Экзамен зачет учебный год 2023 / [Andreas_Fllesdal,_Birgit_Peters,_Geir_Ulfstein]-1

Kress, K. ‘Legal Indeterminacy’, California Law Review 77 (1989) 283–337 Krzyżanowska-Mierzewska, M., ‘The Reception Process in Poland and Slovakia’,

in Keller and Stone Sweet (eds.), A Europe of Rights: The Impact of the ECHR on National Legal Systems

Kumm, M. ‘Constitutional Rights as Principles: On the Structure and Domain of Constitutional Justice’ – A Review Essay on “A Theory of Constitutional Rights”’, International Journal of Constitutional Law 2:3 (2004) 574–96

‘The Legitimacy of International Law: A Constitutionalist Framework of Analysis’, European Journal of International Law 15:5 (2004) 907–31

Lagrange, P. ‘Responsabilité des Etats pour actes accomplis en application du Chapitre VII de la Charte des Nations Unies’, Revue Générale de Droit International Public 112 (2008) 85–110

Lambert, P. ‘Marge nationale d’appréciation et contrôle de proportionnalité’, F. Sudre (ed.), L’interprétation de la Convention européenne des droits de l’homme (Brussels: Bruylant, 1998) 63–89

Lambert-Abdelgawad, E. ‘L’exécution des décisions des juridictions internationales des droits de l’homme: vers une harmonisation des systèmes régionaux’,

Anuario Colombiano de Derecho Internacional 2010–3 Especial, 9–55

‘L’exécution des décisions des juridictions européennes (Cour de Justice des Communautés Européennes et Cour Européenne des Droits de l’Homme)’,

Annuaire Français de Droit International 52 (2006) 676–724

‘Le Protocole 14 et l’exécution des arrêts de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme’, in G. Cohen-Jonathan and J.F. Flauss (eds.), La réforme du système de contrôle contentieux de la Convention européenne des droits de l’homme (Brussels: Bruylant, Nemesis, 2005) 79–113

Preventing and Sanctioning Hindrances to the Right of Individual Petition before the ECtHR (Antwerp: Intersentia, 2011)

‘The Execution of the Judgments of the ECtHR: Towards a Non-coercive and Participatory Model of Accountability’, Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 69:3 (2009) 471–506

The Execution of Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights, 2nd edn (Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing, 2008)

Lasser, M.D.S. Judicial Deliberations: A Comparative Analysis of Judicial Transparency and Legitimacy (Oxford University Press 2004)

Leach, P. ‘Access to the ECtHR – From a Legal Entitlement to a Lottery?’, Human Rights Law Journal 27 (2006) 11–25

‘Quelles sont les réparations adéquates dans les affaires de ‘disparitions’? Leçons issues des affaires sur la Tchétchénie’, E. Lambert-Abdelgawad and K. Martin-Chenut (eds.), Réparer les violations graves et massives des droits de l’homme: La Cour InterAméricaine, pionnière et modèle?, Collection de L’UMR De Droit Comparé de Paris, Vol. XX (Paris: Société de Législation Comparée, 2010)

Responding to Systemic Human Rights Violations: An Analysis of Pilot Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights and their Impact at National Level (Antwerp, Oxford, Portland: Intersentia, 2010)

Taking a Case to the European Court of Human Rights, 3rd edn (Oxford University Press, 2011) 466–8

‘The Chechen Conflict: Analysing the Oversight of the European Court of Human Rights’, European Human Rights Law Review (2008) 732–61

Lester, A. ‘Beyond Wednesbury: Substantive Principles of Administrative Law’,

Public Law (1987) 368

‘The European Court of Human Rights after 50 Years’, in Christoffersen and Madsen (eds.), The European Court of Human Rights Between Law and Politics, 98–115

Letsas, G. A Theory of Interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights

(Oxford University Press, 2007)

‘Judge Rozakis’s Separate Opinions and the Strasbourg Dilemma’, in D. Spielmann, M. Tsirli and P. Voyatzis (eds.), The European Convention on Human Rights: A Living Instrument, Essays in Honour of Christos L. Rozakis (Brussels: Bruylant, 2011)

‘No Human Right to Adopt?’, UCL Human Rights Review 1:1 (2008) 134–53 ‘Strasbourg’s Interpretive Ethic: Lessons for the International Lawyer’, European

Journal of International Law 21:3 (2010) 509–41

‘The Truth in Autonomous Concepts: How to Interpret the ECHR’, European Journal of International Law 15:2 (2004) 279–305

‘Two Concepts of the Margin of Appreciation’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 26:4 (2006) 705–32

Limbach, J. et al. Judicial Independence: Law and Practice of Appointments to the European Court of Human Rights (London: Interights, 2003)

Lock, T. ‘Accession of the EU to the ECHR: Who Would Be Responsible in Strasbourg?’ in D. Ashiagbor, N. Countouris and I. Lianos (eds.), The European Union after the Treaty of Lisbon (Cambridge University Press, 2012)

‘EU Accession to the ECHR: Implications for the Judicial Review in Strasbourg’,

European Law Review 35:6 (2010) 777–98

‘The ECJ and the ECtHR: The Future Relationship between the Two European Courts’, The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals 8:3 (2009) 375–98

Lockhart, N.J.S. and Weiler, J.H.H. ‘“Taking Rights Seriously” Seriously: The European Court and its Fundamental Rights Jurisprudence’, Common Market Law Review 32:1 (1995) 51–94 (Part I) and 579–627 (Part II)

Lorange Backer, I. ‘Begrunnelse for avsiling av en sivil ankesak’, Lov og Rett 48:8 (2009) 49–51

Lucy, W. ‘Adjudication’, in Coleman and Shapiro (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law, 206–67

Lugato, M. ‘Sono le sanzioni del Consiglio di Sicurezza incompatibili con il rispetto delle garanzie procedurali?’, Rivista di Deritto Internazionale 93 (2010) 309–42

Macdonald, R.St.J. ‘The Margin of Appreciation’, in R.St.J. Macdonald, F. Matscher and H. Petzold (eds.), The European System for the Protection of Human Rights (Dordrecht/London: Martinus Nijhoff, 1994) 83–124

Machinska, H. ‘Pilot Lowyer Project Developed by the Council of Europe to Make Direct Access to the ECtHR Easier and More Effective for Individuals’, in Lambert-Abdelgawad, Preventing and Sanctioning Hindrances

Macklem, P. ‘Militant Democracy, Legal Pluralism, and the Paradox of SelfDetermination’, International Journal of Constitutional Law 4 (2006) 488–516

Mahoney, P. ‘Judicial Activism and Judicial Self-Restraint in the European Court of Human Rights: Two Sides of the Same Coin’, Human Rights Law Journal 11 (1990) 57–80

‘Marvellous Richness of Diversity or Invidious Cultural Relativism?’, Human Rights Law Journal 19:1 (1998) 1–6

‘New Challenges for the European Court of Human Rights Resulting from the Expanding Case Load and Membership’, Penn State International Law Review 21:1 (2002) 101–14

‘Universality versus Subsidiarity in the Strasbourg Case Law on Free Speech: Explaining Some Recent Judgments’, European Human Rights Law Review 4 (1997) 364–79

Marchenko, M.N. ‘Yuridicheskaya priroda i charakter resheny Evropeyskogo Suda po pralam cheloveka’, Gusodarstvo i Pravo, 2 (2006)

Matscher, E. ‘Methods of Interpretation of the Convention’, in Macdonald et al. (eds.), The European System for the Protection of Human Rights

Maurer, A. ‘The Federal Constitutional Court’s Emergency Power to Intervene: Provisional Measures Pursuant to Article 32 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act’, German Law Journal 2 (2001)

McGoldrick, D. ‘Multiculturalism and its Discontents’, Human Rights Law Review 5 (2005) 27–56

McNair, A. The Law of Treaties (Oxford University Press, 1968)

Merkel, G. ‘Incompatible Contrasts? Preventive Detention in Germany and the European Convention on Human Rights’, German Law Journal 11 (2010) 1046–66

Meron, T. ‘Martens Clause, Principles of Humanity, and Dictates of Public Conscience’, American Journal of International Law 94 (2000) 78–89

Messineo, F. ‘The House of Lords in Al-Jedda and Public International Law’,

Netherlands International Law Review 56 (2009) 35–62

Metcalf, E. ‘Time for the UK Supreme Court to Think Again on Hearsay’, The Guardian, 15 December 2011

Milanović, M. and Papić, T. ‘As Bad As It Gets: The European Court’s Behrami and Saramati Decision and General International Law’, The International and Comparative Law Quarterly 58:2 (2009) 267–96

Minichmayr, G. Der Beitritt der Europäischen Gemeinschaft zur Konvention zum Schutze der Menschenrechte und Grundfreiheiten (Euro-Jus, Schriftenreihe der Abteilung für Europäische Integration, Krems: Donau Universität, 1999)

Möller, K. ‘Balancing and the Structure of Constitutional Rights’, International Journal of Constitutional Law 5:3 (2007) 453–68

Møse, E. ‘Norway’, in Blackburn and Polakiewicz (eds.), Fundamental Rights in Europe: The European Convention on Human Rights and its Member States, 1950–2000, 636–7

Mosler, H. ‘Die Entstehung des Modells supranationaler und gewaltenteilender Staatenverbindungen in den Verhandlungen über den Schuman-Plan’, E. von Caemmerer et al. (eds.), Probleme des europäischen Rechts: Festschrift für Walter Hallstein (Frankfurt/Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1966) 355–86

Mowbray, A. ‘A Study of the Principle of Fair Balance in the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights’, Human Rights Law Review 10 (2010) 289–317

‘The Consideration of Gender in the Process of Appointing Judges to the European Court of Human Rights’, Human Rights Law Review 8:3 (2008) 549–59

‘The Interlaken Declaration: The Beginning of a New Era for the European Court of Human Rights?’, Human Rights Law Review 10:3 (2010) 519–28

Myjer, E. et al. (eds.), The Conscience of Europe: 50 Years of the European Court of Human Rights (London: Council of Europe, Third Millennium Publishing Limited, 2010)

Ní Aoláin, F. ‘The Emergence of Diversity: Differences in Human Rights Jurisprudence’, Fordham International Law Journal 19 (1995–6) 101–42

Nishikata, T. ‘Oushu-Jinken-Joyaku derogation-joko-to “Hyoka-no-Yochi”: Jinken-Saibansho-no Tosei-wo Chushin-ni’ (‘The Derogation Clause of the ECHR – Judicial Control by the European Court of Human Rights’),

Kobe Hogaku-Zasshi (Kobe Law Journal) 50:2 (2000) 149–86 Nollkaemper, A. ‘Dual Attribution: Liability of the Netherlands for Conduct of

Dutchbat in Srebrenica’, Journal of International Criminal Justice 9 (2011) 1143–57

Nolte, G. ‘General Principles of German and European Administrative Law – A Comparison in Historical Perspective’, Modern Law Review 57 (1994) 191–212

‘Human Rights Protection against International Institutions in Kosovo: The Proposals of the Venice Commission of the Council of Europe and their Implementation’, in Dupuy et al. (eds.), Common Values in International Law: Essays in Honour of Christian Tomuschat, 245–58

Norges offentlige Utredninger, Makt og demokrati, Sluttrapport fra Makt-og demokratiutredningen (Oslo: Statens forvaltningstjeneste Informasjonsforvaltning, 2003)

Nowlin, C. ‘The Protection of Morals under the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms’, Human Rights Quarterly 24 (2002) 264–86

Nußberger, A. ‘The Reception Process in Russia and Ukraine’, in Keller and Stone Sweet (eds.), A Europe of Rights: The Impact of the ECHR on National Legal Systems, 604–77

O’Boyle, M. ‘On Reforming the Operation of the European Court of Human Rights’, European Human Rights Law Review 1 (2008) 3–4

‘The Future’, in Myjer et al. (eds.), The Conscience of Europe: 50 Years of the European Court of Human Rights

O’Donnell, T. ‘The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine: Standards in the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights’, Human Rights Quarterly 4 (1982) 474–96

O’Meara, N. ‘A More Secure Europe of Rights? The European Court of Human Rights, the Court of Justice of the European Union and EU Accession to the ECHR’, German Law Journal 12 (2011) 1813–32

Oeter, S. ‘Die Kontrolldichte hinsichtlich unbestimmter Begriffe und des Ermessens’, in Frowein (ed.), Die Kontrolldichte bei der gerichtlichen Überprüfung von Handlungen der Verwaltung (Berlin: Springer, 1993) 266–91

Pache, E. and Rösch, F. ‘Europäischer Grundrechtsschutz nach Lissabon: die Rolle der EMRK und der Grundrechtecharta in der EU’, Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht 19:17 (2008) 519–22

Pannick, D., ‘Principles of Interpretation of Convention Rights under the Human Rights Act and the Discretionary Area of Judgment’, Public Law (1998) 545–51 Paul, J.R. ‘Comity in International Law’, Harvard International Law Journal 32:1

(1991) 1–80

Pavlakos, G. ‘Constitutional Rights, Balancing and the Structure of Autonomy’,

Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 24:1 (2011) 129–54 Payandeh, M. ‘Constitutional Review of EU Law After Honeywell: Contextualizing

the Relationship Between the German Constitutional Court and the EU Court of Justice’, Common Market Law Review 48 (2011) 9–38

‘Rechtskontrolle des UN-Sicherheitsrates durch staatliche und überstaatliche Gerichte’, Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 66 (2006) 41–71

Pérez, J.R.-Z. ‘The Dynamic Effect of the Case-law of the European Court of Human Rights and the Role of the Constitutional Courts’, in ECtHR (ed.), Dialogue between Judges (Strasbourg: Council of Europe, 2007) 36–52

Peters, A. ‘Die Anwendbarkeit der EMRK in Zeiten komplexer Hoheitsgewalt und das Prinzip der Grundrechtstoleranz’, Archiv des Völkerrechts 48:1 (2010) 22–41

‘Rechtsordnungen und Konstitutionalisierung: Zur Neubestimmung der Verhältnisse’, Zeitschrift für Öffentliches Recht 65 (2010) 3–63

Peters, B. ‘Germany’s Dialogue with Strasbourg: Extrapolating the Bundesverfassungsgericht’s Relationship with the European Court of Human Rights in the Preventive Detention Decision’, German Law Journal 13 (2012) 757–72

Petzold, H. ‘The Convention and the Principle of Subsidiarity’, in Macdonald et al.

(eds.), The European System for the Protection of Human Rights, 41–62 Philippi, N. ‘Divergenzen im Grundrechtsschutz zwischen EuGH und EGMR’,

Zeitschrift für europarechtliche Studien 3:1 (2000) 97–126

Pinna, A. ‘Filtering Applications, the Number of Judgments Delivered and Judicial Decisions by Supreme Courts: Some Thoughts based on the French Example’, in Huls, Adams and Bornhoff (eds.), The Legitimacy of Highest Courts’ Ruling

Polakiewicz, J. ‘The European Union’s Charter of Fundamental Rights and the European Convention on Human Rights: Competition or Coherence in Fundamental Rights Protection in Europe’, Revue européenne de droit public 14:1 (2002) 853–78

Pollicino, O. et al. ‘Report on Italy’, in O. Pollicino (ed.), The National Judicial Treatment of the ECHR and EU Laws: A Comparative Perspective

(Groningen: Europa Law Publishing, 2010) 269–95

Popelier, P., Heyning, C.V.D. and Nuffel, P.V. Human Rights Protection in the European Legal Order: The Interaction between the European and the National Courts (Law and Cosmopolitan Values) (Cambridge, Portland: Intersentia, 2011)

Proelss, A. ‘Der Grundsatz der völkerrechtsfreundlichen Auslegung im Lichte der Rechtsprechung des BVerfG’, H. Rensen and S. Brink (eds.), Linien der Rechtsprechung des Bundesverfassungsgerichts – erörtert von den wissenschatlichen Mitarbeitern (Berlin: De Gruyter Recht, 2009) 553–84

Puente Egido, I. ‘Adhesión de la Unión Europea al Convenio Europeo para la Protección de los Derechos Humanos?’, Soberanía del estado y derecho internacional 2 (2005) 1119–44

Quinn, G. ‘The European Union and the Council of Europe on the Issue of Human Rights: Twins Separated at Birth?’, McGill Law Journal 46:4 (2001) 849–74

Raab, D.J. Strasbourg in the Dock: Prisoner Voting, Human Rights and the Case for Democracy (London: Civitas, 2011)

Ratner, S.R. The New UN Peacekeeping (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1995) Rawls, J. Political Liberalism (New York: Columbia University Press, 1993) Raz, J. Ethics in the Public Domain (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995)

The Authority of Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1979) The Morality of Freedom (Oxford University Press, 1986)

‘The Problem of Authority: Revisiting the Service Conception’, Minnesota Law Review 90 (2006) 1003–44

Rebasti, E. ‘Corte Europea dei diritti dell’uomo e responsabilità degli Stati per trasferimento di poteri ad una organizzazione internazionale’, Rivista di Diritto internazionale 93 (2010) 65–88

Rehnquist, W. ‘The Notion of a Living Constitution’, Texas Law Review 54 (1976) 693–706

Reich, N. ‘Wer hat Angst vor Straßburg?’, Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht 22:10 (2011) 379–84

‘Zur Notwendigkeit einer Europäischen Grundrechtsbeschwerde’, Zeitschrift für Rechtspolitik (2000) 6 375–8

Reinisch, A. ‘Developing Human Rights and Humanitarian Law Accountability of the Security Council for the Imposition of Economic Sanctions’, American Journal of International Law 95 (2001) 851–72

Rengeling, H.W. ‘Brauchen wir die Verfassungsbeschwerde auf Gemeinschaftsebene?’, O. Duel, M. Lutter, and J. Schwarze (eds.), Festschrift für Ulrich Everling (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 1995) 1187f.

Rivers, J. ‘Proportionality and Variable Intensity of Review’, Cambridge Law Journal 65:1 (2006) 174–207

Rozenberg, J. ‘Draft Brighton Declaration is a breath of fresh air’, The Guardian, 9 April 2012

Ruffert, M. ‘Die künftige Rolle des EuGH im europäischen Grundrechtsschutzsystem: Bemerkungen zum EuGH-Urteil v. 20.5.2003’, Europäische Grundrechte-Zeitschrift 31:16/18 (2004) 466–71

Ryngaert, C. ‘The European Court of Human Rights Approach to the Responsibility of Member States in Connection with Acts of International Organizations’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly 60 (2011) 997–1016

Ryssdal, R. ‘Opinion: The Coming of Age of the European Convention on Human Rights’, European Human Rights Law Review 1:1 (1996) 18–29

Sadurski, W. ‘Law’s Legitimacy and “Democracy-Plus”’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 26:2 (2006) 377–409

‘Partnering with Strasbourg: Constitutionalisation of the European Court of Human Rights, the Accession of Central and East European States to the Council of Europe, and the Idea of Pilot Judgments’, Human Rights Law Review 9 (2009) 397–453

Sager, L. ‘The Incorrigible Constitution’, New York University Law Review 65 (1990) 893–961

Sales, P. ‘The General and the Particular: Parliament and the Courts under the Scheme of the European Convention on Human Rights’, in Andenas et al.

(eds.), Tom Bingham and the Transformation of the Law: A Liber Amicorum, 163–82

et al. ‘Rights-Consistent Interpretation and the Human Rights Act 1998’, Law Quarterly Review 127 (2011) 217–38

Salvioli, F. ‘Un Analisis desde el principio pro persona sobre el valor juridica de las Decisiones de la Comision Interamericana de Derechos Humanos’, En Defensa de la Constitución: Libro Homenaje a Germán Bidart Campos

(Buenos Aires: Ediar, 2003)

Sandoval, C. and Duttwiler, M. ‘Redressing Non-pecuniary Damages of Torture Survivors: The Practice of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights’, in G. Gilbert, F. Hampson and C. Sandoval (eds.), The Delivery of Human Rights: Essays in Honour of Professor Sir Nigel Rodley (London and New York: Routledge, 2011) 114–36

Sands, P. ‘Lord Bingham of Cornhill Obituary’, The Guardian, 11 September 2010 Sari, A. ‘Jurisdiction and International Responsibility in Peace Support Operations:

The Behrami and Saramati Cases’, Human Rights Law Review 8 (2008) 151–70 Sarooshi, D. International Organizations and Their Exercise of Sovereign Powers

(Oxford University Press, 2005)

The United Nations and the Development of Collective Security: The Delegation by the UN Security Council of its Chapter VII Powers (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1999)

Scalia, A. ‘Common Law Courts in a Civil Law System: The Role of United States Federal Courts in Interpreting the Constitution and Laws’, in A. Gutmann (ed.), A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law (Princeton University Press, 1998) 3–48

Schapiro, R.A. Polyphonic Federalism: Toward the Protection of Fundamental Rights (University of Chicago Press, 2009)

Scharpf, F. ‘Problem-Solving Effectiveness and Democratic Accountability in the EU’, MPIfG Working Paper 03/1 (2003)

Scheeck, L. ‘Diplomatic Intrusions, Dialogues, and Fragile Equilibria: The European Court as a Constitutional Actor of the European Union’, in Christoffersen and Madsen (eds.), The European Court of Human Rights Between Law and Politics, 164–80

‘The Relationship between the European Courts and Integration through Human Rights’, Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 65 (2005) 837–85

Schlütter, B. (now B. Peters) ‘Aspects of Human Rights Interpretation by the UN Treaty Bodies’, in G. Ulfstein and H. Keller (eds.), UN Treaty Bodies: Law and Legitimacy (Cambridge: University Press, 2012) 261–319

‘Crucifixes in Italian Classrooms: Lautsi v Italy’, European Human Rights Law Review 6 (2011) 86–92

Schütze, J.P. Die Zurechenbarkeit von Völkerrechtsverstößen im Rahmen mandatierter Friedensmissionen der Vereinten Nationen (Berlin: Duncker & Humboldt, 2011)

‘Subsidiarity after Lisbon: Reinforcing the Safeguards of Federalism?’,

Cambridge Law Journal 68 (2009) 525–36

Shany, Y. ‘Assessing the Effectiveness of International Courts: Can the Unquanti-

fiable be Quantified?’, Hebrew University International Law Research Paper No. 03/10

Regulating Jurisdictional Relations betwen National and International Courts

(International Courts and Tribunals) (Oxford University Press, 2007) ‘Toward a General Margin of Appreciation Doctrine in International Law?’,

European Journal of International Law 16:5 (2005) 907–40

Sharpe, R. ‘The Impact of a Bill of Rights on the Role of the Judiciary: A Canadian Perspective’, in P. Alston (ed.), Promoting Human Rights through Bills of Rights: Comparative Perspectives (Oxford University Press, 1999) 431–53

Shelton, D. Remedies in International Human Rights Law, 2nd edn (Oxford University Press, 2005)

Sherwin, E., ‘Rule-Oriented Realism’, Michigan Law Review 103 (2005) 1578–94 Sicilianos, L.A. ‘L’(ir)responsabilité des forces multinationales’, in Boisson de

Chazournes and Kohen (eds.), Liber Amicorum Vera Gowlland-Debbas

(Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2010)

Siekmann, R.C.R. National Contingents in United Nations Peace-Keeping Forces

(Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1991)

Simma, B. ‘Harmonizing Investment Protection and International Human Rights: First Steps towards a Methodology’, in C. Binder (ed.), International Investment Law for the 21st Century (Oxford University Press, 2009) 685–94 Simmons, B. Mobilizing for Human Rights: International Law in Domestic Politics

(Cambridge University Press, 2009)

Singh, M.P. German Administrative Law: In Common Law Perspective, 2nd edn (Berlin: Springer, 2001).

Singh, R. ‘Is There a Role for the “Margin of Appreciation” in National Law after the Human Rights Act?’, European Human Rights Law Review (1999) 15–22 Sitaropoulos, N. ‘Implementation of the European Court of Human Rights’ Judgments concerning National Minorities or why Declaratory Adjudication does not Help’, European Society of International Law Conference Paper

Series, No. 4/2011

Skoghøy, J.E.A. ‘Norske domstolers lovkontroll i forhold til inkorporerte menneskerettskonvensjoner’, Lov og Rett 41:06 (2002) 337–54

Smith, C. ‘The Interaction between the European Convention and the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms within the Norwegian Legal System’, in Mahoney et al. (eds.), Protecting Human Rights: The European Perspective, 1306–7

Spielmann, D. ‘Allowing the Right Margin; the European Court of Human Rights and the National Margin of Appreciation Doctrine: Waiver or Subsidiarity of European Review?’, CELS Working Paper Series, February 2012

Spiering, M. Englishness: Foreigners and Images of National Identity in Postwar Literature. Studia Imagologica: Comparative Literature and European Diversity (Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1992)

Stahn, C. The Law and Practice of International Territorial Administration

(Cambridge University Press, 2008)

Stavropoulos, N. ‘Why Principles?’ (available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers. cfm?abstract_id=1023758)

Stirn, B. Les Libertés en Question, 7th edn (Paris: Lextenso Editions, 2010)

Les sources constitutionnelles du droit administratif: Introduction au droit public, 6th edn (Paris: Lextenso Editions, 2008)

et al. Droits et libertés en France et au Royaume-Uni (Paris: Odile Jacob, 2006) Stone Sweet, A. ‘A Cosmopolitan Legal Order: Constitutional Pluralism and Rights Adjudication in Europe’, Journal of Global Constitutionalism 1:1 (2012) 53–90 ‘Assessing the Impact of the ECHR on National Legal Systems’, in A. Stone Sweet (ed.), A Europe of Rights: The Impact of the ECHR on National Legal

Systems (Oxford University Press, 2008) 677–712

Governing with Judges: Constitutional Politics in Europe (Oxford University Press, 2000)

‘Proportionality Balancing and Global Constitutionalism’, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 47 (2008) 73

‘Sur la constitutionalisation de la Convention Européenne des Droits de l’Homme: Cinquante ans après son installation, la Cour Européenne des Droits de l’Homme conçue comme une Cour constitutionelle’, Revue Trimestrielle des Droits de l’Homme 80 (2009) 923–44

and Mathews, J. ‘Proportionality, Judicial Review, and Global Constitutionalism’, in G. Bongiovanni, G. Sartor and C. Valentini (eds.), Reasonableness and Law (Law and Philosophy Library) (Dordrecht, Heidelberg: Springer Netherlands, 2009) 171–214

‘Introduction: The Reception of the ECHR in National Legal Order’, in Stone Sweet (ed.) A Europe of Rights: The Impact of the ECHR on National Legal Systems, 11–36

Sudre, F. ‘Du “dialogue des juges” à l’euro-compatibilité’, Le dialogue des juges: Mélanges en l’honneur du président Bruno Genevois (Paris: Dalloz, 2009) 1015–31

Sweeney, A. ‘Margins of Appreciation: Cultural Relativity and the European Court of Human Rights in the Post-Cold War Era’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly 54 (2005) 459–74

Tehindrazanarivelo, D.L. ‘Targeted Sanctions and Obligations of States on Listing and De-listing Procedures’, in Boisson de Chazournes and Kohen (eds.),

Liber Amicorum Vera Gowlland-Debbas 127–71

Terris, D. et al. The International Judge: An Introduction to the Men and Women Who decide the World’s Cases (International Courts and Tribunal Series, Oxford University Press, 2007)