TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
Table of contents |
|
List of abbreviations and acronyms ............................................................................................ |
9 |
|
Chapter 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................ |
11 |
|
1.1. Objectives ................................................................................................................................... |
11 |
|
1.2. Scope ........................................................................................................................................... |
12 |
|
1.3. Organisation of the report....................................................................................................... |
12 |
|
Chapter 2. Added value ................................................................................................................ |
13 |
|
2.1. Stakeholder perspectives......................................................................................................... |
13 |
|
2.2. An example of the potential for added value ...................................................................... |
16 |
|
Chapter 3. Approaches ................................................................................................................. |
19 |
|
3.1. Approaches to benchmarking in other industries.............................................................. |
19 |
|
3.2. Common features of other industry approaches................................................................ |
21 |
|
Chapter 4. Barriers and enablers ................................................................................................ |
23 |
|
4.1. Cost benchmarking approaches – Barriers........................................................................... |
23 |
|
4.2. Cost benchmarking approaches – Enablers for the removal of barriers......................... |
28 |
|
4.3. Collecting and sharing data – Barriers .................................................................................. |
33 |
|
4.4. Collecting and sharing data – Enablers................................................................................. |
34 |
|
4.5. Enabling cost benchmarking data collection and sharing – Options .............................. |
37 |
|
Chapter 5. Conclusions and recommendations....................................................................... |
39 |
|
5.1. Summary of findings................................................................................................................ |
39 |
|
5.2. Options for benchmarking for NPP decommissioning....................................................... |
40 |
|
5.3. A possible roadmap for the implementation of benchmarking....................................... |
41 |
|
5.4. Moving forward ......................................................................................................................... |
42 |
|
References....................................................................................................................................... |
43 |
|
List of appendices |
|
|
A. |
Sweden case study: Interface with project delivery tools ............................................. |
45 |
B.1. Details of barriers and enablers identified by industry ................................................. |
49 |
|
B.2. Barriers and enablers: Approach to ascertaining interest group perspectives ......... |
51 |
|
B.3. |
Enabling benchmarking option analysis .......................................................................... |
55 |
COST BENCHMARKING FOR NUCLEAR POWER PLANT DECOMMISSIONING, NEA No. 7460, © OECD 2019 |
7 |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
List of figures |
|
|
2.1: |
Key groups of stakeholders and their roles...................................................................... |
13 |
2.2: |
Potential savings on future projects identified by the NDA from the |
|
|
application of cost benchmarking techniques ................................................................ |
17 |
4.1: |
Barriers and the overarching challenges for their removal .......................................... |
23 |
4.2: |
Organisation and facilitation – Examples of other industries compared to NPP |
|
|
decommissioning (with assumed starting point and vision) ....................................... |
25 |
4.3: |
Benchmark components enabling the normalisation of cost data ............................. |
26 |
4.4: |
Cost benchmarking maturity development cycle........................................................... |
28 |
4.5: |
Dependencies for benchmarking approach development............................................ |
29 |
4.6: |
A critical mass for barrier removal and cost benchmarking development ............... |
29 |
4.7: |
Enablers for the removal of barriers to cost benchmarking ......................................... |
31 |
5.1: |
Benchmarking implementation roadmap........................................................................ |
41 |
A.1: |
Simplified description of governance model adapted for nuclear D&D..................... |
46 |
B2.1: The need for a catalyst to justify industry buy-in to commit to benchmarking?..... |
53 |
|
B2.2: Enabling components to form the critical mass necessary for removal |
|
|
|
of headline barriers............................................................................................................... |
54 |
List of tables |
|
|
4.1: |
Elements informing the quality of normalisation and comparison............................ |
27 |
4.2: |
Supporting information contributing to knowledge of and user confidence |
|
|
in actual cost data................................................................................................................. |
27 |
4.3: |
Examples of benchmarking enablers in the construction sector ................................ |
32 |
4.4: |
Examples of benchmarking enablers in the oil and gas industry................................ |
32 |
4.5: |
Characteristics that need to be considered to support options for cost |
|
|
benchmarking NPP decommissioning .............................................................................. |
33 |
4.6: |
Cost data requirements for project-level and activity-level benchmarking.............. |
34 |
4.7: |
Considerations for data collection and sharing .............................................................. |
35 |
4.8: |
Cost databases: Advantages and disadvantages............................................................. |
36 |
4.9: |
Preliminary considerations informing cost benchmarking, data collection |
|
|
and sharing options.............................................................................................................. |
37 |
4.10: |
Generic options (A-F) for data collection and sharing ................................................... |
38 |
5.1: |
Summary profile for Option F............................................................................................. |
41 |
8 |
COST BENCHMARKING IN THE CONTEXT OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANT DECOMMISSIONING, NEA No. 7460, © OECD 2019 |