Добавил:

mihail1000 Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.

Вуз:

Воронежский государственный технический университет

Предмет:

[НЕСОРТИРОВАННОЕ]

Файл:

Управление строительными проектами, управление сложными социально-экономическими системами и математические основы управления социально-экономическими системами

.pdf

Скачиваний:

Добавлен:

01.05.2022

Размер:

8.02 Mб

Скачать

☆

<<< < Предыдущая 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1112 / 1512 13 14 15 > Следующая >>>

Ч Ы

ИИ

	334.7
			Щ	Х	Ь	Ь
			BIM-	Х		Ь
				. .	, . .

е и		а	а и	ае а, В		,
			,	,	я
Р	я,	. В	, e-mail: bekiron@mail.ru,		.: +7-920-410-39-09
а		и а а а и и ае а, В				,
				я
Р	я,	. В	, e-mail: anastasiyamalyutina@inbox.ru,			.: +7-980-540-80-09

:BIM -

			,		.
			,			,
			.		,
.					,
.				BIM
				BIM
				.
				.
BIM -				.
	.			,
	.		.
			.
К	че е	а:	BIM-	я; BIM-	; CAD-	;
		;		я;	.
						(
BuildingInformationalModeling),				BIM	–	,
						(
BuildingInformationalModel).					,
					,
				«	»	.
		,	.	,		,
			.			.
						.
.				BIM	,	,
.				BIM	,
				,	.
					.	.
				(BIM)		.
				(BIM)	:
					:

©	. .,	.	., 2019
				110

1)	,
;
2)	,
3)	.
	:
1)	,
2)	,
3)	,
4)	,
5)	,
6)	.
7)	,
8)	,
9)	,

10)		,
11)		,
12)	,	.

		BIM
	.	,
-	.
. 1		BIM,
	,	,
	.

1.		1.
2.		2.
2.
3.		3.
3.
4.		4.
,
,	(BIM)	5.
	(BIM)	5.
5.		6.
5.		7.
		7.
6.		8.
	1.
	1.
	2.
	3.
. 1.	,		BIM	BIM
	111

		BIM-				.	USA
						.	USA
				2003		.
		,	2007	[7].
		,					.	,
2		.					,
						,	,
[6].						,
[6].
.		,						50 %,
		,				,		50 %,
,			[12].			,		.
,								.
								[10, 11].
BIM-							[8-10, 15].
		BIM						,
			[9, 12].				.	Open BIM
		Benelux					.	Open BIM
		Benelux						[5].
						[2].
		,				,
			,				[4].	,
			,					,
								BIM,
							-	[3, 10],
		,					[1].
BIM
.			:
	•		:	BIM-		CAD-		.
	•			BIM-		CAD-		.
-				;
	•
,								;
							,
BIM (		,			Autodesk, Allplan, BentleyBuildingDesign,
BIM (		,			Autodesk, Allplan, BentleyBuildingDesign,
SAPPHIRE-3D		),	,				«	»
.						,		.
				.		,	,
				.			,	-
,				,				.
.				,
.
		.					,
		.					,
		,
,		,		.
				112


				,	,		,
.					,
.
.
		,		?	:			BIM
				?
	1.	3D		;	,			BIM:
	1.	3D		;
	2.				;
	3.				;
	4.						;
	5.				;
	6.					BIM	;
						BIM
	BIM				,		.
	BIM				,		.
					,
			BIM	,	,
		,
		.
		–					,
,			CAD	BIM.
,		.					,
		.					,
.		,

;


			3	6	12
		CAD-
Auto CAD		Autodesk, Inc.,	-	-	19 783	-
Nano CAD		,
nanoCADPlus		,	-	-	10 000	30 000
		BIM-
Renga Architecture		RengaSoftware,	-	-	-	160 000
+ Renga Structure		RengaSoftware,	-	-	-	160 000
+ Renga Structure
ARCHICAD		Graphisoft SE,	26 970	48 500	84 950	250 250
ARCHICAD	(	Nemetschek AG)	26 970	48 500	84 950	250 250
	(	Nemetschek AG)
Revit		Autodesk, Inc.,	28 300	-	73 900	-
AECOsim	BentleySystemsInc.,		-	-	-	385 070
Rhino 5 + RhinoBIM	Virtual Build Technologies		-	-	-	107 300
Rhino 5 + RhinoBIM		LLC,	-	-	-	107 300
		LLC,
Allplan	Nemetschek AG,		-	-	-	240 000
Architecture		Autodesk, Inc.,			115 296
engineering		Autodesk, Inc.,	-	-	115 296	-
construction

113

	:
(	) - Rhino 5 + RhinoBIM (Virtual Build Technologies LLC,						)
		=0,6			=230	.	.,
	=0,4		=22,5	.	.
(	) - Architecture engineering construction (Autodesk, Inc.,					)
		=0,6			=255	.	.	=0,3
	=30,0	.	.
	,		,		,
			,		,

(1)

;
–							;
–							;
–		,			.
(	):				230 + 0,4 (–22,5) = 129	.	.
(	):			1 = 0,6	230 + 0,4 (–22,5) = 129	.	.
(	):				255 + 0,3 (–30,0) = 144	.	.
(	):		2 = 0,6		255 + 0,3 (–30,0) = 144	.	.

(2)

;

–;

–				;
–			;
–		,	.
(	):	1 = [(0,6	(230 – 129)2 + 0,4 (–22,5 – 129)2]1/2 = 118,8	.	.
(	):	2 = [(0,6	(255 – 144)2 + 0,3 (–30,0 – 144)2]1/2 = 137,6	.	.
,			.
			,		,
:			,
:
			114

													(3)
			–				;
			–				;
			–						;
			–								.
				(		):	1 = 118,8/129		100 = 92 %
				(		):	2 = 137,6/144		100 = 95,5%
							,		1	100%.	.
							,				.
:
	10% –										;
10–25% –				,							;
	25% –										.

		.					,						-


	,						BIM. BIM						,
	,										,		,
											,
	.
	.
		(		)							,		.


									.	Autodesk
				-					.	,	,
									.		,
							,		,
							,
							.
			BIM							,
		,
		,
	,								.	, ARCHICAD			,
										AR		AI,	Tekla
	Structures QOL,			,			.		,	Bentley AECOsim			Autodesk
	,								,				;
	,						,						,
									, CAD 2D. Autodesk (		,		)
	-			.									,
				.					.		,		,
									.		,
				,							,
				.
		3-			,	BIM-					.		,
						BIM-					.
								BIM-
													.

115

				.
				.
Revit,	,	,		.	Autodesk
Revit,	,	,		,
	,			,
	,			.
		,		.
	:		Revit,	/	–	Tekla
Structures.
	,			,		.
	3.			2
	3.
						2

№

1	Tekla Structures			,
2	Allplan			,
3				,
4	MagiCAD
5	ARCHICAD		,
6	Bentley AECOsim		,
6	Bentley AECOsim		,	,		,
			,	,		,
7	Renga Architecture
8	Renga Structures			,
						3
	BIM-	Autodesk(architecture-engineering-construction)
№

1	AutoCAD( MEP		.
1	Architecture )		.
	Architecture )
2	Showcase					.
3	ReCap			.
				,		,
4	NavisworksSimulate			,
				.
				BIM		,
5	Revit		.			,
			.
	Robot Structural Analysis					,
6	Robot Structural Analysis
6	Professional		.
	Professional

		,		BIM-
	1.	,	;	:
	1.		;
	2.			;
	3.		BIM-	.
	,
	,		,	.
«	»		.	.
«	»		.
			116

	-2-	,				,			,					,
									,
						.			,			Autodesk		.
								,						.
						,		,
						,				.
										.
	:			2							,
	:
	•		CAD;												BIM
			CAD;
	•												;
	•							,
	•							,
								.
												.		BIM,
												.
		,		,		BIM	,					,			,
				,			,								,
					BIM		.
						.	.						,
							.		,				,
									,				. BIM-
													. BIM-
		.
		.
1.		.		.,		.	.,		. .
№ 4-2.;				.											. – 2015. –
№ 4-2.;		.		,		.	.,			. .
2.		.		,		.	.,			. .			.
					. – 2016. – № 2.;								.
					. – 2016. – № 2.;
3.		. .,		.		. .,			. .			. 2014.		.№1.2(11). .
				.								. 2014.		.№1.2(11). .
224-231 .		. .,				. .,			. .,			. .
4.		. .,				. .,			. .,			. .
									.		. 2005. . 152-155.
				-							. 2005. . 152-155.
5.		. .,				. .,			. .,				. .,		. .
							.		:			, 2008. – 495 .
6.		, . .									[	]:	.		. . .
, .		.		, .		;		.	.	.-	.	-	. –		, 2006. –
244 .;		. .,				. .,			. .,			. .,			. .,
7.		. .,				. .,			. .,			. .,			. .,
		. .						, 2008. – 765 C. 1-5.						.	:
-								, 2008. – 765 C. 1-5.
8.		. .,				. .,		. .,			. .
								.
				. 2010.		. 6, № 10.		. 129-132.

117

9.	. .,		. .,			. .,	. .,	. .
912 .						.	:	, 2005. –
912 .	. .,		. .,			. .,	. .
10.	. .,		. .,			. .,	. .
			.	.:	-	, 2007. – 440 .
11.	.	.,	. .
	.						. 2012. № 2.	. 1-5.
12.	.	.,	.	.,		. .
	. 2017. №8.					.
	. 2017. №8.		. 41-62.

THE ADVANTAGES OF USING AND THE DIFFICULTIES OF INTRODUCING BIM-TECHNOLOGIES IN MODERN CONSTRUCTION

O.N. Bekirova, A.N. Malyutina

Bekirova Olga Nikolaevna, Voronezh State Technical University, Candidate of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor, Associate Professor at the Department of Construction Management

Russia, Voronezh, e-mail: bekiron@mail.ru, tel.: +7-920-410-39-09

MalyutinaAnastasiyaNikolaevna, Voronezh State Technical University, Master’s Degree student at the Department of Construction Management

Russia, Voronezh, e-mail: rogoozinaelena@mail.ru, tel.: +7-908-141-32-20

Abstract. BIM technology is an innovative approach to design processes at all stages of building construction and operation, right up to the demolition of a structure. This technology allows you to combine the work of all kinds of professionals who work in designing in different directions, using narrowly focused programs. Another undoubted advantage of information modeling in front of CAD is the probability of identifying the largest percentage of errors, collisions and inconsistencies of a single plan.

The problem of implementing BIM software development is considered necessary and urgent for design and construction companies of our state. Informational alignment in the development of plans opens up new horizons in the issues of saving money and time resources.

BIM is an innovative design approach. This method of modeling provides simultaneous work of many specialists in various fields in one project, also provides the ability to quickly exchange information on the project among themselves and make adjustments to the project. The process of developing plans becomes more efficient due to the efficient allocation of resources and time.

Keywords: BIM technology; BIM modeling; CAD technology; building information modeling; features of implementation; design.references

References

1.Bekirova O.N., Agafonova M.S., Pletnev A.A. Features of business planning for small business International Student Scientific Journal. - 2015. - № 4-2 .;

2.Bekirova O.N., Agafonova M.S., Yelesyutikova V.S. Methods of quality management as an

instrument for ensuring the competitiveness of an organization. International Student Scientific Herald. - 2016. - № 2 .;

3.Burkov V.N., Barkalov S.A., Zolotarev D.N. The task of synthesis of volumes of operations in project management. Economics and management management systems. 2014. Issue number 1.2 (11). Pp. 224-231.

4.Barkalov S.A., Burkov V.N., Kontsedalov V.G., Sirenko S.V. Models and methods of multiproject construction management. Scientific Bulletin of the Voronezh State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering. 2005. p. 152-155.

5.Barkalov S.A., Novikov D.A., Novoseltsev V.I., Polovinkina A.I., Shipilov V.N. Models of conflict and risk management. Voronezh: Scientific book, 2008. - 495 p.

118

6.Barkalov, S.A. Operations Research in Economics [Text]: lab. Workshop, S.A. Barkalov, P.N. Kurochka, I.V. Fedorova; Voronezh.state architect.-building. un-t - Voronezh, 2006. - 244s.;

7.Alferov V.I., Barkalov S.A., Burkov V.N., Kurochka P.N., Khorokhordina N.V., Shipilov V.N. Applied construction project management tasks. Voronezh: Central Black Earth Book Publishing House, 2008. - 765 C. 1-5.

8.Barkalov S.A., Baskakov A.S., Burkov V.N., Sychev A.P. Regressive discrete corporate incentive mechanisms. Bulletin of the Voronezh State Technical University. 2010. T. 6, No. 10. P. 129-132.

9.Barkalov S.A., Burkova I.V., Kolpachev V.N., Kotenko A.M., Potapenko A.M. Optimization models and mechanisms in project management. Voronezh: VGASU, 2005. - 912 p.

10.Barkalov S.A., Burkova I.V., Kurochka P.N., Mikhin P.V. Models and methods of construction project management. M .: Ulanov-press, 2007. - 440 p.

11.Arsenyev DG, Vatin N. I. International cooperation in construction education and science. Construction of unique buildings and structures. 2012. № 2. S. 1-5.

12.Astafieva N. S., Kibireva Yu. A., Vasilyeva I. L. Advantages of the use and difficulty of

implementing information modeling of buildings.Construction of unique buildings and structures.

2017. №8. Pp.

119

<<< < Предыдущая 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1112 / 1512 13 14 15 > Следующая >>>

Соседние файлы в предмете [НЕСОРТИРОВАННОЕ]