
Экзамен зачет учебный год 2023 / Асосков А.В. Коллизионное регулирование договорных обязательств
.pdf
—б и бл и о г раф и я —
Juenger Fr. Choice of Law and Multistate Justice. Dordrecht; Boston; London, 1993.
Juenger Fr. Contract Choice of Law in the Americas // American Journal of Comparative Law. 1997. Vol. 45. P. 195–208.
Juenger Fr. Selected Essays on the Conflict of Laws. New York, 2001.
Juenger Fr. The E.E.C. Convention on the Law Applicable to Contractual Obligations: an American Assessment // Contract Conflicts. The E.E.C. Convention on the Law Applicable to Contractual Obligations: a Comparative Study / Ed. by P. North. Amsterdam; New York; Oxford, 1982. P. 295–322.
Juenger Fr. The European Convention on the Law Applicable to Contractual Obligations: Some Critical Observations // Virginia Journal of International Law. 1981–1982. Vol. 22. P. 123–154.
Junker A. Internationales Privatrecht. München, 1998.
Kahn-Freund O. General Course of Private International Law. Netherlands, 1980.
Kaye P. The New Private International Law of Contract of the European Community. Implementation of the EEC’s Contractual Obligations Convention in England and Wales under the Contracts (Applicable Law) Act 1990. Aldershot, 1993.
Kegel G., Schurig Kl. Internationales Privatrecht: ein Studienbuch. 9. Aufl. München, 2004.
Kessedjian C. Party Autonomy and Characteristic Performance in the Rome Convention and the Rome I Proposal // Japanese and European Private International Law in Comparative Perspective / Ed. by J. Basedow, H. Baum, Y. Nishitani. Tübingen, 2008. P. 105–125.
Kieninger E.-M. Der grenzüberschreitende Verbrauchervertrag zwischen Richtlinienkollisionsrecht und Rom-I Verordnung // Die richtige Ordnung. Festschrift für Jan Kropholler zum 70. Geburtstag / Hrsg. D. Baetge, J. von Hein, M. von Hinden. Tübingen, 2008. S. 499–515.
Kirchner Chr. An Economic Analysis of Choice-of-Law and Choice-of-Forum Clauses // An Economic Analysis of Private International Law / Ed. by J. Basedow and T. Kono. Tübingen. 2006. P. 33–53.
Kluth D. Die Grenzen des kollisionsrechtlichen Verbraucherschutzes: Eine vergleichende Untersuchung der Regelungen der Art. 29, 29a EGBGB und des Art. 6 der Rom-I Verordnung / Studien zum Internationalen Privatund Verfahrensrecht. Bd 27. 2009.
Kost M. Konsensprobleme im internationalen Schuldvertragsrecht / Studien zum vergleichenden und internationalen Recht. Bd 26. Frankfurt am Main, 1995.
— 5 9 3 —

—б и бл и о г раф и я —
Kreytenberg W. Die individuelle Schwerpunktbestimmung internationaler Schuldverträge nach der Ausweichklausel des Artikel 4 Absatz 5 Satz 2 EVÜ: ein Beitrag zur Förderung von Rechtssicherheit und Einzelfallgerechtigkeit im europäischen Kollisionsrecht der Schuldverträge. 2007.
Kropholler J. Internationales Privatrecht, einschließlich der Grundbegriffe des Internationalen Zivilverfahrensrechts. 6. Aufl. Tübingen, 2006.
Kuehne G. Choice of Law and the Effects of Silence: Comments on Arts. 2(4) and 8(2) of the EC Draft Convention // European Private International Law of Obligations: Acts and Documents of an International Colloquium on the European Preliminary Draft Convention on the Law Applicable to Contractual and NonContractual Obligations, held in Copenhagen on April 29 and 30, 1974 / Ed. by O. Lando, B. von Hoffmann, K. Siehr. Tübingen, 1975. P. 121–124.
Kunda I. Internationally Mandatory Rules of a Third Country in European Contract Conflict of Laws. The Rome Convention and the Proposed Rome I Regulation. Rijeka, 2007.
Lagarde P. The E.E.C. Convention on the Law Applicable to Contractual Obligations // Harmonization of Laws in the European Communities: Products Liability, Conflict of Laws, and Corporation Law. Fifth Sokol Colloquium / Ed. by P. Herzog. USA, 1983. P. 49–62.
Lagarde P. The Scope of the Applicable Law in the E.E.C. Convention // Contract Conflicts. The E.E.C. Convention on the Law Applicable to Contractual Obligations: a Comparative Study / Ed. by P. North. Amsterdam; New York; Oxford, 1982. P. 49–58.
Lalive P. Transnational (or Truly International) Public Policy and International Arbitration // Comparative Arbitration Practice and Public Policy in Arbitration / Ed. P. Sanders. ICCA Congress Series, 1986 New York. Vol. 3. Kluwer Law International, 1987. P. 258–318.
Lando O. Contracts / International Encyclopedia of Comparative Law. Vol. III Private International Law / Chief ed. K. Lipstein. Chapter 24. Tübingen, 1976.
Lando O. International Situations and “Situations Involving a Choice Between the Laws of Different Legal Systems” // Harmonization of Private International Law by the E.E.C / Ed. by K. Lipstein. London, 1978. P. 15–24.
Lando O. Lex Fori in Foro Proprio // Maastricht Journal. 1995. Vol. 2. P. 359–375.
Lando O. On Some Writers on the Conflict of Laws of Contracts // Reform and Development of Private International Law. Essays in Honour of Sir Peter North / Ed. by J. Fawcett. Oxford, 2006. P. 237–253.
— 5 9 4 —

—б и бл и о г раф и я —
Lando O. Party Autonomy in the EC Convention on the Law Applicable to Contractual Obligations // The Influence of the European Communities upon Private International Law of the Member States / Ed. Fr. Rigaux. Bruxelles, 1981. P. 191–208.
Lando O. Standard Contracts: a Proposal and a Perspective // Scandinavian Studies in Law. 1966. P. 129–148.
Lando O. The Conflict of Laws of Contracts. General Principles // Recueil des Cours / Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law. Vol. 189. 1984-VI.
Lando O. The EEC Convention on the Law Applicable to Contractual Obligations // Common Market Law Review. 1987. Vol. 24. P. 159–214.
Lando O. The Law Applicable to the Merits of the Dispute // Arbitration International. 1986. Vol. 2. Issue 2. P. 104–115.
Lando O. The Lex Mercatoria In International Commercial Arbitration // International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 1985. Vol. 34. P. 747–768.
Lando O., Nielsen P. The Rome I Regulation // Common Market Law Review. 2008. Vol. 45. P. 1687–1725.
Lasok D., Stone P. Conflict of Laws in European Community. Abingdon, 1987.
Lebedev S., Muranov Al., Khodykin R., Kabatova E. New Russian Legislation on Private International Law // Yearbook of Private International Law. 2002. Vol. 4. P. 117–144.
Lehmann M. Liberating the Individual from Battles between States: Justifying Party Autonomy in Conflict of Laws // Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law. 2008. Vol. 41. P. 381–434.
Leible St. Choice of the Applicable Law // Le nouveau reglement europeen “Rome I” relatif a la loi applicable aux obligations contractuelles. Actes de la 20e Journee de droit international prive du 14 mars 2008 a Lausanne / Eds. E. Ritaine, A. Bonomi. Zürich, 2009. P. 61–75.
Leible St. Parteiautonomie im IPR – Allgemeines Anknüpfungsprinzip oder Verlegenheitslösung // Festschrift Jayme. München, 2004. S. 485–504.
Lein E. The New Rome I / Rome II / Brussels I Synergy // Yearbook of Private International Law. 2008. Vol. 10. P. 177–198.
Lesage-Mathieu St. Dispositives Kollisionsrecht im prozessualen Kontext. Frankfurt am Main, 2005.
Lew J. Applicable Law in International Arbitration. New York, 1978.
Lew J., Mistelis L., Kröll St. Comparative International Commercial Arbitration. Kluwer Law International, 2003.
— 5 9 5 —

—б и бл и о г раф и я —
Lipstein K. Characteristic Performance – a New Concept in the Conflict of Laws in Matters of Contract for the EEC // Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business. 1981. Vol. 3. P. 402–414.
Lipstein K. Introduction: the Preliminary Draft Convention on the Law Applicable to Contractual and Non-Contractual Obligations // Harmonization of Private International Law by the E.E.C / Ed. by K. Lipstein. London, 1978. P. 1–14.
Lipstein K. Principles of the Conflict of Laws, National and International. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1981.
Loacker L. Der Verbrauchervertrag im internationalen Privatrecht: zum Anwendungsbereich von Artikel 5 des Europäischen Schuldvertragsübereinkommens aus österreichischer und deutscher Sicht / Beiträge zum Internationalen Wirtschaftsrecht. Contributions on International Commercial Law. Bd 6. 2006.
Lüderitz A. Anknüpfung im Parteiinteresse // Internationales Privatrecht und Rechtsvergleichung im Ausgang des 20. Jahrhunderts Bewahrung oder Wende? Festschrift für Gerhard Kegel / Hrsg. A. Lüderitz und J. Schröder. Frankfurt am Main, 1977. S. 31–54.
Lüderitz Al. Wechsel der Anknüpfung in bestehendem Schuldvertrag // Festschrift für Max Keller zum 65. Geburtstag. Zürich, 1989. S. 459–471.
Ly F. De, Conflicts of law in international arbitration – an overview // Conflict of Laws in International Arbitration / Eds. Fr. Ferrari, St. Kröll. Munich, 2011. P. 3–16.
Makarov A. Die Resolution des “Institut de Droit International” über das internationale Obligationenrecht von 1908 und deren Einfluss auf die nationalen Kodifikationen des Kollisionsrechts // Festschrift Hans Lewald bei Vollendung des 40. Amtsjahres als ordentlicher Professor im Oktober 1953. Basel, 1953. S. 299–308.
Maniruzzaman A. Choice of Law in International Contracts: Some Fundamental Conflict of Laws Issues // Journal of International Arbitration. 1999. Vol. 16. Issue 4. P. 141–172.
Mankowski P. Consumer Contracts under Article 6 of the Rome I Regulation // Le nouveau reglement europeen “Rome I” relatif a la loi applicable aux obligations contractuelles. Actes de la 20e Journee de droit international prive du 14 mars 2008 a Lausanne / Eds. E. Ritaine, A. Bonomi. Zürich, 2009. P. 121–160.
Mankowski P. Kurzkommentar zum BGH Urteil vom 19.1.2000 // Entscheidungen zum Wirtschaftsrecht. 2000. S. 967.
Mankowski P. Stillschweigende Rechtswahl und wählbares Recht // Das Grünbuch zum Internationalen Vertragsrecht. Beiträge zur Fortentwicklung des Europäischen
— 5 9 6 —

—б и бл и о г раф и я —
Kollisionsrechts der vertraglichen Schuldverhältnisse / Hrsg. St. Leible. München, 2004. S. 63–108.
Mankowski P. Überlegungen zur sachund interessengerechten Rechtswahl in Verträgen des internationalen Wirtschaftsverkehrs // Recht der Internationalen Wirtschaft. 2003.
Mann Fr. Contracts: Effect of Mandatory Rules // Harmonization of Private International Law by the E.E.C / Ed. by K. Lipstein. London, 1978. P. 31–37.
Mann Fr. Lex Facit Arbitrum // Arbitration International. 1986. Vol. 2. Issue 3. P. 241–260.
Mann Fr. The Proper Law in the Conflict of Laws // International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 1987. Vol. 36. № 3.
Martiny D. Die Anknüpfung an den Markt // Festschrift für Ulrich Drobnig zum siebzigsten Geburtstag / Hrsg. J. Basedow, Kl. Hopt, H. Kötz. Tübingen, 1998. S. 389–408.
Martiny D. The Applicable Law to Contracts in the Absence of Choice (Art. 4 Rome Convention) – Old Problems and New Dilemmas // Estudios Sobre Contratacion Internacional / Dir. A. Caravaca, J. Gonzalez. 2006. P. 11–26.
Matic Z. The Hague Convention on the Law Applicable to Contracts for the International Sale of Goods – Rules on the Applicable Law // International Contracts and Conflicts of Laws: a Collection of Essays / Ed. by P. Sarcevic. London, 1990. P. 51–70.
Mayer P. Mandatory rules of law in international arbitration // Arbitration International. 1986. Vol. 2. Issue 4. P. 274–293.
Mayer P. Reflections on the International Arbitrator’s Duty to Apply the Law – The 2000 Freshfields Lecture // Arbitration International. 2001. Vol. 17. Issue 3. P. 235–248.
McDougal III L., Felix R., Whitten R. American Conflicts Law. 5th edition. Transnational Publishers, Inc, 2001.
McGuinness G. The Rome Convention: the Contracting Parties’ Choice // San Diego International Law Journal. 2000. Vol. 1. P. 127–173.
McLachlan C. Splitting the Proper Law in Private International Law // The British Yearbook of International Law. 1990. 61st Year of Issue. P. 311–337.
Michaels R. Globalizing Savigny? The State in Savigny’s Private International Law and the Challenge of Europeanization and Globalization // Duke Law School Legal Studies. Research Paper Series. Research Paper No. 74 September 2005 (http:// ssrn.com/abstract=796228).
Michaels R. Two Economists, Three Opinions? Economic Models for Private International Law – Cross-Border Torts as Example // An Economic Analysis
— 5 9 7 —

—б и бл и о г раф и я —
of Private International Law / Ed. by J. Basedow and T. Kono. Tübingen. 2006. P. 143–184.
Miguel A. de. Applicable Law in the Absence of Choice to Contracts Relating to Intellectual or Industrial Property Rights // Yearbook of Private International Law. 2008. Vol. 10. P. 199–219.
Mincke W. Die Parteiautonomie: Rechtswahl oder Ortswahl // IPRax. 1985. Heft 6.
Mistelis L. Mandatory Rules in International Arbitration: Too Much Too Early or Too Little Too Late? Concluding Remarks // American Review of International Arbitration. 2007. Vol. XVIII. P. 217–228.
Möllenhoff W. Nachträgliche Rechtswahl und Rechte Dritter / Münstersche Beiträge zur Rechtswissenschaft. Bd 69. Berlin, 1993.
Morse C. Comparative Study of the Rules of Conflicts of Laws in the Field of Contracts // The Influence of the European Communities upon Private International Law of the Member States / Ed. Fr. Rigaux. Bruxelles, 1981. P. 141–189.
Morse C. Contracts of Employment and the E.E.C. Contractual Obligations Convention // Contract Conflicts. The E.E.C. Convention on the Law Applicable to Contractual Obligations: a Comparative Study / Ed. by P. North. Amsterdam; New York; Oxford, 1982. P. 143–184.
Morse C. The EEC Convention on the Law Applicable to Contractual Obligations // Yearbook of European Law. 1982. Vol. 2. P. 107–160.
Moser R. Rezension zum: Schnitzer Adolf, Handbuch des Internationalen Privatrechts. 4. Aufl. Basel, 1957–1958 // Schweizerische Juristen-Zeitung. 1958. 54. Jahrgang. Heft 9. S. 141–142.
Moser R. Vertragsabschluss, Vertragsgültigkeit und Parteiwille im internationalen Obligationenrecht. St. Gallen, 1948.
Moss G. Can an Arbitral Tribunal Disregard the Choice of Law Made by the Parties? // Stockholm International Arbitration Review. 2005. Vol. 1. P. 1–21.
Moss G. International Arbitration and the Quest for the Applicable Law // Global Jurist. 2008. Vol. 8. Issue 3. Article 2.
Moss G. Tacit Choice of Law, Partial Choice and Closest Connection: the Case of Common Law Contract Models Governed by a Civilian Law // Rett og toleranse. Festkrift til Helge Johan Thue / Ed. T. Frantzen, J. Giertsen, G. Moss. 2007. P. 367–378.
Mostermans P. Optional (Facultative) Choice of Law? Reflections from a Dutch Perspective // Netherlands International Law Review. 2004. P. 393–410.
— 5 9 8 —

—б и бл и о г раф и я —
Münchener Kommentar zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch. Bd 10 Einführungsgesetz zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuche (Art. 1–46) Internationales Privatrecht. Hrsg. H. Sonnenberger. 4. Aufl. München, 2006.
Münchener Kommentar zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch. Bd 10 Internationales Privatrecht. Rom-I Verordnung. Rom-II Verordnung. Einführungsgesetz zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuche (Art. 1–24) / Hrsg. H. Sonnenberger. 5. Aufl. München, 2010.
Münchener Kommentar zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch. Bd 11. Internationales Wirtschaftsrecht. Einführungsgesetz zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuche (Art. 50–245). 4. Aufl. München, 2006.
Nafziger J. Oregon’s Conflicts Law Applicable to Contracts // Yearbook of Private International Law. 2001. Vol. III. P. 391–418.
Nafziger J. The Louisiana and Oregon Codifications of Choice-of-Law Rules in Context // Welcoming the World: U.S. National Reports to the XVIIIth International Congress of Comparative Law / Eds. J. Reitz, S. Symeonides. American Society of Comparative Law, 2010. P. 165–193.
Naon Gr. Choice-of-Law Problems in International Commercial Arbitration // Recueil des Cours / Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law. Vol. 289. 2001.
Neuhaus P. Die Grundbegriffe des internationalen Privatrechts. 2. Aufl. Tübingen, 1976.
Nishitani Y. Party Autonomy and its Restrictions by Mandatory Rules in Japanese Private International Law: Contractual Conflicts Rules // Japanese and European Private International Law in Comparative Perspective / Ed. by J. Basedow, H. Baum, Y. Nishitani. Tübingen, 2008. P. 77–103.
Nishitani Y. Mancini und die Parteiautonomie im Internationalen Privatrecht. Heidelberg, 2000.
North P. The E.E.C. Convention on the Law Applicable to Contractual Obligations (1980): its History and Main Features // Contract Conflicts. The E.E.C. Convention on the Law Applicable to Contractual Obligations: a Comparative Study / Ed. by P. North. Amsterdam; New York; Oxford, 1982. P. 3–30.
North P. Varying the proper law // Multum non Multa. Festschrift für Kurt Lipstein aus Anlass seines 70. Geburtstages / Hrsg. P. Feuerstein, Cl. Parry. Heidelberg, 1980. P. 205–220.
Nygh P. Autonomy in International Contracts. Oxford, 1999.
Nygh P. The Reasonable Expectations of the Parties as a Guide to the Choice of Law in Contract and in Tort // Recueil des Cours / Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law. Vol. 251. 1995.
— 5 9 9 —

—б и бл и о г раф и я —
Offerhaus J. International Contracts under the Benelux Treaty on Private International Law // Liber Amicorum of Congratulations to Algot Bagge. 1956. P. 160–172.
Otto D. Säumnis in internationalen Schiedsverfahren // IPRax. 2002. Heft 3. S. 164–169.
Overbeck A. von, Contracts: the Swiss Draft Statute Compared with the E.E.C. Convention // Contract Conflicts. The E.E.C. Convention on the Law Applicable to Contractual Obligations: a Comparative Study / Ed. by P. North. Amsterdam; New York; Oxford, 1982. P. 269–294.
Papeil A.-S. Conflict of overriding mandatory rules in arbitration // Conflict of Laws in International Arbitration / Eds. Fr. Ferrari, St. Kröll. Munich, 2011. P. 341–377.
Parra-Aranguren G. The Fifth Inter-American Specialized Conference on Private International Law // E Pluribus Unum. Liber Amicorum A.L. Droz / Eds. A. Borras, A. Bucher, A. Struycken, M. Verwilghen. Nijhoff, 1996.
Patocchi P. Characteristic Performance: a New Myth in the Conflict of Laws? Some Comments on a Recent Concept in the Swiss and European Private International Law of Contract // Études de droit international en l’honneur de Pierre Lalive / Eds. Chr. Dominice, P. Lalive. 1993. P. 113–139.
Pertegas M. Cross-Border Litigation in Intellectual Property Rights: Choice of Law Rules in IP Rights Under The Rome I Regulation / Litigating Intellectual Property Rights Disputes Cross-border: EU Regulations, ALI Principles, CLIP Project / Ed. by St. Bariatti. Milan, 2010. P. 55–61.
Pertegas M. The Notion of Contractual Obligation in Brussels I and Rome I // Enforcement of International Contracts in the European Union. Covergence and Divergence between Brussels I and Rome I / Eds. J. Meeusen, M. Pertegas, G. Straetmans. Antwerpen, 2004. P. 175–190.
Pfister B. Die nachträgliche Vereinbarung des Schuldstatuts // Recht der Internationalen Wirtschaft. 1973. S. 440–444.
Philip A. Mandatory Rules, Public Law (Political Rules) and Choice of Law in the E.E.C. Convention on the Law Applicable to Contractual Obligations // Contract Conflicts. The E.E.C. Convention on the Law Applicable to Contractual Obligations: a Comparative Study / Ed. by P. North. Amsterdam; New York; Oxford, 1982. P. 81–110.
Piroddi P. International Subcontracting in EC Private International Law // Yearbook of Private International Law. 2005. Vol. 7. P. 289–331.
Plender R., Wilderspin M. The European Private International Law of Obligations. 3rd ed. London, 2009.
— 6 0 0 —

—б и бл и о г раф и я —
Pocar F. Protection of Weaker Parties in the Rome Convention and the Rome I Proposal // Japanese and European Private International Law in Comparative Perspective / Ed. by J. Basedow, H. Baum, Y. Nishitani. Tübingen, 2008. P. 127–133.
Poudret J.-Fr., Besson S. Comparative Law of International Commercial Arbitration. 2nd ed. Sweet & Maxwell, 2007.
Private International Law at the End of the 20th Century: Progress or Regress?: XVth International Congress of Comparative Law / Ed. by S. Symeonides. Kluwer Law International. 2000.
Pulkowski Fl. Internationale Zuständigkeit und anwendbares Recht bei Streitigkeiten aus grenzüberschreitenden Bauverträgen // IPRax. 2001. Heft 4. S. 306–310.
Qin R. Parteiautonomie: Eine rechtsvergleichende Untersuchung. Frankfurt am Main, 2004.
Rabel E. Conflicts Rules on Contracts // Lectures on the Conflict of Laws and International Contracts. Delivered at the Summer Institute on International and Comparative Law, University of Michigan Law School (August 5–20, 1949). Michigan, 1951. P. 127–141.
Rabel E. The Conflict of Laws: a Comparative Study. 2nd ed. Prep. by U. Drobnig. Vol. 1 Introduction: Family Law. Michigan, 1958.
Rabel E. The Conflict of Laws: a Comparative Study. 2nd ed. Prep. by U. Drobnig. Vol. 2 Foreign Corporations: Torts: Contracts in general. Michigan, 1960.
Rabel E. The Conflict of Laws: a Comparative Study. 2nd ed. Vol. 3 Special Obligations: Modification and Discharge of Obligations. Michigan, 1964.
Rasmussen-Bonne H.-E. Alternative Rechtsund Forumswahlklauseln: eine vergleichende Darstellung / Studien zum Europäischen und Internationalen Wirtschaftsrecht. Bd 9. Frankfurt am Main, 1999.
Rau A. The Arbitrator and “Mandatory Rules of Law” // American Review of International Arbitration. 2007. Vol. XVIII. P. 51–89.
Reimann M. Savigny’s Triumph? Choice of Law in Contracts Cases at the Close of the Twentieth Century // Virginia Journal of International Law. 1998–1999. Vol. 39. P. 571–605.
Restatement (Second) of Conflict of Laws with Revisions. Vol. 1. §§ 1–221. American Law Institute Publishers, 1971.
Restatement (Second) of Conflict of Laws with Revisions. Vol. 2. §§ 222–End. Index. American Law Institute Publishers, 1971.
Revisions of Portions of the 1971 Text of Restatement of the Law, Second, Conflict of Laws 2d. As Adopted and Promulgated by the American Law Institute. May 19, 1988. Vol. 1. American Law Institute Publishers, 1989.
— 6 0 1 —

—б и бл и о г раф и я —
Rigaux Fr. Institut de Droit International. 65. Session in Basel vom 26. August – 3. September 1991 // RabelsZ. 1992. Bd 56. S. 547–552.
Rinze J. The Scope of Party Autonomy under the 1980 Rome Convention on the Law Applicable to Contractual Obligations // Journal of Business Law. 1994. P. 412–430.
Roth W.-H. Internationales Versicherungsvertragsrecht: Das Versicherungsverhältnis im internationalen Vertragsrecht – Zugleich ein Beitrag zum Schutz des schwächeren Vertragspartners im IPR und zur Dienstleistungsfreiheit in der Europäischen Gemeinschaft. Tübingen, 1985.
Rowley K. The Often Imitated, but not Yet Duplicated, Revised Uniform Commercial Code Article 1 // Uniform Commercial Code Law Journal. 2006. Vol. 38. No. 3. P. 195–212.
Rühl Chr. Rechtswahlfreiheit und Rechtswahlklauseln in Allgemeinen Geschäftsbedingungen. Baden-Baden, 1999.
Rühl G. Party Autonomy in the Private International Law of Contracts: Transatlantic Convergence and Economic Efficiency // Conflict of Laws in a Globalized World / Ed. by E. Gottschalk, R. Michaels, G. Rühl, J. von Hein. Cambridge, 2007. P. 153–183.
Rühl G. Rechtswahlfreiheit im europäischen Kollisionsrecht // Die richtige Ordnung. Festschrift für Jan Kropholler zum 70. Geburtstag / Hrsg. D. Baetge, J. von Hein, M. von Hinden. Tübingen, 2008. S. 187–209.
Sambugaro G. What “Law” to Choose for International Contracts? // The European Legal Forum. 2008. Issue 3. P. 126–131.
Sandrock O. “Handcuffs” Clauses in International Commercial Contracts: Basic Reflections on the Autonomy of the Parties to Choose the Proper Law for their Contracts // International Lawyer. 1997. Vol. 31. P. 1105–1119.
Schacherreiter J. Leading Decisions zum Internationalen Privatrecht. Wien, 2008.
Schack H. Keine stillschweigende Rechtswahl im Prozeß! // IPRax. 1986. Heft 5. S. 272–274.
Schack H. Rechtswahl im Prozess? // Neue Juristische Wochenschrift. 1984. S. 2736–2739.
Schäfer H.-B., Lantermann K. Choice of Law from an Economic Perspective // An Economic Analysis of Private International Law / Ed. by J. Basedow and T. Kono. Tübingen. 2006. P. 87–119.
Schmidt J. The Invalidity of Certain Choices of Law Clauses under German Law // Journal of Business Law. 1995. P. 308–310.
Schnitzer A. Die funktionelle Anknüpfung im internationalen Vertragsrecht // Festgabe für Wilhelm Schönenberger. 1968.
— 6 0 2 —