
3. ENERGY, CLIMATE CHANGE AND TRANSPORT
The transport sector accounts for over half of total energy-related emissions, and the reduction in transport emissions has been slow compared to that in other sectors. As part of the climate framework, the government set the target to reduce transport emissions by at least 70% from 2010 to 2030. To achieve this very ambitious target, the government introduced several policies to support new low-emission vehicles as well as to introduce more biofuels in the fuel mix.
One major development in the transport sector is the growth in electric vehicles (EVs). Sweden has one of the highest shares of EVs in new car sales globally, which requires new infrastructure to support continued growth.
Figure 3.1 GHG emissions by sector, 1990 and 2016
1990 |
|
2016 |
|
|
|
|
3% |
|
|
5% |
|
|
|
|
11% |
|
13% |
|
Energy* |
10% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
13% |
|
|
Industrial processes |
|
|
|
|||
71.5 Mt |
|
52.9 Mt |
|
Agriculture |
|
|
|||
|
|
|
74% |
71% |
|
Waste |
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
||
|
|
|
From 1990 to 2016, total GHG emissions were reduced by 26%, with the largest decline in energy-related emissions.
* Energy includes emissions from transport and stationary combustion in different sectors.
Source: SEPA (2018a), National Inventory Report Sweden 2018, https://unfccc.int/documents/65685.
Energy-related CO2 emissions
The following sections focus on energy-related CO2 emissions, which account for the majority of GHG emissions.
CO2 emissions by sector and fuel
Sweden’s energy-related CO2 emissions fell rapidly in the late 1970s as oil use in electricity generation, industry and space heating was replaced with electricity from new nuclear power plants. In the following decades, emissions were relatively stable as declines in the residential and commercial sectors offset increases in transport. Since the early 2000s, emissions have declined across all the sectors, notably in industry, through the decreased use of fuel oil in pulp and paper industries (Figure 3.2). However, the decline has stalled in recent years, and emissions have remained stable since 2013.
In 2017, Sweden’s energy-related CO2 emissions were 38 million tonnes (Mt). The transport sector emitted 20 Mt, over half of the total emissions. Most of the rest were from heat and power generation, which accounted for 19% of the total emissions; manufacturing industry with 17%; and oil refineries with 7%. The commercial and residential sectors together represented just over 4% of the total emissions. This does not include indirect emissions from consumption of electricity and district heating.
34
IEA. All rights reserved.
3. ENERGY, CLIMATE CHANGE AND TRANSPORT
Transport emissions have remained flat in the last five years as increased energy demand partly offset the gains from rapid growth in biofuels. Emissions from industry and from power and heat have fallen slightly in recent years, as a result of switching to higher shares of renewable energy. Sweden’s CO2 intensity in heat and power generation is the second lowest in the International Energy Agency (IEA) after Norway.
The dominance of transport emissions is reflected also in the share of emissions by fuel type (Figure 3.3). In 2017, oil accounted for 69% of the total CO2 emissions, followed by coal at 18%. However, emissions from oil decreased by 19% from 2007 and those from coal by 24%. Emissions from non-renewable waste in heat and power generation, however, has increased significantly. Natural gas accounts for only a few percentage points of total emissions and has declined in recent decades.
Figure 3.2 Energy-related CO emissions by sector, 1990-2017
70 |
MtCO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Power and heat generation |
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other energy industries* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industry** |
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential |
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial*** |
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transport |
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1990 |
1993 |
1996 |
1999 |
2002 |
2005 |
2008 |
2011 |
2014 |
2017 |
|
Sweden has reduced its energy-related CO2 emissions across most sectors, but less so in the transport sector, which accounted for over half of total emissions in 2016.
* Other energy includes emissions from oil refineries and coke ovens.
** Industry includes CO emissions from combustion at construction and manufacturing industries. Emissions related to industry processes other than combustion are not included.
*** Commercial includes commercial and public services, agriculture/forestry and fishing.
Source: IEA (2019a forthcoming), CO Emissions from Fuel Combustion 2019 preliminary, www.iea.org/statistics/.
Figure 3.3 Energy-related CO emissions by source, 1990-2017
MtCO
70

Other*
60
Coal
50
Natural gas
40
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1990 |
1993 |
1996 |
1999 |
2002 |
2005 |
2008 |
2011 |
2014 |
2017 |
Oil emits most energy-related CO2, as it dominates emissions from transport and industry.
* Other includes emissions from peat and non-renewable waste combustion.
Source: IEA (2019a forthcoming), CO Emissions from Fuel Combustion 2019, preliminary, www.iea.org/statistics/.
35
ENERGY SYSTEM TRANSFORMATION
IEA. All rights reserved.
3. ENERGY, CLIMATE CHANGE AND TRANSPORT
CO2 drivers and carbon intensity
Total CO2 emissions in a country are related to the size of the population, economic development, energy intensity of the economy, and carbon intensity of the energy supply, as per the equation: CO2 = population × GDP/capita × TPES/GDP × CO2/TPES (GDP = gross domestic product, TPES = total primary energy supply).
Between 1990 and 2017, Sweden’s GDP per capita increased by 51% and the population grew by 18%. Yet, Sweden managed to reduce its CO2 emissions by 28%, owing to a 41% drop in energy intensity of the economy and a 30% drop in the carbon intensity of the energy supply (Figure 3.4).
Figure 3.4 Energy-related CO2 emissions and main drivers, 1990-2017
1.6 |
Index 1990 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GDP/capita |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Population |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CO2emissions |
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CO2/TPES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TPES/GDP |
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1990 |
1993 |
1996 |
1999 |
2002 |
2005 |
2008 |
2011 |
2014 |
2017 |
|
Despite large economic growth per capita, Sweden has managed to reduce its energy-related CO2 emissions significantly.
Note: Real GDP in 2010 USD prices and purchasing power parity (PPP).
Source: IEA (2019a forthcoming), CO Emissions from Fuel Combustion 2019 preliminary, www.iea.org/statistics/.
In 2016, Sweden’s carbon intensity was 85 grammes of carbon dioxide (gCO2) per US dollar (USD) (2010 prices and PPP), the second lowest in the IEA after Switzerland (Figure 3.5). Sweden’s carbon intensity was half the IEA Europe average of 173 gCO2 per USD and much below the IEA average of 237 gCO2 per USD. In terms of CO2 emissions per capita, Sweden again ranks the second-lowest in the IEA, after Mexico.
Figure 3.5 CO2 intensity in IEA member countries, 2016
kgCO /USD (2010 PPP) 0.5 0.47
0.4
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
0.09 |
0.08 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0.1 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Sweden has the second-lowest CO intensity in the IEA, after Switzerland.
2
Source: IEA (2019a forthcoming), CO Emissions from Fuel Combustion 2019 preliminary, www.iea.org/statistics/.
36
IEA. All rights reserved.
