Briefcase on Commercial Law
Second Edition
Michael Connolly, LLB, Barrister
Senior Lecturer in Law
University of Westminster, London
C
P
Cavendish
Publishing
Limited
London • Sydney
First published in 1995 by Cavendish Publishing Limited, The Glass House, Wharton Street, London, WC1X 9PX, United Kingdom
Telephone: +44 (0) 171 278 8000 |
Facsimile: +44 (0) 171 278 8080 |
E-mail: info@cavendishpublishing.com
Visit our Home Page on http://www.cavendishpublishing.com
© Connolly, M |
1995 |
First edition |
1995 |
Second edition |
1998 |
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning or otherwise, except under the terms of the Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or under the terms of a licence issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency, 90 Tottenham Court Road, London W1P 9HE, UK, without the prior permission in writing of the publisher.
Connolly, Michael
Briefcase on Commercial law – 2nd ed
1. Commercial law – England 2. Commercial law – Wales
I. Title |
II. Commercial law |
346.4’2’07 |
|
ISBN 1 85941 255 6
Printed and bound in Great Britain
Contents
Table of cases ix
Part 1 Agency |
|
|
1 The agent’s authority |
1 |
|
1.1 |
Actual authority |
1 |
1.2 |
Implied actual authority |
1 |
1.3 |
Apparent (or ostensible) authority |
3 |
1.4 |
Usual authority (the doctrine of Watteau v Fenwick) |
9 |
2 |
Agency by operation of law |
13 |
|
|
2.1 |
Agency of necessity |
13 |
|
2.2 |
Agency by cohabitation |
16 |
3 |
Ratification |
17 |
|
|
3.1 |
Ratification may be implied from conduct |
17 |
|
3.2 |
Rules for ratification |
17 |
|
3.3 |
Void acts |
23 |
4 |
Relationship between the principal and the third party |
25 |
|
|
4.1 |
Principal’s liabilities to the third party |
25 |
|
4.2 |
Principal’s rights towards the third party |
26 |
5 |
Doctrine of undisclosed principal |
27 |
|
|
5.1 |
General rule |
27 |
|
5.2 |
Exceptions to the general rule |
28 |
|
5.3 |
Set-off and the undisclosed principal |
30 |
6 |
Relationship between the principal and the agent |
31 |
|
|
6.1 |
Agent’s duties |
31 |
|
6.2 |
Principal’s duties |
41 |
|
6.3 |
Termination by the parties |
48 |
7 |
Relationship between agent and third party |
53 |
|
|
7.1 |
Warranty of authority |
53 |
|
7.2 |
Contractual liabilities of the agent – the general rule |
54 |
iii
BRIEFCASE on Commercial Law
7.3Contractual liabilities of the agent – exceptions to
the general rule |
55 |
7.4 The contractual rights of the agent – general rule |
56 |
7.5The contractual rights of the agent – exceptions to
|
the general rule |
57 |
7.6 |
Doctrine of election |
57 |
Part 2 Contracts generally |
|
|
8 Contract classification |
59 |
|
8.1 |
Sale of goods within the Sale of Goods Act 1979 |
59 |
8.2 |
Contracts of bailment |
65 |
8.3 |
Auctions |
66 |
9 Terms of the contract |
67 |
|
9.1 |
Innominate terms |
67 |
9.2 |
Implied terms – title – s 12 of the Sale of Goods Act 1979 |
68 |
9.3Implied terms – description – s 13 of the Sale of Goods
Act 1979 |
70 |
9.4Implied terms – quality – s 14(2) of the Sale of Goods
Act 1979 |
75 |
9.5Implied terms – goods fit for a particular purpose
– s 14(3) of the Sale of Goods Act 1979 |
81 |
9.6Implied terms – Sale by sample – s 15 of the Sale of
|
Goods Act 1979 |
84 |
9.7 |
Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 |
85 |
9.8 |
Exclusion clauses and the criminal law |
101 |
9.9 |
Consumer Protection Act 1987 |
102 |
Part 3 Sale of goods |
|
|
10 Passing of property |
103 |
|
10.1 |
Section 17 of the Sale of Goods Act 1979 – property |
|
|
passes when the parties intend |
103 |
10.2 |
Section 18 of the Sale of Goods Act 1979 – rules for |
|
|
ascertaining intention |
104 |
10.3 |
Unascertained goods and s 18, r 5(1) |
107 |
10.4 |
Ascertainment without s 18 |
111 |
10.5 |
Equitable interest in unascertained goods |
113 |
10.6 |
Reservation of title clauses |
115 |
11 Risk, mistake and frustration |
119 |
|
11.1 |
Transfer of risk |
119 |
11.2 |
Mistake and s 6 of the Sale of Goods Act 1979 |
122 |
iv
|
|
|
|
Contents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.3 |
Frustration and s 7 of the Sale of Goods Act 1979 |
123 |
|
|
11.4 |
Perish |
124 |
|
12 Passing of title by non-owner |
125 |
|||
|
12.1 |
The general rule, nemo dat quod non habet – s 21 of |
|
|
|
|
the Sale of Goods Act 1979 |
125 |
|
|
12.2 |
Nemo dat exceptions – s 21 of the Sale of Goods |
|
|
|
|
Act 1979 and estoppel |
125 |
|
|
12.3 |
Nemo dat exceptions – s 2 of the Factors Act 1889 |
|
|
|
|
– sale by mercantile agent |
128 |
|
|
12.4 |
Nemo dat exceptions – s 8 of the Factors Act 1889 |
|
|
|
|
(s 24 of the Sale of Goods Act 1979), seller |
|
|
|
|
continues in possession |
133 |
|
|
12.5 |
Nemo dat exceptions – s 9 of the Factors Act 1889 |
|
|
|
|
(s 25 of the Sale of Goods Act 1979), buyer in |
|
|
|
|
possession |
135 |
|
|
12.6 |
Nemo dat rule exceptions – s 23 of the Sale of |
|
|
|
|
Goods Act 1979 – voidable title |
141 |
|
|
12.7 |
Part III of the Hire Purchase Act 1964 |
142 |
|
13 Performance of the contract |
145 |
|||
|
13.1 |
Delivery |
145 |
|
|
13.2 |
Instalment deliveries – s 31 of the Sale of Goods |
|
|
|
|
Act 1979 |
149 |
|
|
13.3 |
Acceptance and repudiatory breach |
153 |
|
14 |
Seller’s remedies |
159 |
||
|
14.1 |
Price – s 49(1) of the Sale of Goods Act 1979 |
159 |
|
|
14.2 |
Damages for non-acceptance – s 50 of the Sale of |
|
|
|
|
Goods Act 1979 |
161 |
|
|
14.3 |
Lien – ss 41, 42 and 43 of the Sale of Goods Act 1979 |
163 |
|
|
14.4 |
Stoppage in transit – ss 44–46 of the Sale of Goods |
|
|
|
|
Act 1979 |
166 |
|
|
14.5 |
Right to resell – ss 47 and 48 of the Sale of Goods |
|
|
|
|
Act 1979 |
168 |
|
15 |
Buyer’s remedies |
171 |
||
|
15.1 |
Right to reject |
171 |
|
|
15.2 |
Damages for non-delivery – s 51 of the Sale of Goods |
|
|
|
|
Act 1979 |
174 |
|
|
15.3 |
Specific performance – s 52 of the Sale of Goods |
|
|
|
|
Act 1979 |
178 |
|
v
BRIEFCASE on Commercial Law |
|
|
||
|
|
|||
|
15.4 |
Remedy for breach of warranty – s 53 of the Sale of |
|
|
|
|
Goods Act 1979 |
179 |
|
|
15.5 |
Special damage – s 54 of the Sale of Goods Act 1979 |
180 |
|
Part 4 Credit |
|
|||
16 |
Consumer credit agreements |
181 |
||
|
16.1 |
Types of credit agreement |
181 |
|
|
16.2 |
Obligations of the parties |
184 |
|
|
16.3 |
Sale by debtor |
191 |
|
|
16.4 |
Lien |
193 |
|
|
16.5 |
Dealer as agent |
192 |
|
|
16.6 |
Early payment |
200 |
|
17 |
Enforcement and remedies |
203 |
||
|
17.1 |
Damages for breach |
203 |
|
|
17.2 |
Minimum payment clauses |
204 |
|
|
17.3 |
Extortionate credit bargains |
207 |
|
|
17.4 |
Repossession |
208 |
|
Part 5 International trade and finance |
|
|||
18 |
Bills of lading |
213 |
||
|
18.1 |
General |
213 |
|
|
18.2 |
Bill as a contract of carriage – Bills of Lading Act 1855 |
213 |
|
|
18.3 |
Document of title |
217 |
|
|
18.4 |
Bill as a receipt |
218 |
|
|
18.5 |
Delivery order as a bill of lading |
218 |
|
|
18.6 |
Quality and condition – common law |
219 |
|
|
18.7 |
Quantity – common law |
219 |
|
19 FOB (Free on Board) contracts |
221 |
|||
|
19.1 |
General |
221 |
|
|
19.2 |
Export licences |
221 |
|
|
19.3 |
Duties of the buyer |
222 |
|
|
19.4 |
Duties of the seller |
225 |
|
|
19.5 |
Passing of property |
226 |
|
|
19.6 |
Risk |
227 |
|
20 CIF (Cost, Insurance, Freight) contracts |
229 |
|||
|
20.1 |
General |
229 |
|
|
20.2 |
Duties of the seller |
230 |
|
|
20.3 |
Duties of the buyer |
231 |
|
vi
|
|
|
Contents |
|
|
|
|
|
20.4 |
Passing of property |
232 |
|
20.5 |
CIF and risk |
233 |
21 |
Bills of exchange |
235 |
|
|
21.1 |
Definition of a bill of exchange |
|
|
|
– Bills of Exchange Act 1882 |
235 |
|
21.2 |
Transfer of bill of exchange |
236 |
|
21.3 |
Holder for value |
237 |
|
21.4 |
Holder in due course |
238 |
|
21.5 |
Liability on the bill |
239 |
|
21.6 |
Payment and discharge of a bill |
239 |
|
21.7 |
Documentary bills |
240 |
22 |
Documentary credits |
241 |
|
|
22.1 |
Revocable and irrevocable credits |
241 |
|
22.2 |
Confirmed credits |
241 |
|
22.3 |
Straight and negotiation credits |
241 |
|
22.4 |
The status of the UCP (Uniform Customs |
|
|
|
and Practice for Documentary Credits) |
242 |
|
22.5 |
Autonomy of the credit |
243 |
|
22.6 |
Strict compliance with the documents |
243 |
|
22.7 |
Time of opening the credit |
247 |
|
22.8 |
Contract between buyer and issuing bank |
249 |
|
22.9 |
Contract between issuing bank and advising |
|
|
|
or confirming bank |
249 |
|
22.10 |
Contract between banks and seller |
250 |
|
22.11 |
Performance bonds and guarantees |
251 |
Index |
|
255 |
|
vii
Table of cases
Aberdeen Railway Co v Blaikie Bros (1852) 2 Eq Rep 1281; |
|
|
23 LT (OS) 315; 1 Macq 461, (Sc) HL |
|
35 |
Adams v Morgan [1924] 1 KB 751; 68 SJ 348; 40 TLR 70 |
|
46–47 |
Agricultores Federados Argentinos v Ampro SA |
|
|
[1965] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 157 |
|
223–24 |
Airborne Accessories v Goodman, see Andrabell, Re |
|
|
Albemarle Supply Co Ltd v Hind & Co [1928] 1 KB 307; |
|
|
[1927] All ER Rep 401, CA |
|
192, 193 |
Aldridge v Johnson (1857) 7 E & B 885; 119 ER 1476 |
|
61, 110 |
Aliakmon, The, see Leigh & Sillavan v Aliakmon Shipping |
|
|
Allam v Europa Poster Services [1968] 1 All ER 826; [1968] 1 WLR 639 |
|
34 |
Allison v Clayhills (1907) 97 LT 709 |
|
36 |
Aluminium Industrie Vaassen BV v Romalpa Aluminium Ltd |
|
|
[1976] 1 WLR 676; [1976] 2 All ER 552; |
|
|
[1976] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 443, CA |
|
115 |
Alpha Trading v Dunnshaw-Pattern [1981] QB 290; |
|
|
[1981] 1 All ER 482, CA |
|
45 |
American Accord, The, see United City Merchants (Investments) Ltd |
|
|
v Royal Bank of Canada |
|
|
Anangel Atlas v IHI [1990] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 167 |
|
38 |
Andrabell, Re, Airborne Accessories v Goodman [1984] 3 All ER 407 |
|
116–17 |
Andrews v Hopkinson [1957] 1 QB 229; [1956] 3 All ER 922 |
|
188 |
Andrews v Ramsay & Co [1903] 2 KB 635; 47 SJ 728; 19 TLR 620 |
|
39 |
Anglo Auto Finance Co Ltd v James [1963] 3 All ER 566; |
|
|
[1963] 1 WLR 1042, CA |
|
206–07 |
Arab Bank Ltd v Ross [1952] 2 QB 216; 1 All ER 709, CA |
|
238 |
Archer v Stone (1898) 78 LT 34 |
|
28–29 |
Archivent Sales v Strathclyde Regional Council (1984) 27 Build LR 98; |
|
|
85 SLT 154 (Scot, Outer House) |
|
136 |
Arcos Ltd v E A Ronaasen & Son [1933] AC 470, HL |
73, 74, 225 |
|
Ardennes (SS) (Owner of cargo) v Ardennes (SS) (Owner) |
|
|
[1951] 1 KB 55; [1950] 2 All ER 517 |
|
214 |
Armagas v Mundogas, The Ocean Frost [1986] AC 717; |
|
|
[1985] 3 All ER 795, HL |
|
6, 7 |
Armour v Thyssen Edelstahlwerke AG [1991] 2 AC 339, HL |
|
118 |
Armstrong v Jackson [1917] 2 KB 822; 33 TLR 444; 61 SJ 631; 117 LT 479 |
36 |
|
Asfar v Blundell [1896] 1 QB 123; 73 LT 648; 12 TLR 29, CA |
|
124 |
Ashbury Railway Carriage & Iron Co v Riche (1875) LR 7 HL 653 |
|
24 |
ix
BRIEFCASE on Commercial Law |
|
|
|
|
|
Ashington Piggeries v Christopher Hill [1972] AC 441; |
|
|
[1971] 2 WLR 1051; [1971] 1 All ER 847, HL |
74, 84 |
|
Associated Distributers v Hall [1938] 2 KB 83; |
|
|
[1938] 1 All ER 511, CA |
205–06 |
|
Astley Industrial Trust Ltd v Miller [1968] 2 All ER 362 |
132 |
|
Aswan v Lupdine [1987] 1 WLR 1, CA |
78 |
|
Atari Corporation v Electronics Boutique [1988] 1 All ER 1010; |
|
|
[1998] WLR 66; 141 SJ 168; (1997) The Times, 25 July, CA |
107 |
|
Attorney General for Ceylon v Silva [1953] AC 461, PC |
5–6 |
|
Attorney General for Hong Kong v Reid [1993] 3 WLR 1143; |
|
|
[1994] 1 All ER 1, PC |
39, 40 |
|
Babury v London Industrial plc (1989) 139 NLJ 1596 |
53 |
|
Bank Melli Iran v Barclays Bank DCO [1951] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 367; |
|
|
2 TLR 1057 |
244, 249 |
|
Bank of England v Vagliano Bros [1891] AC 107, HL |
236 |
|
Bankers Trust Co v State Bank of India |
|
|
[1991] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 443, CA |
245, 249–50 |
|
Banque de l’Indochine et de Suez SA v JH Rayner (Mincing Lane) |
|
|
[1983] QB 711, CA |
250–51 |
|
Barber v NWS Bank plc [1996] 1 All ER 906; 1 WLR 641; |
|
|
(1995) The Times, 27 November, CA |
186–87 |
|
Barclays Bank Ltd v WJ Simms, Son & Cooke (Southern) Ltd |
|
|
[1980] QB 677 |
240 |
|
Barron v Fitzgerald (1840) 6 Bing NC 201; 133 ER 79 |
46 |
|
Barrow, Lane & Ballard v Phillip Phillip & Co [1929] 1 KB 574; |
|
|
[1928] All ER 74 |
123, 124 |
|
Bartlett v Sydney Marcus Ltd [1965] 1 WLR 1013; 2 All ER 753, CA |
81 |
|
Bayerische Hypotheken-Und Wechselbank AG v Dietzinger |
|
|
(C-45/96) (1998) The Times, 25 March, ECJ |
183–84 |
|
Bayliffe v Butterworth (1847) 1 Exch 425; 154 ER 181 |
46 |
|
Beale v Taylor [1967] 3 All ER 253; 1 WLR 1193, CA |
71 |
|
Bedford Insurance Co v Instituto D Resseguros Do Brasil |
|
|
[1985] 1 QB 966; [1984] 3 All ER 766 |
24 |
|
Behrend v Produce Brokers [1920] 3 KB 530; 36 TLR 775; 124 LT 281 |
147 |
|
Bence Graphics v Fasson UK (1996) 146 NLJ 1577, CA |
179–80 |
|
Bentinck Ltd v Cromwell Engineering Co [1971] 1 QB 324; |
|
|
1 All ER 33, CA |
208 |
|
Bently v Craven (1853) 18 Beav 75; 52 ER 29 |
35 |
|
Bentworth Finance Ltd v Lubert [1968] 1 QB 680; |
|
|
[1967] 2 All ER 810, CA |
190 |
|
Bernstein v Pamson Motors [1987] 2 All ER 200; RTR 384 |
173–74 |
|
Beverley Acceptances v Oakley [1982] RTR 417; |
|
|
(1982) The Times, 21 May, CA |
131 |
|
Bickerton v Burrell (1816) 5 M & S 383; 105 ER 1091 |
57 |
|
x
|
Table of cases |
||
|
|||
Bird v Brown (1850) 4 Ex 786; 154 ER 1433 |
|
21, 22, 23 |
|
Boardman v Phipps [1965] 2 App Cas 46; [1966] 3 WLR 1009; |
|
|
|
3 All ER 721, HL |
|
41 |
|
Bolton v Lambert (1889) 41 Ch D 295; 60 LT 687; 5 TLR 357 |
|
21, 22 |
|
Bolton v Lancashire & Yorkshire Ry Co (1866) LR 1 CP 431; |
|
|
|
13 LT 764, CA |
|
167 |
|
Bond Worth Ltd, Re [1980] Ch 228; [1979] 3 WLR 629; |
|
|
|
3 All ER 919 |
|
115, 116 |
|
Bondina Ltd v Rollaway Shower Blinds Ltd [1986] 1 All ER 564, CA |
|
239 |
|
Booth v Bowson (1892) 8 TLR 641 |
|
152 |
|
Borden v Scottish Timber Products [1981] Ch 25; 3 WLR 672; |
|
|
|
[1979] 3 All ER 961; [1980] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 160, CA |
|
115 |
|
Boston Deep Sea Fishing & Ice Co v Ansell (1888) 39 Ch D 339; |
|
|
|
59 LT 345 |
|
38 |
|
Bowes v Shand (1877) 2 App Cas 455; 36 LT 857, HL |
|
225 |
|
Bowes, Re, Earl of Strathmore v Vane (1886) 33 Ch D 586; 55 LT 260 |
|
47 |
|
Bowmaker Ltd v Barnet Instruments Ltd [1945] KB 65; |
|
|
|
[1944] 2 All ER 579, CA |
|
208 |
|
Bowmaker Ltd v Wycombe Motors Ltd [1946] KB 65; |
|
|
|
[1946] 2 All ER 113 |
|
192–93 |
|
Boyter v Thomson [1995] 3 All ER 135, (Sc) HL |
|
28, 76, 84 |
|
Brady v St Margaret’s Trust Ltd [1963] 2 QB 494; |
|
|
|
[1963] 2 All ER 275, CA |
190–91, 203 |
||
Braithwaite v Foreign Hardwood Co Ltd [1905] 2 KB 543; 92 LT 637, |
|
|
|
21 TLR 413, CA |
|
153 |
|
Brandt (HO) & Co v HN Morris & Co [1917] 3 KB 784; 117 LT 196, CA |
221–22 |
||
Brandt v Liverpool, Brazil & River Plate Steam Navigation Co Ltd |
|
|
|
[1924] 1 KB 575; [1923] All ER Rep 656 |
213–14, 215 |
||
Branwhite v Worcester Works Finance Ltd [1969] 1 AC 552; |
|
|
|
[1968] 3 WLR 760; [1968] 3 All ER 104, HL |
194–95, 197 |
||
Braude (E) (London) Ltd v Porter [1959] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 161 |
|
180 |
|
Bridge v Campbell Discount Co Ltd [1962] AC 600; |
|
|
|
[1962] 1 All ER 385, HL |
|
205, 206 |
|
Bridges & Salmon v The Swan, see Swan, The |
|
45 |
|
Bristol Tramways v Fiat Motors [1910] 2 KB 831, CA |
|
82 |
|
British & Beningtons Ltd v Western Cachar Tea Co (1923) AC 48, HL |
|
153 |
|
British Imex Industries v Midland Bank Ltd [1958] 1 QB 542; |
|
|
|
1 All ER 264 |
|
247 |
|
British Thompson-Houston Co Ltd v Federated European Bank Ltd |
|
|
|
[1932] 2 KB 176; 101 LJKB 690; 147 LT 345 |
|
4 |
|
Brook v Hook (1871) LR 6 Exch 89; 24 LT 34 |
|
24 |
|
Browne v Hare (1858) 3 H & N 484; 157 ER 561; affirmed |
|
|
|
(1859) 4 H & H 822; 157 ER 1067 Court of Exchequer Chamber |
|
226 |
|
Bryans v Nix (1839) 4 M & W 775; 150 ER 1634 |
|
47 |
|
Budberg v Jerwood and Ward (1934) 51 TLR 99 |
|
129–30 |
|
xi
BRIEFCASE on Commercial Law |
|
|
|
|
|
Bullen v Swan (1907) 23 TLR 258, CA |
121 |
|
Bunge & Co Ltd v Tradax England Ltd [1975] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 235 |
224 |
|
Bunge Corporation v Tradax Export SA [1981] 1 WLR 711, HL |
68, 146–47 |
|
Burrows (John) Ltd v Subsurface Suveys Ltd (1968) DLR (2d) 354; |
|
|
[1968] SCR 607, Can |
235 |
|
Business Applications Specialists Ltd v Nationwide Credit |
|
|
[1988] RTR 332; [1988] BTLC 461; 8 Tr L 33; CCLR 135, CA |
84 |
|
Butterworth v Kingsway Motors Ltd [1954] 2 All ER 694; |
|
|
[1954] 1 WLR 1286 |
185–86 |
|
Butwick v Grant [1924] 2 KB 483; 131 LT 476 |
21 |
|
Cahn and Mayer v Pockett’s Bristol Channel Steam Packet Co Ltd |
|
|
[1899] 1 QB 643; 80 LT 269; 15 TLR 247, CA |
240 |
|
Calico Printers v Barclays Bank (1931) 145 LT 51; 39 Ll L Rep 51 |
33–34 |
|
Cammell Laird & Co Ltd v Manganese Bronze & Brass Co Ltd |
|
|
[1934] AC 402, HL |
83 |
|
Campanari v Woodburn (1854) 15 CB 400; 139 ER 480 |
49 |
|
Campbell Discount v Gall [1961] 1 QB 431; 2 All ER 104, CA |
193–94 |
|
Cape Asbestos Co Ltd v Lloyds Bank Ltd [1921] WN 274 |
241 |
|
Capital Finance Co Ltd v Bray [1964] 1 All ER 603; 1 WLR 323, CA |
209 |
|
Car and Universal Finance Co Ltd v Caldwell [1965] 1 QB 525; |
|
|
[1964] 1 All ER 290, CA |
138, 141–42 |
|
Cargill International SA v Bangladesh Sugar and Food Industries |
|
|
Corporation [1998] 2 All ER 406 |
252–53 |
|
Cargill UK Ltd v Continental UK Ltd [1989] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 290, CA |
224 |
|
Carlos Federspiel v Twigg [1957] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 240 |
108, 226 |
|
Carr v James Broderick & Co Ltd [1942] 2 KB 275 |
209 |
|
Castle v Playford (1872) LR 7 Exch 98; 26 LT 315 |
119 |
|
Cavendish Woodhouse Ltd v Manley |
|
|
(1984) 148 JP 299; 82 LGR 376; 3 Tr L 56 |
72, 101 |
|
Cehave NV v Bremer, The Hansa Nord [1976] QB 44; |
|
|
[1975] 3 All ER 739; WLR 447, CA |
68 |
|
Central Newbury Car Auctions v Unity Finance [1957] 1 QB 371; |
|
|
[1956] 3 All ER 905; 3 WLR 1068, CA |
127 |
|
Chalmers, Ex p, Re Edwards (1873) LR 8 Ch App 289; 28 LT 325, CA |
163 |
|
Champion v Short (1807) 1 Camp 53; 170 ER 874 |
147 |
|
Chapleo v Brunswick Building Society (1881) 6 QBD 696; 44 LT 449 |
5 |
|
Charge Card Services, Re [1987] Ch 150; [1986] 3 All ER 289 |
|
|
(discussed (1987) 2 BFLR 119); affirmed [1988] 3 All ER 702, CA |
181–82 |
|
Charter v Sullivan [1957] 2 QB 117; 2 WLR 528; 1 All ER 809, CA |
161–62 |
|
Chartered Trust plc v Pitcher (Robert John) [1987] CCLR 71; |
|
|
[1988] RTR 72, CA |
210 |
|
Chaudhry v Prabhakar [1989] 1 WLR 29; [1988] 3 All ER 718, CA |
34 |
|
Cheetham & Co Lyd v Thornham Spinning Co Ltd |
|
|
[1964] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 17 |
232 |
|
xii
|
|
Table of cases |
|
|
|
Chelmsford Auctions v Poole [1973] QB 542; 2 WLR 219, CA |
57 |
|
China-Pacific v Food Corporation of India, The Winson |
|
|
[1982] AC 939; [1981] 3 WLR 860; 3 All ER 688; |
|
|
[1982] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 117, HL |
15–16 |
|
Chinery v Viall (1860) 5 HN 288; 157 ER 1192 |
162 |
|
Choko Star, The, [1990] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 516, CA |
13–14 |
|
Chubb Cash Ltd v John Crilley & Son [1983] 2 All ER 294, CA |
191–92 |
|
Ciudad de Neiva, The, see Mitsui v Flota Mercante Grandcolumbiana SA |
||
Clarkson Booker Ltd v Andjel [1964] 2 QB 775; 3 WLR 466; |
|
|
3 All ER 26, CA |
58 |
|
Clay v Yates (1856) 1 H & N 73; 156 ER 1123 |
62 |
|
Claydon v Bradley [1987] 1 All ER 522, CA |
235 |
|
Clemens (E) Horst Co v Biddell Bros [1911] 1 KB 214; affirmed |
|
|
[1912] AC 18, HL |
229 |
|
Clough Mill v Martin [1985] 1 WLR 111; [1984] 3 All ER 982, CA |
117 |
|
CN Marine v Stena Line [1982] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 336 |
178–79 |
|
Cohen v Kittel (1889) 22 QBD 680; 60 LT 932; 5 TLR 345 |
32 |
|
Cohen v Roche [1927] 1 KB 169; 136 LT 219; 42 TLR 674 |
178 |
|
Coldunell Ltd v Gallon [1986] QB 1184; 1 All ER 429, CA |
207 |
|
Colley v Overseas Exporters Ltd [1921] 3 KB 302; 126 LT 58; |
|
|
37 TLR 797 |
159, 228 |
|
Commerford v Britanic Assurance (1908) 24 TLR 593 |
25 |
|
Commission Car Sales v Saul [1957] NZLR 144, NZ |
168–69 |
|
Comptoir D’Achat et de Vente du Boerenbond Belge SA v Luis de |
|
|
Ridder Limitada, The Julia [1949] AC 293; 1 All ER 269, HL |
218 |
|
Constantia, The (1807) 6 Rob 321; 165 ER 947 |
166–67 |
|
Cooke v Eskelby (1887) 12 App Cas 271; 56 LT 673; 3 TLR 481 |
30 |
|
Cooper v Bill (1865) 3 H & C 722; 159 ER 715 |
164, 165 |
|
Coral (UK) v Rechtman [1996] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 235 |
18 |
|
Couturier v Hastie (1856) 5 HL Cas 673, HL |
122 |
|
Creative Press Ltd v Harman [1973] IR 313, IRE |
235 |
|
Cundy v Lindsay (1878) 3 App Cas 459, HL |
125 |
|
Cunliffe v Harrisson (1851) 6 Exch 903; 155 ER 813 |
148 |
|
Cunningham (J and J) Ltd v Robert A Munro & Co Ltd |
|
|
(1922) 28 Com Cas 42; 13 Ll L Rep 62 |
223, 227 |
|
Curtis v Williamson (1874) LR 10 QB 57, 31 LT 678 |
27 |
|
Customs Brokers (R & B) Co Ltd v United Dominions Trust Ltd |
|
|
[1988] 1 All ER 847; 1 WLR 321 |
76, 85 |
|
Danish Mercantile v Beaumont [1951] Ch 680; All ER 925 |
23 |
|
Davies v Sumner [1984] 3 All ER 831; [1984] 1 WLR 1301, HL |
76 |
|
Dawber Williamson Roofing v Humberside CC (1979) Build LR 70 |
136 |
|
Dawson Ltd v H & G Dutfield [1936] 2 All ER 232 |
61 |
|
De Bussche v Alt (1878) 8 Ch D 286; 38 LT 370, CA |
33 |
|
Dearle v Hall [1828] 3 Russ 1; 38 ER 475 |
118 |
|
xiii
BRIEFCASE on Commercial Law |
|
|
|
|
|
Debenham v Mellon (1880) 6 App Cas 24, 43 LT 673, HL |
16 |
|
Debtors Re (No 78 of 1980) (1985) The Times, 11 May |
33 |
|
Decro-Wall International SA v Practitioners in Marketing Ltd |
|
|
[1971] 1 WLR 361; 2 All ER 216, CA |
152–53 |
|
Demarara Bauxite v Hubbard [1923] AC 673; 129 LT 517, PC |
36–37 |
|
Demby Hamilton v Barden [1949] 1 All ER 435 |
122 |
|
Dennant v Skinner [1948] 2 KB 164; 2 All ER 29 |
103 |
|
Devlin v Hall (1990) 155 JP 20; [1990] RTR 320; 10 Tr L 46; |
|
|
Crim LR 879 |
76 |
|
Diamond Alkali Export Corp v Bourgeois [1921] 3 KB 443; |
|
|
All ER Rep 283 |
230, 231 |
|
Diamond v Graham [1968] 1 WLR 1061, CA |
237–38 |
|
Dibbins v Dibbins [1896] 2 Ch 348; 75 LT 137 |
19, 22 |
|
Dingle v Hare (1859) 1 LT 38; 7 CB (NS) 145; 141 ER 770 |
2–3 |
|
Discount Records v Barclays Bank [1975] 1 WLR 315; 1 All ER 1071; |
|
|
Lloyd’s Rep 444 |
276 |
|
Dixon v London Small Arms Co (1876) 1 AC 632; 35 LT 559 |
62 |
|
Dixon Kerby Ltd v Robinson [1965] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 404 |
83 |
|
Dodd v Wilson [1946] 2 All ER 691 |
63 |
|
Donald H Scott v Barclays Bank, see Scott (Donald H) v Barclays Bank |
||
Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562, HL |
34, 93 |
|
Drummond v Van Ingen (1887) 12 App Cas 284, HL |
84–85 |
|
Drury v Victor Buckland Ltd [1941] 1 All ER 9, CA |
187 |
|
Du Jardin v Beadman Bros [1952] 2 QB 712; 2 All ER 160 |
130, 137–38 |
|
Dublin City Distillary Ltd v Doherty [1914] AC 823; 11 LT 81, HL |
145 |
|
Durham Fancy Goods Ltd v Michael Jackson (Fancy Goods) Ltd |
|
|
[1968] 2 QB 839; 3 WLR 225; 2 All ER 987 |
56, 239 |
|
Dyster v Randall [1926] Ch 932; 135 LT 596 |
29 |
|
Eaglehill Ltd v Needham Builders Ltd [1973] AC 992; |
|
|
[1972] 3 All ER 895; 3 WLR 789, HL |
239–40 |
|
Eastern Distributers v Goldring [1957] 2 QB 600; 3 WLR 237; |
|
|
2 All ER 525, CA |
126–27 |
|
Eastgate, Re, Ex p Ward (1903) |
141 |
|
Edmunds v Bushell and Jones (1865) LR 1 QB 97 |
9, 10 |
|
Edwards v Ddin [1976] 1 WLR 943 |
109 |
|
Edwards, Re, see Chalmers, Ex p |
123 |
|
Effort Shipping v Linden Management SA, The Giannis NK |
|
|
[1998] 1 All ER 495; The Times, 29 January, HL |
216–17 |
|
Egyptian Int Foreign Trade Co v Soplex, The Raffaella |
|
|
[1985] Lloyd’s Rep 36, CA |
6 |
|
Elafi, The, see Karlshamns v Eastport Navigation Corp |
|
|
Elian and Rabbath v Matsas and Matsas [1966] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 495, CA |
251 |
|
Ellis Son & Vidler Ltd, Re, see Stapylton Fletcher |
|
|
Elphick v Barnes (1880) 5 CPD 321 |
106 |
|
xiv
|
Table of cases |
|
|
||
Empressa Exportadora de Azucar v Industria Azucarera National SA, |
|
|
The Playa Larga [1983] 2 Lloyd’s Rep |
70 |
|
Equitable Trust Co of New York v Dawson Partners Ltd (1927) |
|
|
27 Lloyd’s Rep 49, HL |
243 |
|
Esso Petroleum Ltd v Commissioners of Customs & Excise |
|
|
[1976] 1 All ER 117, HL |
65 |
|
European Asian Bank AG v Punjab and Sind Bank (No 2) |
|
|
[1983] 1 WLR 642; 2 All ER 508, CA |
241–42 |
|
European Commission v United Kingdom (C-300/95) |
|
|
[1997] All ER (EC) 481, ECJ |
102 |
|
Fairlie v Fenton (1870) LR 5 Exch 169; 22 LT 373 |
56 |
|
Farnworth Finance v Attryde [1970] 1 WLR 1053; 2 All ER 774, CA |
173, 190 |
|
Farquharson Bros v King [1902] AC 325; 86 LT 810; 18 TLR 665, HL |
5, 126 |
|
Felthouse v Bindley (1862) 11 CBNS 869; 142 ER 1037; |
|
|
[1863] 1 New Rep 401; 7 LT 835; 1 WR 429 |
7 |
|
Fercometal SARL v Mediterranean Shipping Co SA |
|
|
[1988] 2 All ER 742; [1988] 3 WLR 200; [1988] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 199, HL |
154 |
|
Financings Ltd v Baldock [1963] 2 QB 104; [1963]] 1 All ER 443, CA |
204 |
|
Financings Ltd v Stimson [1962] 3 All ER 386; 1 WLR 1184, CA |
194 |
|
First Energy v Hungarian International Bank |
|
|
[1993] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 194, CA |
7 |
|
First National Bank v Syad [1991] 2 All ER 250, CA |
211–12 |
|
Flynn v Mackin [1974] IR 101, IRE |
61 |
|
Folkes v King [1923] 1 KB 282; 12 LT 405; 39 TLR 77, CA |
130 |
|
Forestal Mimosa Ltd V Oriental Credit Ltd [1986] 1 WLR 631; |
|
|
2 All ER 400; 1 Lloyd’s Rep 329, CA |
242 |
|
Forrest & Son Ltd v Aramayo (1900) 83 LT 335, CA |
222–23 |
|
Forsythe International v Silver Shipping Co, The Saetta |
|
|
[1994] 1 All ER 851; [1993] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 268 |
139, 149 |
|
Forth v Simpson (1849) 13 QBD 680; 116 ER 1423 |
48 |
|
Forthright Finance Ltd v Carlyle Finance Ltd [1997] CCLR 84, CA |
64, 137 |
|
Forthright Finance Ltd v Ingate (Carlyle Finance Ltd, third party) |
|
|
4 All ER 99; CCLR 95, CA |
199–200 |
|
Four Point Garage v Carter [1985] 3 All ER 12 |
117 |
|
Fray v Voules (1859) 1 El & El 839; 120 ER 1125, CA |
32 |
|
Freeman & Lockyer v Buckhurst and Kapoor [1964] 2 QB 480; |
|
|
2 WLR 618; 1 All ER 630, CA |
1, 3–4, 11 |
|
Freeth v Burr (1874) LR 9 CP 208 |
152 |
|
French v Leeston [1922] 1 AC 451; 10 Ll L Rep 448, HL |
45 |
|
Frith v Frith [1906] AC 254; 22 TLR 388, PC |
51 |
|
Frost v Aylesbury Dairy Co [1905] 1 KB 608; 92 LT 527; 21 TLR 300, CA |
82 |
|
Gabriel, Wade & English Ltd v Arcos (1929) 34 Ll L Rep 306 |
148 |
|
Gadd v Houghton (1876) 1 Ex D 357; 35 LT 222 |
55 |
|
xv
BRIEFCASE on Commercial Law |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Galatia, The, see Golodetz & Co Inc v Czarnikow-Rionda Co Inc |
|
|
|
Gamer’s Motor Centre (Newcastle) Proprietary Ltd v Natwest |
|
|
|
Wholesale Australia Proprietary Ltd (1987) 163 CLR 236; |
|
|
|
72 ALR 321 HC Aus |
|
139 |
|
Garcia v Page & Co (1936) 55 Lloyd’s Rep 391 |
|
247 |
|
Gaussen v Morton (1830) 10 B & C 731; 109 ER 622 |
|
50–51 |
|
Geddling v Marsh [1920] 1 KB 668; 122 LT 775; 36 TLR 337 |
|
77 |
|
Giannis NK, The, see Effort Shipping v Linden Management SA |
|
|
|
Gill & Duffas SA v Berger & Co Inc [1983] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 622; |
|
|
|
CA; reversed [1984] AC 382, HL |
147–48, 153–54, |
||
|
|
|
231–32 |
Ginzberg v Barrow Haematite Steel Co Ltd [1966] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 343 |
232 |
||
Glasscock v Balls (1889) 24 QBD 13; 62 LT 163, CA |
|
239 |
|
Glencore Grain Rotterdam BV v Lebanese Organisation for |
|
|
|
International Commerce [1997] 4 All ER 514; |
|
|
|
2 Lloyd’s Rep 386, CA |
|
156–57, 226 |
|
Godley v Perry Burton & Sons [1960] 1 WLR 9; 1 All ER 36 |
|
85 |
|
Godts v Rose (1854) 17 CB 229; 139 ER 1058 |
|
109 |
|
Goldcorp Exchange Ltd, In re [1994] 3 WLR 199, PC |
|
112–13 |
|
Golodetz & Co Inc v Czarnikow-Rionda Co Inc, The Galatia |
|
|
|
[1980] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 453; 1 All ER 501, CA |
|
218 |
|
Grant v Australian Knitting Mills [1936] AC 85, PC |
|
71 |
|
Grant v Norway (1851) 10 CB 665; 138 ER 263 |
|
219 |
|
Great Eastern Railway v Lord’s Trustee [1909] AC 109; 100 LR 130; |
|
||
25 TLR 176, HL |
|
164, 165 |
|
Green Ltd v Cade Brothers Farms [1978] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 602 |
|
87 |
|
Griffiths v Peter Conway [1939] 1 All ER 685 |
|
82 |
|
Groom v Barber [1915] 1 KB 316; [1914–15] All ER Rep 194 |
|
231, 233 |
|
Guarantee Trust of New York v Hannay & Co [1918] 2 KB 623, CA |
246 |
||
Gudermes, The, see Mitsui v Novorossiyisk Shipping Co |
|
|
|
Hadley v Baxendale (1854) 9 Exch 341; 156 ER 145 |
|
162–63, 179 |
|
Hagedorn v Oliverson (1814) 2 M & S 485; 105 ER 461 |
|
18 |
|
Hall (R & H) Ltd and W H Pim (Junior) & Co’s Arbitration, Re |
|
|
|
[1928] All ER 763; 30 Ll L Rep 159, HL |
|
176–77 |
|
Hamer v Sharp (1874) LR 19 Eq 108, 31 LT 643 |
|
2 |
|
Hammer & Barrow v Coca-Cola [1962] NZLR 723, NZ |
|
172 |
|
Hammond & Co Ltd v Bussey (1887) 20 QBD 79; 4 TLR 95, CA |
|
176 |
|
Hampden v Walsh (1876) 1 QBD 189; 33 LT 852 |
|
51, 52 |
|
Hancock v Hodgson (1827) 4 Bing 269; 130 ER 770 |
|
56 |
|
Hansa Nord, The, see Cehave NV v Bremer |
|
|
|
Hanson v Meyer (1805) 6 East 614; 102 ER 1425 |
|
105 |
|
Hansson v Hamel & Horley Ltd [1922] 2 AC 36; 127 LT 74; |
|
|
|
38 TLR 466, HL |
|
213 |
|
Harlingdon & Leinster Enterprises Ltd v Christopher Hull Fine |
|
|
|
xvi
|
Table of cases |
||
|
|||
Art Ltd [1991] 1 QB 56; [1990] 1 All ER 737, CA |
72–73, 80 |
||
Harlow and Jones Ltd v Panex (International) Ltd |
|
|
|
[1967] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 509 |
|
163, 225 |
|
Harrods v Lemon [1931] 2 KB 157; 144 LT 657; 47 TLR 248 |
|
37 |
|
Hart v Mills (1846) 15 M & W 85; 153 ER 771 |
|
148 |
|
Hartley v Hymans [1920] 3 KB 475 |
|
146 |
|
Havering LBC v Stevenson [1970] 1 WLR 1375; [1971] RTR 58 |
|
76 |
|
Head (Phillip) v Showfronts [1970] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 140 |
|
63, 104 |
|
Head v Tattersall (1871) LR 7 Exch 7 |
|
121 |
|
Healey v Howlett [1917] 1 KB 337; 116 LT 591 |
|
107–08 |
|
Heap v Motorists Advisory Agency Ltd [1923] 1 KB 577 |
|
132 |
|
Hedley Byrne & Co Ltd v Heller & Partners Ltd [1964] AC 465; |
|
|
|
[1963] 3 WLR 101; 2 All ER 575, HL |
|
97 |
|
Heisler v Anglo-Dal [1954] 2 All ER 770; 1 WLR 1273; |
|
|
|
2 Lloyd’s Rep 5; 98 SJ 698, CA |
|
157 |
|
Helby v Mathews [1895] AC 471, HL |
|
136, 181 |
|
Hely-Hutchinson v Brayhead [1968] 1 QB 549; [1967] 3 WLR 1408; |
|
|
|
3 All ER 98, CA |
|
1–2, 4 |
|
Henderson v Williams [1895] 1 QB 521; 72 LT 98; 11 TLR 148, CA |
|
126 |
|
Hendy Lennox v Puttick [1984] 1 WLR 485; 2 All ER 152; |
|
|
|
2 Lloyd’s Rep 422 |
|
116 |
|
Hermione, The [1922] All ER 570; 126 LT 701 |
|
32 |
|
Hibernian Bank Ltd v Gysin and Hanson [1939] 1 KB 483; |
|
|
|
1 All ER 166, CA |
|
237 |
|
Highway Foods International, In re (Mills v Harris) |
|
|
|
[1995] 1 BCLC 209; (1994) The Times, 1 November |
118, 140–41 |
||
Hilton v Tucker (1888) 39 Ch D 669; 59 LT 172; 4 TLR 618 |
|
145 |
|
Hine Bros v SS Insurance Syndicate (1895) 72 LT 79; 11 TLR 224, CA |
|
26 |
|
Hippisley v Knee Bros [1905] 1 KB 1; 92 LT 20; 21 TLR 5, CA |
|
39 |
|
Home Insulation Ltd v Wadsley [1988] CCLR 25; BTLC 279 |
|
201–02 |
|
Honam Jade, The, see Phibro Energy AG v Nissho Iwai Corp |
|
|
|
Hong Kong Fir Shipping Co Ltd v Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd |
|
|
|
[1962] 2 QB 26; 1 All ER 474; 2 WLR 474; |
|
|
|
[1961] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 478, CA |
|
67 |
|
Horn v Minister of Food [1948] 2 All ER 1036; 65 TLR 1906 |
120–21, 124 |
||
Houghton v Matthews (1803) 3 B & P 485; 127 ER 263 |
|
47 |
|
Household Machines v Cosmos Exports Ltd [1947] 1 KB 217; |
|
|
|
[1946] 2 All ER 622 |
|
177 |
|
Howard v Pickford Tool Co Ltd [1951] 1 KB 417 |
|
156 |
|
Howe Richardson Scale Co Ltd v Polimex-Cekop |
|
|
|
[1978] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 161, CA |
|
251 |
|
Howell v Coupland (1876) 1 QBD 258; 33 LT 832, CA |
|
123 |
|
Hughes v Hall [1981] RTR 430; 3 Tr L 90 |
|
76, 101 |
|
Humberside Finance v Thompson [1996] CCLR 23; 16 Tr L 242, CA |
|
182–83 |
|
Humble (Grace) v Hunter (1848) 12 QBD 310; 116 ER 885; 11 LT (OS) 265 |
28 |
||
xvii
BRIEFCASE on Commercial Law |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hyundai Heavy Industries v Papadopoulos [1980] 1 WLR 1129, HL |
64, 160–61 |
||
Ian Stach Ltd v Baker Bosley Ltd, see Stach (Ian) Ltd v Baker Bosley Ltd |
|
||
Industries & General Mortgage Co v Lewis [1949] 2 All ER 573 |
|
38 |
|
Inglis v Stock (1885) 10 App Cas 263; 52 LT 821, HL |
|
120, 227 |
|
Interoffice Telephones Ltd v Freeman (Robert) Co Ltd [1958] 1 KB 190; |
|
||
[1957] 3 All ER 479, CA |
|
203 |
|
Ireland v Livingston [1872] LR 5 HL 395; 27 LT 79 |
|
1, 31–32 |
|
Irvine v Watson (1880) 5 QBD 414; 42 LT 800 |
|
25–26 |
|
Jackson v Rotax Motor & Cycle Co Ltd [1910] 2 KB 937; 103 LT 411, CA |
150 |
||
Jade International Steel Stahl und Eisen GmbH & Co KG v Robert |
|
|
|
Nicholas (Steels) Ltd [1978] QB 917; [1978] 3 All ER 104 , CA |
|
238–39 |
|
Jerome v Bently [1952] 2 All ER 114; 2 TLR 58 |
|
125 |
|
Jones (RE) Ltd v Waring and Gillow Ltd [1926] AC 670; |
|
|
|
[1926] All ER 36, HL |
|
166 |
|
Jones v Tarleton (1842) 9 M & W 675; 152 ER 285 |
|
238 |
|
Julia, The, see Comptoir D’Achat et de Vente du Boerenbond Belge SA v |
|
||
Luis de Ridder Limitada |
|
|
|
Julian Hodge Bank v Hall (1997) unreported, CA |
|
210–11 |
|
Karberg (Arnhold) & Co v Blythe, Green, Jourdain & Co [1916] 1 KB 495; |
|
||
114 LT 152; 32 TLR 186, CA |
|
230 |
|
Karflex Ltd v Poole [1933] 2 KB 251; All ER 46 |
|
184 |
|
Karlshamns v Eastport Navigation Corp, The Elafi [1982] 1 All ER 208 |
112 |
||
Karsales (Harrow) Ltd v Wallis [1956] 2 All ER 866; 1 WLR 936, CA |
|
187 |
|
Keay v Fenwick (1876) 1 CPD 745, CA |
|
23 |
|
Keeble v Combined Lease Finance plc [1996] CCLR 63, CA |
|
142–43 |
|
Keech v Sandford (1726) Sel Cast King 61; 25 ER 223 |
|
40 |
|
Keighley, Maxted v Durant [1901] AC 240; 84 LT 777; 17 TLR 527, HL |
11, 20 |
||
Kelly v Cooper [1993] AC 205, PC |
|
37 |
|
Kelly v Lombard Banking Ltd [1958] 3 All ER 713 |
|
186 |
|
Kelly v Solari (1841) 9 M & W 54; 152 ER 24 |
|
238 |
|
Kelner v Baxter (1866) LR 2 CP 174; 15 LT 213 |
|
17, 18 |
|
Kendall (Henry) & Sons v Lillico (William) & Sons Ltd |
|
|
|
[1969] 2 AC 31; [1968] 3 WLR 110; [1968] 2 All ER 444, HL |
78–79, 83, 84 |
||
Ketley Ltd v Scott [1981] ICR 241 |
|
207 |
|
Kinahan v Parry [1910] 2 KB 389; 102 LT 826; reversed |
|
|
|
[1911] 1 KB 459, CA |
|
11–12 |
|
King v Tunnock [1996] SCLR 742, Sheriff’s Court |
|
50 |
|
Kingdom v Cox (1848) 5 CB 522; 136 ER 982 |
|
149 |
|
Kirkam v Attenborough [1897] 1 QB 201; 75 LT 543, 13 TLR 131, CA |
|
106 |
|
Kofi Sunkersette Obu v Strauss [1951] AC 253, PC |
|
43 |
|
Korea Exchange Bank v Debenhans (Central Buying) Ltd |
|
|
|
xviii
|
Table of cases |
|
|
||
[1979] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 548, CA |
|
235–36 |
Kronprinsessan Margereta, The, The Parana and Other Ships |
|
|
[1921] AC 486; 124 LT 609, PC |
|
226–27 |
Kwei Tek Chao v British Traders & Shippers Ltd |
|
|
[1954] 2 QB 459; 2 WLR 365 |
|
172–231 |
Lambert v G & C Finance Ltd (1963) SJ 666 |
|
138 |
Lancashire Wagon Co Ltd v Nuttall (1879) 42 LT 465, CA |
|
200 |
Langton v Higgins (1859) 4 H & N 402, 157 ER 896 |
|
110 |
Law & Bonar Ltd v British American Tobacco Ltd [1916] 2 KB 605 |
145, 218, |
|
|
|
226, 231, 233 |
Lazenbury Garages Ltd v Wright [1976] 1 WLR 459, CA |
|
162 |
Lease Management Services Limited v Purnell Secretarial |
|
|
Services Limited [1994] CCLR 127; 13 Tr L 337, CA |
88, 89, 196–97 |
|
Leavey (J) & Co v Hirst & Co [1944] KB 24; [1943] 2 All ER 581 |
|
177 |
Lee v Butler [1893] 2 QB 318, 69 LT 370, 9 TLR 631, CA |
64, 135–36, 181 |
|
Lee v Griffin (1861) 1 B & S 272; 121 ER 716 |
|
62 |
Leigh & Sillavan Ltd v Aliakmon Shipping Co Ltd, The Aliakmon |
|
|
[1986] AC 785; 2 WLR 902; 2 All ER 145, HL |
214–15, 217, 232 |
|
Lewis v Nicholson (1852) 18 QBD 503; 19 LT (OS) 122 |
|
54 |
Lickbarrow v Mason (1787) 2 TR 63, 100 ER 35; affirmed |
|
|
(1793) 2 H Bl 211; 126 ER 511, HL |
|
217 |
Linck, Moeller & Co v Jameson & Co (1885) 2 TLR 206 |
|
26 |
Lister v Stubbs [1890] 45 Ch D 1; 63 LT 75; 6 TLR 317, CA |
|
38–39, 40 |
Lloyds Bank v Bank of America [1938] 2 KB 147; |
|
|
[1938] 2 All ER 63, CA |
|
131, 247 |
Lloyds Bowmaker Leasing Ltd v MacDonald [1993] CCLR 65 |
|
196 |
Lockett v Charles [1938] 4 All ER 170; 159 LT 547; 55 TLR 22 |
|
63 |
Logicrose v Southend United Football Club [1988] 1 WLR 1256 |
|
39–40 |
Lombard North Central plc v Butterworth [1987] QB 527; |
|
|
1 All ER 267, CA |
|
204 |
Lombard North Central plc v Stobart (1990) 9 TLR 105; |
|
|
[1990] CCLR 53, CA |
|
201 |
Lombard Tricity Finance v Paton [1989] 1 All ER 918, CA |
|
188–89 |
London Wine Co (Shippers) Ltd, Re [1986] PCC 121 |
|
111, 113, 114 |
Lowther v Harris [1927] 1 KB 393; 136 LT 377; 43 TLR 24 |
|
129 |
Lutton v Saville Tractors (Belfast) Ltd [1986] NI 327 |
|
79, 173 |
Luxor v Cooper [1941] AC 108; 1 All ER 33, HL |
|
45 |
Lyons (JL) & Co Ltd v May & Baker Ltd [1923] 1 KB 685; 121 LT 413 |
171 |
|
Mahesan v Malaysia Government Officers’ Co-operative Housing Society |
||
[1979] AC 374, PC |
|
39 |
Malas (Hamzeh) & Sons v British Imex Industries Ltd [1958] 2 QB 127; |
||
2 WLR 100; 1 All ER 262; [1957] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 549, CA |
|
243 |
Manbre Saccharine Co Ltd v Corn Products Ltd [1919] 1 KB 198; |
|
|
xix
BRIEFCASE on Commercial Law |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120 LT 113 |
|
233 |
|
Manchester Liners v Rea [1922] 2 AC 74, HL |
|
83, 84 |
|
Maple Flock Co Ltd v Universal Furniture Products (Wembley) Ltd |
|
|
|
1 KB 148; [1933] All ER Rep 15, CA |
|
151 |
|
Marcel (Furriers) Ltd v Tapper [1953] 1 WLR 49; 1 All ER 15 |
|
63 |
|
Maritime National Fish Ltd v Ocean Trawlers [1935] AC 524, PC |
|
124 |
|
Marsh v Jelf (1862) 3 F & F 234; 176 ER 105 |
|
44 |
|
Marten v Whale [1917] 2 KB 480; 117 LT 137; 33 TLR 330 |
|
137 |
|
Martindale v Smith (1841) 1 QB 389; 113 ER 1181 |
|
166 |
|
Martineau v Kitching (1872) LR 7 QB 436; 26 LT 836 |
|
119 |
|
Mash & Murrell v Emmanuel [1961] 1 All ER 485; [1961] WLR 862; |
|
|
|
reversed [1962] 1 All ER 77n; 1 WLR 16, CA |
122, 226, 227 |
||
Mason v Burningham [1949] 2 KB 545; [1949] 2 All ER 134, CA |
|
69 |
|
Mason v Clifton (1863) 3 F & F 899; 176 ER 408 |
|
44 |
|
Mawcon Ltd, Re [1960] 1 All ER 188; [1960] 1 WLR 78 |
|
23 |
|
McLaughlin v Gentles (1919) 51 DLR 383 SC of Ontario, Canada |
|
11 |
|
McPherson v Watt (1877) 3 App Cas 254, HL |
|
35–36 |
|
McRae v Commonwealth Disposals Commission (1951) 84 CLR 377, |
|
|
|
HC of Australia |
|
123 |
|
Melachrino v Nickol and Knight [1920] 1 KB 693; 122 LT 545; 36 TLR 143 |
175 |
||
Mercantile Credit v Cross [1965] 2 QB 205; [1965] 1 All ER 577, CA |
|
209, 210 |
|
Mercantile Credit v Hamblin [1965] 2 QB 242; [1964] 3 WLR 798; |
|
|
|
3 All ER 592, CA |
|
128 |
|
Mercantile Union Guarantee Corporation Ltd v Wheatley [1938] 1 KB 490; |
|||
[1937] 4 All ER 713 |
|
184–85 |
|
Mercer v Craven Grain Storage Ltd [1994] CLC 328, HL |
|
65–66 |
|
Mersey Steel v Benzon (1884) 9 App Cas 434, HL |
|
152 |
|
Metropolitan Asylums v Kingham (1890) 6 TLR 217 |
|
21–22 |
|
Microbeads AG v Vinhurst Roadmarkings Ltd [1975] 1 WLR 218; |
|
|
|
1 All ER 529; 1 Lloyd’s Rep 375, CA |
|
69 |
|
Midland Bank Ltd v Seymour [1955] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 147 |
|
249 |
|
Mihalis Angelos, The [1971] 1 QB 164; [1970] 3 WLR 601; |
|
|
|
3 All ER 125, CA |
|
67–68 |
|
Miles v McIlwraith (1883) 8 App Cas 120; 48 LT 689, PC |
|
9–10 |
|
Millar v Radford (1903) 19 TLR 575, CA |
|
44–45 |
|
Millar’s Machinery Co Ltd v David Way & Sons |
|
|
|
(1935) 40 Com Cas 204, CA |
|
171 |
|
Miller v Beale (1879) 27 WR 403 |
|
43 |
|
Millet v Van Heeck & Co [1921] 2 KB 369; 125 LT 51; 37 TLR 411, CA |
|
175 |
|
Mills v Harris, see Highway Foods International, In re |
|
|
|
Mitchell v Finney Lock Seeds [1983] 2 AC 803; 3 WLR 163; |
|
|
|
[1983] 2 All ER 737; 2 Lloyd’s Rep 272, HL |
|
87 |
|
Mitchell v Jones (1905) 24 NZLR 932 |
|
134 |
|
Mitsui v Flota Mercante Grandcolumbiana SA, The Ciudad de Neiva |
|
|
|
xx
|
Table of cases |
|
|
||
[1989] 1 All ER 951, CA |
227 |
|
Mitsui v Novorossiyisk Shipping Co, The Gudermes |
|
|
[1993] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 311, CA |
215–16 |
|
Molling & Co v Dean & Son (1901) 18 TLR 217 |
172 |
|
Monarch Airlines v London Luton Airport Ltd |
|
|
[1998] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 403; [1997] CLC 698 |
95 |
|
Montebianco v Carlyle Mills [1981] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 509, CA |
150 |
|
Moore & Co Ltd and Landauer, Re [1921] 2 KB 519; 125 LT 372; |
|
|
37 TLR 452, CA |
73, 74, 225 |
|
Moorgate Mercantile v Twitchings [1977] AC 890; [1976] 3 WLR 66; |
|
|
2 All ER 641, HL |
128 |
|
Moorgate Mercantile Leasing Ltd v Gell and Ugolini Dispensers |
|
|
(UK) Ltd [1986] CCLR 1 |
195–96, |
|
|
|
197, 199 |
Mordaunt Bros v British Oil & Cake Mills [1910] 2 KB 502 |
168 |
|
Moss v Hancock [1899] 2 QB 111; 80 LT 693; 15 TLR 353 |
59 |
|
Mount (DF) Ltd v Jay & Jay (Provisions) Co Ltd [1960] 1 QB 159; |
|
|
[1959] 3 WLR 537; 3 All ER 307; 2 Lloyd’s Rep 269 |
169 |
|
Mucklow v Mangles (1808) 1 Taunt 318; 127 ER 856 |
110 |
|
Muller, Maclean & Co v Anderson (1921) 8 Lloyd’s Rep 328 |
160 |
|
Munro (Robert A) & Co Ltd v Meyer [1930] 2 KB 312 |
150 |
|
Nanka Bruce v Commonwealth Trust [1926] AC 77; 169 LT 35, PC |
105 |
|
Napier (FE) v Dexters Ltd [1962] 26 Lloyd’s Rep 184 |
224 |
|
Nash v Dix (1898) 78 LT 448 |
29 |
|
National Cash Register Co Ltd v Stanley [1921] 3 KB 292 |
189 |
|
National Coal Board v Gamble [1959] 1 QB 11; [1958] 2 All ER 203; |
|
|
3 WLR 434 |
108–09 |
|
National Employers Insurance Association v Jones [1988] 1 AC 24; |
|
|
2 WLR 952; 2 All ER 425, HL |
140 |
|
Newborne v Sensolid (GB) Ltd [1953] 1 QB 45; 1 All ER 708; |
|
|
2 WLR 596, 97 SJ 209, CA |
17–18 |
|
Newtons of Wembley v Williams [1965] 1 QB 560; [1964] 3 WLR 888; |
|
|
3 All ER 532, CA |
138 |
|
Niblett v Confectioners’ Materials Ltd [1921] 3 KB 387, CA |
69, 78 |
|
Noblett v Hopkinson [1905] 2 KB 214; 92 LT 462; 21 TLR 448 |
110 |
|
Norfolk County Council v Secretary of State for the Environment |
|
|
[1973] 3 All ER 673; 1 WLR 1400, 117 SJ 650 |
8 |
|
North and South Wales Bank v Macbeth [1908] AC 137, HL |
236–37 |
|
Northwood Development Company v Aeon Insurance |
|
|
[1994] 10 Const LJ 157; 38 Con LR |
252 |
|
Ocean Frost, The, see Armagas v Mundogas |
|
|
Oliver v Court (1820) 8 Price 127; 146 ER 1152 |
35 |
|
Oliver v Davis and Another [1949] 2 KB 727, CA |
237 |
|
xxi
BRIEFCASE on Commercial Law |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Omega Trust Company Ltd and Another v Wright Son and Pepper |
|
|
|
[1996] NPC 189, CA |
|
94, 95 |
|
Oppenheimer v Attenborough [1908] 2 KB 221, CA |
|
133 |
|
Oppenheimer v Frazer [1907] 2 KB 50; 97 LT 3; 23 TLR 410, CA |
|
132 |
|
Orbit Mining and Trading Co Ltd v Westminster Bank Ltd |
|
|
|
[1963] 1 QB 794; [1962] 3 All ER 565, CA |
|
235 |
|
Overbrooke v Glencombe [1974] 3 All ER 511; 1 WLR 1335 |
|
7–8 |
|
Overstone Ltd v Shipway [1962] 1 All ER 52; 1 WLR 117, CA |
|
203–04 |
|
Owen (Edward) Engineering Ltd v Barclays Bank International Ltd |
|
|
|
[1978] QB 159; 1 All ER 976; [1977] 3 WLR 764, CA |
|
252 |
|
Pacific Motor Auctions Pty Ltd v Motor Credits (Hire-Finance) Ltd |
|
|
|
[1965] AC 867; 2 WLR 881; 2 All ER 105, PC |
|
134 |
|
Page v Combined Shipping and Trading Co [1997] 3 All ER 656; |
|
|
|
(1996) 15 Tr LR 357, CA |
|
50 |
|
Panchaud Frères SA v Etablissements General Grain Co |
|
|
|
[1970] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 53, CA |
|
157 |
|
Parsons (Livestock) Ltd v Uttley Ingham & Co Ltd [1978] QB 791; |
|
|
|
[1977] 3 WLR 990; [1978] 1 All ER 525; [1977] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 522, CA |
63 |
||
Paton’s Trustees v Finlayson (1923) SC 872 |
|
165–66 |
|
Patrick v Russo-British Export Co Ltd [1927] 2 KB 535 |
|
177 |
|
Pavia & Co SpA v Thurmann–Nielsen [1952] 2 QB 84; 1 All ER 492; |
|
|
|
1 Lloyd’s Rep 153, CA |
|
248 |
|
Payzu v Ltd Saunders [1919] 2 KB 581, CA |
|
176 |
|
PB Leasing v Patel and Patel (t/a Plankhouse Stores) [1995] CCLR 82 |
|
198–99 |
|
Peachdart Ltd, Re [1984] Ch 131; [1983] 3 WLR 878; 3 All ER 204 |
|
116 |
|
Pearson v Rose & Young [1951] 1 KB 275; [1950] 2 All ER 1027, CA |
|
130, 138 |
|
Penn v Bristol and West Building Society [1997] 3 All ER 470, CA |
|
53–54 |
|
Perkins v Bell (1893) 1 QB 193; 67 LT 792; 9 TLR 147 |
|
171 |
|
Pfeiffer (E) Weikellerei-Weineinkauf GmbH & Co v Arbuthnot Factors |
|
||
[1988] 1 WLR 150 |
|
117–18 |
|
Phibro Energy AG v Nissho Iwai Corp, The Honam Jade |
|
|
|
[1991] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 38, CA |
|
224–25 |
|
Philips v Hyland and Hampstead Plant Hire [1987] 2 All ER 620; |
|
|
|
1 WLR 659; (1985) 129 SJ 47; (1988) 4 Const LJ 53, CA |
|
93, 97 |
|
Phillipson v Hayter (1870) LR 6 CP 38; 23 LT 556 |
|
16 |
|
Phipps v Boardman, see Boardman v Phipps |
|
|
|
Pignataro v Gilroy [1919] 1 KB 459; 120 LT 480; 35 TLR 191 |
|
109 |
|
Pinnock Bros v Lewis & Peat Ltd [1923] 1 KB 690 |
|
73 |
|
Playa Larga, The, see Empressa Exportadora de Azucar v Industria |
|
|
|
Azucarera National SA |
|
|
|
Polenghi v Dried Milk Co Ltd (1904) 10 Com Cas 42; 92 LT 64 |
|
159–60 |
|
Poole v Smith Car Sales [1962] 1 WLR 744; 2 All ER 482, CA |
106–07, 121 |
||
Porter v General Guaruntee Corporation [1982] RTR 384 |
|
173, 190 |
|
Poulton & Son v Anglo-American Oil Co Ltd (1910) 27 TLR 38; |
|
|
|
xxii
|
Table of cases |
|
|
||
(1911) 27 TLR 216, CA |
164–65 |
|
Pound (AV) & Co v MW Hardy & Co Inc [1956] AC 588; |
|
|
2 WLR 683; 1 All ER 639, HL |
222 |
|
Powell v Lloyds Bowmaker Ltd [1996] SLT 117, (Sc) Sheriff’s Court |
200 |
|
Prager v Blatspiel, Stamp & Heacock Ltd [1924] 1 KB 566; 130 LT 672; |
|
|
40 TLR 287 |
14, 15 |
|
Presentacions Musicales v Secunda [1994] Ch 271; 2 All ER 737; |
|
|
2 WLR 660, CA |
22–23 |
|
Priest v Last [1903] 2 KB 148; 89 LT 33; 19 TLR 527, CA |
82 |
|
Pritchet & Gold and Electrical Power Storage Co Ltd v Currie |
|
|
[1916] 2 Ch 515; 115 LT 325, CA |
104 |
|
Punjab National Bank v De Boinville [1992] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 7 |
55 |
|
Purnell Secretarial Services Limited v Lease Management |
|
|
Services Limited, see Lease Management Services Limited |
|
|
v Purnell Secretarial Services Limited |
|
|
Pyrene Co Ltd v Scindia Navigation Co Ltd [1954] 2 QB 402; |
|
|
2 WLR 1005; 2 All ER 158; 1 Lloyd’s Rep 321 |
221, 227 |
|
R v Baldwin’s Garage [1988] Crim LR 438 |
182 |
|
R v Modupe [1991] Crim LR 530; (1991) The Times, 27 February |
|
|
(1992) 11 Tr LR 59, CA |
189 |
|
R & B Customs Brokers v UDT, see Customs Brokers (R & B) Co Ltd v |
|
|
United Dominions Trust Ltd |
|
|
Rabone v Williams (1785) 7 Term Rep 360 |
30 |
|
Raffaella, The, see Egyptian Int Foreign Trade Co v Soplex |
|
|
Rama Corporation v Proved Tin [1952] 2 QB 147; 1 All ER 554 |
3 |
|
Rayner (JH) & Co Ltd v Hambros Bank [1943] KB 37; |
|
|
[1942] 2 All ER 694, CA |
244 |
|
Raynham Farm v Symbol Motor Corporation [1987] BTLC 157 |
75 |
|
Read v Anderson (1884) 13 QBD 779; 51 LT 55 |
46, 51, 52 |
|
Rearden Smith Line Ltd v Yngvar Hansen-Tangen |
|
|
[1976] 1 WLR 989; 3 All ER 570, HL |
68, 74 |
|
Reddall v Union Castle Mail SS Co Ltd (1914) 84 LJKB 360; 112 LT 910 |
167–68 |
|
Regent OHG Aisenstadt und Barig v Francesco of Jermyn Street Ltd |
|
|
[1981] 3 All ER 327 |
151–52 |
|
Resolute Maritime v Nippon, The Skopas [1983] 2 All ER 1; |
|
|
1 WLR 857; 1 Lloyd’s Rep 31 |
55 |
|
Rhode v Thwaites (1827) 6 B & C 388; 108 ER 495 |
109 |
|
Rhodes v Fielder, Jones & Harrison (1919) 89 LJKB 15 |
46 |
|
Rhodes v Forewood (1876) 1 App Cas 256; 34 LT 890 |
49 |
|
Rhodian River, The, [1984] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 373 |
11 |
|
Robinson v Graves [1935] 1 KB 579, CA |
62 |
|
Robinson v Mollett (1875) LR 7 HL 802; 33 LT 544 |
3 |
|
Rodacanachi v Milburn (1887) 18 QBD 67; 56 LT 594; 3 TLR 115, CA |
174–75 |
|
Rogers v Parish (Scarborough) Ltd [1987] QB 933; 2 WLR 353; |
|
|
xxiii
BRIEFCASE on Commercial Law |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 All ER 232, CA |
|
79 |
|
Rosenbaun v Belson [1900] 2 Ch 267; 82 LT 658 |
|
2 |
|
Rowland v Divall [1923] 2 KB 500; All ER Rep 270, CA |
|
61–62, 69 |
|
Royal Bank of Scotland v Cassa [1992] 1 Bank LR 251, CA |
|
242 |
|
Saetta, The, see Forsythe International v Silver Shipping Co |
|
|
|
Said v Butt [1920] 3 KB 497; 124 LT 413; 36 TLR 762 |
|
29 |
|
Sainsbury v Street [1972] 1 WLR 834; 3 All ER 1127 |
|
124 |
|
Santa Clara, The, see Vitol v Norelf |
|
|
|
Schenkers Ltd v Overland Shoes Ltd (1998) 142 SJ LB 84; |
|
|
|
The Times, 26 February, CA |
|
91 |
|
Scott (Donald H) Ltd v Barclays Bank Ltd [1923] 2 KB 1; |
|
|
|
129 LT 108; 39 TLR 198, CA |
|
230, 231 |
|
Seaconsar Far East Ltd v Bank Markazi Jomhouri Islami Iran |
|
|
|
[1997] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 89 |
244, 245, 250 |
||
Selectmove Ltd, Re [1995] 1 All ER 531; 1 WLR 474, CA |
|
7 |
|
Sellers v London Counties Newspapers [1951] 1 KB 784; |
|
|
|
1 All ER 544, CA |
|
45–46 |
|
Shaw v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis |
|
|
|
[1987] 1 WLR 1332; 3 All ER 405 |
|
127 |
|
Shearson Lehman Hutton Inc v Maclaine Watson (No 2) |
|
|
|
[1990] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 441 |
|
162 |
|
Shine v General Guarantee Corp [1988] 1 All ER 911, CA |
|
79–80 |
|
Shipton Anderson & Co Ltd v Weil Brothers & Co Ltd |
|
|
|
[1912] 1 KB 574; 106 LT 372; 28 TLR 269 |
|
149 |
|
Sign-O-Lite v Metropolitan Life (1990) 74 DLR (4th) 541; Can |
|
11, 12 |
|
Silver v Ocean Steamship Co Ltd [1930] 1 KB 416; [1929] All ER 611, CA |
219 |
||
Sinason-Teicher Inter-American Grain Corp v Oilcakes and Oilseeds |
|
|
|
Trading Co Ltd [1954] 1 WLR 1394, CA |
|
248 |
|
Singer Co v Tees & Hartlepool Port Authority [1988] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 164 |
86, 94 |
||
Singh (Gian) & Co v Banque de l’Indochine [1974] 1 WLR 1234; |
|
|
|
2 All ER 754; 2 Lloyd’s Rep 1, PC |
|
246 |
|
Skopas, The, see Resolute Maritime v Nippon |
|
|
|
Sky Petroleum Ltd v VIP Petroleum Ltd [1974] 1 All ER 954 |
|
179 |
|
Slater v Finning [1996] 3 All ER 398; 3 WLR 190; 15 Tr L 458, (Sc) HL |
|
84 |
|
Smart v Sandars (1848) 5 CB 895; 136 ER 1132 |
|
51 |
|
Smith v Bush [1990] 1 AC 831; [1989] 2 WLR 790; 2 All ER 514, HL |
|
94, 95 |
|
Smyth & Co Ltd v Bailey Son & Co Ltd [1940] 3 All ER 60; |
|
|
|
164 LT 102, HL |
|
229–30 |
|
Société des Industries Metallurgiques v Bronx Engineering Ltd |
|
|
|
[1975] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 465, CA |
|
178 |
|
Solholt, The [1983] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 605, CA |
|
178 |
|
Somes v British Empire Shipping Co (1860) 8 HLC 338; 11 ER 459, HL |
164 |
||
Soprama SpA v Marine & Animal By-Products Corporation |
|
|
|
xxiv
|
Table of cases |
|
|
||
[1966] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 367 |
244, 249 |
|
Sorral v Finch [1977] AC 728; [1976] 2 All ER 371; 2 WLR 883, HL |
2 |
|
South Australian Insurance Co v Randell (1869) LR 3 PC 101, |
|
|
22 LT 843; 16 ER 755, PC |
65, 66 |
|
South Western General Property Co v Marton (1982) 263 EG 1090 |
92 |
|
Southern and District Finance plc v Barnes [1996] 1 FCR 679; |
|
|
27 HLR 691; [1995] CCLR 62; (1995) The Times, 19 April, CA |
212 |
|
Southern Water Authority v Carey [1985] 2 All ER 1077 |
19 |
|
Sovereign Finance v Silver Crest Furniture and Others [1997] CCLR 76 |
89 |
|
Spartali v Benecke (1850) 10 CB 212; 138 ER 87 |
163–64 |
|
Speedway Safety Products v Hazell & Moore Industries Pty Ltd |
|
|
[1982] 1 NSWLR 255, CA Aus |
72 |
|
Spiro v Lintern [1973] 1 WLR 1002; 3 All ER 319 |
8–9, 20 |
|
Springer v G W R [1921] 1 KB 257; 24 LT 79, CA |
14–15 |
|
St Albans City and District Council v International Computers Ltd |
|
|
(1994) The Times, 11 November; [1995] FSR 686, affirmed in part |
|
|
[1996] 4 All ER 481, CA |
60, 88 |
|
Stach (Ian) Ltd v Baker Bosley Ltd [1958] 2 QB 130 |
248–49 |
|
Stadium Finance v Robbins [1962] 2 QB 664; 3 WLR 453; |
|
|
2 All ER 633, CA |
133 |
|
Staffs Motor Guarantee v British Wagon Co Ltd [1934] 2 KB 305 |
131–32 |
|
Stag Line Ltd v Tyne Ship Repair Group, The Zinnia [1984] 2 Lloyd’s |
|
|
Rep 211 |
87–88 |
|
Stamford Finance v Gandy [1957] CLY 597 |
200–01 |
|
Stapylton Fletcher Ltd, Re Ellis Son & Vidler Ltd, Re |
|
|
[1994] 1 WLR 1181; [1995] 1 All ER 192 |
113 |
|
State Trading Corporation of India v Golodetz [1989] QB 108, CA |
155 |
|
Steels & Busks Ltd v Bleecker Bik & Co Ltd [1956] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 228 |
85 |
|
Stein, Forbes & Co v County Tailoring (1916) 86 LJKB 448; 115 LT 215 |
159, 160 |
|
Sterns v Vickers [1923] 1 KB 78, CA |
120 |
|
Stevenson v Beverly Bentinck Ltd [1976] 2 All ER 606; |
|
|
1 WLR 483, CA |
142 |
|
Stewart Gill Ltd v Myer [1992] QB 600; 2 All ER 257; |
|
|
[1992] 2 WLR 721; (1991) 11 TR LR 86; (1992) NLJ 241, CA |
90 |
|
Stocznia Gdanska SA v Latvian Shipping Co [1998] 1 WLR 574, HL |
161 |
|
Strathmore, Earl of v Vane, see Re Bowes |
|
|
Sui Yin Kwan v Eastern Insurance [1994] 2 AC 199; 1 All ER 213, PC |
27 |
|
Summers v Solomon (1857) E & B 879; 119 ER 1474 |
5 |
|
Swan, The, Bridges & Salmon v The Swan [1968] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 5 |
56 |
|
Sweet v Pym (1800) 1 East 4; 102 ER 2 |
48 |
|
Tai Hing Cotton Mill Ltd v Kamsing Knitting Factory [1979] AC 91; |
|
|
[1978] 2 WLR 62; 1 All ER 515, PC |
176 |
|
Tappenden v Artus and Rayleigh Garage [1964] 2 QB 185; |
|
|
xxv
BRIEFCASE on Commercial Law |
|
|
|
|
|
[1963] 3 All ER 213, CA |
192, 193 |
|
Tarling v O’Riordan (1878) 2 LR Ir 82, CA IRE |
149–50 |
|
Tatung (UK) Ltd v Galex Telesure Ltd (1989) 5 BCC 325 |
117 |
|
Taylor v Great Eastern Ry Co [1901] 1 KB 774; 84 LT 770; 17 TLR 394 |
167 |
|
Taylor v Oakes Roncoroni (1922) 38 TLR 349; 127 LT 267, KBD and CA |
157 |
|
Taylor v Robinson (1818) 8 Taunt 648, 129 ER 536 |
47 |
|
Teheran-Europe Co Ltd v ST Belton (Tractors) Ltd [1968] 2 QB 545; |
|
|
3 WLR 205; 2 All ER 886, CA |
83 |
|
Thain v Anniesland Trade Centre [1997] SLT (Sh Ct) 102; SCLR |
|
|
(Sh Ct) 991 |
80–81 |
|
Thompson v Lohan (Plant) Ltd [1987] 2 All ER 631; 1 WLR 649; |
|
|
131 SJ 358; TLR 65, CA |
97 |
|
Thompson v Robinson [1955] Ch 177; 2 WLR 185; |
|
|
1 All ER 154 |
161 |
|
Thomson v Davenport (1829) 9 B & C 78; 109 ER 30 |
57 |
|
Tigress, The (1863) 32 LJ Adm 97; BR & L 38; 167 ER 286 |
168 |
|
Toby Constructions Products Ltd v Computa Bar (Sales) Pty Ltd |
|
|
[1983] 2 NSWLR 48, Aus |
59 |
|
Toepfer v Warinco AG [1978] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 569 |
75 |
|
Toulmin v Millar (1887) 3 TLR 836, HL |
44 |
|
Trans Trust SPRL v Danubian Trading Co Ltd [1952] 2 QB 297; |
|
|
1 All ER 970; 1 Lloyd’s Rep 348, CA |
247–48 |
|
Turley v Bates (1863) 2 H & C 200; 159 ER 83 |
105 |
|
Turnball & Co v Mundas Trading Co [1954] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 198, |
|
|
(1953–55) 90 CLR 235, HC Aus |
223 |
|
Turner v Goldsmith [1891] 1 QB 544; 64 LT 301; 7 TLR 233 |
49 |
|
Turpin v Bilton (1843) 5 Man & G 455; 134 ER 641 |
31 |
|
UCB Leasing Ltd v Holtom [1987] RTR 362; [1987] CCLR 101, CA |
190 |
|
UK Insurance Association v Nevill (1887) 19 QBD 110; 2 TLR 658 |
28 |
|
Underwood v Burgh Castle [1921] 1 KB 343; 126 LT 401; |
|
|
38 TLR 44; 91 LJKB 355 |
104 |
|
Union Transport Finance Ltd v British Car Auctions Ltd |
|
|
[1978] 2 All ER 385, CA |
191 |
|
Unique Mariner, The [1978] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 438 |
13, 14 |
|
United City Merchants (Investments) Ltd v Royal Bank of Canada, |
|
|
The Amercan Accord [1983] 1 AC 168; [1982] 2 WLR 1039; |
|
|
2 All ER 720; Lloyd’s Rep 1 HL |
246–47 |
|
United Dominion Trust Ltd v Western [1976] QB 54; |
|
|
[1975] 3 All ER 1017, CA |
195 |
|
United Dominion Trust v Whitfield [1987] CCLR 60 |
200 |
|
United Dominions Trust (Commercial) Ltd v Ennis [1968] 1 QB 54; |
|
|
[1967] 2 All ER 345, CA |
204–05 |
|
United Dominions Trust (Commercial) Ltd v Taylor [1980] SLT 28; |
|
|
xxvi
|
|
Table of cases |
|
|
|
CCLR 29 |
188 |
|
Universal Steam Navigation Co v James Mckelvie & Co [1923] AC 492; |
||
129 LT 395; 39 TLR 480, HL |
55 |
|
Urquhart, Lindsay & Co Ltd v Eastern Bank Ltd [1922] 1 KB 318; |
|
|
126 LT 354 |
243 |
|
Valpy v Gibson (1847) 4 CB 837; 136 ER 737 |
165 |
|
Varley v Whipp [1900] 1 QB 513 |
70–71 |
|
Vic Mill Ltd, Re [1913] 1 Ch 465; 108 LT 44, CA |
161 |
|
Victoria Laundry (Windsor) Ltd v Newman Industries Ltd |
|
|
[1949] 2 KB 528; 1 All ER 997, CA |
177–78 |
|
Vinden v Hughes [1905] 1 KB 795; 21 TLR 324 |
236 |
|
Vitol v Norelf, The Santa Clara [1996] AC 800; 3 WLR 105, HL |
154–55, 156 |
|
Wade & English v Arcos, see Gabriel, Wade & English Ltd v Arcos |
|
|
Wadham Stringer v Meaney [1980] 3 All ER 789; 1 WLR 39 |
205 |
|
Wahbe Tamari v ‘Colprogeca’-Sociedada Geral de Fibras; |
|
|
[1969] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 18 |
241 |
|
Wait, Re [1927] 1 Ch 606; [1926] All ER Rep 433, CA |
113–14 |
|
Wait v Baker (1848) 2 Exch 1; 154 ER 380 |
217–18, 226 |
|
Wait & James v Midland Bank (1926) 31 Com Cas 172 |
111 |
|
Waithman v Wakefield (1807) 1 Camp 120; 170 ER 898 |
17 |
|
Wakefield v Duckworth [1915] 1 KB 218; 112 LT 130; 31 TLR 40 |
54–55 |
|
Waldron-Kelly v British Railways Board [1981] 3 Cur Law 33 |
93 |
|
Walker v Boyle [1982] 1 WLR 495; 1 All ER 634 |
91 |
|
Wallace v Woodgate (1824) 1 C & P 575; 171 ER 1323 |
165 |
|
Wallis v Russell [1902] IR 585, IRE |
82 |
|
Ward v Bignall [1967] 1 QB 534; 2 WLR 1050; 2 All ER 449, CA |
103, 169 |
|
Ward (Alexander) & Co Ltd v Samyang Navigation Co Ltd |
|
|
[1975] 1 WLR 673, HL |
23 |
|
Warder’s v Norwood [1968] 2 QB 663; 2 WLR 1440; |
|
|
2 All ER 602; 2 Lloyd’s Rep 1, CA |
108 |
|
Warinco v Samor [1977] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 582 |
151 |
|
Warlow v Harrison (1859) 1 E & E 309; 120 ER 920; |
|
|
925 Court of Exch Chamber |
66 |
|
Warman v Southern Counties Finance Corporation Ltd |
|
|
[1949] 2 KB 576; 1 All ER 711 |
185 |
|
Watson v Davies [1931] 1 Ch 455; 144 LT 545 |
22 |
|
Watson v Swann (1862) 11 CB (NS) 756; 142 ER 993 |
18–19 |
|
Watteau v Fenwick [1893] 1 QB 346, 67 LT 831; 9 TLR 133 |
10–11 |
|
Waugh v Clifford [1982] Ch 374; 1 All ER 1095 |
32–33 |
|
Way v Latilla [1937] 3 All ER 759, HL |
43 |
|
Weiner v Gill [1906] 2 KB 574; 75 LJKB 916, CA |
106 |
|
Weiner v Harris [1910] 1 KB 285, CA |
129 |
|
Whitehead v Taylor (1839) 10 Ad & E 210; 113 ER 81 |
24 |
|
xxvii
BRIEFCASE on Commercial Law |
|
|
|
|
|
Whitehorn Bros v Davison [1911] 1 KB 463, CA |
142 |
|
Wickham Holdings Ltd v Brooke House Motors Ltd |
|
|
[1967] 1 All ER 117; 1 WLR 295, CA |
191, 192 |
|
Wiehe v Dennis Bros (1913) 29 TLR 250 |
121 |
|
Wilensko Slaski v Fenwick [1938] 3 All ER 429; 54 TLR 1019 |
149 |
|
Wilkie v Scottish Aviation Ltd [1956] SC 198 |
44 |
|
Williams v Moor (1843) 11 M & W 256; 152 ER 798 |
19 |
|
Williams v Reynolds (1865) B & S 495; 122 ER 1278 |
174 |
|
Williams Bros v E T Agius Ltd [1914] AC 510; 30 TLR 351; |
|
|
110 LT 865, HL |
175 |
|
Williams Leasing v McCauley [1994] CCLR 78, CA |
197, 198 |
|
Williamson v Rider [1963] 1 QB 89; [1962] 2 All ER 268, CA |
217 |
|
Wilson v Rickett [1954] 1 QB 598; [1954] 2 WLR 629; |
|
|
[1954] 1 All ER 868, CA |
77 |
|
Wilson v Tumman (1843) 6 Man G 236; 134 ER 879 |
20 |
|
Wimble Sons & Co v Rosenburg & Sons [1913] 3 KB 743; |
|
|
109 LT 294; 29 TLR 752, CA |
145–46, 226, 227 |
|
Winson, The, see China-Pacific v Food Corporation of India |
|
|
Withers v Reynolds (1831) 2 B & Ad 882; 109 ER 1370 |
152 |
|
Woodchester Equipment (Leasing) Ltd v British Association of |
|
|
Canned and Prerserved Foods Importers and Distributors Ltd |
|
|
[1995] CCLR 51, CA |
197–98 |
|
Woodman v Photo Trade Processing (1981) unreported, |
|
|
see (1981) 131 NLJ 935 County Court |
93 |
|
Worboys v Carter (1987) 2 EGLR 1, CA |
9 |
|
Worcester Works Finance Ltd v Cooden Engineering Co Ltd |
|
|
[1972] 1 QB 210; [1971] 3 WLR 661; 3 All ER 708, CA |
134–35 |
|
Workman Clark & Co v Lloyd Brazileno [1908] KB 968; 99 lT 477; |
|
|
24 TLR 458, CA |
160 |
|
Wormell v RHM Agriculture East Ltd [1987] 1 WLR 1091; |
|
|
3 All ER 75, CA |
78–79 |
|
Wren v Holt [1903] 1 KB 610; 88 LT 282 |
71 |
|
Wright v Carter [1903] 1 Ch 27; 87 LT 624; 19 TLR 29, CA |
37 |
|
WRM Group Ltd v Wood and Others (1997) unreported, CA |
91, 92 |
|
Wyatt v Marquis of Hertford (1802) 3 East 147; 102 ER 553 |
25 |
|
Yeoman Credit Ltd v Waragowski [1961] 3 All ER 145; |
|
|
1 WLR 1124, CA |
203, 204 |
|
Yonge v Toynbee [1910] 1 KB 215; 10 LT 57; 26 TLR 211 |
53 |
|
Yuking Line v Rendsburg Investment Corporation of Liberia |
|
|
[1996] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 604 |
155–56 |
|
Zinnia, The, see Stag Line Ltd v Tyne Ship Repair Group
xxviii