
- •Final Report of the RK&M Initiative
- •Foreword
- •Acknowledgements
- •Table of contents
- •List of figures
- •List of tables
- •List of abbreviations and acronyms
- •The glossary of terms of records, knowledge and memory (RK&M) preservation
- •Executive summary
- •Key findings and recommendations
- •Chapter 1. Introduction
- •1.1. Background and scope of the RK&M initiative
- •The formulation of a dedicated initiative under the aegis of the RWMC
- •Modus operandi of the RK&M initiative
- •Key questions and objectives of the RK&M initiative
- •A product and process-oriented initiative
- •The fields of application and target audiences of the RK&M initiative
- •1.2. Evolutions in RK&M preservation thinking: A historical review
- •The RK&M reference bibliography
- •Popular themes in RK&M preservation literature
- •Landscape of Thorns
- •Atomic Priesthood
- •Summary of lessons learnt from the historical review
- •1.3. References
- •Chapter 2. RK&M preservation: Fundamentals
- •2.1. RK&M preservation and its connection to safety
- •The repository: From “seclusion and oblivion” to a societally embedded facility
- •Introducing the concept of oversight
- •2.2. Protecting humans and the environment
- •2.3. Supporting informed decision making
- •2.4. References
- •Chapter 3. RK&M preservation: Challenges and opportunities
- •3.1. Information life cycle management
- •3.2. Causes and consequences of RK&M loss
- •Lessons from RK&M loss in the nuclear field
- •Lessons from RK&M loss outside the nuclear field
- •3.3. RK&M preservation in a regulatory context
- •National RK&M preservation regulation
- •Planning responsibilities over time
- •International soft law
- •Regulation: a necessary condition for RK&M preservation
- •3.5. References
- •Chapter 4. Key characteristics of RK&M preservation approaches and mechanisms
- •4.1. Introducing the idea of a “systemic strategy” for RK&M preservation
- •4.2. Multiple time frames
- •The short term
- •The medium term
- •The long term
- •4.3. Multiple media
- •4.4. Multiple contents
- •4.5. Multiple transmission modes
- •4.6. Multiple actors
- •Multiple disciplines
- •Multiple interests, concerns and roles
- •4.7. Multiple locations
- •4.8. References
- •Chapter 5. RK&M preservation approaches and mechanisms
- •5.1. Introduction to the RK&M preservation “toolbox”
- •5.2. Dedicated record sets and summary files
- •5.3. Memory institutions
- •5.4. Markers
- •5.5. Time capsules
- •5.6. Culture, education and art
- •5.7. Knowledge management
- •5.8. Oversight provisions
- •5.9. International mechanisms
- •5.10. Regulatory framework
- •5.11. References
- •Chapter 6. Towards a systemic strategy for RK&M preservation
- •6.2. Meeting national needs
- •6.3. RK&M preservation starts today – life cycle thinking
- •6.4. RK&M preservation is an ongoing process
- •6.5. RK&M preservation is a participatory process
- •6.6. Illustration: Two fictional examples
- •Fictional example 1
- •Compliance activities
- •Best practice activities
- •Supporting activities
- •Fictional example 2
- •Compliance activities
- •Best practice activities
- •Supporting activities
- •6.7. References
- •Chapter 7. Conclusions and outlook
- •7.1. Conclusions
- •Embedding disposal facilities in society
- •Preventing inadvertent human intrusion and supporting informed decision making over time
- •Developing a systemic strategy for RK&M preservation
- •The importance of multi-disciplinarity and participation
- •7.2. Outlook
- •Upholding and elaborating an open and holistic attitude
- •Creating awareness, supporting engagement and starting RK&M preservation today
- •Developing international collaboration
- •7.3. Reference
- •Annex 1. RK&M glossary
- •Archive
- •Awareness
- •Control
- •Composite expressions
- •Cultural heritage
- •Data
- •Information
- •Knowledge
- •Composite expressions
- •Long term
- •Marker
- •Mediated/non-mediated transmission
- •Medium term
- •Memory
- •Message
- •Monument
- •Oversight
- •Record
- •Redundancy
- •Short term
- •Stakeholder
- •Systemic strategy
- •Very short term
- •References
- •Annex 2. Descriptions of RK&M preservation mechanisms
- •2.1. Mechanism description sheet: template
- •2.2. Mechanism description sheets
- •Dedicated record sets and summary files
- •Key information file (KIF)
- •Set of essential records (SER)
- •Memory institutions
- •Archives
- •Libraries
- •Museums
- •Markers
- •Surface markers
- •Monuments
- •Sub-surface markers
- •Deep geological markers
- •Surface traces
- •Time capsules
- •Large visible time capsules
- •Large invisible time capsules
- •Small time capsules
- •Culture, education and art
- •Industrial heritage
- •Alternative reuse of the disposal site/infrastructure
- •Heritage inventories and catalogues
- •Local history societies
- •Intangible cultural heritage
- •Education, research and training
- •Public information dissemination activities
- •Knowledge management
- •Knowledge retention tools
- •Knowledge risk analysis
- •Knowledge sharing philosophy
- •Oversight provisions
- •Monitoring
- •Land use control
- •Clear and planned responsibilities
- •International mechanisms
- •International regulations and agreements
- •International standards and guidelines
- •International inventories and catalogues
- •International co-operation
- •International education and training programmes
- •International archiving initiatives
- •Regulatory framework
- •National regulatory framework
- •Safeguards
- •2.3. Mechanisms overview table
- •Annex 3. Deliverables of the RK&M initiative
- •Workshop and conference proceedings
- •Studies
- •Reports
- •Website
- •Annex 4. Members and participating organisations of the RK&M initiative
- •NEA PUBLICATIONS AND INFORMATION

DESCRIPTIONS OF RK&M PRESERVATION MECHANISMS
Public information dissemination activities
Mechanism |
|
Public information dissemination activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approach |
|
Culture, Education and Art |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
This element generically refers to the dissemination of information on nuclear energy, ionising radiation, |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Definition/description |
|
RWM and related topics through a large variety of media, including exhibitions, publications (from |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
historical and scientific works to comics), websites, information sessions, documentary films and other |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
media, directed at the general public. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
How does this |
|
A large variety of information is available on nuclear energy, ionising radiation and RWM, disseminated |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
via various media (from leaflets to reports to online interviews to documentaries), from various sources |
||||||||||||||||||||||
mechanism contribute |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(from nuclear lobby to protest groups to open source platforms). Information centres dedicated to |
||||||||||||||||||||||
to RK&M preservation/ |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
radioactivity and/or RWM are often part of radioactive waste disposal projects, then constituting a |
||||||||||||||||||||||
How can it be |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
particular information dissemination activity that links knowledge to the site and supports memory of |
||||||||||||||||||||||
implemented? |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
the disposal facility. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Does the mechanism mainly preserve information, records, knowledge, memory, or awareness? |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Information: |
|
|
|
Records: |
|
Knowledge: X |
Memory: |
|
Awareness: |
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Public information dissemination activities mainly target the preservation of knowledge about RWM and |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
specific disposal projects for the general public. Information is shared and thereby preserved to a certain, |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
limited degree. Memory of disposal activities may also be supported. |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
What is the level of detail addressed/provided by the mechanism? |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Low level of detail: X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High level of detail: |
|
|
|
|||||||||
Scope |
|
Compared with expert knowledge, the level of detail addressed here is low. |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
What is the main geographical or administrative-political scope |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
(development/implementation/operation) of the mechanism? On which scale does the mechanism |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
notably enable RK&M preservation? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
[Note also the field “International dimension” further below.] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
Local: X |
|
Regional: X |
National: X |
|
International: |
|
|
Virtual: |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
Public information dissemination activities may foster RK&M preservation on the local, regional or |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
national level. Also the organisation of these activities may come from the local, regional or national |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
level. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Which timescale(s) is this mechanism mainly aimed at (target timescale)? |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Long term: |
|
|
|
Medium term: |
|
|
Short term: X |
|
Very short term: X |
||||||||||||
|
|
Information dissemination activities are expected to be organised mainly during the (pre-)operational |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
phase. They may continue in the post-closure phase. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
When should this mechanism be implemented? This may or may not be equal to the target timescale. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Timescales |
|
Pre-operational: X |
|
|
|
|
|
Operational: X |
|
Pre-closure: |
|
Post-closure: |
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For information dissemination activities, the implementation timescale is equal to the target timescale. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
When should this mechanism be developed? This may or may not be equal to the implementation |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
timescale. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Done: X |
|
Pre-operational: |
Operational: |
|
|
|
Pre-closure: |
|
|
Post-closure: |
|||||||||||
|
|
Public information dissemination activities, as concepts, readily exist. The conceptualisation and |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
planning of individual events can be considered part of their implementation. |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Should the mechanism be implemented intentionally (e.g. time capsules) or is its emergence largely |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
unintentional (e.g. surface traces) or can it not be fully controlled (e.g. art work)? |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
Intentional: X |
|
|
|
|
|
Unintentional: |
|
Cannot be controlled: |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Organisations formally involved in RWM may organise public information dissemination activities |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
according to a pre-defined information policy that may take RK&M preservation considerations into |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
account. Additionally, other players may use this mechanism according to the topical matters of the |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
moment. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Characteristics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Is the mechanism mainly tangible or intangible? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
Tangible: X |
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible: X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
Information is intangible, but supported by tangible carriers, such as exhibitions, brochures, etc. Either of |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
these may be actively disseminated. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Does the mechanism mainly rely on mediated transmission or non-mediated transmission? |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
Mediated transmission: X |
|
|
|
Non-mediated transmission: |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
Public information dissemination activities are a form of mediated transmission. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Information dissemination activities can be performed under the responsibility of many different actors: |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
the regulator and implementing agency at the time of repository siting, construction and operation, |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Actors |
|
local/regional/national government, local information committees, other public/private organisations at |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
the local, regional and national level. Information will also be disseminated by actors without a “formal” |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
responsibility, such as documentary makers, protest groups, journalists, workers, researchers, etc. |
PRESERVATION OF RK&M ACROSS GENERATIONS: FINAL REPORT OF THE RK&M INITIATIVE, NEA No. 7421, © OECD 2019 |
143 |

DESCRIPTIONS OF RK&M PRESERVATION MECHANISMS
Mechanism |
|
Public information dissemination activities |
|
|
|
|
|
All types of dissemination activities that raise the level of awareness and understanding about RWM in |
Main |
|
general and disposal projects in particular support RK&M transfer and preservation. |
|
Different information dissemination media have different strengths with regard to their scope, impact |
|
strengths/benefits |
|
|
|
and longevity. E.g. governmental and scientific publications have the potential to remain accessible over |
|
|
|
|
|
|
many decades, while videos posted on social media have the potential to reach large groups of people. |
|
|
Information must be collected and presented in a way that is appropriate and understandable for the |
|
|
public, and opinions on appropriateness and understandability vary. Technocracy and expertocracy are |
Specific |
|
a challenge, as is polarisation (although for the sake of awareness alone, polarisation might be seen as a |
|
benefit). |
|
issues/challenges |
|
|
|
Particular care must be taken to use media and formats that are attractive to young people. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The need for simplification may not be compatible with the dissemination of information on complex |
|
|
technical issues. |
|
|
|
International |
|
Internet, films, documentaries, international publications, open source media, etc. have international |
dimension |
|
outreach. |
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated repository records: KIF |
Connection to other |
|
Culture, education and art: alternative reuse of the disposal site/infrastructure; education, research and |
approaches/ |
|
training; art |
mechanisms |
|
Regulatory framework: e.g. regulations related to the right to access to environmental information |
|
|
Memory institutions: libraries. |
Information resources |
|
|
issued by the RK&M |
|
— |
initiative |
|
|
|
|
|
Other information |
|
Stilgoe, J. & Lock, S. (2014). Why should we promote public engagement with science? Public |
resources |
|
Understanding of Science, 23(1), pp. 4 – 15. |
|
|
• Exhibition "De Homer à Oppenheimer", Palais de la Découverte, Paris, 03.12.2013–08.06.2014 |
|
|
www.palais-decouverte.fr/fr/ressources/expositions-passees/la-radioactivite-de-homer-a- |
|
|
oppenheimer-exposition-terminee/ |
|
|
• Hadermann J.; Issler H.; Zurkinden A. (2014): Die nukleare Entsorgung in der Schweiz 1945-2006. Von |
Examples |
|
den Anfängen bis zum Entsorgungsnachweis [Nuclear waste management in Switzerland: From the |
|
beginnings to the demonstration of disposal feasibility]. Verlag Neue Zürcher Zeitung NZZ, Zürich (in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
German) |
|
|
• The Belgian implementing agency NIRAS/ONDRAF publishes a biannual magazine for the broad |
|
|
public and triannual newspaper distributed in the region of the central interim storage facilities. |
|
|
www.niras.be/general-publications |
Art
Mechanism |
|
Art |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approach |
|
Culture, Education and Art |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This broad mechanism includes public art, visual arts (drawing, painting, sculpture, photography, video, |
||||
Definition/description |
|
filmmaking, internet art), socially engaged art, design, craft, architecture, music, performing arts (dance, |
||||
|
|
theatre) and literature inspired by nuclear (waste) culture. |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The nuclear field has been a source of inspiration for many artists, producing artworks exhibited in public |
||||
|
|
space, museums, preserved in public collections and documented in publications. Art can support RK&M |
||||
|
|
preservation as it can help and stimulate the exploration of speculative futures and the visualisation of |
||||
|
|
the immaterial and invisible (see Carpenter, 2016 and NEA, 2015, pp. 110-136). |
|
|||
How does this |
|
Works of art may be commissioned to respond to a particular nuclear site, to engage a local community, |
||||
mechanism contribute |
|
make public nuclear archives, facilitate interdisciplinary dialogue or convey a particular message. As |
||||
to RK&M preservation/ |
|
such, art may relay cultural knowledge, information or awareness from one generation to another or aim |
||||
How can it be |
|
to communicate directly to the future. |
|
|
|
|
implemented? |
|
Art competitions can be a useful tool to collect new ideas and provide multiple perspectives on RK&M |
||||
|
|
preservation and RWM. If the proposals are published and archived and the artworks executed and |
||||
|
|
preserved, they also contribute directly to RK&M preservation. |
|
|
||
|
|
A “Percent for Art” scheme can be implemented, where from the start of the project some percentage of |
||||
|
|
the project cost is set aside to fund and install public art. |
|
|
||
|
|
Does the mechanism mainly preserve information, records, knowledge, memory, or awareness? |
||||
Scope |
|
Information: |
Records: |
Knowledge: |
Memory: X |
Awareness: X |
|
Art contributes to preserving memory and awareness. It also aims to preserve cultural knowledge related |
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
to the repository and RWM in general. Artworks themselves, when kept with the appropriate context, |
||||
|
|
can be seen as a record. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
144 |
PRESERVATION OF RK&M ACROSS GENERATIONS: FINAL REPORT OF THE RK&M INITIATIVE, NEA No. 7421, © OECD 2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DESCRIPTIONS OF RK&M PRESERVATION MECHANISMS |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mechanism |
|
Art |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What is the level of detail addressed/provided by the mechanism? |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
Low level of detail: X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High level of detail: |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
With respect to radioactivity and radioactive waste disposal, art would normally be expected to transmit |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
messages with low levels of detail. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
What is the main geographical or administrative-political scope |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Scope |
|
(development/implementation/operation) of the mechanism? On which scale does the mechanism |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
notably enable RK&M preservation? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
[Note also the field “International dimension” further below.] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
Local: |
|
Regional: X |
|
National: X |
|
International: X |
|
Virtual: X |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
If not connected to a building or monument (cf. the respective mechanisms), art is most often not |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
connected to a site, but could be displayed, performed, etc. at various places. In this sense, art works on a |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
national, international and virtual scale. Museums with permanent exhibitions may have a regional (or |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
even national) influence. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
Which timescale(s) is this mechanism mainly aimed at (target timescale)? |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
Long term: |
|
|
Medium term: X |
|
Short term: X |
Very short term: |
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
Although the focus of art is on the timescale of decades or centuries, it can also address RK&M creation |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
and transfer in the very short term, and its influence may extend to the long term. |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
When should this mechanism be implemented? This may or may not be equal to the target timescale. |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Pre-operational: |
|
|
|
|
Operational: X |
|
|
Pre-closure: X |
|
|
Post-closure: |
|
|||||
|
Timescales |
|
The making of individual pieces of art in the repository context may peak in the operational phase. |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
Preliminary work for RK&M preservation purposes, supported before the repository is operated, may be |
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
considered as part of the concept development (see hereunder). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
When should this mechanism be developed? This may or may not be equal to the implementation |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
timescale. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Done: X |
Pre-operational: X |
Operational: X |
|
Pre-closure: |
|
|
Post-closure: |
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
The concept of Art as a means to foster knowledge and memory already exists. But as a component of a |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
strategy it may still be further developed. The making of individual pieces of art is considered here as |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
implementation (see above). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
Should the mechanism be implemented intentionally (e.g. time capsules) or is its emergence largely |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
unintentional (e.g. surface traces) or can it not be fully controlled (e.g. art work)? |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Intentional: X |
|
|
|
|
Unintentional: |
|
|
|
|
Cannot be controlled: X |
|
||||||
|
|
|
As an intentional RK&M preservation mechanism, works of art may be commissioned, art competitions |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
can be organised and a “Percent for Art” scheme can be implemented. Apart from that, it cannot be |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
controlled. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Is the mechanism mainly tangible or intangible? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Characteristics |
|
Tangible: X |
|
|
|
|
Intangible: X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
This mechanism covers both tangible (e.g. visual arts, literature) and intangible (e.g. performance art, |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
dance) art. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Does the mechanism mainly rely on mediated transmission or non-mediated transmission? |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Mediated transmission: X |
|
|
Non-mediated transmission: X |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
Art may operate as mediated transmission relaying cultural knowledge, information or awareness from one |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
generation to another; or as non-mediated transmission producing cultural artefacts and public artworks |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
(e.g. in the form of markers) which intend to communicate a message directly to a future audience. |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Actors |
|
Works of art may be commissioned from artists and artist collectives, e.g. by the implementing agency, a |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
museum, public arts organisation, local community or heritage organisation, at a local, regional, national |
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
and international level. A dedicated, interand transdisciplinary committee could be set up. |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Visual arts are a powerful means for mediation with the public. They can help expand awareness of |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
radioactive waste issues to a large public, and may act as an introduction or a pointer to more specific |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
information. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depending on the type of artwork and media, visual art may document changing perceptions of RWM |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
and bring together academic research and professional knowledge from different disciplines and |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Main |
|
industrial sectors, engaging diverse parts of the population over many years. |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
Non-linguistic communication avoids the drawbacks associated with languages (translation, |
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
strengths/benefits |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
obsolescence, etc.), has the potential to deliver complex ideas and messages, and include archive and |
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
documentary material. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
Contemporary visual art is concerned with critical awareness of visual culture, landscape, architecture |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
exploring conceptual and invisible concerns such as radiation and geological disposal. |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Artists are also experimenting with durable sustainable formats such as distributed online networks, |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
microfiche, land-art, gesso and stone carving. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Specific |
|
Very often, the primary purpose of art is neither to last nor to inform, and artistic freedom is highly valued. |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
Art with the dedicated goal of RK&M preservation should thus preferably be specifically commissioned in |
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
issues/challenges |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
partnership with art museums and agencies. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PRESERVATION OF RK&M ACROSS GENERATIONS: FINAL REPORT OF THE RK&M INITIATIVE, NEA No. 7421, © OECD 2019 |
145 |

DESCRIPTIONS OF RK&M PRESERVATION MECHANISMS
Mechanism |
|
Art |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The level of public engagement, and the message delivered, may vary greatly, and their impact may be |
|
|
|
experienced many years after production. |
|
|
|
When the work of art is created to convey a specific message, this message can be very basic (“Danger!”) or |
|
|
|
very complex, such as “the psychic haunting” of radiation. As non-verbal communication is typically vague |
|
|
|
and imprecise, it allows multiple readings and cannot be completely culture-independent. |
|
Specific |
|
Art works relying on verbal communication, such as films, poetry or novels, may not be understood after a |
|
|
certain period of time. |
||
issues/challenges |
|
||
|
Works of art placed in the public space serve an aesthetic and symbolic function. They are typically subject |
||
|
|
||
|
|
to the opinion of the public and may be removed if they no longer correspond to the prevailing taste. They |
|
|
|
may also become political symbols and be destroyed for that reason. |
|
|
|
The media, materials and processes used in visual arts have a direct impact on their longevity. For some |
|
|
|
types of works, such as films, videos or computer art, specific equipment or software is necessary, and needs |
|
|
|
to be preserved to support the artwork. |
|
International |
|
Art is typically able to deliver messages to an international audience. Various international art platforms exist |
|
dimension |
|
(e.g. international art festivals). |
|
Connection to other |
|
Memory Institutions: Museums |
|
|
Culture, Education and Art: Industrial Heritage; Alternative Reuse of the Disposal Site/Infrastructure; |
||
approaches/ |
|
||
|
Intangible cultural heritage |
||
mechanisms |
|
||
|
Markers |
||
|
|
||
|
|
• NEA (2015), Radioactive Waste Management and Constructing Memory for Future Generations. Proceedings |
|
|
|
|
of the International Conference and Debate, 15-17 September, 2014, Verdun, France. Part III: Contributions |
Information resources |
|
|
from Artists and Posters. pp. 109-136. OECD, Paris. |
|
• H. Codée & E. Verhoef, Using art, stories and cultural heritage to preserve knowledge and memory. In: NEA |
||
issued by the RK&M |
|
|
(2015), Radioactive Waste Management and Constructing Memory for Future Generations: Proceedings of the |
initiative |
|
|
|
|
|
International Conference and Debate - 15-17 September 2014, Verdun, France, p. 55 (explaining how, in the |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Netherlands, COVRA collaborates with regional museums by acting as a storage facility for collections |
|
|
|
that are not on display), OECD, Paris. |
|
|
• Anderson, K. (2005), Designing for deep time: how art history is used to mark nuclear waste. A thesis |
|
|
|
|
submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Theory, Criticism |
|
|
|
and History of Art, Design and Architecture within the joint degree M.S./M.F.A. program School of Art and |
Other information |
|
• |
Design Pratt Institute October 2005. www.kellianderson.com/MSthesis.pdf |
resources |
|
http://nuclear.artscatalyst.org/ |
|
|
|
• Carpenter, E. (Ed.) (2016). The Nuclear Culture Source Book. Black Dog Publishing, London. |
|
|
|
• Graham, N., Zook, K., Wilkinson, J., Pietrzak, A. (2018). Nuclear, Landmarker for a Waste Isolation Site: |
|
|
|
|
International Architecture Competition. WM2018 Conference, Phoenix, Arizona, USA. |
|
|
• Markers designed for WIPP (Landscape of Thorns, Menacing earthworks, Spike field, etc.) |
|
|
|
|
www.wipp.energy.gov/picsprog/articles/wipp exhibit message to 12,000 a_d.htm |
|
|
• Andra’s programme on visual arts e.g. www.andra.fr/memoire-et-art/reglement_appel.pdf |
|
|
|
• |
www.cecilemassart.com/ |
|
|
• Films such as “Into Eternity”, “Containment”, “Journey to the safest place on earth” |
|
|
|
• Erich Berger and Mari Keto, “Inheritance” http://inheritance-project.net/ |
|
|
|
• Thomson & Craighead, “Temporary Index”. This project is about creating a series of real-time numeric |
|
|
|
|
counters expressing radioactive decay. Each display will countdown in seconds, showing the time |
|
|
|
remaining before the given item of waste or a particular site is considered to be safe. As a first step, data |
|
|
|
projections have been displayed in art galleries. The next step will be to establish a network of these |
|
|
|
counters online, which can later be attached to places such as Google Earth. Ultimately, possibilities of |
|
|
|
building semi-permanent physical counters in the places referred to will be investigated, with a view to |
|
|
|
making them self (solar) powered. See www.thomson-craighead.net/temporary_index.html |
|
|
• Nuclear Culture project: http://nuclear.artscatalyst.org/ |
|
Examples |
|
• The Center for Land Use Interpretation: www.clui.org/ |
|
|
• Schemes such as Percent for Art: 1% of the total project costs are allocated to the development of public |
||
|
|
|
artwork. The advantage of this scheme is that the real costs of artwork are accounted for at the very start |
|
|
|
of the project, rather than as an additional afterthought. This model could be very valuable for ensuring |
|
|
|
RK&M is implemented from the start. |
|
|
• Various works held in collections of Contemporary Art: Tate Gallery, UK; Museum of Modern Art, New |
|
|
|
|
York; Living Art Museum, Iceland. |
|
|
Examples of long-term art projects outside of the RWM field |
|
|
|
• The Long Now Foundation, established in 1996 to develop the 10,000 Year Clock and Library projects, |
|
|
|
|
including a “Rosetta disk” (a nickel disk micro-etched with information in thousands of languages), as well |
|
|
|
as to become the seed of a very long-term cultural institution. The Long Now Foundation hopes to |
|
|
|
provide a counterpoint to today's accelerating culture and help make long-term thinking more common. |
|
|
|
http://longnow.org/ |
|
|
• Jem Finer, Long Player, London. A 1000 yearlong composition, started in 1999, scheduled to end in 2999. |
|
|
|
|
https://longplayer.org/ |
|
|
• Organ/ASLSP (As SLow aS Possible). www.aslsp.org/de/ |
146 |
PRESERVATION OF RK&M ACROSS GENERATIONS: FINAL REPORT OF THE RK&M INITIATIVE, NEA No. 7421, © OECD 2019 |