Экзамен зачет учебный год 2023 / [Andreas_Fllesdal,_Birgit_Peters,_Geir_Ulfstein]-1

Brouwer, A. Digital Borders and Real Rights: Effective Remedies for Third-country Nationals in the Schengen Information System (Leiden: Nijhoff, 2008)

Brown, L.N. et al. French Administrative Law, 5th edn (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998)

Bruinsma, F.J. and Parmentier, S. ‘Interview with L. Wildhaber, President of the ECHR’, Netherlands Quarterly Review of Human Rights 21:2 (2003) 185–201 Buyse, A. ‘The Court’s New Priority Policy’, 17 November 2010, http://echrblog.

blogspot.com/2010/11/courts-new-priority-policy.html

Caflisch, L. ‘Les conventions américaine et européenne des droits de l’homme et le droit international général’, Révue générale du droit international 108:5 (2004) 9–22

Çalı, B. ‘The Legitimacy of the European Court of Human Rights: The View from the Ground’ (Department of Political Science, University College London, 2011)

Callewaert, J. ‘Quel avenir pour la marge d’appreciation?’, in Mahoney et al. (eds.),

Protecting Human Rights: The European Perspective: Studies in Memory of Rolv Ryssdal, 147–66

Cameron, I. ‘Competing Rights?’, in S. de Vries, S. Weatherill and U. Bernitz (eds.), The Protection of Fundamental Rights in the EU after Lisbon (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2013)

‘Protecting Legal Rights: On the (in)security of Targeted Sanctions’, in P. Wallensteen and C. Staibano (eds.), International Sanctions: Between Words and Wars in the Global System (London and New York: Routledge, 2005) 181–206

‘Protocol 11 to the ECHR: the European Court of Human Rights as a Constitutional Court?’, Yearbook of European Law 15 (1995) 219–62

Canivet, G. Cours suprêmes nationales et convention européenne des droits de l’homme: nouveau rôle ou bouleversement de l’ordre juridique interne? (Paris: Cour de Cassation, 2005)

Cardwell, P.J., French, D. and White, N. ‘Comments’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly 58 (2009) 233–40

Carozza, P.G. ‘Subsidiarity as a Structural Principle of International Human Rights Law’, American Journal of International Law 97 (2003) 38–79

Cassel, D. ‘The Expanding Scope and Impact of Reparations Awarded by the InterAmerican Court of Human Rights’, in K. De Feyter et al. (eds.), Out of the Ashes: Reparation for Victims of Gross and Systematic Human Rights Violations (Antwerp: Intersentia, 2005)

Cassese, A. ‘The Nicaragua and Tadic Tests Revisited in Light of the ICJ Judgment on Genocide in Bosnia’, European Journal of International Law 18 (2007) 649–68

Chinkin, C. ‘International Humanitarian Law, Human Rights and the UK Courts’, in Boisson de Chazournes and Kohen (eds.), International Law and the Quest for its Implementation: Liber Amicorum Vera Gowlland-Debbas, 243–64

Christoffersen, J. ‘Individual and Constitutional Justice’, in Christoffersen and Madsen (eds.), The European Court of Human Rights between Law and Politics, 181–203

‘Primaritetsprinsippet – nye tanker om EMRKs stilling i dansk ret’, in Christoffersen and Madsen (eds.), Menneskerettighedsdomstolen – 50 års samspil med dansk ret og politik (Copenhagen: Thomson 2009)

and Madsen, M.R. The European Court of Human Rights between Law and Politics (Oxford University Press, 2011)

Ciampi, A. ‘Security Council Targeted Sanctions and Human Rights’, in B. Fassbender (ed.), Securing Human Rights? Achievements and Challenges of the UN Security Council (Oxford University Press, 2011)

Claes, M. and de Visser, M. ‘Are You Networked Yet? On Dialogues in European Judicial Networks’, Utrecht Law Review 8:2 (2012) 100–14

Clapham, A. ‘The Subject of Subjects and the Attribution of Attribution’, in Boisson de Chazournes and Kohen (eds.), International Law and the Quest for its Implementation: Liber Amicorum Vera Gowlland-Debbas, 45–58

Clarke, K. Speech by Rt. Hon. Kenneth Clarke QC MP, Secretary of State for Justice, Lord Chancellor, 26 April 2011, High Level Conference on the Future of the European Court of Human Rights, Izmir, 26–7 April 2011. Available at: www.coe.int/t/dghl/standardsetting/conferenceizmir/Speeches/ Speech%20UK.pdf

Cohen-Eliya, M. and Porat, I. ‘Proportionality and the Culture of Justification’,

American Journal of Comparative Law 59:2 (2010) 463–90

‘The Hidden Foreign Law Debate in Heller: The Proportionality Approach in American Constitutional Law’, San Diego Law Review 46:2 (2009) 367–413 Conforti, B. ‘Le principe d’équivalence et le contrôle sur les actes communautaires dans la jurisprudence de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme’, in S. Breitenmoser et al. (eds.), Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law:

Liber Amicorum Luzius Wildhaber (Zürich and Baden-Baden: Dike & Nomos, 2007) 173–82

Conroy, R.W. ‘The UN Experience with Travel Sanctions: Selected Cases and Conclusions’, in D. Cortright and G.A. Lopez (eds.), Smart Sanctions: Targeting Economic Statecraft (Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2002) 145–69

Coomber, A. ‘Judicial Independence: Law and Practice of Appointments to the European Court of Human Rights’, European Human Rights Law Review 5 (2003) 486–500

Coppell, J. and O’Neill, A. ‘The European Court of Justice: Taking Rights Seriously?’, Common Market Law Review 29:4 (1992) 669–92

Cosgrove, E. ‘Examining Targeted Sanctions. Are Travel Bans Effective?’, in Wallensteen and Staibano (eds.), International Sanctions: Between Words and Wars in the Global System, 207–28

Costa, J.-P. ‘Interview exclusive de Jean-Paul Costa, président de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme’, Droits de l’homme – jurisprudence de la cour européenne des droits de l’homme, 5 (2007) 77–80

Craig, P. ‘Perspectives on Process: Common Law, Statutory and Political’, Public Law (2010) 275–96

‘The European Union Act 2011: Locks, Limits and Legality’, in P. Craig and G. de Búrca (eds.), The Evolution of EU Law (Oxford University Press, 2012)

Crawford, J. ‘International Law as an Open System’, in J. Crawford (ed.), International Law as an Open System (London: Cameron May Press, 2002) 17–38 Crema, L. ‘Disappearance and New Sightings of Restrictive Interpretation(s)’,

European Journal of International Law 21 (2010) 681–700

Daillier, P. et al. Droit international public (Paris: Librairie générale de droit et de jurisprudence, 2009)

Dannenbaum, T. ‘Translating the Standard of Effective Control into a System of Effective Accountability: How Liability Should Be Apportioned for Violations of Human Rights by Member State Troop Contingents Serving as United Nations Peacekeepers’, Harvard International Law Journal 51 (2010) 113–92

de Búrca, G. ‘The European Court of Justice and the International Legal Order after Kadi’, Harvard International Law Journal 51 (2010) 1–49

‘The Influence of European Legal Concepts on UK Law: Proportionality and Wednesbury Unreasonableness’, European Public Law 3 (1993) 561–87

and Weiler, J.H.H., ‘Introduction’, in G. de Búrca and J.H.H. Weiler (eds.),

The Worlds of European Constitutionalism (Cambridge University Press, 2012) 1–7

de Lange, R. ‘Judicial Deliberations and Human Rights Adjudication’, in N. Huls, M. Adams and J. Bornhoff (eds.), The Legitimacy of Highest Courts’ Ruling

(The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2009)

de Schutter, O. ‘L’interprétation de la Convention européenne des droits de l’homme: un essai en démolition’, Revue de Droit International de Sciences Diplomatiques, Politiques, et Sociales 70 (1992) 83–127

de Wet, E. ‘Human Rights Considerations and the Enforcement of Targeted Sanctions in Europe: The Emergence of Core Standards of Judicial Protection’, in Fassbender (ed.), Securing Human Rights? Achievements and Challenges of the UN Security Council 141–71

The Chapter VII Powers of the United Nations Security Council (Oxford and Portland: Hart Publishing, 2004)

Devlin, P. The Judge (Oxford University Press, 1981)

Dorigo, S. ‘Imputazione e responsabilità internazionale per l’attività delle forze di Peacekeeping delle Nazioni Unite’, Rivista di Diritto Internazionale 85 (2002) 903–45

Doswald-Beck, L. Human Rights in Times of Conflict and Terrorism (Oxford University Press, 2011) 22–5

Dowling, J. and Pfeffer, J. ‘Organizational Legitimacy: Social Values and Organizational Behavior’, The Pacific Sociological Review 18:1 (1975) 122–36

Doyle, M. ‘Kant, Liberal Legacies and Foreign Affairs’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 12 (1983) 205–23

Drzemezewski, A. ‘Election des juges à la Cour Européenne de Strasbourg: un aperçu’, L’Europe des libertés 33 (2010) 6–10

‘Quelques observations sur le rôle de la Commission des questions juridiques et droits de l’homme de l’Assemblée parlementaire dans l’exécution des arrêts de la Cour de Strasbourg’, H. Hartig (ed.), Trente ans de droit européen des droits de l’homme: études à la mémoire de Wolfgang Strasser

(Brussels: Nemesis, Bruylant, 2007), 55–63

‘The European Human Rights Convention: A New Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg as of 1 November 1998’, Washington and Lee Law Review 55:3 (1998) 697–736

‘The Internal Organisation of the European Court of Human Rights: The Composition of Chambers and the Grand Chamber’, European Human Rights Law Review 3 (2000) 233–48

Dunt, I. ‘Clarke: “No question” of human rights withdrawal’ (www.politics.co.uk/ news/legal-and-constitutional/clarke-no-question-of-human-rights-with- drawal-$21387359.htm)

Dupuy, P.M. ‘Evolutionary Interpretation of Treaties: Between Memory and Prophecy’, in E. Cannizzaro (ed.), The Law of Treaties Beyond the Vienna Convention (Oxford University Press, 2011) 123–37

Dutheillet de Lamothe, O. ‘Olivier Dutheillet de Lamothe Member, Conseil constitutionnel France’, International Journal of Constitutional Law 3:4 (2005) 550–6

Dworkin, R. A Matter of Principle (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1985)

‘Do Values Conflict? A Hedgehog’s Approach’, Arizona Law Review 43 (2001) 251–9

‘Even Bigots and Holocaust Deniers Must Have Their Say’, The Guardian, 14 February 2006

‘Hart’s Postscript and the Character of Political Philosophy’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 24:1 (2004) 1–37

Justice in Robes (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2006) Law’s Empire (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1986)

‘Rights as Trumps’, in J. Waldron (ed.), Theories of Rights (Oxford University Press, 1984) 153–67

Taking Rights Seriously (London: Duckworth, 1977)

Dzehtsiarou, K. ‘Does Consensus Matter? Legitimacy of European Consensus in the Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights’, Public Law (July 2011) 534–53

and Greene, A. ‘Legitimacy and the Future of the European Court of Human Rights: Critical Perspectives from Academia and Practitioners’, German Law Journal 12:10 (2011) 1707–15

Eaton, M. ‘The New Judicial Filtering Mechanism: Introductory Comments’, in Directorate General of Human Rights (ed.), Future Developments of the European Court of Human Rights in the Light of the Wise Persons’ Report: Colloquy organized by the San Marino chairmanship of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe, San Marino, 22–3 March 2007 (France: Council of Europe, 2007)

Eckhoff. T. Rettskildelære (Oslo: Universitetsforlaget, 2001)

Ejima, A. ‘Yoroppa Jinken-Saibansho-niokeru “Hyoka-no-yochi” Riron-no Aratana Hatten’ (‘New Development of the “Margin of Appreciation” Doctrine in the European Court of Human Rights’), Meiji University Graduate School (Law) Review 29 (1992) 55–73

Endicott, T.A.O. ‘Law and Language’, in J. Coleman and S. Shapiro (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law (Oxford University Press, 2002) 935–68

Endo, K. ‘Subsidiarity and its Enemies: To What Extent is Sovereignty Contested in the Mixed Commonwealth of Europe?’, EUI Working Papers, RSC No. 2001/24 at 36, available at www.eui.eu/RSCAS/WP-Texts/01_24.pdf

‘The Principle of Subsidiarity: From Johannes Althusius to Jacques Delors’,

Hokkaido Law Review 44:6 (1994) 553–652

English, R. ‘Human Rights – Strasbourg or Luxembourg?’, UK Human Rights Blog (9 September 2011)

Everling, U. ‘Europäische Union, Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention und Verfassungsstaat: Schlusswort auf dem Symposion am 11. Juni 2005 in Bonn’, Europarecht 40:4 (2005) 411–18

Fairgrieve, D. and Muir Watt, H. Common Law et tradition civiliste: convergence ou concurrence? (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 2006)

Fassbender, B. Securing Human Rights? Achievements and Challenges of the UN Security Council (Oxford University Press, 2011)

‘Targeted Sanctions Imposed by the UN Security Council and Due Process Rights: A Study Commissioned by the UN Office of Legal Affairs and Follow-up Action by the United Nations’, International Organizations Law Review 3 (2006) 437–85

UN Security Council Reform and the Right of Veto (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1998)

Finnis, J. ‘Natural Law: The Classical Tradition’, in Coleman and Shapiro (eds.),

The Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law, 1–60 Fitzmaurice, M. ‘Dynamic (Evolutive) Interpretation of Treaties I’, Hague Year-

book of International Law 21 (2008) 101–57

Flauss, J.-F. ‘De l’indépendance de la Cour Européenne des droits de l’homme’, J.-F. Flauss (ed.), La mise en œuvre du Protocole n°11: le nouveau règlement

de la CourEDH: actes de la journée d’études du 23 octobre 1999 à la mémoire de Louis Edmond Pettiti (Brussels: Bruylant 2000) 13–31

and Cohen-Jonathan, G. ‘La Cour EDH et le Droit international’, Annuaire Français de Droit International 50 (2004) 778–802

Føllesdal, A. ‘Legitimacy Deficits beyond the State: Diagnoses and Cures’, in A. Hurrelmann, S. Schneider and J. Steffek (eds.), Legitimacy in an Age of Global Politics (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2007) 211–28

‘Subsidiarity’, Journal of Political Philosophy 6 (1998) 190–218

‘The Legitimacy of International Human Rights Review: The Case of the European Court of Human Rights’, Journal of Social Philosophy 40:4 (2009) 595–607

Franck, T. ‘Legitimacy in the International System’, American Journal of International Law 82:4 (1988) 705–59

The Power of Legitimacy among Nations (New York: Oxford University Press, 1990)

Frank, A. ‘UNO-Sanktionen gegen Terrorismus und Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention (EMRK)’, in S. Breitenmoser et al. (eds.), Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law: Liber Amicorum Luzius Wildhaber (Zürich and Baden-Baden: Dike & Nomos, 2007) 237–60

French, D. ‘Treaty Interpretation and the Incorporation of Extraneous Legal Rules’,

The International and Comparative Law Quarterly 55:2 (2006) 281–314

Die Kontrolldichte bei der gerichtlichen Überprüfung von Handlungen der Verwaltung (Berlin: Springer, 1993)

“The Transformation of Constitutional law through the European Convention on Human Rights”, Israel Law Review 41 (2008) 489–99

‘The UN Anti-Terrorism Administration and the Rule of Law’, in P.M. Dupuy et al. (eds.), Common Values in International Law: Essays in Honour of Christian Tomuschat (Kehl: N.P. Engel, 2006) 785–95

Furtado, C.F. ‘Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner? Protection for National Minorities in Eastern and Central Europe under the Council of Europe’, Columbia Human Rights Law Review 34 (2003) 333–412

Gaja, G. ‘The Review by the European Court of Human Rights of Member States’ Acts Implementing European Union Law: “Solange” Yet Again?’, in M. Shaw et al. (eds.), Common Values in International Law: Essays in Honour of Christian Tomuschat (Kehl: N.P. Engel, 2006) 517–26

Gardiner, R. Treaty Interpretation (Oxford University Press, 2008)

Gerards, J. ‘Judicial Deliberations in the European Court of Human Rights’, in Huls et al. (eds.), The Legitimacy of Highest Courts’ Rulings: Judicial Deliberations and Beyond, 407–36

‘The Pilot Judgment Procedure before the European Court of Human Rights as an Instrument for Dialogue’, in M. Claes and P. Popelier (eds.), Constitutional Conversations (Antwerp, Oxford, Portland: Intersentia, forthcoming, available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1924806

Giegerich, T. ‘Die Verfassungsbeschwerde an der Schittstelle von deutschem, internationalem und supranationalem Recht’, C. Grabenwarter and S. Hammer (eds.), Allgemeinheit der Grundrechte und Vielfalt der Gesellschaft (Stuttgart: Richard Boorberg Verlag, 1994) 101ff

‘Wirkung und Rang der EMRK in den Rechtsordnungen der Mitgliedstaaten’, R. Grote, (ed.), EMRK/GG: Konkordanzkommentar zum europäischen und deutschen Grundrechtsschutz (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2006) 61–98

Grant, R. and Keohane, R. ‘Accountability and Abuses of Power in World Politics’,

American Political Science Review 99:1 (2005) 29–43

Greenberg, M. ‘The Standard Picture and its Discontents’ (available at http:// papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1103569)

Greenberg, S. ‘New Horizons for Human Rights: The European Convention, Court and Commission’, Columbia Law Review 63:8 (1963) 1384–412

Greer, S. ‘“Balancing” and the European Court of Human Rights: A Contribution to the Habermas–Alexy Debate’, Cambridge Law Journal 63 (2004) 412–34 ‘Constitutionalising Adjudication under the European Convention on Human

Rights’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 23 (2003) 405–33

The European Convention on Human Rights: Achievements, Problems and Prospects (Cambridge University Press, 2006)

The Margin of Appreciation: Interpretation and Discretion under the European Convention on Human Rights, Human Rights Files No. 17 (Strasbourg: Council of Europe, 2000)

‘What’s Wrong with the European Convention on Human Rights?’, Human Rights Quarterly 30 (2008) 680–702

Groussot, X. ‘European Rights’ and Dialogues in the Context of Constitutional’,

Scandinavian Studies in Law 55 (2010) 45–75

Groves, J. ‘Human Rights Act is GOOD for us, insists Clegg in direct challenge to Cameron’, Mail Online (27 August 2011)

Grozev, Y. ‘How Human Rights Protection has Evolved: A Critical Analysis of Ten Years of Case Law’, in ECtHR (ed.), Ten Years of the ‘New’ European Court of Human Rights 1998–2008, Situation and Outlook (Strasbourg: Council of Europe, 2009) 34–9

Guyomar, M. ‘Conclusions sur Conseil d’État, Assemblée, 14 December 2007, M. Planchenault (1re espèce), et Garde des sceaux, ministre de la Justice c/ M. Boussouar (2e espèce)’, Revue Française de Droit Administratif (2008)

‘Le dialogue des jurisprudences entre le Conseil d’État et la Cour de Strasbourg: appropriation, anticipation, émancipation’, in Mélanges en l’honneur de Jean-Paul Costa (Paris: Dalloz, 2011) 311–20

et al., Contentienx Administratif (Paris: Dalloz, 2010)

Habermas, J. Between Facts and Norms (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996)

‘Intolerance and Discrimination’, International Journal of Constitutional Law 1 (2003) 2–12

‘Toward a Cosmopolitan Europe’, Journal of Democracy 14 (2003) 86–100 Hale, B. ‘“Argentoratum Locutum”: Is Strasbourg or the Supreme Court Supreme?’,

Human Rights Law Review 12 (2012) 65–78

‘Beanstalk or Living Instrument?’ in ECtHR (ed.), Dialogue between Judges (Strasbourg: Council of Europe, 2011)

‘European Court of Human Rights: The Limits to the Evolutive Interpretation of the Convention’ at www.echr.coe.int/ECHR/EN/Header/The+Court/ Events+at+the+court/Opening+of+the+judicial+year/ (15 April 2011)

Hale, Sir M. The History of the Common Law of England, 6th edn (London: H. Butterworth, 1820)

Halpérin, J.L. Les mondialisations du droit (Paris: Dalloz, 2009) L’impossible code civil (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1992)

Hampson, F. ‘The Future of the European Court of Human Rights’, in G. Gilbert, F. Hampson and C. Sandoval (eds.), Strategic Visions for Human Rights: Essays in Honour of Professor Kevin Boyle (London and New York: Routledge, 2011) 141–66

Hansel, B. ‘Effektiver Rechtsschutz in Grundrechtsfragen durch Vorlagepflicht oberster Bundesgerichte oder europäische Verfassungsbeschwerde’, Walter Hallstein-Institut, WHI Paper 6/03 (2003)

Haratsch, A. ‘Die Solange-Rechtsprechung des Europäischen Gerichtshofs für Menschenrechte: das Kooperationsverhältnis zwischen EGMR und EuGH’,

Zeitschrift für Ausländisches Öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 66:4 (2006) 927–47

Harmsen, R. ‘The European Court of Human Rights as a “Constitutional Court”’, in J. Morison, K. McEvoy and G. Anthony (eds.), Judges, Transition and Human Rights (Oxford University Press, 2007) 33–53

Harris, D.J. et al. Law of the ECHR, 2nd edn (Oxford University Press, 2009) Hart, H.L.A. ‘Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals’, Harvard Law

Review 71 (1957) 593–629

The Concept of Law, 2nd edn (Oxford University Press, 1994)

Heckscher, S. ‘Finns det någon europeisk rätt?’ C. Wong (ed.), Festskrift till Per Ole Träskman (Stockholm: Norstedts, 2011)

Hedigan, J. ‘The Election of Judges to the European Court of Human Rights’, in M.G. Kohen (ed.), Promoting Justice, Human Rights and Conflict Resolution through International Law: Liber Amicorum Lucius Caflish (Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2007) 235–53

Helfer, L.R. Alter, K.J. and Guerzovich, M.F. ‘Islands of Effective International Adjudication: Constructing an Intellectual Property Rule of Law in the Andean Community’, American Journal of International Law (2009) 1–47 Helgesen, J.E. ‘What are the Limits to the Evolutive Interpretation of the Convention?’, in ECtHR (ed.), Dialogue between Judges (Strasbourg: Council of

Europe, 2011) 19–28

Hennette-Vauchez, S. ‘Constitutional v. International? When Unified Reformatory Rational Mismatch the Plural Paths of Legitimacy of ECHR Law’, in Christoffersen and Madsen (eds.), The European Court of Human Rights Between Law and Politics, 144–63

Heringa, A.W. and Kiiver, P. Constitutions Compared: An Introduction to Comparative Constitutional Law, 2nd edn (Ius Commune Europaeum, Antwerp, Oxford, Maastricht: Intersentia, Metro, 2009)

Herne Hill, Lord Lester of. ‘The European Court of Human Rights after 50 Years’,

European Human Rights Law Review 4 (2009) 461–78

‘Universal versus Subsidiarity: A Reply’, European Human Rights Law Review (1998) 73–81

Herring, J. ‘Who Decides on Human Rights?’, Law Quarterly Review 125 (2009) 1–5

Hershovitz, S. ‘Integrity and Stare Decisis’, in S. Hershovitz (ed.), Exploring Law’s Empire (Oxford University Press, 2006) 103–18

Heun, W. The Constitution of Germany: A Contextual Analysis (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2011)

Heuschling, L. ‘Comparative Law in French Human Rights Cases’, in E. Örücü (ed.), Judicial Comparativism in Human Rights Cases (United Kingdom National Committee of Comparative Law, 2003) 23–47

Hilf, M. ‘Europäische Union und Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention’, Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law (ed.),

Recht zwischen Umbruch und Bewahrung: Festschrift für Rudolf Bernhardt

(Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer, 1995) 1193–1210

Himma, K.E. ‘Inclusive Legal Positivism’, in Coleman and Shapiro (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law, 125–65

Hirsch, M. The Responsibility of International Organizations Toward Third Parties: Some Basic Principles (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1995) 66–71

Hirschl, R. Towards Juristocracy: The Origins and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2004)

Hoffmann, L. ‘Human Rights and the House of Lords’, Modern Law Review 62 (1999) 159–66

‘The Universality of Human Rights’, Judicial Studies Boards Annual Lecture

(2009)

Hofmann, M. ‘Zum zweiten “Lissabon-Urteil” des Tschechischen Verfassungsgerichts’, Europäische Grundrechtzeitschrift 37: 5–6 (2010) 153–6

Hölderlin, F. ‘Patmos’, in E.L. Santner (ed.), Hyperion and Selected Poems (New York: Continuum, 1990)

Human Rights Association. ‘Cameron Warned over Human Rights’, The Guardian, 21 August 2011

Hurd, I. ‘Legitimacy and Authority in International Politics’, International Organization 53:2 (1999) 379–408

Isensee, J. ‘Subsidiarität, das Prinzip und seine Prämissen’, P. Blickle, T.O. Hüglin and D. Wyduckel (eds.), Subsidiarität als rechtliches und politisches Ordnungsprinzip in Kirche, Staat und Gesellschaft, Beiheft 20 (Berlin: Duncker und Humboldt, 2001) 129–77

Jaag, T. ‘Beitritt der EG zur EMRK?: zum Gutachten 2/94 des Europäischen Gerichtshofs’, Aktuelle Juristische Praxis 5:8 (1996) 980–4

Janik, C. ‘Die EMRK und internationale Organisationen – Ausdehnung und Restriktion der equivalent protection Formel in der neuen Rechtsprechung des EGMR’, Zeitschrift für Ausländisches Öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht

70 (2010) 127–79

Jennings, C. Oppenheim’s International Law, Vol. I (London: Longman, 1992) Kaboğlu, I.O. and Koutnatzis, S.I.G. ‘The Reception Process in Greece and Turkey’,

in Keller and Stone Sweet (eds.), A Europe of Rights: The Impact of the ECHR on National Legal Systems, 452–531

Kastanas, E. Unité et diversité: notions autonomes et marge d’appréciation des États dans la jurisprudence de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme (Brussels: Bruylant, 1996)

Kavanagh, A. ‘Defending Deference in Public Law and Constitutional Theory’,

Law Quarterly Review 126 (2010) 222–50

Keller, H. and Stone Sweet, A. A Europe of Rights: The Impact of the ECHR on National Legel Systems (Oxford University Press, 2008)

Keller, H., Fischer, A. and Kühne, D. ‘Draft Statute for the European Court of Human Rights – A Contribution to Reforming the European System’,

Human Rights Law Journal 30 (2011) 1–12

‘Debating the Future of the European Court of Human Rights after the Interlaken Conference: Two Innovative Proposals’, European Journal of International Law 21:4 (2010) 1025–48

Keller, H., Forowicz, M. and Engi, L. Friendly Settlements before the European Court of Human Rights: Theory and Practice (Oxford University Press, 2010)

Keller, P. ‘Re-thinking Ethnic and Cultural Rights in Europe’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 18 (1998) 29–59

Klabbers, J. ‘Kadi Justice at the Security Council?’, International Organizations Law Review 4 (2007) 293–304

Klabbers, J., Ulfstein G. and Peters, A. The Constitutionalization of International Law (Online edn Oxford Scholarship Online, Oxford University Press, 2009)

Kolb, R. ‘Le contrôle de Résolutions contraignantes du Conseil de sécurité des Nations Unies par des jurisdictions internationales ou nationales sous l’angle du respect du jus cogens’, Revue Suisse de Droit International et Européen (2008) 401–41

Koroteev, K. ‘Judgment of the Russian Constitutional Court on Supervisory Review in Civil Proceedings: Denial of Justice, Denial of Europe’, Human Rights Law Review 7 (2007) 619–32