
- •Final Report of the RK&M Initiative
- •Foreword
- •Acknowledgements
- •Table of contents
- •List of figures
- •List of tables
- •List of abbreviations and acronyms
- •The glossary of terms of records, knowledge and memory (RK&M) preservation
- •Executive summary
- •Key findings and recommendations
- •Chapter 1. Introduction
- •1.1. Background and scope of the RK&M initiative
- •The formulation of a dedicated initiative under the aegis of the RWMC
- •Modus operandi of the RK&M initiative
- •Key questions and objectives of the RK&M initiative
- •A product and process-oriented initiative
- •The fields of application and target audiences of the RK&M initiative
- •1.2. Evolutions in RK&M preservation thinking: A historical review
- •The RK&M reference bibliography
- •Popular themes in RK&M preservation literature
- •Landscape of Thorns
- •Atomic Priesthood
- •Summary of lessons learnt from the historical review
- •1.3. References
- •Chapter 2. RK&M preservation: Fundamentals
- •2.1. RK&M preservation and its connection to safety
- •The repository: From “seclusion and oblivion” to a societally embedded facility
- •Introducing the concept of oversight
- •2.2. Protecting humans and the environment
- •2.3. Supporting informed decision making
- •2.4. References
- •Chapter 3. RK&M preservation: Challenges and opportunities
- •3.1. Information life cycle management
- •3.2. Causes and consequences of RK&M loss
- •Lessons from RK&M loss in the nuclear field
- •Lessons from RK&M loss outside the nuclear field
- •3.3. RK&M preservation in a regulatory context
- •National RK&M preservation regulation
- •Planning responsibilities over time
- •International soft law
- •Regulation: a necessary condition for RK&M preservation
- •3.5. References
- •Chapter 4. Key characteristics of RK&M preservation approaches and mechanisms
- •4.1. Introducing the idea of a “systemic strategy” for RK&M preservation
- •4.2. Multiple time frames
- •The short term
- •The medium term
- •The long term
- •4.3. Multiple media
- •4.4. Multiple contents
- •4.5. Multiple transmission modes
- •4.6. Multiple actors
- •Multiple disciplines
- •Multiple interests, concerns and roles
- •4.7. Multiple locations
- •4.8. References
- •Chapter 5. RK&M preservation approaches and mechanisms
- •5.1. Introduction to the RK&M preservation “toolbox”
- •5.2. Dedicated record sets and summary files
- •5.3. Memory institutions
- •5.4. Markers
- •5.5. Time capsules
- •5.6. Culture, education and art
- •5.7. Knowledge management
- •5.8. Oversight provisions
- •5.9. International mechanisms
- •5.10. Regulatory framework
- •5.11. References
- •Chapter 6. Towards a systemic strategy for RK&M preservation
- •6.2. Meeting national needs
- •6.3. RK&M preservation starts today – life cycle thinking
- •6.4. RK&M preservation is an ongoing process
- •6.5. RK&M preservation is a participatory process
- •6.6. Illustration: Two fictional examples
- •Fictional example 1
- •Compliance activities
- •Best practice activities
- •Supporting activities
- •Fictional example 2
- •Compliance activities
- •Best practice activities
- •Supporting activities
- •6.7. References
- •Chapter 7. Conclusions and outlook
- •7.1. Conclusions
- •Embedding disposal facilities in society
- •Preventing inadvertent human intrusion and supporting informed decision making over time
- •Developing a systemic strategy for RK&M preservation
- •The importance of multi-disciplinarity and participation
- •7.2. Outlook
- •Upholding and elaborating an open and holistic attitude
- •Creating awareness, supporting engagement and starting RK&M preservation today
- •Developing international collaboration
- •7.3. Reference
- •Annex 1. RK&M glossary
- •Archive
- •Awareness
- •Control
- •Composite expressions
- •Cultural heritage
- •Data
- •Information
- •Knowledge
- •Composite expressions
- •Long term
- •Marker
- •Mediated/non-mediated transmission
- •Medium term
- •Memory
- •Message
- •Monument
- •Oversight
- •Record
- •Redundancy
- •Short term
- •Stakeholder
- •Systemic strategy
- •Very short term
- •References
- •Annex 2. Descriptions of RK&M preservation mechanisms
- •2.1. Mechanism description sheet: template
- •2.2. Mechanism description sheets
- •Dedicated record sets and summary files
- •Key information file (KIF)
- •Set of essential records (SER)
- •Memory institutions
- •Archives
- •Libraries
- •Museums
- •Markers
- •Surface markers
- •Monuments
- •Sub-surface markers
- •Deep geological markers
- •Surface traces
- •Time capsules
- •Large visible time capsules
- •Large invisible time capsules
- •Small time capsules
- •Culture, education and art
- •Industrial heritage
- •Alternative reuse of the disposal site/infrastructure
- •Heritage inventories and catalogues
- •Local history societies
- •Intangible cultural heritage
- •Education, research and training
- •Public information dissemination activities
- •Knowledge management
- •Knowledge retention tools
- •Knowledge risk analysis
- •Knowledge sharing philosophy
- •Oversight provisions
- •Monitoring
- •Land use control
- •Clear and planned responsibilities
- •International mechanisms
- •International regulations and agreements
- •International standards and guidelines
- •International inventories and catalogues
- •International co-operation
- •International education and training programmes
- •International archiving initiatives
- •Regulatory framework
- •National regulatory framework
- •Safeguards
- •2.3. Mechanisms overview table
- •Annex 3. Deliverables of the RK&M initiative
- •Workshop and conference proceedings
- •Studies
- •Reports
- •Website
- •Annex 4. Members and participating organisations of the RK&M initiative
- •NEA PUBLICATIONS AND INFORMATION

DESCRIPTIONS OF RK&M PRESERVATION MECHANISMS
Surface traces
Mechanism |
|
Surface traces |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approach |
|
Markers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
Surface traces are any long-lasting feature(s), visible at the ground surface without excavation, which can |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
be identified as originating from the use of a site for a large-scale, industrial activity. The traces must be |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Definition/description |
|
anthropogenic, they may consist of residual elements of site structures (mounds, walls, foundations, etc.) |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
but also of human-induced changes to the natural environment (altered water courses, excavations, |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
etc.). Depending on the nature and the scale of the features and the degree to which they blend with the |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
local environment as they age, they may be more visible from above (e.g. by flying over the site, google |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
earth, etc.). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If a site is closed and abandoned without full restoration, adventitious surface traces will be inevitable. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Surface traces may also be deliberately left in situ, or even created by design. Surface traces are notably |
||||||||||||||||||||||
How does this |
|
conceived as supporting RK&M preservation in the long term, when oversight has lapsed. The idea is |
||||||||||||||||||||||
mechanism contribute |
|
that they will preserve or recreate awareness, by alerting the observer to previous activity at the site. In |
||||||||||||||||||||||
to RK&M preservation/ |
|
themselves, they are unlikely to provide a straightforward message about the facility, but they can |
||||||||||||||||||||||
How can it be |
|
stimulate interest in previous activities at the site, and may thus contribute to the restoration of |
||||||||||||||||||||||
implemented? |
|
information, memory and/or knowledge relating to the operations conducted there. In order to fulfil this |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
function they will need to be recognised and linked to other information sources, on-site (e.g. sub- |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
surface markers) or off-site (e.g. archives). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
Does the mechanism mainly preserve information, records, knowledge, memory, or awareness? |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Information: |
|
|
|
Records: |
|
|
Knowledge: |
|
Memory: |
|
|
|
Awareness: X |
|||||||||
|
|
Surface traces can only act to provide awareness. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
What is the level of detail addressed/provided by the mechanism? |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Low level of detail: X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High level of detail: |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
Surface traces can only act to provide awareness, for example that the site had previously been used for |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Scope |
|
significant human industrial activity, which is a message with a low level of detail. |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
What is the main geographical or administrative-political scope |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
(development/implementation/operation) of the mechanism? On which scale does the mechanism |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
notably enable RK&M preservation? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
[Note also the field “International dimension” further below.] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
Local: X |
|
Regional: X |
|
National: |
|
International: |
|
Virtual: |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
Over time, surface traces are likely only to provide their input at a local or regional scale. Their deliberate |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
development can be addressed nationally or even internationally. |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Which timescale(s) is this mechanism mainly aimed at (target timescale)? |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
Long term: X |
|
|
Medium term: |
Short term: |
|
|
Very short term: |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
Surface traces may aid RK&M preservation in the medium term (e.g. pointing out the dimension of the |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
repository, complementing alternative reuse of the site, being part of monitoring schemes), but are |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
mainly aimed at the long term. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
When should this mechanism be implemented? This may or may not be equal to the target timescale. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Pre-operational: |
|
|
|
|
|
Operational: |
|
|
Pre-closure: X |
|
|
Post-closure: X |
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
Timescales |
|
If no deliberate action is undertaken to remove them, surface traces will appear throughout the |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
operational, preand post-closure phase. The deliberate implementation of surface traces would notably |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
take place during the pre-closure and/or post-closure phase. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
When should this mechanism be developed? This may or may not be equal to the implementation |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
timescale. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
Done: |
Pre-operational: X |
|
Operational: X |
|
Pre-closure: X |
|
Post-closure: |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
The concept and design of deliberate surface traces can be developed once the site is known and the |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
disposal concept decided upon, possibly in connection with the development of markers or |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
monuments. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Should the mechanism be implemented intentionally (e.g. time capsules) or is its emergence largely |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
unintentional (e.g. surface traces) or can it not be fully controlled (e.g. art work)? |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Intentional: X |
|
|
|
|
|
Unintentional: X |
|
|
|
|
Cannot be controlled: X |
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Intentionally implemented surface traces may have higher chances to persist and maintain awareness, |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
but unintentional traces are likely to be left after closure of the repository unless serious efforts are made |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Characteristics |
|
to remove them. In this sense, some degree of residual surface traces is likely to be uncontrollable. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Is the mechanism mainly tangible or intangible? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
Tangible: X |
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
This mechanism refers to tangible traces on the surface of the disposal site. |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Does the mechanism mainly rely on mediated transmission or non-mediated transmission? |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
Mediated transmission: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-mediated transmission: X |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
124 |
PRESERVATION OF RK&M ACROSS GENERATIONS: FINAL REPORT OF THE RK&M INITIATIVE, NEA No. 7421, © OECD 2019 |