
- •Final Report of the RK&M Initiative
- •Foreword
- •Acknowledgements
- •Table of contents
- •List of figures
- •List of tables
- •List of abbreviations and acronyms
- •The glossary of terms of records, knowledge and memory (RK&M) preservation
- •Executive summary
- •Key findings and recommendations
- •Chapter 1. Introduction
- •1.1. Background and scope of the RK&M initiative
- •The formulation of a dedicated initiative under the aegis of the RWMC
- •Modus operandi of the RK&M initiative
- •Key questions and objectives of the RK&M initiative
- •A product and process-oriented initiative
- •The fields of application and target audiences of the RK&M initiative
- •1.2. Evolutions in RK&M preservation thinking: A historical review
- •The RK&M reference bibliography
- •Popular themes in RK&M preservation literature
- •Landscape of Thorns
- •Atomic Priesthood
- •Summary of lessons learnt from the historical review
- •1.3. References
- •Chapter 2. RK&M preservation: Fundamentals
- •2.1. RK&M preservation and its connection to safety
- •The repository: From “seclusion and oblivion” to a societally embedded facility
- •Introducing the concept of oversight
- •2.2. Protecting humans and the environment
- •2.3. Supporting informed decision making
- •2.4. References
- •Chapter 3. RK&M preservation: Challenges and opportunities
- •3.1. Information life cycle management
- •3.2. Causes and consequences of RK&M loss
- •Lessons from RK&M loss in the nuclear field
- •Lessons from RK&M loss outside the nuclear field
- •3.3. RK&M preservation in a regulatory context
- •National RK&M preservation regulation
- •Planning responsibilities over time
- •International soft law
- •Regulation: a necessary condition for RK&M preservation
- •3.5. References
- •Chapter 4. Key characteristics of RK&M preservation approaches and mechanisms
- •4.1. Introducing the idea of a “systemic strategy” for RK&M preservation
- •4.2. Multiple time frames
- •The short term
- •The medium term
- •The long term
- •4.3. Multiple media
- •4.4. Multiple contents
- •4.5. Multiple transmission modes
- •4.6. Multiple actors
- •Multiple disciplines
- •Multiple interests, concerns and roles
- •4.7. Multiple locations
- •4.8. References
- •Chapter 5. RK&M preservation approaches and mechanisms
- •5.1. Introduction to the RK&M preservation “toolbox”
- •5.2. Dedicated record sets and summary files
- •5.3. Memory institutions
- •5.4. Markers
- •5.5. Time capsules
- •5.6. Culture, education and art
- •5.7. Knowledge management
- •5.8. Oversight provisions
- •5.9. International mechanisms
- •5.10. Regulatory framework
- •5.11. References
- •Chapter 6. Towards a systemic strategy for RK&M preservation
- •6.2. Meeting national needs
- •6.3. RK&M preservation starts today – life cycle thinking
- •6.4. RK&M preservation is an ongoing process
- •6.5. RK&M preservation is a participatory process
- •6.6. Illustration: Two fictional examples
- •Fictional example 1
- •Compliance activities
- •Best practice activities
- •Supporting activities
- •Fictional example 2
- •Compliance activities
- •Best practice activities
- •Supporting activities
- •6.7. References
- •Chapter 7. Conclusions and outlook
- •7.1. Conclusions
- •Embedding disposal facilities in society
- •Preventing inadvertent human intrusion and supporting informed decision making over time
- •Developing a systemic strategy for RK&M preservation
- •The importance of multi-disciplinarity and participation
- •7.2. Outlook
- •Upholding and elaborating an open and holistic attitude
- •Creating awareness, supporting engagement and starting RK&M preservation today
- •Developing international collaboration
- •7.3. Reference
- •Annex 1. RK&M glossary
- •Archive
- •Awareness
- •Control
- •Composite expressions
- •Cultural heritage
- •Data
- •Information
- •Knowledge
- •Composite expressions
- •Long term
- •Marker
- •Mediated/non-mediated transmission
- •Medium term
- •Memory
- •Message
- •Monument
- •Oversight
- •Record
- •Redundancy
- •Short term
- •Stakeholder
- •Systemic strategy
- •Very short term
- •References
- •Annex 2. Descriptions of RK&M preservation mechanisms
- •2.1. Mechanism description sheet: template
- •2.2. Mechanism description sheets
- •Dedicated record sets and summary files
- •Key information file (KIF)
- •Set of essential records (SER)
- •Memory institutions
- •Archives
- •Libraries
- •Museums
- •Markers
- •Surface markers
- •Monuments
- •Sub-surface markers
- •Deep geological markers
- •Surface traces
- •Time capsules
- •Large visible time capsules
- •Large invisible time capsules
- •Small time capsules
- •Culture, education and art
- •Industrial heritage
- •Alternative reuse of the disposal site/infrastructure
- •Heritage inventories and catalogues
- •Local history societies
- •Intangible cultural heritage
- •Education, research and training
- •Public information dissemination activities
- •Knowledge management
- •Knowledge retention tools
- •Knowledge risk analysis
- •Knowledge sharing philosophy
- •Oversight provisions
- •Monitoring
- •Land use control
- •Clear and planned responsibilities
- •International mechanisms
- •International regulations and agreements
- •International standards and guidelines
- •International inventories and catalogues
- •International co-operation
- •International education and training programmes
- •International archiving initiatives
- •Regulatory framework
- •National regulatory framework
- •Safeguards
- •2.3. Mechanisms overview table
- •Annex 3. Deliverables of the RK&M initiative
- •Workshop and conference proceedings
- •Studies
- •Reports
- •Website
- •Annex 4. Members and participating organisations of the RK&M initiative
- •NEA PUBLICATIONS AND INFORMATION

DESCRIPTIONS OF RK&M PRESERVATION MECHANISMS
Mechanism |
|
Set of essential records (SER) |
|
|
|
|
|
The decision on SER implementation should be made by the regulator and/or the implementing agency. |
|
|
Rules for the selection, classification, maintenance, periodic review and short term preservation of the |
|
|
SER should be developed by the implementing agency in co-operation with regulators, archives and as |
Actors |
|
many disciplines and stakeholders as relevant. |
|
|
The national archives shall be responsible for preserving the SER in the medium and long term. Other |
|
|
preservation institutes (e.g. local and international archives, servers of international co-operation bodies, |
|
|
education bodies) should be involved to create redundancy. |
Main |
|
The SER provides detailed information on the repository system, selected specifically as to be an |
|
information, knowledge and decision-making resource for future society, particularly technicians, |
|
strengths/benefits |
|
|
|
researchers and decision makers. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There is a need to develop a traceable and justifiable approach for the repository records classification |
Specific |
|
and selection, taking into account regulations, archiving rules and stakeholder requirements. The |
issues/challenges |
|
durability and accessibility of the SER need to be maintained. Security issues may control some aspects |
|
|
of accessibility. |
International |
|
The SER is intended mainly for local and national use. It is too detailed and specific to play a significant |
|
international role. Nevertheless, best practices can be shared and international bodies may also preserve |
|
dimension |
|
|
|
national SERs in the longer term. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated record sets and summary files: KIF (the KIF and SER should point to each other) |
|
|
Memory institutions: archives |
Connection to other |
|
Regulatory framework: National regulatory framework (regulation will likely require the production and |
approaches/ |
|
updating of a SER) |
mechanisms |
|
Oversight: oversight related records (these (e.g. related to monitoring and land use) may be included in the SER) |
|
|
Knowledge management |
|
|
Culture, education and art: Education, research and training |
|
|
|
Information resources |
|
• NEA (forthcoming), Preservation of Records, Knowledge and Memory (RK&M) Across Generations: |
issued by the RK&M |
|
Compiling a Set of Records for a Radioactive Waste Repository, OECD, Paris. |
initiative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
• IAEA (1999), Maintenance of Records for Radioactive Waste Disposal, IAEA-TECDOC-1097, IAEA, Vienna. |
|
|
• IAEA (2004), Records for Radioactive Waste Management up to Repository Closure: Managing the Primary |
Other information |
|
Level Information (PLI) Set, IAEA-TECDOC-1398, IAEA, Vienna. |
|
• IAEA (2006), Data Requirements and Maintenance of Records for Spent Fuel Management: A Review, IAEA- |
|
resources |
|
|
|
TECDOC-1519, IAEA, Vienna. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
• IAEA (2007), Long Term Preservation of Information for Decommissioning Projects, Technical Report |
|
|
Series 467, IAEA, Vienna. |
Examples |
|
• The Detailed Memory File (“Dossier Détaillé de Mémoire”) required in France (Decree 2007-1557 |
|
modified 28th June 2016) contains much of the information likely to be found in the SER. However, this |
|
|
|
is a single prepared document, rather than a compilation of existing records. |
Memory institutions
Archives
Mechanism |
|
Archives |
|
|
|
Approach |
|
Memory institutions |
|
|
|
|
|
The term “archive” refers to both an accumulation of historical records and to the physical place where |
|
|
these records are located. It also denotes the institution or service in charge of the management and |
|
|
custody of these records. |
|
|
Archives generally consist of records (including both documents and objects), in analogue and/or digital |
|
|
format, that have been selected for permanent or long-term preservation, based on the grounds of their |
|
|
enduring administrative, informational, cultural, historical or legal value as evidence of the work of the |
|
|
creating organisation or programme. Archival records are mostly unpublished and almost always |
Definition/description |
|
unique, unlike books or journals, for which many identical copies exist. Archives focus on collections |
|
rather than on individual records. Special care is taken to maintaining the context of each collection. The |
|
|
|
|
|
|
preservation of “original” material (i.e. in its original format, on the original medium) is particularly |
|
|
important. This means that archives, as institutions, are quite distinct from libraries with regard to their |
|
|
functions and organisation, although archival collections may sometimes be found within library |
|
|
buildings. |
|
|
National archives acquire, preserve and make available national records, in particular those created by |
|
|
national agencies. They usually establish policies and procedures for managing these records and assist |
|
|
national agencies in carrying out their records management responsibilities. |
110 |
PRESERVATION OF RK&M ACROSS GENERATIONS: FINAL REPORT OF THE RK&M INITIATIVE, NEA No. 7421, © OECD 2019 |

DESCRIPTIONS OF RK&M PRESERVATION MECHANISMS
Mechanism Archives
Archives, as institutions, are responsible for selecting, acquiring, preserving and making available records in a coherent and contextually meaningful manner.
|
In the framework of a disposal project, the relevant records are usually firstly kept by the organisation(s) |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
in charge of the project. This information repository is not strictly speaking an archive, but a |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
management tool that is used to organise, preserve and access information during the entire duration of |
|||||||||||||||||||||
How does this |
the project. Depending on national legislation and the administrative status of the organisation(s) in |
|||||||||||||||||||||
mechanism contribute |
charge of disposal, the process of transferring records to one or more archives may be initiated at |
|||||||||||||||||||||
to RK&M preservation/ |
different points in time during the operational phase of the repository or after closure. At the latest, the |
|||||||||||||||||||||
How can it be |
process should take place when a transfer of responsibilities occurs (e.g. after repository closure). |
|||||||||||||||||||||
implemented? |
Ultimately, the relevant records should be stored in one or more archives, preferably with a different |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
geographic scope of influence to add to accessibility and redundancy. Given that repository records are |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
of national relevance and importance, at least a subset of them is likely to be preserved by national |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
archives. The possibility to establish an archive dedicated to repository records, with dedicated funding, |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
at the national and/or international level, should also be taken into consideration. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Regarding the selection of repository records to be archived, see especially the “SER” mechanism. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Does the mechanism mainly preserve information, records, knowledge, memory or awareness? |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Information: X |
|
|
Records: X |
|
Knowledge: |
|
Memory: |
|
|
Awareness: |
|||||||||||
|
Archives preserve records with information. By paying special attention to maintaining the context of |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
and coherence among record collections, archives aim to support both users’ ability to understand, |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
interpret and use the content of the records (knowledge) and a broader awareness of events, people, |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
places and levels of knowledge in the past (memory). If a dedicated nuclear archive were to be |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
established, its sheer existence would also support awareness. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
What is the level of detail addressed/provided by the mechanism? |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
Scope |
Low level of detail: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High level of detail: X |
|
|
|
||||||||
The “level of detail” is relative, but in the RK&M preservation context, the focus of (whole) archives is on |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
knowledge supporting/enabling, detailed information, more than on awareness supporting/enabling, |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
basic information. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
What is the main geographical or administrative-political scope (development/implementation/ |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
operation) of the mechanism? On which scale does the mechanism notably enable RK&M preservation? |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
[Note also the field “International dimension” further below.] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Local: X |
Regional: X |
|
National: X |
|
International: |
|
Virtual: X |
||||||||||||||
|
Archives exist on different levels, notably the local, regional and national level. International archives are |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
rare (see separate mechanism “International archiving activities”). Online archives with digital(ised) |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
records also exist. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
Which timescale(s) is this mechanism mainly aimed at (target timescale)? |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Long term: X |
|
Medium term: X |
|
|
|
Short term: |
|
|
Very short term: |
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
While archives are always “used in the present”, their main aim is to preserve selected records for the |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
longer timescales, rather than the very short and short term (although, as repository projects often |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
extend over many decades, archived records may also be consulted prior to repository closure). |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
When should this mechanism be implemented? This may or may not be equal to the target timescale. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Pre-operational: |
|
|
|
Operational: |
|
|
Pre-closure: X |
Post-closure: X |
|||||||||||||
|
For this mechanism, the implementation timescale refers to the transfer of records to archives. While the |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
implementer will do some in-house “archiving”, this is not considered as transfer to an archive. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Timescales |
Depending on the national regulatory framework, the transfer of records directly related to the |
|||||||||||||||||||||
repository is likely to happen mostly in the preand post-closure phase. |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Taking into account national archives that also establish policies and procedures for managing records, |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
and assist national agencies in carrying out their records management responsibilities, the |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
implementation timescale can be understood to also include the pre-operational and operational phase |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
(as preparatory phases for the actual record transfer). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
When should this mechanism be developed? This may or may not be equal to the implementation |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
timescale. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Done: X |
|
Pre-operational: |
|
Operational: X |
Pre-closure: X |
|
|
Post-closure: |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Archives already exist. A dedicated archive may be developed during the operational and pre-closure |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
timescales. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Should the mechanism be implemented intentionally (e.g. time capsules) or is its emergence largely |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
unintentional (e.g. surface traces) or can it not be fully controlled (e.g. art work)? |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Intentional: X |
|
Unintentional: |
|
|
|
Cannot be controlled: |
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Characteristics |
Archives are an intentional mechanism. This includes providing records to be archived. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Is the mechanism mainly tangible or intangible? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Tangible: X |
|
Intangible: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Archives and their content are tangible. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PRESERVATION OF RK&M ACROSS GENERATIONS: FINAL REPORT OF THE RK&M INITIATIVE, NEA No. 7421, © OECD 2019 |
111 |

DESCRIPTIONS OF RK&M PRESERVATION MECHANISMS
Mechanism |
|
Archives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Does the mechanism mainly rely on mediated transmission or non-mediated transmission? |
|
|
|
|
|
Characteristics |
|
Mediated transmission: X |
Non-mediated transmission: X |
|
|
|
|
|
Archives use both mediated and non-mediated transmission. While the collection of records is |
||
|
|
||
|
|
continuously and actively maintained for preservation and accessibility purposes (mediated |
|
|
|
transmission), the content of the individual records is fixed and is transferred in a non-mediated way. |
|
|
|
Archives can be developed and run by both government and private actors at all geographical levels. |
|
Actors |
|
The establishment of a dedicated nuclear archive could be the shared responsibility of government, |
|
|
implementing and regulatory agencies. Archiving specialists should obviously be involved. Society at |
||
|
|
||
|
|
large should be made aware of the existence of the archive and the potential to make use of it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The main mission of archives is the long-term preservation of collections of records in order to ensure |
|
|
|
access over an indefinite period of time. Access relates to both “form” (integrity of the information |
|
|
|
carrier) and “content” (understandability through providing coherence and context). |
|
|
|
As one or more public agencies are likely to be involved in radioactive waste management (e.g. the |
|
Main |
|
safety authority), their records are usually due to be delivered to the national archive. This ensures their |
|
strengths/benefits |
|
preservation in the longer term – even when the legal framework of waste disposal does not include |
|
|
|
specific provisions related to repository records. |
|
|
|
The specific strengths of a dedicated national or international “nuclear archive”, in comparison to a |
|
|
|
generic archive, need to be investigated. The existence of such an archive would make it easier to locate |
|
|
|
the relevant records. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If the waste disposal implementing agency is a private company, it may not be legally required to hand |
|
|
|
over its records to a public archive. This process would need to be defined and organised. |
|
|
|
For public archives, well-established standards for record collection and metadata already exist. These |
|
|
|
standards may not be entirely compatible with the specific needs related to geological repository |
|
|
|
records. From an archival point of view, e.g. records are considered “archival records” when they are no |
|
|
|
longer in use or when the corresponding process has been completed. The long timescales of the |
|
Specific |
|
disposal process are a challenge in this respect. |
|
|
Therefore, requirements regarding the format and structure of records collections, as well as metadata |
||
issues/challenges |
|
||
|
and contextual information, media, language, retention periods, access and confidentiality must be |
||
|
|
||
|
|
developed in concert with the institutional stakeholders (in particular the regulator) for RK&M |
|
|
|
preservation. They also need to be compared to current archival policies and practices, as defined by |
|
|
|
international (e.g. ISO) and national standards. |
|
|
|
Outside legally defined usage, potential users must first recognise an information need in order to |
|
|
|
search and subsequently find the relevant information in archives. Other mechanisms should direct |
|
|
|
users to archives. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Archives are usually part of a wider network. The management of archival collections (e.g. cataloguing) is |
|
International |
|
governed by international standards. |
|
dimension |
|
Specific benefits derived from international nuclear archives, as well as expected challenges, remain to |
|
|
|
be investigated. |
|
|
|
International mechanisms: International archiving initiatives |
|
|
|
Dedicated record sets and summary files: SER; KIF |
|
Connection to other |
|
Culture, education and art: Alternative reuse of the site and/or its infrastructure (an archive could be |
|
|
established on-site) |
|
|
approaches/ |
|
|
|
|
Time capsules (Mediated time capsules containing records can be seen as a particular sort of archive.) |
||
mechanisms |
|
||
|
Legal Framework: National legal framework; safeguards |
||
|
|
||
|
|
Oversight provisions (Archives can serve oversight by preserving usable records. Oversight is also likely to |
|
|
|
produce records that will be archived.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
• Ohnesorge, K.W., “Digital Preservation at the Swiss Federal Archives”, in NEA (2011), The Preservation |
|
|
|
of Records, Knowledge and Memory (RK&M) Across Generations: Scoping the Issue, Workshop |
|
|
|
proceedings. 11-13 October 2011 in Issy-les-Moulineaux, OECD, Paris. |
|
Information resources |
|
• NEA (2013), The Preservation of Records, Knowledge and Memory (RK&M) Across Generations: Improving |
|
issued by the RK&M |
|
Our Understanding, Proceedings of the second RK&M Workshop, 12-13 September 2012, Issy-les- |
|
|
Moulineaux, France, OECD, Paris. Items 31, 32 and 35 on archiving. |
||
initiative |
|
||
|
• Tucker, S., “The Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (United Kingdom) Nuclear Archive: The |
||
|
|
||
|
|
importance of stakeholder engagement”, in NEA (2015), Radioactive Waste Management and |
|
|
|
Constructing Memory for Future Generations: Proceedings of the International Conference and Debate, |
|
|
|
15-17 September 2014, Verdun, France, OECD, Paris. |
|
Other information |
|
• International Council on Archives, ICA (www.ica.org/en). |
|
resources |
|
• Council of Audiovisual Archives, CCAAA (www.ccaaa.org). |
|
|
|
• National archives in each country. |
|
Examples |
|
• Dedicated nuclear archive: Nucleus: The Nuclear and Caithness Archives, Wick, Scotland |
|
|
|
(www.highlifehighland.com/nucleus-nuclear-caithness-archives). |
112 |
PRESERVATION OF RK&M ACROSS GENERATIONS: FINAL REPORT OF THE RK&M INITIATIVE, NEA No. 7421, © OECD 2019 |

DESCRIPTIONS OF RK&M PRESERVATION MECHANISMS
Libraries
Mechanism |
|
Libraries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approach |
|
Memory institutions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
A library refers to a place where collections of books, periodicals and other information materials like |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
films, photographs and audio recordings or even archives, are kept. It may be a physical building or |
||||||||||||||||||||
Definition/description |
|
room and/or a virtual space. It provides physical or digital access to its collections. Library collections |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
may be generic (such as in a national, a university or a municipal library) or highly specialised. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
National libraries may be responsible for collecting all books published in the country or relevant to the |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
country. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Public libraries help structure and disseminate publicly available information. They hold materials of |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
different genres, which helps to reach a broad audience. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
A dedicated section on “nuclear” or “radioactivity” or “radioactive waste management” can create |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
awareness for the issue. The material in this section would be useful for keeping RK&M on particular |
||||||||||||||||||||
How does this |
|
disposal project and/or on the broader context of disposal projects, e.g. works on local history, on |
||||||||||||||||||||
mechanism contribute |
|
scientific background (e.g. radioactivity), etc. Libraries often also host reading groups, where the topic of |
||||||||||||||||||||
to RK&M preservation/ |
|
waste disposal could be discussed based on materials in the library. |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
How can it be |
|
In the short term, specialised libraries may contribute to the preservation of RK&M in the sense that they |
||||||||||||||||||||
implemented? |
|
hold scientific information necessary to research, e.g. by the implementing agency, the regulator or R&D |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
institutions. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the medium term, all relevant reports published by the implementer are likely to be kept at the |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
national library, for example the KIF could be stored by public libraries at different locations, both in |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
paper and in digital format. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Does the mechanism mainly preserve information, records, knowledge, memory, or awareness? |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information: X |
|
|
|
Records: |
|
|
Knowledge: X |
|
Memory: X |
|
Awareness: |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Through their high accessibility, libraries promote the spread and preservation of information, |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
knowledge, memory and/or awareness contained in the various materials in their collections. While |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
specialised libraries may also preserve particular records, this is more the purpose of archives than of |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
libraries in general. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
What is the level of detail addressed/provided by the mechanism? |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Scope |
|
Low level of detail: X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High level of detail: X |
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
Libraries contain material of a broad variety of detail and genres. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
What is the main geographical or administrative-political scope (development/implementation/ |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
operation) of the mechanism? On which scale does the mechanism notably enable RK&M preservation? |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
[Note also the field “International dimension” further below.] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
Local: X |
|
|
Regional: X |
|
National: X |
|
|
International: |
Virtual: X |
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Libraries exist at various levels and often collaborate regionally, nationally and sometimes |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
internationally. Virtual libraries are gaining in importance. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
Which timescale(s) is this mechanism mainly aimed at (target timescale)? |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
Long term: |
|
|
|
Medium term: X |
|
|
|
Short term: X |
|
|
Very short term: X |
|||||||||
|
|
Libraries preserve RK&M in the present and near future, but there are also quite a few libraries worldwide |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
that are many centuries old. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
When should this mechanism be implemented? This may or may not be equal to the target timescale. |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
Pre-operational: |
|
|
|
|
Operational: |
|
|
|
Pre-closure: |
|
|
Post-closure: |
||||||||
|
|
Libraries already exist. One would try to make sure that national libraries and public libraries, especially |
||||||||||||||||||||
Timescales |
|
those in the vicinity of disposal projects, contain a number of references on disposal projects from the |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
pre-operational and operational phases onwards. Disposal projects could also include on-site or nearby |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
library projects as a form of added value and dedicated RK&M preservation, which could be developed |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
during all timescales. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
When should this mechanism be developed? This may or may not be equal to the implementation |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
timescale. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
Done: X |
Pre-operational: |
|
Operational: |
|
Pre-closure: |
|
|
|
Post-closure: |
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
Libraries already exist. The materials that could go into libraries are developed throughout all phases of |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
the repository lifetime. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Should the mechanism be implemented intentionally (e.g. time capsules) or is its emergence largely |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
unintentional (e.g. surface traces) or can it not be fully controlled (e.g. art work)? |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Intentional: X |
|
|
|
Unintentional: X |
|
|
Cannot be controlled: X |
|
|
|||||||||||
Characteristics |
|
Specialised libraries may be dedicated RK&M preservation mechanisms. The content of public libraries |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
cannot be fully controlled. Neither can the existence and content of private or personal libraries. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Is the mechanism mainly tangible or intangible? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
Tangible: X |
|
|
|
Intangible: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
Libraries and their content are tangible. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PRESERVATION OF RK&M ACROSS GENERATIONS: FINAL REPORT OF THE RK&M INITIATIVE, NEA No. 7421, © OECD 2019 |
113 |