Добавил:
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

malov_ea_fenomen_sotsialnykh_setei_aktornosetevoi_kontekst_t

.pdf
Скачиваний:
5
Добавлен:
27.10.2020
Размер:
2.18 Mб
Скачать

231

анализа процессов нелинейной социокультурной динамики // Журнал социологии и социальной антропологии. 2012. № 3. С. 51–68.

Флигстин, Н. Поля, власть и социальные навыки: критический анализ новых институциональных течений // Экономическая социология: Новые подходы к институциональному и сетевому анализу / Сост. и науч. ред. В.В. Радаев. М.: РОССПЭН, 2002. — C. 119–156.

Хархордин, О. Латур: практики и сети // Волков В., Хархордин О. Теория практик. СПб.: Изд-во ЕУСПб, 2008. — С. 243–261.

Хархордин, О. Предисловие научного редактора // Латур Б. Нового времени не было. — СПб.: Изд-во ЕУСПб, 2006. — С. 6–56.

Чураков, А. Н. Анализ социальных сетей // Социологические исследования.

2001. № 1. С. 109-121.

Чураков, А.Н. Вероятностные модели социальных сетей // Социологические исследования. — 2001. — № 9. — С. 99-114.

Штейнберг, И. Е. Русское чудо: локальные и семейные сети взаимоподдержки и их трансформация // Неформальная экономика: Россия и мир / Ред. Т.Шанин. — М.: Логос, 1999. — С. 183-218.

Якубович, В. Институты, социальные сети и рыночный обмен: подбор работников и рабочих мест в России // Экономическая социология: Новые подходы к институциональному и сетевому анализу / Составитель и научный редактор В.В.Радаев. — М.: РОССПЭН, — 2002. — С. 210-251.

Gladarev, B., Lonkila, M. The Role of Social Networking Sites in Civic Activism in Russia and Finland // Europe-Asia Studies. — 2012. Vol. 64., No.8. — P. 1377-1396.

Adorno, T. Subject and object // The essential Frankfurt school reader / Ed. By A. Arato & E. Gebhardt. New York: Continuum publishing. — 1994. — P. 497-511.

Amsterdamska, O. Surely, You Must be Joking, Monsieur Latour! // Science, Technology and Human Values. — 1990. — Vol. 15. P. 495-504.

Arsenault, A., & Castells, M. The structure and dynamics of global mutli-media business networks. International Journal of Communication. — 2008. — № 2, — P. 707–748.

232

Ashby, W. Ross Principles of the Self-Organizing Dynamic System // Journal of General Psychology. —1947. — vol. 37, — P. 125—128.

Baker, W. E. Floor Trading and Crowd Dynamics Adler P. A. The Social Dynamics of Financial Markets. — Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1984. — P. 107–128.

Barnes, J. A. Social networks // Addison-Wesley Module. —1972. — No. 26. — P. 1-29.

Barnes, J. A. Class and committees in a Norwegian Island parish. // Human Relations. — 1954. — №7. — P. 39—58.

Bloor, D. Anti-Latour. // Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. —1999. —

V.30, № 1. — Р. 113—129.

Bott, E. Urban families: conjugal roles and social networks // Human Relations. —

1955. — №8. — Р. 345-385.

Collins, R., Kemper T. Dimensions of Microinteraction // American Journal of Sociology. — 1990. — Vol. 96., No. 1. — Р. 32-68.

Collins, R. Interaction ritual chains, power and property: The Micromacroconnection as an empirically based theoretical problem // The Micro-Macro Link. University of California Press, 1987. — Vol.5. — Pp. 47 - 69.

Callon, M. Actor-Network Theory: the Market Test // J. Law and J. Hassard (Eds) Actor Network and After. — Oxford and Keele. —1999. — P.181-195.

Callon, M., Latour B. Don’t throw the baby out with the Bath school! // Science as practice and culture (Pickering A., ed). — Chicago, 1992. — P. 301-342.

Callon, M., Law J. Agency and the hybrid collectif // The South Atlantic quart. — N.-Y., 1995. — Vol. 94. — N 2. — P. 51-59.

Callon, M. Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fisherme of St Brieuc Bay / Power, action and belief: a new sociology of knowledge? — London, Routledge, —1986. – P. 196-223.

Callon M. From Science as an Economic Activity to Socioeconomics of Scientific Research. The Dynamics of Emergent and Consolidated Techno-Economic Networks. In P. Mirowski and E.M. Sent, eds. Science Bought and Sold. Essays in the Economics of

233

Science. — Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. — 2002. — P. 277-317.

Callon, M. The Sociology of an Actor-Network: The Case of the Electric Vehicle. In Michel Callon, John Law and A. Rip, eds. Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology. — Houndmills: Macmillan. —1986. — P. 19-34.

Collins H.,Yearley S. Epistemological chicken, in A. Pickering (ed.) // Science as Practice and Culture. — Chicago: Chicago University Press. — 1992. — P. 301–326 & 369–389.

Cook, K., Whitmeyer J. Two approaches to social structure: exchange theory and network analysis // Annual Review of Sociology. —1992. — Vol. 18. — P. 109-127.

Callon, M., Law J. On the Construction of sociotechnical networks: content and context revisited. // Knowledge and Society. —1989. — Vol. 9. — P. 57–83.

Davern, M. Social Networks and Economic Sociology: A Proposed Research Agenda For a More Complete Social Science // American Journal of Economics and Sociology. —1997. — Vol. 56, №3. — P. 288 – 291.

Etzkowitz, H., Leydesdorff L. The Triple HelixUniversity-Industry-Government Relations: A Laboratory for Knowledge Based Economic Development EASST Review

1995. — № 14. — P. 14-19.

Friedman, M. On the sociology of scientific knowledge and its philosophical agenda

// Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. — 1998. — Vol. 29, No. 2. — P. 239271.

Harre, R. Material objects in social world // Theory, Culture and Society. — 2002. — Vol. 19., No 5/6.

Horkheimer, M. Art and Mass Culture / / Critical Theory: Selected Essays. —1941.

— pp. 273–290.

Killworth, P. D., Bernard H. R. Informant accuracy in social network data // Human Organization. — 1976. — № 35. — pp. 269-286.

Latour, B. Drawing things together / M. Lynch & S.Woolgar. Representation in scientific practice. — Cambridge MA: MIT Press, 1988. — pp. 19–68.

Latour B. Give Me a Laboratory and I will Raise the World. In Karin D. Knorr-

234

Cetina and Michael Mulkay, eds. Science Observed: Perspectives on the Social Study of Science. — London: Sage. — 1983. — P. 141-170.

Latour B. Trains of thoughts —Piaget, Formalism and the Fifth Dimension. // Common Knowledge — 1997, — Vol.6., № 3, — pp. 170-191.

Latour B. On actor-network-theory: A Few Clarifications plus more than a few Complications, Soziale Welt 47(4): 1997, Pp. 1-14.

Latour B. The trouble with Actor Network Theory // Soziale Welt. —1999. — № 47.

pp. 369-381.

Latour B. Promises of constructivism // Chasing technoscience: Matrix for materiality /

Ed. by D. Ihde & E. Selinger. Indiana: Indiana University Press, 2003. — P. 27-46.

Latour B. On recalling ANT // Actor Network Theory and after (Hassard J., ed) Blackwell Publishers / The Sociological Review. — Oxford, 1999.

Latour B. Technology is society made durable // in J. Law (ed) A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination. — London: Routledge. — 1991. — P. 103–131.

Law J. (1999). After ANT: Topology, Naming and Complexity. In J. Law and J. Hassard (Eds.) Actor-Network Theory and After. Oxford and Keele, Blackwell and the Sociological Review: 1-14.

Lin, N. Social resources and instrumental action // Social Structure and Network Analysis / Ed. By P. Mardsen. – Beverly Hills: Sage, — 1982.

Lynch, M. The Discursive Production of Uncertainty: The OJ Simpson “Dream Team” and the Sociology of Knowledge Machine // Social Studies of Science. — 1998.

— № 28. — P. 829-868.

MacLean, C., Hassard, J. Symmetrical Absence / Symmetrical Absurdity: Critical notes on the production of actor-network accounts // Journal of Management Studies. — 2004. — № 41(3). — pp. 493-519.

Maturana, H. R., Varela, F. J. Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living // Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science. / Robert S. Cohen, and Marx W. Wartofsky (eds.). — Dordecht (Holland): D. Reidel Publishing Co., — 1980. —Vol. 42.

235

Merton, R. K. Social and cultural contexts of science // R.K. Merton. The sociology of science: theoretical and empirical investigations. — Chicago; London: The University of Chicago Press. — 1973. — P. 173-190.

Мizruchi, M. Social network analysis: Recent Achievements and Current Controversies // Acta Sociologica. —1994. — Volume 37. — P. 329-343.

Mol, Annemarie & Law, J. Regions, networks and fluids: anaemia and social topology // Social Studies of Science. —1994. — №24. — pp. 641-671.

Mol, A. Ontological Politics: a Word and Some Questions // J. Law and J. Hassard (Eds) Actor Network and After. — Oxford and Keele, Blackwell and the Sociological Review. — 1999. — P. 74-89.

Nowotny, H. Actor-networks vs. science as self-organizing system: A comparative view of two constructivist approaches // Sociology of the Sciences. — 1990. — № 14. —

P. 223-239.

Parsons, Т., Shils, E. A., Allport, G. W. Some Fundamental Categories in the Theory of Action. Chapter in: Toward a general Theory of Action, ed. by Talcott Parsons and Edward A. Shils. — Cambridge ( Mass.), Harvard University Press. — 1956.— Vol. 1, No. 1, Nov. — P. 3-29.

Pickering, A. Don’t throw the baby out with the Bath school! // Science as practice and culture. — Chicago, — 1992. — P. 301-326.

Pinch, T., Bijker, W. The Social Construction of Facts and Artefacts: Or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology Might Benefit Each Other // Social Studies of Science. 1984. — № 14. — P. 399-441.

Pinch, T. Bijker W. Science, Relativism and the New Sociology of Technology: Reply to Russell // Social Studies of Science. — 1986. — № 16. — P. 347-360.

Russell, S. The Social Construction of Artefacts: Response to Pinch and Bijker // Social Studies of Science. — 1986. — №16. — P. 331-346.

Schaffer, S. The eighteenth brumaire of Bruno Latour // Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science. — 1991. — № 22. — P. 174–192.

Trevillion, S. Networking and community partnership. 2nd ed., Ashgate Publishing

236

Limited. — 1999. — UK. — P. 15-18.

Wellman, B. Network analysis: some basic principles // Sociological Theory. — 1983. — №1. — P. 155-200.

Wiseman, J. P, Friendship: bonds and binds in a voluntary relationship // Journal of Social Personal Relations. — 1986. — Vol. 3. — P. 191-211.

White, H. Where Do Markets Come From? // American Journal of Sociology. — 1981. — Volume 87. — P. 517 – 547.

Vespignani, A. Predicting the Behavior of Techno-Social Systems // SCIENCE. — July, 2009. — Vol. 325., № 24. — P. 425 – 428.