
- •Final Report of the RK&M Initiative
- •Foreword
- •Acknowledgements
- •Table of contents
- •List of figures
- •List of tables
- •List of abbreviations and acronyms
- •The glossary of terms of records, knowledge and memory (RK&M) preservation
- •Executive summary
- •Key findings and recommendations
- •Chapter 1. Introduction
- •1.1. Background and scope of the RK&M initiative
- •The formulation of a dedicated initiative under the aegis of the RWMC
- •Modus operandi of the RK&M initiative
- •Key questions and objectives of the RK&M initiative
- •A product and process-oriented initiative
- •The fields of application and target audiences of the RK&M initiative
- •1.2. Evolutions in RK&M preservation thinking: A historical review
- •The RK&M reference bibliography
- •Popular themes in RK&M preservation literature
- •Landscape of Thorns
- •Atomic Priesthood
- •Summary of lessons learnt from the historical review
- •1.3. References
- •Chapter 2. RK&M preservation: Fundamentals
- •2.1. RK&M preservation and its connection to safety
- •The repository: From “seclusion and oblivion” to a societally embedded facility
- •Introducing the concept of oversight
- •2.2. Protecting humans and the environment
- •2.3. Supporting informed decision making
- •2.4. References
- •Chapter 3. RK&M preservation: Challenges and opportunities
- •3.1. Information life cycle management
- •3.2. Causes and consequences of RK&M loss
- •Lessons from RK&M loss in the nuclear field
- •Lessons from RK&M loss outside the nuclear field
- •3.3. RK&M preservation in a regulatory context
- •National RK&M preservation regulation
- •Planning responsibilities over time
- •International soft law
- •Regulation: a necessary condition for RK&M preservation
- •3.5. References
- •Chapter 4. Key characteristics of RK&M preservation approaches and mechanisms
- •4.1. Introducing the idea of a “systemic strategy” for RK&M preservation
- •4.2. Multiple time frames
- •The short term
- •The medium term
- •The long term
- •4.3. Multiple media
- •4.4. Multiple contents
- •4.5. Multiple transmission modes
- •4.6. Multiple actors
- •Multiple disciplines
- •Multiple interests, concerns and roles
- •4.7. Multiple locations
- •4.8. References
- •Chapter 5. RK&M preservation approaches and mechanisms
- •5.1. Introduction to the RK&M preservation “toolbox”
- •5.2. Dedicated record sets and summary files
- •5.3. Memory institutions
- •5.4. Markers
- •5.5. Time capsules
- •5.6. Culture, education and art
- •5.7. Knowledge management
- •5.8. Oversight provisions
- •5.9. International mechanisms
- •5.10. Regulatory framework
- •5.11. References
- •Chapter 6. Towards a systemic strategy for RK&M preservation
- •6.2. Meeting national needs
- •6.3. RK&M preservation starts today – life cycle thinking
- •6.4. RK&M preservation is an ongoing process
- •6.5. RK&M preservation is a participatory process
- •6.6. Illustration: Two fictional examples
- •Fictional example 1
- •Compliance activities
- •Best practice activities
- •Supporting activities
- •Fictional example 2
- •Compliance activities
- •Best practice activities
- •Supporting activities
- •6.7. References
- •Chapter 7. Conclusions and outlook
- •7.1. Conclusions
- •Embedding disposal facilities in society
- •Preventing inadvertent human intrusion and supporting informed decision making over time
- •Developing a systemic strategy for RK&M preservation
- •The importance of multi-disciplinarity and participation
- •7.2. Outlook
- •Upholding and elaborating an open and holistic attitude
- •Creating awareness, supporting engagement and starting RK&M preservation today
- •Developing international collaboration
- •7.3. Reference
- •Annex 1. RK&M glossary
- •Archive
- •Awareness
- •Control
- •Composite expressions
- •Cultural heritage
- •Data
- •Information
- •Knowledge
- •Composite expressions
- •Long term
- •Marker
- •Mediated/non-mediated transmission
- •Medium term
- •Memory
- •Message
- •Monument
- •Oversight
- •Record
- •Redundancy
- •Short term
- •Stakeholder
- •Systemic strategy
- •Very short term
- •References
- •Annex 2. Descriptions of RK&M preservation mechanisms
- •2.1. Mechanism description sheet: template
- •2.2. Mechanism description sheets
- •Dedicated record sets and summary files
- •Key information file (KIF)
- •Set of essential records (SER)
- •Memory institutions
- •Archives
- •Libraries
- •Museums
- •Markers
- •Surface markers
- •Monuments
- •Sub-surface markers
- •Deep geological markers
- •Surface traces
- •Time capsules
- •Large visible time capsules
- •Large invisible time capsules
- •Small time capsules
- •Culture, education and art
- •Industrial heritage
- •Alternative reuse of the disposal site/infrastructure
- •Heritage inventories and catalogues
- •Local history societies
- •Intangible cultural heritage
- •Education, research and training
- •Public information dissemination activities
- •Knowledge management
- •Knowledge retention tools
- •Knowledge risk analysis
- •Knowledge sharing philosophy
- •Oversight provisions
- •Monitoring
- •Land use control
- •Clear and planned responsibilities
- •International mechanisms
- •International regulations and agreements
- •International standards and guidelines
- •International inventories and catalogues
- •International co-operation
- •International education and training programmes
- •International archiving initiatives
- •Regulatory framework
- •National regulatory framework
- •Safeguards
- •2.3. Mechanisms overview table
- •Annex 3. Deliverables of the RK&M initiative
- •Workshop and conference proceedings
- •Studies
- •Reports
- •Website
- •Annex 4. Members and participating organisations of the RK&M initiative
- •NEA PUBLICATIONS AND INFORMATION

DESCRIPTIONS OF RK&M PRESERVATION MECHANISMS
Mechanism |
|
Large, invisible time capsules |
|
|
|
|
|
Large, invisible time capsules can be designed to be robust, immobile and long-lasting. They are better |
|
|
protected from environmental factors, such as erosion by wind and rain, and from human threats, such |
|
|
as theft and vandalism, than those at the surface. Some time capsules have planned lifetimes of more |
|
|
than 6000 years. They are thus fit for non-mediated transmission aimed at the long term. |
Main |
|
The time capsule concept is well developed and “ready-to-go”. |
|
The opening of the (control) capsule at regular intervals provides the basis for a recurring ritual, as well |
|
strengths/benefits |
|
|
|
as the opportunity to apply the most recent preservation techniques for improving the longevity of its |
|
|
|
|
|
|
content and potentially arresting or reversing degradation. |
|
|
Overall, time capsules have to potential to be well-integrated to other mechanisms within a systemic |
|
|
approach (see also below), but they can ultimately also preserve an RK&M function should other |
|
|
mechanisms have failed. |
|
|
|
|
|
Large, invisible time capsules may be expensive to develop and install, and may quite quickly be seen as |
Specific |
|
anachronistic. Quality control related to their content over time cannot be assured. The relevance and |
|
interpretability of their content cannot be guaranteed over time, especially in the case of non-mediated |
|
issues/challenges |
|
|
|
transmission. The existence of invisible time capsules may be forgotten over time and they may be |
|
|
|
|
|
|
missed by potential inadvertent intruders. |
International |
|
There is general interest in time capsules across the international community (and a number of informal |
|
associations, such as the International Time Capsule Society). Large time capsule projects are discussed |
|
dimension |
|
|
|
and registered internationally. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Markers: Sub-surface markers; Monuments (time capsules can be seen as a particular type of sub-marker |
|
|
themselves and they can also work together with other markers, e.g. when surface markers or monuments |
|
|
point to them) |
|
|
Memory Institutions: Archives (a maintained time capsule containing records can be seen as a sort of archive |
Connection to other |
|
or a complement to traditional archives) |
approaches/ |
|
International Mechanisms (international time capsule societies and registers exist) |
mechanisms |
|
Dedicated Repository Records: SER; KIF (can be included in a time capsule) |
|
|
Culture, Education and Art: Local history societies (can be involved with the content of time capsules); |
|
|
Intangible cultural heritage (openings can be part of commemorations or rituals) |
|
|
Oversight (maintained time capsules can form part of oversight activities and oversight information can be |
|
|
included in their content) |
|
|
|
Information resources |
|
• Pescatore, C. and Van Luik, A. (2016), Millennial Time Capsules as a Promising Means for Preserving |
issued by the RK&M |
|
Records for Future Generations. Waste Management Conference, Phoenix, Arizona, USA. WM |
initiative |
|
Symposia, USA |
|
|
|
Other information |
|
• Jarvis, W. E. (2003). Time Capsules: a cultural history. McFarland & Co., Inc. Jefferson, North Carolina. |
|
• The International Time Capsule Society (ITCS), see https://crypt.oglethorpe.edu/international-time- |
|
resources |
|
|
|
capsule-society. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Westinghouse Time Capsules, created for the 1939 and 1964 World’s Fairs respectively. Both are |
Examples |
|
buried 50 feet below Flushing Meadows–Corona Park in New York. They are to be opened in the year |
|
6939, five thousand years after the first capsule was sealed. See |
|
|
|
|
|
|
https://archive.org/details/storyofwestingho00pendrich |
|
|
|
Small time capsules
Mechanism |
|
Small time capsules |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approach |
|
Time capsules |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This mechanism refers to small, purpose-built, sealed enclosures containing a cache of information items |
||||
Definition/description |
|
(which can include short documents as well as small objects). They would be buried between the ground |
||||
|
level and the disposal horizon and/or in the outer parts of the repository, or they can be integrated into |
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
e.g. a monument or surface marker. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Small time capsules at the disposal site would aim to create awareness of the repository upon their |
||||
How does this |
|
discovery and to transfer the information they preserve upon their opening. They would probably be |
||||
|
placed underground, in the disposal facility openings and access ways, at depths ranging from the |
|||||
mechanism contribute |
|
|||||
|
disposal horizon to the top of the defined “barrier strata” that make up the host geology. They would |
|||||
to RK&M preservation/ |
|
|||||
|
work in a similar manner to small sub-surface and small deep geological markers, with the difference |
|||||
How can it be |
|
|||||
|
that their content would preserve more information than the inscriptions, design and distribution of |
|||||
implemented? |
|
|||||
|
sub-surface markers can preserve. They would notably be designed to be opened upon their discovery, |
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
rather than to be opened at regular intervals as part of a commemoration or ritual. |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scope |
|
Does the mechanism mainly preserve information, records, knowledge, memory, or awareness? |
||||
|
Information: X |
Records: X |
Knowledge: |
Memory: |
Awareness: |
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PRESERVATION OF RK&M ACROSS GENERATIONS: FINAL REPORT OF THE RK&M INITIATIVE, NEA No. 7421, © OECD 2019 |
129 |

DESCRIPTIONS OF RK&M PRESERVATION MECHANISMS
Mechanism |
|
Small time capsules |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Small time capsules have the potential to preserve relatively short records (e.g. the KIF). Additionally, |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
when opened they may contribute to the regeneration of some knowledge (when e.g. short |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
interpretable RWM or radiation protection guidelines or perhaps a small measurement device with a |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
short manual are discovered upon their opening) and memory (by means of carrying contextual |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
information, a picture, a drawing, a newspaper article, small objects, etc). When placed below surface at |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
the disposal site, they may also serve in first instance as a small sub-surface marker to create awareness. |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
What is the level of detail addressed/provided by the mechanism? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Low level of detail: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High level of detail: X |
|||||||
|
|
Due to their size, the level of detail provided by small time capsules cannot be very detailed, but, due to |
|||||||||||||||||||
Scope |
|
the fact that they contain a cache of information, still relatively detailed compared to e.g. sub-surface |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
markers. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What is the main geographical or administrative-political scope |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
(development/implementation/operation) of the mechanism? On which scale does the mechanism |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
notably enable RK&M preservation? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
[Note also the field “International dimension” further below.] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
Local: X |
Regional: |
National: |
|
International: |
|
Virtual: |
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Small time capsules function on a local scale (i.e. upon discovery). If their discovery and opening would |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
be appreciated as a noteworthy event, their RK&M preservation scope may broaden to the national level. |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
For the purpose of recognition, copies may also be distributed more widely, e.g. to schools, displayed in |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
visitor centres. They may also have the potential to be elaborated virtually. |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
Which timescale(s) is this mechanism mainly aimed at (target timescale)? |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
Long term: X |
|
Medium term: X |
Short term: |
|
|
Very short term: |
|||||||||||||
|
|
Time capsules are typically designed for a minimum of 100 years, and some have planned lifetimes of |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
more than 6 000 years. They can work as a mechanism for the long term, when oversight would have |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
been lost, and/or they can support oversight activities during the medium term. |
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
When should this mechanism be implemented? This may or may not be equal to the target timescale. |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
Pre-operational: |
|
|
|
Operational: X |
|
|
Pre-closure: X |
|
|
Post-closure: X |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Timescales |
|
Small time capsules can be designed into the excavated access ways (shafts and tunnels) of the |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
repository and its surrounding environment during the operational phase and at the early stage of |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
closure activities. They can also be installed below surface in the early post-closure phase. |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
When should this mechanism be developed? This may or may not be equal to the implementation |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
timescale. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Done: |
|
Pre-operational: X |
|
Operational: X |
|
Pre-closure: X |
|
Post-closure: |
|||||||||||
|
|
Small, invisible time capsules already exist, but they have not yet been applied within the context of |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
disposal projects. Time capsules would need to be developed during the planning and operations of a |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
repository, before its closure. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
Should the mechanism be implemented intentionally (e.g. time capsules) or is its emergence largely |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
unintentional (e.g. surface traces) or can it not be fully controlled (e.g. art work)? |
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
Intentional: X |
|
|
|
Unintentional: |
|
|
|
|
Cannot be controlled: |
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
Time capsules are a clear example of intentional implementation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Is the mechanism mainly tangible or intangible? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Characteristics |
|
Tangible: X |
|
|
|
Intangible: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
Small time capsules and their content are tangible. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
Does the mechanism mainly rely on mediated transmission or non-mediated transmission? |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
Mediated transmission: |
|
|
Non-mediated transmission: X |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Small time capsules would normally function as a non-mediated transmission mechanism aimed to |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
reach future generations directly, without relying on the presence of intermediaries. |
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
The implementing agency could explicitly plan for the installation of small time capsules at the disposal |
|||||||||||||||||||
Actors |
|
site, working alongside the host community and local authorities, and involving multiple disciplines |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
(historians, material scientists, etc.). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
Small time capsules can be designed to be robust and long-lasting. Being buried they are well protected |
|||||||||||||||||||
Main strengths/ |
|
from environmental factors, such as erosion by wind and rain, and from human threats, such as theft and |
|||||||||||||||||||
benefits |
|
vandalism. Their proximity to the repository can be seen as an advantage with regard to indicating and |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
informing about its presence and nature. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Long-term erosion or major geomorphological changes could be disruptive to small time capsules. |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Slow degradation of the time capsule content may obscure or distort the information it carries. |
|||||||||||||||||||
Specific issues/ |
|
Amateur archaeologists, acting as “trophy hunters”, may excavate the site for small buried time capsules. |
|||||||||||||||||||
challenges |
|
They should not interfere with the safety functions of isolation and containment nor change the |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
conditions of the repository environment. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
Small time capsules may be missed by a potential inadvertent intruder. |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130 |
PRESERVATION OF RK&M ACROSS GENERATIONS: FINAL REPORT OF THE RK&M INITIATIVE, NEA No. 7421, © OECD 2019 |