
- •Final Report of the RK&M Initiative
- •Foreword
- •Acknowledgements
- •Table of contents
- •List of figures
- •List of tables
- •List of abbreviations and acronyms
- •The glossary of terms of records, knowledge and memory (RK&M) preservation
- •Executive summary
- •Key findings and recommendations
- •Chapter 1. Introduction
- •1.1. Background and scope of the RK&M initiative
- •The formulation of a dedicated initiative under the aegis of the RWMC
- •Modus operandi of the RK&M initiative
- •Key questions and objectives of the RK&M initiative
- •A product and process-oriented initiative
- •The fields of application and target audiences of the RK&M initiative
- •1.2. Evolutions in RK&M preservation thinking: A historical review
- •The RK&M reference bibliography
- •Popular themes in RK&M preservation literature
- •Landscape of Thorns
- •Atomic Priesthood
- •Summary of lessons learnt from the historical review
- •1.3. References
- •Chapter 2. RK&M preservation: Fundamentals
- •2.1. RK&M preservation and its connection to safety
- •The repository: From “seclusion and oblivion” to a societally embedded facility
- •Introducing the concept of oversight
- •2.2. Protecting humans and the environment
- •2.3. Supporting informed decision making
- •2.4. References
- •Chapter 3. RK&M preservation: Challenges and opportunities
- •3.1. Information life cycle management
- •3.2. Causes and consequences of RK&M loss
- •Lessons from RK&M loss in the nuclear field
- •Lessons from RK&M loss outside the nuclear field
- •3.3. RK&M preservation in a regulatory context
- •National RK&M preservation regulation
- •Planning responsibilities over time
- •International soft law
- •Regulation: a necessary condition for RK&M preservation
- •3.5. References
- •Chapter 4. Key characteristics of RK&M preservation approaches and mechanisms
- •4.1. Introducing the idea of a “systemic strategy” for RK&M preservation
- •4.2. Multiple time frames
- •The short term
- •The medium term
- •The long term
- •4.3. Multiple media
- •4.4. Multiple contents
- •4.5. Multiple transmission modes
- •4.6. Multiple actors
- •Multiple disciplines
- •Multiple interests, concerns and roles
- •4.7. Multiple locations
- •4.8. References
- •Chapter 5. RK&M preservation approaches and mechanisms
- •5.1. Introduction to the RK&M preservation “toolbox”
- •5.2. Dedicated record sets and summary files
- •5.3. Memory institutions
- •5.4. Markers
- •5.5. Time capsules
- •5.6. Culture, education and art
- •5.7. Knowledge management
- •5.8. Oversight provisions
- •5.9. International mechanisms
- •5.10. Regulatory framework
- •5.11. References
- •Chapter 6. Towards a systemic strategy for RK&M preservation
- •6.2. Meeting national needs
- •6.3. RK&M preservation starts today – life cycle thinking
- •6.4. RK&M preservation is an ongoing process
- •6.5. RK&M preservation is a participatory process
- •6.6. Illustration: Two fictional examples
- •Fictional example 1
- •Compliance activities
- •Best practice activities
- •Supporting activities
- •Fictional example 2
- •Compliance activities
- •Best practice activities
- •Supporting activities
- •6.7. References
- •Chapter 7. Conclusions and outlook
- •7.1. Conclusions
- •Embedding disposal facilities in society
- •Preventing inadvertent human intrusion and supporting informed decision making over time
- •Developing a systemic strategy for RK&M preservation
- •The importance of multi-disciplinarity and participation
- •7.2. Outlook
- •Upholding and elaborating an open and holistic attitude
- •Creating awareness, supporting engagement and starting RK&M preservation today
- •Developing international collaboration
- •7.3. Reference
- •Annex 1. RK&M glossary
- •Archive
- •Awareness
- •Control
- •Composite expressions
- •Cultural heritage
- •Data
- •Information
- •Knowledge
- •Composite expressions
- •Long term
- •Marker
- •Mediated/non-mediated transmission
- •Medium term
- •Memory
- •Message
- •Monument
- •Oversight
- •Record
- •Redundancy
- •Short term
- •Stakeholder
- •Systemic strategy
- •Very short term
- •References
- •Annex 2. Descriptions of RK&M preservation mechanisms
- •2.1. Mechanism description sheet: template
- •2.2. Mechanism description sheets
- •Dedicated record sets and summary files
- •Key information file (KIF)
- •Set of essential records (SER)
- •Memory institutions
- •Archives
- •Libraries
- •Museums
- •Markers
- •Surface markers
- •Monuments
- •Sub-surface markers
- •Deep geological markers
- •Surface traces
- •Time capsules
- •Large visible time capsules
- •Large invisible time capsules
- •Small time capsules
- •Culture, education and art
- •Industrial heritage
- •Alternative reuse of the disposal site/infrastructure
- •Heritage inventories and catalogues
- •Local history societies
- •Intangible cultural heritage
- •Education, research and training
- •Public information dissemination activities
- •Knowledge management
- •Knowledge retention tools
- •Knowledge risk analysis
- •Knowledge sharing philosophy
- •Oversight provisions
- •Monitoring
- •Land use control
- •Clear and planned responsibilities
- •International mechanisms
- •International regulations and agreements
- •International standards and guidelines
- •International inventories and catalogues
- •International co-operation
- •International education and training programmes
- •International archiving initiatives
- •Regulatory framework
- •National regulatory framework
- •Safeguards
- •2.3. Mechanisms overview table
- •Annex 3. Deliverables of the RK&M initiative
- •Workshop and conference proceedings
- •Studies
- •Reports
- •Website
- •Annex 4. Members and participating organisations of the RK&M initiative
- •NEA PUBLICATIONS AND INFORMATION

RK&M GLOSSARY
Commentary: With this definition, the creation of information (e.g. by organising data) requires human activity, but the preservation of information does not. For example, a marker preserves information, independently of the presence of intermediaries.
Knowledge
The result of learning processes. Once acquired in a particular field, knowledge provides insights and skills. It results in the ability to understand, interpret and use the relevant data, information and records.
Composite expressions
Knowledge preservation: Preservation of knowledge, in a particular field is about maintaining or creating learning processes in that field. An example over the medium term would be the funding of a university chair; another example over the medium term would be facilitating the passing of skills from one generation to another.
Knowledge reconstruction: Over the long term, knowledge will inevitably be diluted as interest fades. Tools/opportunities then need to be devised for knowledge reconstruction. For instance, the Rosetta Stone proved to be a vital tool for reconstructing the knowledge of the ancient Egyptian language.
Regaining knowledge: Since media that are meant to support knowledge (e.g. books, records, instructions) are not understood as “knowledge” in this report (no matter whether they have been written with the intention to codify somebody’s knowledge therein) the term “knowledge preservation” is not used to describe the process of record preservation. However, preservation of records may be understood as preserving the possibility to regain knowledge (through studying the preserved media).
Long term
This term refers to the period of time in the post-operational repository phase when oversight has been lost. The long term extends over the whole period over which, according to the safety regulations, safety must be demonstrated, typically hundreds of thousands of years in the case of high-level waste. (See also “short term”, “medium term” and “oversight”.)
Marker
A long-lasting object that indicates an area of influence, power or danger. It is placed strategically at or near the site for immediate recognition or for discovery at a later time.
Commentary: A marker is an object meant to reach out to future generations in the medium to long term. Any marker is conceived to be immobile (i.e. in permanent association with a site), robust, in order to maximise survivability on its own, and to provide messages designed to be understandable across generations.
Mediated/non-mediated transmission
Mediated transmission: The message or record is passed on from one generation to another.
Non-mediated transmission: The message or record is sent directly (and in its original format) from the present time to the future receiver.
Commentary: In mediated transmission, each generation may undertake steps that affect the continuity of readability (legibility and language) and understandability (comprehension and context). Non-mediated transmission places no reliance on the presence of intermediaries. It is recognised that these two “tracks” of transmission may address different target audiences, convey different levels of detail and use different technical means to achieve survivability.
PRESERVATION OF RK&M ACROSS GENERATIONS: FINAL REPORT OF THE RK&M INITIATIVE, NEA No. 7421, © OECD 2019 |
101 |

RK&M GLOSSARY
Medium term
This term refers to the period of time of indirect oversight activities that would follow repository closure. Timescales are typically in the order of a few hundred years. (See also “short term”, “long term” and “oversight”.)
Memory
The awareness of events, people, places and levels of knowledge in the past.
Message
A significant point that is conveyed in concise form.
Monument
A visible and complex type of marker, i.e., a large building or an ensemble of structures. A monument may consist of several visible and less visible markers, e.g. in order to encircle an area. Like a marker, a monument may bear a message, e.g. in the form of inscriptions, or be the message itself. (See also “marker”.)
Oversight
“Oversight is a general term for ‘watchful care’ and refers to society ‘keeping an eye’ on the technical system and the actual implementation of plans and decisions.” (ICRP, 2013)
Commentary: Oversight is the reference concept promoted by the ICRP for reconciling geological disposal with fundamental principles of radiological protection (see Section 2.1 for details).
Record
A usually unique and original object or a selected piece of data/information that has been committed to a medium (analogue or digital) and that is kept, together with the appropriate context and structure, for later use.
Commentary: In the vast majority of cases, records will be documents. But also other original objects can be considered records. Generally, records should be pieces of evidence of (past) activities. Another aspect to distinguish records from other objects is that records should be, in principle, suitable for archiving, so that markers, monuments, etc. are not regarded as records. Usually, records are the entity of the medium and the information on it (e.g. a folder, a CD). In case of electronic files, however, one may still consider them “records” even if there is no original “medium” (e.g. if stored in a IT “cloud”).
Redundancy
In the context of a RK&M preservation strategy, “redundancy” means that some elements of the strategy can be degraded or lost without substantial damage to its overall RK&M preservation capacity (based on Trauth et al., 1993: p. F-33).
102 |
PRESERVATION OF RK&M ACROSS GENERATIONS: FINAL REPORT OF THE RK&M INITIATIVE, NEA No. 7421, © OECD 2019 |

RK&M GLOSSARY
Short term
This term refers to the period of time that ends with repository closure. This period includes both the pre-operational and the operational phases of the repository. Timescales are in the order of 100 years. (See also “very short term”, “medium term” and “long term”.)
Stakeholder
Any actor (institution, group or individual) with an interest, concern or role to play in the radioactive waste management related RK&M preservation process.
Systemic strategy
An RK&M preservation strategy whose components offer a variety of RK&M transmission mechanisms that are integrated with one another or that complement one another, act as indexes to each other, and provide for diversity and redundancy, with a view to maximising information accessibility, understandability and survivability over the timescales considered.
Commentary: A dual-track strategy – providing mechanisms for both mediated and nonmediated transmission of information – is part of a systemic strategy.
Very short term
A period of time consistent with staff stability in role, cycles of organisational change and regulatory expectations of periodic safety reviews. Typical timescales are 10 to 20 years. (See also “short term”.)
References
ICRP (2013), Radiological Protection in Geological Disposal of Long-Lived Solid Radioactive Waste, ICRP Publication 122, Annals of the ICRP, Vol. 42/3, pp. 1-57.
Trauth, K.M., S.C. Hora and R.V. Guzowski (1993), Expert Judgement on Markers to Deter Inadvertent Human Intrusion into the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant, SAND92-1382 l UC-721, prepared by Sandia National Laboratories for the US Department of Energy, Albuquerque, New Mexico and Livermore.
PRESERVATION OF RK&M ACROSS GENERATIONS: FINAL REPORT OF THE RK&M INITIATIVE, NEA No. 7421, © OECD 2019 |
103 |