- •Contents
- •Introduction to the fourth edition
- •From the introduction to the first edition
- •Table of cases
- •Table of treaties
- •Table of Security Council and General Assembly resolutions
- •Abbreviations
- •1 What is war?
- •2 The course of war
- •3 A historical perspective of the legal status of war
- •5 The criminality of war of aggression
- •6 Controversial consequences of the change in the legal status of war
- •7 The concept of self-defence
- •8 The modality of individual self-defence
- •9 Collective self-defence
- •10 Collective security
- •Conclusion
- •Index of persons
- •Index of subjects
Introduction to the fourth edition
This is a completely updated edition of a book originally published in 1988 and last revised in the early part of 2001. In the short space of time since then, the international community has gone through the watershed date of 9 September 2001, the ensuing war in Afghanistan and the resumption of the Gulf War. These events have already left their mark on the way in which the jus ad bellum is perceived and practised. Moreover, several international legal phrases – like ‘material breach’ or so-called ‘preemptive’ self-defence – have percolated from the somewhat rarefied sphere of discourse by scholars and specialists to the public arena of political jousting. The result has been a lot of heat, but not necessarily much light.
The fourth edition examines the new developments in an effort to interpret correctly their proper meaning. As well, the new edition reflects recent judicial pronouncements of the International Court of Justice, relevant decisions adopted by the Security Council, the final Draft Articles on State responsibility as formulated by the International Law Commission and an unprecedented spate of legal literature on the subject of the use of inter-State force.
There are several new supplementary sections in the book. These relate mainly to consent by States to the use of force (as expressed either ad hoc or by treaty); an armed attack by non-State actors; the various phases in the Gulf War up to the occupation of Iraq in 2003 and beyond; and immunities from jurisdiction. Additionally, the views expressed in previous editions of the book on interceptive (as distinct from ‘preemptive’) self-defence and on response to terrorist attacks are further expounded. Other segments of the book have been entirely rewritten with a view to reflecting recent State practice.
xi
From the introduction to the first edition
War has plagued homo sapiens since the dawn of recorded history and, at almost any particular moment in the annals of the species, it appears to be raging in at least a portion of the globe (frequently, in many places at one and the same time).
War has consistently been a, perhaps the, most brutal human endeavour. If for no other reason, the subject of war should be examined and reexamined continuously. There is a tendency today to avoid the use of the term ‘war’, regarding it as arcane and largely superseded by the phrase ‘international armed conflict’. However, apart from the fact that the expression ‘war’ – appearing as it does in many international instruments and constituting an integral part of a host of customary international legal norms – is far from outdated, a general reference to international armed conflicts ignores the important theoretical as well as practical distinctions existing between wars and other uses of inter-State force (‘short of war’).
This book is divided into three parts. The first part deals with questions like: What is war? When does it commence and terminate? Is there a twilight zone between war and peace? What is the difference between peace treaties, armistice agreements and cease-fires? Where can war be waged and what is the meaning of neutrality? These problems, with their numerous ramifications, seriously impact on the substance of international law.
The focus of the discussion in the second part is the contemporary prohibition of the use of force in international relations. The current state of the law is put in relief against the background of the past. The meaning of aggression, as defined by a consensus Resolution of the United Nations General Assembly in 1974, is explored. The construct of crimes against peace, which is part of the Nuremberg legacy, is set out. Some controversial implications of the illegality and criminality of wars of aggression are fathomed, with a view to establishing the true dimensions of the transformation undergone by modern international law in this domain.
The third part wrestles with the complex topics of self-defence and collective security. In the practice of States, most legal disputes concerning
xii
From the introduction to the first edition |
xiii |
the use of force hinge on the alleged exercise of the individual or collective right of self-defence. In fact, more often than not, self-defence is invoked by both antagonists simultaneously. The question when, and under what conditions, self-defence may legitimately take place is crucial. In this context, the scope of an armed attack – giving rise to self-defence – is investigated, and a differentiation is made between armed attacks from and by a State. The functions discharged by the Security Council in the evaluation of self-defence are probed. Other pertinent matters relate to the modality of self-defence, e.g., can armed reprisals or forcible measures for the protection of nationals abroad be harmonized with the law of the UN Charter? Collective self-defence comes under a special scrutiny, and the infrastructure of the various types of treaties in which it is usually embedded is analyzed.
Collective security, as an institutionalized use of force by the international community, is still an elusive concept in reality. The original mechanism devised by the Charter has yet to be activated, although some imperfect substitutes have evolved. An important subject of discourse is the relative powers – actual and potential – of the Security Council, the General Assembly and (in the light of the Nicaragua Judgment) even the International Court of Justice.
Table of cases
Administrative Decision No. II 106 Alabama Claims 29
Armstrong Cork Company Case 73
Arrest Warrant Case (Case Concerning the Arrest Warrant of 11 April 2000) 145, 148–9
Barcelona Traction Case (Case Concerning
the Barcelona Traction, Light and Power
Company, Limited) 109, 254
Certain Expenses of the United Nations
(Article 17, Paragraph 2, of the
Charter) 307, 316, 324
Chorzo´w Factory Case (Case Concerning
the Factory at Chorzo´w) (Claim for
Indemnity) (Merits) 104–5
Christiansen, Re 160
Corfu Channel Case (Merits) 205–6, 221,
244
Dalmia Cement Ltd. v. National Bank of Pakistan 19, 33
Delalic Case (Prosecutor v. Delalic et al.) 8 Dette Publique Ottoman, Affaire de la 168
East Timor Case (Case Concerning East Timor) 109, 169, 172
Erdemovic Case (Prosecutor v. Erdemovic) 143
Farben,I. G.,Case(USAv.Krauchetal.)133
Fisheries Jurisdiction Case (Jurisdiction of
the Court) 40
Genocide Case (Case Concerning
Application of the Convention on the
Prevention and Punishment of the
Crime of Genocide) 109, 324–5
High Command Case (USA v. Von Leeb et al.) 133–4, 137, 140
Hostage Case (USA v. List et al.) 160
Justice Case (USA v. Altstoetter et al.) 160
Kuperskic Case (Prosecutor v. Kuperskic et al.) 224
Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory 40–1, 109, 169, 204
Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons 17, 86, 102, 161–2, 164, 175, 196, 208–9, 229, 238–9
Lockerbie Case (Case Concerning Questions of Interpretation and Application of the 1971 Montreal Convention Arising from the Aerial Incident at Lockerbie) 322–3
Lockerbie Case (Her Majesty’s Advocate v. Al Megrahi et al.) 323
Merge´ Case 46
Ministries Case (USA v. Von Weizsaecker et al.) 121, 146, 178
Namibia Advisory Opinion (Legal Consequences for State of the Continued Presence of South Africa in Namibia (South West Africa) notwithstanding Security Council Resolution 276) 289, 291
Naulilaa Case 224, 225
Nicaragua Case (Case Concerning Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua)
Jurisdiction 212, 318, 320 Merits 6, 69–70, 72, 88, 90, 92–7,
100, 105, 113, 127, 131, 181, 183, 193–6, 198, 201–3, 208, 210–14, 216–17, 220, 222, 229, 242, 254, 256, 268–72, 318
Order 105
xiv
Table of cases |
xv |
Nissan Case (Attorney-General v. Nissan) 309
North Sea Continental Shelf Cases 93 Nuremberg Trial (International Military Tribunal) 118–21, 132–3, 137,
139–41, 144–5, 156, 159, 167, 172, 192, 211–12, 249
Oil Platforms Case (Case Concerning Oil
Platforms) 182, 193–4, 196, 209, 268–9
Pinochet Case (Ex parte Pinochet Ugarte (No. 3)) 147–8
Reservations to the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide 72
RuSHA Case (USA v. Greifelt et al.) 168
Tadic Case (Prosecutor v. Tadic) 8, 203–4, 284
Tehran Case (Case Concerning United
States Diplomatic and Consular
Staff in Tehran) 197–8, 206, 213, 236
Tokyo Trial (International Military Tribunal for the Far East) (In re Hirota and Others) 121, 133, 145, 149, 180–1, 212
Ulysses Case (Navios Corporation v. The Ulysses II et al.) 33
Zuhlke, In re 160–1
