Добавил:
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
книги / 613.pdf
Скачиваний:
3
Добавлен:
07.06.2023
Размер:
6.5 Mб
Скачать

DESCRIPTIONS OF RK&M PRESERVATION MECHANISMS

Mechanism

 

Safeguards

 

 

 

 

Whereas the general aim of RK&M preservation is to keep awareness of disposal sites and to enable future generations

 

to make informed decisions, the general aim of safeguards, from a security and malevolent use of nuclear material

 

point of view, can be said to be the opposite. Tensions may thus arise between the classified and expertocratic nature

 

of safeguards on the one hand, and the open, participatory nature of RK&M preservation on the other.

Specific issues/

The current regulation on safeguards includes all kinds of facilities that handle nuclear material, but for geological

repositories considerations are still at a conceptual level. Discussions are ongoing within the IAEA and the European

challenges

Commission on how international safeguards should be implemented in such facilities, considering both the

 

 

operational and the post-closure phase and the desired continuity between those phases (including issues such as

 

institutional continuity, handling of classified documents, economic provisions, etc.).

 

Safeguards only apply to disposal facilities containing fissile material, and will thus not support to RK&M

 

preservation for other repositories.

International

International organisations (Euratom and IAEA) are central to the development and conduct of safeguards provisions.

dimension

 

 

 

International mechanisms: international regulations and agreements; international inventories and catalogues;

Connection to

international co-operation; international education and training programmes; international archives

Regulatory framework: national regulatory framework

other

Oversight provisions: monitoring; clear and planned responsibilities; land use control

approaches/

Knowledge management: knowledge risk analysis

mechanisms

Memory institutions: archives

 

 

Dedicated record sets and summary files: SER

 

• Ormai, P. (2011). The Connection between the Areas of Safeguards and Physical Protection and Record and Memory

Information

 

Keeping. In: NEA (2012). The Preservation of Records, Knowledge and Memory (RK&M) Across Generations: Scoping

resources

 

the Issue. Workshop proceedings. 11-13 October 2011, Issy-les-Moulineaux, France. Item 26.

issued by the

• NEA (2013). The Preservation of Records, Knowledge and Memory (RK&M) Across Generations: Improving Our

RK&M initiative

 

Understanding. Proceedings of the second RK&M Workshop. 12-13 September 2012, Issy-les-Moulineaux,

 

 

France. Items 9 & 10, OECD, Paris.

 

• European Commission (2005). Commission Regulation (Euratom) No 302/2005 of 8 February 2005 on the

 

 

application of Euratom safeguards - Council/Commission statement.

 

• IAEA (1972). The structure and content of agreements between the Agency and States required in connection

 

 

with the treaty on the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons. INFCIRC/153. IAEA, Vienna.

 

• IAEA (1996). Issues in Radioactive Waste Disposal. IAEA-Tecdoc-909. IAEA, Vienna.

Other

• IAEA (2010). Technological Implications of International Safeguards for Geological Disposal of Spent Fuel and

information

 

Radioactive Waste. NW-T-1.21. IAEA, Vienna.

resources

• IAEA (2011). Model Integrated Safeguards Approach for a Geological Repository. IAEA Department of

 

 

Safeguards (SGCP-CCA) SG-PR-1306. IAEA, Vienna.

 

• IAEA (2017). Technologies Potentially Useful for Safeguarding Geological Repositories. ASTOR Group Report

 

 

2011-2016. STR-384. IAEA, Vienna.

 

• NEA (1995). Future human actions at disposal sites: a report from the NEA Working Group on Assessment of

 

 

Future Human Actions at Radioactive Waste Disposal Sites. OECD, Paris.

 

• Safeguards and verification | IAEA, see www.iaea.org/topics/safeguards-and-verification

Examples

• Safeguards to avoid misuse - European Commission, see https://ec.europa.eu/energy/en/topics/nuclear-

 

energy/safeguards-avoid-misuse

 

 

For a national example, see www.onr.org.uk/safeguards/index.htm

2.3.Mechanisms overview table

This annex provides an overview table of the way the different RK&M preservation mechanisms vary with regard to their key characteristics, based on the filled out tick boxes of the mechanism description sheets (Annex 2.2). It aids to visualise diversity among the key characteristics, which is fundamental to the idea of a systemic strategy.

This table can also be used as a practical tool to compare and combine approaches and mechanisms in such a way that, in order to achieve robustness, different mechanisms of a variety of approaches are selected (rows) that cover a variety of key characteristics (columns). The table can be downloaded in Excel format from the RK&M initiative website at www.oecdnea.org/rwm/rkm.

The limitations of the overview table are the following. The table only includes mechanism description components that were elaborated by using tick boxes in the mechanism description sheets (Annex 2.2). Establishing diversity with regard to involved actors and comparing main strengths/benefits and issues/challenges is thus a task for which the table does not offer visual assistance. The table also does not display the inter-connectedness among the mechanisms, which is the second fundamental of a systemic strategy.

PRESERVATION OF RK&M ACROSS GENERATIONS: FINAL REPORT OF THE RK&M INITIATIVE, NEA No. 7421, © OECD 2019

175

DESCRIPTIONS OF RK&M PRESERVATION MECHANISMS

176

PRESERVATION OF RK&M ACROSS GENERATIONS: FINAL REPORT OF THE RK&M INITIATIVE, NEA No. 7421, © OECD 2019

Соседние файлы в папке книги