Учебный год 2023 / phd
.pdfLEGAL CHALLENGES OF CROSS-BORDER INSOLVENCIES IN SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA WITH REFERENCE TO TANZANIA AND KENYA: A FRAMEWORK FOR LEGISLATION AND POLICIES
BENHAJJ SHAABAN MASOUD
A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of Nottingham Trent University for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy
February 2012
COPYRIGHT
This work is the intellectual property of the author. You may copy up to 5% of this work for private study, or personal, non-commercial research. Any re-use of the information contained within this document should be fully referenced, quoting the author, title, university, degree level and pagination. Queries or requests for any other use, or if a more substantial copy is required, should be directed in the owner of the Intellectual Property Rights.
i
ABSTRACT
Although a substantial body of literature has developed in recent years in the area of cross-border insolvency, this scholarship has been dominated by scholars from the United States and Europe, so that a perspective from most of Sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries is lacking. This study addresses this perspective. It makes an in-depth examination and discussion of the challenges that SSA countries face in reform and application of cross-border insolvency law given the ever-growing multinational trade and investment. The study focuses on the risk of failure of SSA legislative processes to properly address the potential challenges of cross-border insolvencies in a manner that is sensitive to the local contexts and which provides a balance with international insolvency benchmarks. It examines cross-border insolvency theories; the global drivers for convergence of insolvency law through global insolvency norms; and the implications for cross-border insolvency regulations arising from cross-border trade and investment arrangements, such as the bilateral investment treaties, before considering the state and future of the legislative frameworks of SSA countries. It then brings out the ‘pressures’ exerted on and issues that emerge in the consideration and quest for crafting a workable and appropriate cross-border insolvency framework for a SSA country. Notably, the current insights and the pressures from the global convergence may result in unsuitable legislative reforms as such insights and the global insolvency norms are not necessarily and directly relevant to SSA situations. The study offers the perspective that has hitherto been lacking in the current scholarship and provides a theoretical insight and understanding on how the crafting of a workable and appropriate legislative framework may be undertaken, taking account of local policies and providing a balance with the existing international insolvency benchmarks. The study underscores the significance and challenge of prioritising the local contexts in developing a functional cross-border insolvency framework.
ii
|
TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
Copyright |
i |
|
Abstract |
ii |
|
Table of Contents |
iii |
|
List of Abbreviation |
xiii |
|
Table of Legislation |
xvi |
|
Table of Cases |
xviii |
|
Acknowledgement |
xxi |
|
CHAPTER ONE |
1 |
|
THE CONTEXTUAL FRAMEWORK OF THE STUDY |
1 |
|
1.1 |
Introduction |
1 |
1.2 |
Background |
1 |
1.3 |
Research Problem |
7 |
1.4 |
Aim, Objectives, and Research Questions of the Study |
10 |
1.4.1 |
Objectives |
10 |
1.4.2 |
Research Questions |
10 |
1.5 |
Research Methodology and Sources |
11 |
1.6 |
Organisation of the Study |
12 |
CHAPTER TWO |
14 |
CONCEPTUAL AND THEORETICAL ASPECTS OF THE CROSS-BORDER INSOLVENCY LANDSCAPE WITH REFERENCE TO SUB-SAHARAN
AFRICA |
14 |
|
2.1 |
Introduction |
14 |
2.2 |
The Concept of Insolvency and Cross-Border Insolvency |
15 |
iii
2.3A Brief Overview of Theoretical and Policy Foundations of
|
Insolvency Systems |
19 |
2.4 |
Problems and Issues Involved in Cross-Border Insolvencies |
24 |
2.5 |
Competing Theories in Cross-Border Insolvencies |
27 |
2.5.1 |
Theoretical Underpinning for Territorialism and Universalism |
29 |
2.5.2 |
A Review of the Debate over Territorialism and Universalism |
30 |
2.5.2.1 |
Protection of Local Interests |
30 |
2.5.2.2 |
Predictability |
32 |
2.5.2.3 |
Efficiency and Value Maximisation |
34 |
2.5.2.4 |
Practicality |
36 |
2.5.3 |
Alternative Approaches Emerging from the Debate |
37 |
2.5.3.1 |
Cooperative Territorialism |
39 |
2.5.3.2 |
Modified Universalism |
40 |
2.5.3.3 |
Contractualism or Bankruptcy Selection Clause Approach |
41 |
2.6Placing the Theoretical Approaches and the Associated Issues in
|
SSA Context |
43 |
2.7 |
Some Thoughts and Issues Relating to Reform Strategies |
48 |
2.8 |
Conclusion |
52 |
CHAPTER THREE |
53 |
|
THE GLOBAL CONVERGENCE OF INSOLVENCY LAW AND THE |
|
|
QUEST FOR A SUB-SAHARAN AFRICAN CROSS-BORDER |
|
|
INSOLVENCY FRAMEWORK |
53 |
|
3.1 |
Introduction |
53 |
3.2Globalisation and the Pressure for Convergence of Insolvency Law
Systems |
54 |
3.3Global Insolvency Norms and the Benchmarking of Insolvency
iv
Reform Process |
57 |
3.3.1The ‘Soft Law’ Approach of the Standardisation Initiatives and the
Strategies for Ensuring Observance |
60 |
3.3.2Relevance and Suitability of International Insolvency Standards in
SSA Context |
65 |
3.4Appraising the Nature and Compliance’s Assessments of the
International Insolvency Standards from a SSA Perspective |
72 |
3.5The Recent Global Crisis and the Continued Influence of
Multilateral Institutions for SSA Insolvency Reform Process |
85 |
3.6Towards Adoption of and Compliance with International
Insolvency Standards: Which Approach? |
87 |
3.7Drivers behind the Emerging Reform Trends in Sub-Saharan
|
Africa |
92 |
3.8 |
Conclusion |
95 |
CHAPTER FOUR |
98 |
|
EXTENT OF FACILITATION OF CROSS-BORDER TRADE AND |
|
|
INVESTMENT AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR CROSS-BORDER |
|
|
INSOLVENCY REGULATION IN SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA |
98 |
|
4.1 |
Introduction |
98 |
4.2Overview of the Linkage between Cross-Border Insolvency and
|
Facilitation of Trade and Investment |
99 |
4.3 |
Liberalisation and Reform of the Supporting Legal Environment |
101 |
4.3.1 |
Market Liberalisation |
102 |
4.3.2 |
Reform Challenges and Problems |
103 |
4.4Multilateral Institutions’ Role in Facilitation of Cross-Border Trade
and Investment |
105 |
v
4.4.1The Proposed Role of WTO in Financial Crisis Resolution and the
Cross-Border Insolvency Implications Involved |
107 |
4.4.2An Example of Cross-Border Insolvency Implication Arising from
Activities of other Multilateral Institutions |
108 |
4.5The Bilateral Investment Arrangements and their Linkage to Cross-
Border Insolvency |
111 |
4.5.1The Implications of the Bilateral Investment Treaties for Cross-
Border Insolvency Regulation |
115 |
4.5.2Linking Tools between Bilateral Investment Treaties and Cross-
|
Border Insolvency Regulation |
117 |
4.5.2.1 |
Scope and Definition of ‘Investment’ and ‘Investor’ |
120 |
4.5.2.2 Standards of Treatment of Foreign Investors and Foreign |
|
|
|
Investments |
122 |
4.5.2.3 Encouraging and Creating a Favourable Environment for Foreign |
|
|
|
Investments |
127 |
4.5.2.4 Transfer of Funds and Repatriation of Capital and Profits |
128 |
|
4.5.2.5 Reciprocity Principle |
131 |
|
4.5.2.6 Expropriation |
133 |
|
4.5.2.7 Dispute Settlement |
135 |
|
4.6 |
Inter-Regional and Regional Economic Arrangements |
136 |
4.6.1Inter-Regional Economic Arrangements and the Cross-Border
Insolvency Potential |
138 |
4.6.2Regional Economic Arrangements and the Cross-Border Insolvency
Potentials |
142 |
4.6.3Critiquing the Inter-Regional and Regional Trade Arrangements
Involving SSA with Cross-Border Insolvency in Mind |
147 |
4.7The ‘Crowding in’ and ‘Crowding out’ Effects of Cross-Border
Trade and Investment in the Context of Cross-Border Insolvency 149
vi
4.7.1 The ‘Crowding In’ and ‘Crowding Out’ and their Related Effects 150
4.7.2The Potential Impact of Effective Cross-Border Insolvency
Regulation on Cross-Border Trade and Investments |
152 |
4.8A Case for Differential and Contextual Treatments in Cross-Border
Insolvency Regulation? |
155 |
4.9 Conclusion |
158 |
CHAPTER FIVE |
160 |
THE COMMON LAW APPROACH TO CROSS-BORDER INSOLVENCY AND ITS APPLICABILITY IN SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA WITH REFERENCE TO TANZANIA AND KENYA
5.1 Introduction
5.2A Historical Basis of Cross-Border Insolvency Frameworks in
SSA’s Legal System
5.2.1The Reception and Nature of the Cross-Border Insolvency Law
Inherited from the Colonial Administration in SSA
5.2.2A Brief Survey of the State of Cross-Border Insolvency at Common
|
Law |
167 |
5.2.2.1 Jurisdiction for Initiating Insolvency Proceedings Regarding a |
|
|
|
Foreign Company |
170 |
5.2.2.2 |
Recognition of Foreign Proceedings |
171 |
5.2.2.3 |
Ancillary Proceedings |
173 |
5.2.2.4 |
Judicial Assistance and Cooperation |
174 |
5.2.2.5 |
Fair and Equitable Treatment of Local and Foreign Creditors |
176 |
5.3Considering the Common Law Approach in Light of Cross-Border Insolvency Theories and the International Insolvency Benchmarks 177
5.4Fitting the Common Law Approach into Cross-Border Trade and
Investment Facilitation Arrangements |
181 |
vii
5.5 |
Utility and Limitations of the Common Law Approach in SSA |
184 |
5.6 |
Conclusion |
191 |
CHAPTER SIX |
194 |
|
A SURVEY OF THE STATE OF CROSS-BORDER INSOLVENCY |
|
|
LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORKS IN SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA WITH |
|
|
REFERENCE TO TANZANIA AND KENYA |
194 |
|
6.1 |
Introduction |
194 |
6.2A Brief Overview of Legal and Socio-Economic Settings in SSA
|
with Reference to Tanzania and Kenya |
195 |
6.2.1 |
A Historical and Socio-Economic Backdrop |
195 |
6.2.2 |
Application of Law in Cross-Border Insolvencies in SSA Countries: |
|
|
Past, Present and Future |
199 |
6.3The International Character of Tanzania’s Insolvency Related
Legislation |
208 |
6.3.1Cross-Border Insolvency Aspects in Tanzania’s Inherited Colonial
Legislation |
208 |
6.3.2 Legal Developments in Cross-Border Insolvencies in Tanzania |
211 |
6.3.2.1 Treatment of Foreign Companies and Creditors in Domestic |
|
Proceedings |
214 |
6.3.2.2 Co-operation with and Recognition of Foreign Insolvency |
|
Proceedings |
217 |
6.3.2.3 Co-ordination and Communication |
219 |
6.4The International Character of Kenya’s Insolvency Related
Legislation |
220 |
6.4.1Cross-Border Insolvency Aspects in Kenya’s Inherited Colonial
Legislation |
220 |
viii
6.4.2Legislative Reform Initiative and Cross-Border Insolvency
Regulation in Kenya |
222 |
6.4.3Cross-Border Insolvency Features Emerging From the Kenyan
Reform Initiative |
225 |
6.4.3.1 Towards Adoption of the UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border
Insolvency |
225 |
6.4.3.2 Key Aspects of the Proposed Kenyan Model Law on Cross-Border |
|
Insolvency |
226 |
6.4.3.2.1Application of the Proposed Law to Foreign Jurisdictions
and Proceedings |
226 |
6.4.3.2.2Treatment of Foreign Creditors and Foreign
|
Representatives |
227 |
6.4.3.2.3 |
Recognition |
229 |
6.4.3.2.4 |
Protection of Creditors |
230 |
6.4.3.2.5 |
Communication, Co-ordination and Co-operation |
231 |
6.4.3.2.6 |
Application of other Relevant Laws |
231 |
6.5Applying the Relevant Bankruptcy Rules into Cross-Border
Corporate Insolvency Proceedings |
232 |
6.5.1 A Glimpse at the Cross-Border Bankruptcy Rules |
234 |
6.5.2Impact of the Cross-Border Bankruptcy Rules for Cross-Border
Corporate Insolvency Regulation |
241 |
6.5.3Effect of the Contemplated Kenyan Reform on the Future of Cross-
Border Insolvency Regulation |
245 |
6.6State Owned Enterprises and the Treatment of Cross-Border
Insolvency Aspects with Reference to Tanzania |
246 |
6.7Cross-Border Insolvency Treatment in SSA Regional Groupings
with Special Reference to Tanzania and Kenya |
249 |
ix