- •Preface
- •Origins of Rule: Pinnel’s Case
- •Rule Reviewed: Foakes v. Beer
- •Justifications for Rule
- •Objections Raised to Rule
- •Common Law Reforms
- •Scattered Legislative Reforms
- •U.C.C. Rejects Preexisting Duty Rule
- •Tenacious Rule Reaffirmed
- •Exception for Subsequent Unanticipated Event
- •Comparison of U.C.C. and Restatement Second Positions
- •When Preexisting Duty Rule Applies Today
- •Possible Common Law Solutions
- •Conclusion: Reform of Preexisting Duty Rule
- •Origins of Past Consideration Rule: Hunt v. Bate
- •Emergence of Moral Obligation Principle
- •Early Nineteenth Century English Support for Mansfield’s Ideas
- •Negative Reaction Sets In
- •Initial American Reception Mixed
- •English Precedents Not Requiring Prior Legal Obligation
- •Void Contracts Covered
- •Implied Previous Request
- •Consideration Found without Implied Request
- •11. American Promissory Restitution Supported by Moral Obligation Alone
- •Independent Ground of Moral Obligation
- •Reasons Justifying Moral Obligation as an Independent Ground
- •Conclusion: Moral Obligation Principle
- •Notes
- •Tables of Cases
- •Table of Statutes
- •Subject Index
Subject Index
Accord, 13, 14–17, 19, 167. See also Contract modification
Adequacy. See Exchange values relevant
Ames, James B. (1846–1910), 17, 23, 126, 128–29
Assumpsit, 2, 6, 83; past consideration, 74, 78, 84, 98, 111, 168, 181; preexisting duty, 13, 15, 16, 17, 25, 31, 68, 126, 127, 128
Australian law, 143
Bankruptcy. See Waiver exceptions Bargain, 2, 4, 5; past consideration rule, 73, 84, 91, 94, 98, 105, 106, 115, 116, 118, 121, 123, 168, 176, 190; preexisting duty rule, 24, 25,
56. See also Consideration; Past consideration rule; Preexisting duty rule
Bargain consideration, 2, 3, 9, 10, 128, 134, 143; non-bargain circumstances, 1, 5, 8, 121. See also Promissory liability without consideration)
Benefit. See Consideration; Moral obligation principle; Promissory restitution; Restitution
Bentham, Jeremy (1748–1832), 39, 82, 91, 109, 128, 129
Blackburn, Lord (1813–96), 17, 21, 22, 24, 39, 43, 53, 127, 128, 129
Blackstone, Wm. (1723–80), 3, 4, 31, 91, 182, 185
Bracton, Henry de (JKB 1247–57), 31, 138, 169
Buller, Francis (JKB) (1746–1800), 78, 81, 171, 172
Business planners, 3, 5, 8; past consideration rule, 89, 90, 91, 185; preexisting duty rule, 17, 18, 23, 26, 41, 43. See also Long term contracts; Uniformity of rules
Business usage, 3; legitimate commercial reasons, 45, 46, 48, 52, 56, 57, 59, 62, 63, 132, 165 (see U.C.C. abolishes preexisting duty); past consideration rule, 77, 79, 91, 169, 170; preexisting duty rule, 26, 41, 43, 45, 46, 56, 59, 62, 65, 132, 135, 146, 150, 151, 159, 163, 165. See also Contextual needs
California Field Code (1872), 39, 144, 145, 146. See also Codification of common law; Positivism
Canon law, 80, 85, 167, 168, 171, 173, 174, 177, 194
Case reports, 29, 88, 106, 107, 108,
216 |
Subject Index |
109, 111. See also Johnson’s reporter’s note; Smith’s Leading Cases; Treatise writers; Wennall v. Adney reporters’ note; Williams’ reporter’s note
Causa, 5, 6; past consideration rule, 83, 175; preexisting duty rule, 43, 52, 56, 59, 67, 148, 167. See also Business usage; Canon law; Consideration; Good faith
Changed circumstances. See Unanticipated circumstances
Civil law, 3, 6, 10; past consideration, 76, 81–82, 83, 85, 88, 90, 91, 95, 97, 121, 169, 175 (see Mansfield, Lord); preexisting duty, 15, 23, 31, 52, 65, 67, 68, 156
Civil procedure, 9, 45–46, 74–75, 80, 85, 90, 110, 111, 121, 125, 128, 173, 193; trial by jury, 87, 109, 110, 170, 179–80, 183, 191. See also Forms of action abolished; Fusion of law and equity
Codification of common law, 39–46, 144–50, 175, 193
Coercion, 9, 18, 19, 25, 30, 31, 48, 49– 50, 51, 52, 57, 58, 64, 65, 69, 70, 159, 160. See also Economic duress
Coke, Edward (1552–1634) (CJCP 1606–13; CJKB 1613–16), 14, 16, 23, 24, 26, 27, 29, 31, 47, 52, 126, 127, 129, 136
Commercial practices. See Business usage
Consensual theory, 5; past consideration, 80, 109, 110, 121, 174, 175, 194; preexisting duty, 23, 26, 29, 31, 33, 42, 52, 52–53, 58, 68, 133, 134, 137, 146, 151
Consent, 4, 5, 6; past consideration, 73, 77, 85, 111, 122, 167; preexisting duty, 13, 32, 43, 46, 48, 49, 53, 56, 57, 64, 65, 68, 69, 146
Consideration, doctrine of, 1, 3, 6, 9, 13, 15, 25, 26, 61, 63, 83, 89, 90, 94, 115, 122, 123, 128, 144, 168; benefit in past consideration, 74, 82, 172; benefit in preexisting duty, 17, 24,
27, 28–29, 153, 158, 161, 165, 166; criticisms of, 1, 10, 24, 29, 74, 170; detriment, 24, 27, 142, 143, 153, 158, 166; origins, 2. 6, 25; past consideration, 74, 77, 100; preexisting duty, 17, 18, 19, 22, 31, 45, 48, 49– 50, 51, 52, 68. See also Assumpsit; Bargain; Bargain consideration; Defendant’s previous request; Exchange values relevant; Moral obligation principle; Past consideration rule; Preexisting duty rule; Promissory liability without consideration; Promissory restitution
Contextual needs, 39, 67–68, 69, 122, 134, 150. See also Business usage Contract discharge. See Contract modi-
fication
Contract formation contrasted with discharge, 15, 17, 25, 37–38, 40, 42, 45, 68, 128, 134, 148, 153; contrasted with negotiation, 45, 150, 167. See also Preexisting duty rule, criticism of
Contract modification, 13, 19, 23, 25, 132, 147–48; consideration found, 28–29, 35, 49–50, 51, 52, 55, 66–67, 153, 154, 155, 156, 161; money contracts, 19, 130; services contracts, 19, 30, 33, 49–50, 52, 63, 64, 130, 131, 139, 140. See also Preexisting duty rule; U.C.C. abolishes preexisting duty rule
Cooley, Thomas (1824–98), 32, 55 Corbin, Arthur (1874–1967), 7, 8, 24
Damages, 8, 18, 51, 53, 134, 138, 156 Debt action, 2, 3; past consideration, 74, 167, 181; preexisting duty, 14–
15, 17, 126, 128
Defendant’s previous request, 74, 81, 82, 89, 98, 99–100, 103, 106, 110, 112, 116, 168, 174, 177; implied fiction, 82, 105, 106–9, 110. See also Bargain; Consideration; Implied previous request; Past consideration rule
Denman, Lord (1779–1854), 29, 50,
Subject Index |
217 |
81, 83, 84, 88, 89, 90, 91, 93, 94, 97, 100, 102, 112–13, 123, 174, 175, 181. See also Mansfield, Lord, reaction against; Stare decisis
Denning, Alfred (M.R. 1962–83), 37, 142, 143, 153
Duress. See Coercion; Economic duress
Economic duress, 9, 19, 30–35, 43, 44, 46, 48, 130–31, 134, 137, 138–39, 140, 148, 149, 150, 153; lessens need for preexisting duty rule, 31, 33, 34, 42, 70, 140, 159
Economic efficiency, 4, 46, 49, 50, 52, 65–66, 69, 161. See also Business usage
Economic underdog, 7, 8, 19, 35, 41, 42, 59, 65–66, 140, 147, 148, 150, 151, 152, 159, 163, 164, 165–66
Ellenborough, Lord (Edward Law) (CJKB 1802–18), 30, 81, 82, 84, 86, 93, 100, 132, 175
Enlightenment, 91, 169, 175, 182. See also Civil law; Mansfield, Lord
Equity, 7; past consideration, 77, 78, 79, 80, 83, 84, 85, 101, 110, 113, 120, 122, 167, 168, 171, 172, 173, 174, 177, 178, 194, 198 (see Moral obligation principle); preexisting duty, 26, 31, 34, 43, 44, 51, 133, 138, 140, 148, 162. See also Fusion of law and equity
Exchange values relevant, 6, 22, 31, 69, 120, 134, 138, 139, 140, 152, 154, 166, 198
Excuse. See Impossibility; Unanticipated circumstances, exception Executory contracts, 16; preexisting
duty, 16, 30, 57, 127, 137, 147, 157, 160, 166
Fair dealing. See Business usage; Fairness; Good faith
Fairness, 7; past consideration, 73, 92, 110, 113, 115, 121, 122, 123; preexisting duty, 56, 58, 59, 60, 143, 151, 162, 163
Fictions, 4; past consideration, 74, 75,
82, 108, 110, 111 (see Implied previous request); preexisting duty, 27, 30, 51 (see Rescission and substitution)
Formalism, 6, 9, 18, 21, 23, 26, 92, 93, 100, 112–13, 114, 115, 121, 139. See also Monistic doctrinal test; Stare decisis; Treatise writers; Wennall v. Adney reporters’ note
Forms of action abolished, 5, 7; past consideration rule, 82, 88, 109–10, 111, 121, 181, 193; preexisting duty rule, 17, 23, 68, 128
Freedom of contract, 17, 23, 31, 32, 46, 65, 68, 121, 130
French code, 145, 156, 165 Frustration. See Impossibility Fusion of law and equity, 5, 7; past
consideration, 73, 109, 110, 113, 121, 183, 193, 198; preexisting duty, 18, 23, 26, 33, 37, 43, 44, 51, 68, 69, 128, 148
Gaynor, Wm. (1849–1913), 112–13, 195
General principles. See Uniformity of rules
German civil code, 68, 165, 175 Gift, 36, 55, 85, 117, 118, 168
Good faith, 23, 33, 43–46, 58, 59, 148, 149, 150, 160, 162, 167; origins, 43– 44; U.C.C, 43, 45–46. See also U.C.C. abolishes preexisting duty rule
Gratuitous promises, 7; past consideration, 79, 82, 85, 117, 118, 173, 175; preexisting duty, 27, 35, 40, 47, 135, 145, 166
Hardwicke, Lord (Phillip York) (LC 1737–56), 78, 80, 140, 172
Holmes, Oliver W., Jr. (1841–1935), 3, 10, 43, 128, 138
Holt, John (CJKB 1689–1709), 75, 77, 79, 80, 83, 84, 89, 93, 105, 106, 132, 163, 169. See also Ratification exceptions; Waiver exceptions
218 |
Subject Index |
Implied previous request, 82, 105, 106– 9, 110, 112, 191, 192, 194; consideration without implied request, 109, 110–14; subsequent promise equivalent of request, 110–11, 112, 195. See also Defendant’s previous request; Fictions; Moral obligation principle; Williams’ reporter’s note
Impossibility, 8, 44, 53, 58, 157. See also Unanticipated circumstances
Impracticability. See Impossibility Indian Contract Act of 1872, 39, 144 Individualism, 6, 8, 31, 32, 46, 91, 95 Industrial economy, 4, 26, 46, 52, 58,
65, 67, 68, 69, 91, 156, 179; preindustrial, 4, 26, 69
Infants’ contracts. See Ratification exceptions
Japanese code, 68
Jeffersonian natural law, 122, 175, 180. See also Natural law
Johnson’s reporter’s note, 108, 111, 113. See also Wennall v. Adney reporters’ note
Kent, James (NY Ch. 1814–23), 3, 107,
109, 191, 193
Langdell, Christopher (1826–1906), 94, 101, 187
Law merchant, 146, 163, 169. See also Business usage
Legal realism, 4, 8, 41, 56, 93, 95, 115 Llewellyn, Karl (1893–1962), 34, 41,
43, 141, 146. See also Uniform Commercial Code
Long term contracts, 4, 26, 38, 49, 52, 68, 69, 134, 148, 150. See also Business planners; Industrial economy; Relational contracts
Love and affection, 74, 79, 80, 108, 118, 187
Mansfield, Lord (Wm. Murray) (CJKB 1756–88), 6, 8, 9, 10, 22, 23, 27, 110, 169, 172, 177; American reception of ideas, 9, 88, 93–94, 102–3,
105–7, 112–13, 119, 120, 121–23, 184; moral obligation principle, 47, 73, 74, 76–80, 83, 84, 85, 93, 94, 119– 21, 123, 132, 171, 174, 195 (controversial position, 78–79, 80, 86, 88– 92, 120, 121, 146, 174, 180); reaction against moral obligation, 86–95, 106, 107, 120–21, 184, 185–86, 187; support for ideas, 81–86, 97–103, 111, 188. See also Moral obligation principle
Market ideas. See Bargain; Business planners; Business usage; Consensual theory; Industrial economy; Predictability
Married women’s contracts, 83, 84, 89, 93, 94, 99, 100, 101–3, 119, 169, 171, 174, 175, 181, 189–90. See also Ratification exceptions
Metcalf, Theron, 109, 193 Modification. See Contract modifica-
tion
Money contracts modifications. See Contract modification
Monistic doctrinal test, 3, 100, 108, 121, 129, 130
Moral obligation principle, 8, 9, 76–86, 90, 94, 95, 101, 105, 111, 112–13, 114, 115–23, 160, 175, 176, 186, 190; benefit received by promissor, 86, 88, 94, 101, 108, 113, 114, 115, 116, 118, 122, 123, 178, 179, 180, 192, 197, 198; consideration unnecessary, 105, 113, 115–20, 121–22; constitutes consideration, 78, 79, 82, 86, 101, 105–14, 115, 116, 121, 196, 198 (see Implied previous request); early narrow scope, 88, 89, 90, 91, 114, 117, 119, 121, 122 (see Holt, John; Ratification exceptions; Waiver exceptions); no prior legal obligation, 82, 83, 86, 89, 97–100, 109, 113, 114, 117, 119 (see Defendant’s previous request; Wennall v. Adney reporters’ note); origins, 75–80, 82, 97–103; prior to Mansfield, 79, 88, 90, 94, 97– 103, 107; promise required, 7, 86, 87, 98, 99, 113, 115, 119, 120, 123,
Subject Index |
219 |
192. See also Mansfield, Lord; Past consideration rule
Morality, 8; past consideration, 73, 88, 89, 90, 91 93, 98, 101, 102, 112, 116, 119, 120, 172, 178, 180, 197, 198; preexisting duty rule, 21, 23, 30, 51, 133, 138, 140, 148. See also Civil law; Mansfield, Lord; Moral obligation principle
Natural law, 9, 85, 88, 92, 133, 171, 180
Negotiable instruments, 22, 129, 131, 132, 134, 136, 163, 169, 183
Negotiorum gestio, 86, 179
Officiousness, 78, 83, 84, 98, 100, 107, 117, 121, 122, 168, 178. See also Moral obligation principle
Parke, James (BEx 1834–55), 22, 82, 92, 93, 95, 156, 185, 187
Parol evidence rule, 18, 66, 134, 144, 165, 170, 172
Parsons, Theophilus (1797–1882), 94, 95, 114, 185
Past consideration rule, 1, 2, 6, 82, 90, 100, 109, 112, 114, 115; compared with preexisting duty, 2, 29, 50, 159, 171; defendant’s previous request, 74, 75, 82, 97, 98, 168 (see Defendant’s previous request; Wennall v. Adney reporters’ note); origins, 74– 75; reform, 4, 5, 9, 10, 90, 110, 111, 115, 120–23, 185, 186 (see Implied previous request; Moral obligation principle; Promissory Restitution; Ratification exceptions; Waiver exceptions). See also Assumpsit; Bargain; Civil law; Consideration; Debt action
Policing mechanisms, 9, 18, 25, 26, 34, 35, 43–44, 46, 56, 62, 65, 67, 69, 137, 148. See also Economic duress; Good faith; Unconscionability
Pollock, Frederick (1845–1937), 5, 138 Positivism, 3, 89, 91, 92. See also Ben-
tham; Formalism; Statutory reforms
Pothier, Robert (1699–1772), 157, 194. See also Civil law
Predictability factor, 2, 3, 4, 5; past consideration, 73, 87, 89, 90, 91, 95, 122, 123, 185; preexisting duty, 18, 21, 23, 26, 46, 157. See also Uniformity of rules
Preexisting duty rule, 1, 2, 6, 13, 17, 25, 47, 50, 61, 63, 64, 65, 66, 69, 70, 125, 129, 130, 137, 139, 164; criticism of, 13, 15, 17, 21–25, 29, 43, 46, 49, 126, 127, 129, 130, 132, 133, 165; justification for, 18–19, 21–22, 30, 33, 48, 49, 69, 148; origins, 14– 16, 126, 127; reform, 9, 10, 17, 18, 25–46, 49–50, 51, 55, 64, 128, 136, 153–55, 164, 166 (see Economic duress; Reliance; U.C.C. abolishes preexisting duty rule; Unanticipated circumstances); traditional exceptions, 26–28, 44, 54, 126, 127, 129, 135, 136. See also Assumpsit; Bargain; Civil law; Debt action; Contract modification
Promissory estoppel, 35, 36–38, 47, 63, 66, 90, 116, 122, 134, 142, 143, 153, 166, 183. See also Reliance
Promissory liability without consideration, 1, 5, 6, 122; past consideration, 109, 114, 115–20, 121 (see Moral obligation principle; Promissory restitution); preexisting duty rule, 28–29, 37, 41, 43, 54, 56, 66–67 (see U.C.C. abolishes preexisting duty rule). See also Bargain; Promissory estoppel
Promissory restitution, 73, 85, 95, 105– 23; benefit received, 74, 112, 118, 120; consideration not required, 115– 20; no prior legal obligation, 82, 109, 114, 115–20; promise required, 84. See also Moral obligation principle
Proprietary interests, 2, 3, 4, 14, 15, 18, 126, 168
Quasi-contract. See Restitution
Ratification exceptions, 75–76, 77–78, 81, 83, 88, 93, 101, 102, 113, 117,
220 |
Subject Index |
119, 169. See also Holt, John; Moral obligation principle; Past consideration rule; Void contracts
Reasonable expectations, 1, 4, 5, 6, 7, 39, 65, 68, 69, 86, 118, 130, 138 Reforms. See Moral obligation princi-
ple; Statutory reforms; U.C.C. abolishes preexisting duty rule
Relational contracts, 6, 50, 54. See also Long term contracts
Release. See Contract modification Reliance, 7; overcomes preexisting
duty rule, 26, 27, 35–38, 47, 51, 56– 57, 64, 141–42, 143, 144, 149, 160; past consideration rule, 174. See also Promissory estoppel
Rescission and substitution, 4, 19, 27, 47–48, 51, 54, 55, 131, 136, 147, 148, 159, 160, 161; criticism of, 47, 51, 135, 137, 158, 159, 164–65. See also Preexisting duty rule
Restatement of Contracts (1932), 8, 116, 144, 149; past consideration rule, 114, 115; preexisting duty rule, 38, 47, 58, 151, 155. See also Promissory estoppel
Restatement Second of Contracts (1981), 1, 6, 35, 63; past consideration rule, 115–16, 122–22 (see Moral obligation principle); retains preexisting duty rule, 36, 47–50, 64, 143, 151, 164, 166 (criticism of, 47, 48, 49, 51, 52, 59, 62, 64, 66); reform needed, 65–68, 69, 166. See also Preexisting duty rule; Promissory estoppel; Reliance; U.C.C. abolishes preexisting duty rule; Unanticipated circumstances
Restitution, 7, 8, 9, 84, 85, 94, 100, 120, 122, 123; past consideration rule, 84, 119, 120, 172–73, 180, 183 (see Promissory restitution); preexisting duty rule, 31, 34, 57, 138, 140
Restitutionary promises. See Promissory restitution
Right to breach, 8, 30, 51, 137, 138, 154, 156. See also Damages
Roman law, 6, 86, 169, 177, 191, 198
Seal, 38, 40, 134, 135, 145, 147, 172, 173, 183
Services contracts modifications. See Contract modification
Singapore law, 144, 153
Sjt. Williams. See Williams’ reporter’s note
Smith’s Leading Cases, 22, 23, 129 Stare decisis, differences in United
States and England, 9, 16, 17, 18, 25, 28, 29, 30, 37, 38, 50, 82, 92, 93, 97, 109, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 122, 127, 128, 129, 136, 137, 154, 183. See also Mansfield, Lord, American reception
Statute of Frauds (1677), 39, 42, 64, 66, 77, 80, 130, 136, 144, 147, 170, 172, 174, 196. See also Written formality
Statute of limitations. See Waiver exceptions
Statutory reforms, 2–3, 8, 10; past consideration rule, 88, 88, 91, 117; preexisting duty rule, 39–46, 50, 64, 70, 129, 144–50. See also Restatement of Contracts; Restatement Second of Contracts; U.C.C. abolishes preexisting duty rule
Tenterden, Lord (Charles Abbott) (CJKB 1818–32), 86, 87, 88, 176, 179, 180
Time factor, 2, 3. See also Bargain Trade usage. See Business usage Treatise writers, 3, 5, 8, 22, 91, 94–95,
109, 129, 156, 181, 182, 185. See also Case reports; Monistic doctrinal test
U.C.C. abolishes preexisting duty rule, 41–46, 63, 66; contrasted with Restatement Second of Contracts, 48, 57, 61–63; good faith required, 43– 46, 48, 61–62, 150, 159, 162 (legitimate commercial reason, 45, 46, 48, 52, 56, 57, 59, 62, 63, 65, 150, 151, 152, 156, 163; see also Business usage: legitimate commercial reason)
Subject Index |
221 |
UN Convention on sales, 68, 146, 167 Unanticipated circumstances, 4, 6, 8; exception to preexisting duty rule,
26, 27, 33, 36, 44, 47, 48, 50, 51–59, 63, 135, 137, 139, 144, 149, 150, 152, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 161–62, 164; origins of exception, 52–55
Unconscionability, 9, 34–35, 46, 140, 141, 166
Uniform Commercial Code (U.C.C.), 6, 34, 41, 45, 46; good faith, 43, 45– 46. See also U.C.C. abolishes preexisting duty rule
Uniform Written Obligations Act (1925), 40, 42, 145, 146
Uniformity of rules, 3, 100, 108, 121, 129, 130, 143, 185. See also Codification of common law
Unjust enrichment. See Restitution Usurious contracts, 83, 92, 100–101,
119, 182, 189. See also Ratification exception
Void contracts, 100–103, 169, 190. See also Married women’s contracts; Usurious contracts
Waiver exceptions, 75, 76, 77–78, 83, 83, 88, 93, 100–101, 111, 116, 143, 144, 163, 169, 171, 183, 184. See also Holt, John; Moral obligation principle; Past consideration rule
Wennall v. Adney reporters’ note, 88– 92, 93, 94, 95, 97–98, 99, 100, 114, 175, 176, 188; rejection of, 112–14, 116, 117, 118, 119, 121 (see Moral obligation principle). See also Defendant’s previous request; Past consideration rule; Treatise writers
Widow’s ratification. See Married women’s contracts
Williams’ reporter’s note, 106, 107, 109, 111. See also Implied previous request
Williston, Samuel (1861–1963), 3, 40, 47, 95, 114, 115, 129, 130, 185. See also Restatement of Contracts
Written formality, 9; past consideration, 76, 79, 88, 93, 116, 119, 169– 70, 172, 180, 184, 196, 197; preexisting duty, 26, 27, 39, 40, 41, 42, 64, 66, 144, 145, 146, 147, 160, 163, 166. See also Statute of Frauds; Uniform Written Obligations Act
About the Author
KEVIN M. TEEVEN received his Juris Doctorate from the University of Illinois College of Law in 1971 and is a Professor at Bradley University in Peoria, Illinois. His research interests include the legal history of the reform of common law contract in both the United States and Great Britain. He is author of numerous law review articles and A History of the AngloAmerican Common Law of Contract (Greenwood Press, 1990).
