
- •Foreword
- •Acknowledgements
- •Table of contents
- •Executive summary
- •Introduction
- •Purpose and scope
- •Structure of the report
- •Definitions
- •Classification of rail transport services
- •Key parameters
- •Data sources
- •References
- •1. Status of rail transport
- •Highlights
- •Introduction
- •Rail transport networks
- •Urban rail network
- •Conventional rail network for passenger and freight services
- •High-speed rail network
- •Rail transport activity
- •Passenger rail
- •Urban rail
- •Conventional and high-speed rail
- •Freight rail
- •What shapes rail transport?
- •Passenger rail
- •Freight rail
- •Rail transport and the energy sector
- •Energy demand from rail transport
- •Energy intensity of rail transport services
- •GHG emissions and local pollutants
- •Well-to-wheel GHG emissions in rail transport
- •Additional emissions: Looking at rail from a life-cycle perspective
- •High-speed rail
- •Urban rail
- •Freight rail
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Rail network developments
- •Rail transport activity
- •Passenger rail
- •Urban rail
- •Conventional and high-speed rail
- •Freight rail
- •Implications for energy demand
- •Implications for GHG emissions and local pollutants
- •Direct CO2 emissions
- •Well-to-wheel GHG emissions
- •Emissions of local pollutants
- •References
- •3. High Rail Scenario: Unlocking the Benefits of Rail
- •Highlights
- •Introduction
- •Motivations for increasing the role of rail transport
- •Urban rail
- •Conventional and high-speed rail
- •Freight rail
- •Trends in the High Rail Scenario
- •Main assumptions
- •Rail network developments in the High Rail Scenario
- •Rail transport activity
- •Passenger rail in the High Rail Scenario
- •Urban rail
- •Conventional and high-speed rail
- •Freight rail in the High Rail Scenario
- •Implications for energy demand
- •Implications for GHG emissions and local pollutants
- •Direct CO2 emissions in the High Rail Scenario
- •Well-to-wheel GHG emissions
- •Investment requirements in the High Rail Scenario
- •Fuel expenditure
- •Policy opportunities to promote rail
- •Passenger rail
- •Urban rail
- •Conventional and high-speed rail
- •Freight rail
- •Conclusions
- •4. Focus on India
- •Highlights
- •Introduction
- •Status of rail transport
- •Passenger rail
- •Urban rail
- •Conventional passenger rail
- •High-speed rail
- •Freight rail
- •Dedicated freight corridors
- •Rail transport energy demand and emissions
- •Energy demand from rail transport
- •GHG emissions and local pollutants
- •Outlook for rail to 2050
- •Outlook for rail in the Base Scenario
- •Context
- •Trends in the Base Scenario
- •Passenger rail
- •Freight rail
- •Implications for energy demand
- •Implications for GHG and local pollutant emissions
- •Outlook for rail in the High Rail Scenario
- •Key assumptions
- •Trends in the High Rail Scenario
- •Passenger and freight rail activity
- •Implications for energy demand
- •Implications for GHG and local pollutant emissions
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •Acronyms, abbreviations and units of measure
- •Acronyms and abbreviations
- •Units of measure
- •Glossary

IEA 2019. All rights reserved.
IEA 2019. All rights reserved. |
The Future of Rail |
|
Opportunities for energy and the environment |
|
|
Freight rail |
|
|
An example used to assess the capacity of freight rail transport to deliver GHG emission |
|
|
reductions on a life-cycle basis involves the construction of a new double-track freight corridor |
|
|
with an (arbitrary) length of 500 kilometres connecting two important freight nodes with an |
|
|
annual freight demand of 50 million tonnes.40 Road transport is the only alternative mode |
|
|
Page | 61 |
||
considered, since air shipping is appropriate only for very different types of goods, and maritime |
||
|
||
transport does not compete directly with surface transport (except in coastal areas). The key |
|
|
parameters considered in the three cases are given in Table 1.4. The GHG emissions savings are |
|
|
assumed to come not only from truck operation, but also from the avoidance of the emissions |
|
|
otherwise embedded in the vehicle itself, since a company replacing truck haulage by freight rail |
|
|
will require a smaller trucking fleet. |
|
Table 1.4 Transport emissions mitigation with a new 500 kilometre freight rail corridor: selected variables in three cases
|
Category |
Variable |
|
Unit |
|
High |
|
Medium |
|
Low |
||||
|
|
|
potential |
|
potential |
|
potential |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rail infrastructure |
Total embedded |
|
kt CO2-eq |
|
|
1 700 |
|
|
2 200 |
|
|
4 300 |
|
|
construction |
emissions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Train efficiency and |
Well-to-wheel |
|
g CO2-eq/tonne- |
9.5 |
|
14.0 |
|
23.2 |
|
||||
|
power mix |
emission intensity |
|
kilometre |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Modal share |
Train / truck shares |
% |
|
50/50 |
|
30/70 |
|
10/90 |
|
||||
|
Train occupancy |
Load carried |
|
tonnes/train |
2 900 |
|
1 900 |
|
800 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note: kt = thousand tonnes; g CO2-eq = grammes of carbon-dioxide equivalent.
Sources: Embedded emissions for rail construction assume the same values as calculated for high-speed rail (see Table 1.2). Train emissions intensity and loadings are based on country benchmarks, with high potential based on Russia, medium potential by the weighted world average and low potential by emission factors in China and train loading in the European Union.
Key message • A new freight rail corridor is estimated to have the capacity to replace 10-50% of road freight. The intensity of train emissions varies proportionally to train size.
The analysis suggests that, in the best case, net emission benefits are achieved after slightly more than one year after infrastructure construction (Figure 1.33). This is largely due to the fact that the emissions intensity of freight rail is nearly ten-times lower than that of trucks. The medium case offers net benefits in less than four years, while the most pessimistic scenario achieves emissions neutrality after 24 years.
To summarise, the extent of the GHG value of building a new rail line depends on a combination of topological considerations and infrastructural decisions, the level of operational efficiency of the train, load factors and electricity mixes and, most of all, the total volume of passengers or freight shifted to rail. Under favourable conditions, rail can deliver important GHG emission savings by shifting traffic away from passenger cars, trucks and planes. Many other considerations need to be taken into account, such as the impact on air quality (especially in urban areas), the value of reduced road congestion, savings in travel time and noise. Another caveat is that this analysis does not attempt to evaluate the potential for and value of efficiency increases in electric vehicles in other transport modes or the impact of vehicle sharing.
40 Estimation based on average national freight volumes by mode in (IEA, 2018a). This 50 million tonnes is about equivalent to 5% of the total annual freight transported by rail in a large country such as India or Russia.