
- •Final Report of the RK&M Initiative
- •Foreword
- •Acknowledgements
- •Table of contents
- •List of figures
- •List of tables
- •List of abbreviations and acronyms
- •The glossary of terms of records, knowledge and memory (RK&M) preservation
- •Executive summary
- •Key findings and recommendations
- •Chapter 1. Introduction
- •1.1. Background and scope of the RK&M initiative
- •The formulation of a dedicated initiative under the aegis of the RWMC
- •Modus operandi of the RK&M initiative
- •Key questions and objectives of the RK&M initiative
- •A product and process-oriented initiative
- •The fields of application and target audiences of the RK&M initiative
- •1.2. Evolutions in RK&M preservation thinking: A historical review
- •The RK&M reference bibliography
- •Popular themes in RK&M preservation literature
- •Landscape of Thorns
- •Atomic Priesthood
- •Summary of lessons learnt from the historical review
- •1.3. References
- •Chapter 2. RK&M preservation: Fundamentals
- •2.1. RK&M preservation and its connection to safety
- •The repository: From “seclusion and oblivion” to a societally embedded facility
- •Introducing the concept of oversight
- •2.2. Protecting humans and the environment
- •2.3. Supporting informed decision making
- •2.4. References
- •Chapter 3. RK&M preservation: Challenges and opportunities
- •3.1. Information life cycle management
- •3.2. Causes and consequences of RK&M loss
- •Lessons from RK&M loss in the nuclear field
- •Lessons from RK&M loss outside the nuclear field
- •3.3. RK&M preservation in a regulatory context
- •National RK&M preservation regulation
- •Planning responsibilities over time
- •International soft law
- •Regulation: a necessary condition for RK&M preservation
- •3.5. References
- •Chapter 4. Key characteristics of RK&M preservation approaches and mechanisms
- •4.1. Introducing the idea of a “systemic strategy” for RK&M preservation
- •4.2. Multiple time frames
- •The short term
- •The medium term
- •The long term
- •4.3. Multiple media
- •4.4. Multiple contents
- •4.5. Multiple transmission modes
- •4.6. Multiple actors
- •Multiple disciplines
- •Multiple interests, concerns and roles
- •4.7. Multiple locations
- •4.8. References
- •Chapter 5. RK&M preservation approaches and mechanisms
- •5.1. Introduction to the RK&M preservation “toolbox”
- •5.2. Dedicated record sets and summary files
- •5.3. Memory institutions
- •5.4. Markers
- •5.5. Time capsules
- •5.6. Culture, education and art
- •5.7. Knowledge management
- •5.8. Oversight provisions
- •5.9. International mechanisms
- •5.10. Regulatory framework
- •5.11. References
- •Chapter 6. Towards a systemic strategy for RK&M preservation
- •6.2. Meeting national needs
- •6.3. RK&M preservation starts today – life cycle thinking
- •6.4. RK&M preservation is an ongoing process
- •6.5. RK&M preservation is a participatory process
- •6.6. Illustration: Two fictional examples
- •Fictional example 1
- •Compliance activities
- •Best practice activities
- •Supporting activities
- •Fictional example 2
- •Compliance activities
- •Best practice activities
- •Supporting activities
- •6.7. References
- •Chapter 7. Conclusions and outlook
- •7.1. Conclusions
- •Embedding disposal facilities in society
- •Preventing inadvertent human intrusion and supporting informed decision making over time
- •Developing a systemic strategy for RK&M preservation
- •The importance of multi-disciplinarity and participation
- •7.2. Outlook
- •Upholding and elaborating an open and holistic attitude
- •Creating awareness, supporting engagement and starting RK&M preservation today
- •Developing international collaboration
- •7.3. Reference
- •Annex 1. RK&M glossary
- •Archive
- •Awareness
- •Control
- •Composite expressions
- •Cultural heritage
- •Data
- •Information
- •Knowledge
- •Composite expressions
- •Long term
- •Marker
- •Mediated/non-mediated transmission
- •Medium term
- •Memory
- •Message
- •Monument
- •Oversight
- •Record
- •Redundancy
- •Short term
- •Stakeholder
- •Systemic strategy
- •Very short term
- •References
- •Annex 2. Descriptions of RK&M preservation mechanisms
- •2.1. Mechanism description sheet: template
- •2.2. Mechanism description sheets
- •Dedicated record sets and summary files
- •Key information file (KIF)
- •Set of essential records (SER)
- •Memory institutions
- •Archives
- •Libraries
- •Museums
- •Markers
- •Surface markers
- •Monuments
- •Sub-surface markers
- •Deep geological markers
- •Surface traces
- •Time capsules
- •Large visible time capsules
- •Large invisible time capsules
- •Small time capsules
- •Culture, education and art
- •Industrial heritage
- •Alternative reuse of the disposal site/infrastructure
- •Heritage inventories and catalogues
- •Local history societies
- •Intangible cultural heritage
- •Education, research and training
- •Public information dissemination activities
- •Knowledge management
- •Knowledge retention tools
- •Knowledge risk analysis
- •Knowledge sharing philosophy
- •Oversight provisions
- •Monitoring
- •Land use control
- •Clear and planned responsibilities
- •International mechanisms
- •International regulations and agreements
- •International standards and guidelines
- •International inventories and catalogues
- •International co-operation
- •International education and training programmes
- •International archiving initiatives
- •Regulatory framework
- •National regulatory framework
- •Safeguards
- •2.3. Mechanisms overview table
- •Annex 3. Deliverables of the RK&M initiative
- •Workshop and conference proceedings
- •Studies
- •Reports
- •Website
- •Annex 4. Members and participating organisations of the RK&M initiative
- •NEA PUBLICATIONS AND INFORMATION

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Executive summary
Geological repositories for the final disposal of radioactive waste are currently being developed in many countries. These repositories are designed to be inherently safe over the periods of time that are necessary to protect humankind and the environment against the effects of ionising radiation. The issue of maintaining some information and a degree of awareness of the facilities in the future is a challenge that has been much discussed over the past 50 years. Against the background of ever increasing demands by waste management organisations and other stakeholders for international reflection and progress towards viable and shared strategies in this field, the Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA) Radioactive Waste Management Committee (RWMC) launched an initiative on the “Preservation of Records, Knowledge and Memory (RK&M) Across Generations” – the so-called “RK&M initiative”, that ran from March 2011 to April 2018. The initiative aimed at gaining a theoretically founded, broadly based understanding of the issue, leading to the development of a “toolbox” of methods that will eventually be combined into a strategic action plan for RK&M preservation across generations.
To achieve this goal, the initiative focused on five key questions:
•For which reasons and purposes do we need and want to preserve RK&M about radioactive waste across generations?
•What kind of information needs to be maintained?
•Over which timescales?
•By whom and for whom?
•What can be done now and later to provide maximum continuity and accessibility of RK&M?
Key findings and recommendations
In the past, RK&M preservation efforts were mainly directed at avoiding inadvertent human intrusion through messages and methods focusing on danger and promoting aversion. Although deterring potential intruders remains a valid goal, it was found that this should rather be achieved by supporting an informed and alert attitude towards the required levels of safety, security and societal accordance. More generally, supporting informed decision making in the future – including the decision to access the repository and the waste it contains – was identified as an integral part of responsible radioactive waste management. This is in line with recent recommendations issued by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP), as well as with a prudent approach to safety and a conscious attitude to ethics.
Achieving these objectives can only be done in a manner that combines the preservation of records, knowledge and memory. Indeed, it is not just a question of handing down a message, but of keeping that message interpretable, meaningful, credible and usable over time. Moreover, there is no single approach or mechanism that would achieve, on its own, the preservation of RK&M over all timescales. Therefore, the RK&M initiative compiled a list of 35 mechanisms grouped into 9 broad approaches that are described in detail in this report and include the following:
•dedicated record sets and summary files;
•memory institutions (archives; libraries; museums);
PRESERVATION OF RK&M ACROSS GENERATIONS: FINAL REPORT OF THE RK&M INITIATIVE, NEA No. 7421, © OECD 2019 |
13 |

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
•markers (both above and below the surface);
•time capsules (both with and without opening strategies);
•culture, education and art (e.g. cultural heritage; alternative reuse of the disposal site; education, research and training; works of art);
•knowledge management (e.g. knowledge retention tools; knowledge sharing philosophy);
•oversight provisions (monitoring; clear and planned responsibilities; land use controls);
•international mechanisms (e.g. international regulations and agreements; international inventories and catalogues);
•regulatory framework (national regulatory framework; safeguards).
The first approach in this list, “dedicated record sets and summary files”, includes two mechanisms that were developed by the initiative:
•Set of essential records (SER) – a unique set of records, selected during the repository lifetime, together aimed at providing sufficient information for current and future generations to ensure an adequate understanding of the repository system and its performance.
•Key information file (KIF) – a single document, produced in a multidisciplinary and participatory manner, intended to inform present and future stakeholders without specialised knowledge.
A sustainable RK&M preservation strategy will combine a number of mechanisms selected from the above compilation into a system. These mechanisms should have different key characteristics in terms of timescales addressed, media, contents, transmission modes, actors and locations. The mechanisms should be integrated with, or complement, one another, refer to each other and provide for diversity and redundancy, with a view to maximising information accessibility, understandability and survivability. Such a preservation strategy inherently requires to be elaborated in a multidisciplinary and participatory process. In particular, RK&M preservation aims at the societal embedding of the repository by creating a holistic disposal project in which the disposal technology, the site design and the societal environment are integrated and mutually supporting. Examples of strategies can be found in this publication.
In addition to this publication, deliverables include a reference bibliography, providing a literature overview of work performed in the field of the preservation of RK&M in relation to radioactive waste management, a catalogue of current laws and regulations regarding RK&M preservation in force in various countries and guidelines on the development of both a KIF and a SER.
14 |
PRESERVATION OF RK&M ACROSS GENERATIONS: FINAL REPORT OF THE RK&M INITIATIVE, NEA No. 7421, © OECD 2019 |