Abstract
The name of this degree work is “ecological bases of wastewater leather industry”. In work it is considered types of treatment sewage water in leather industry, production technology, types of waste and methods of their cleaning. The new technology of processing of the waste of tanning, by by calcium hydroxide and sodium hydroxide combination from chromium ions(vi). Chromium is a common pollutant introduced into natural waters due to the discharge of a variety of industrial wastewaters. On the other hand, chromium based catalysts are also usually employed in various chemical processes, including selective oxidation of hydrocarbons. In all over the world, chromium (cr) is dominant in most of the effluent streams as compared to other heavy metal ions[2]. Caio f etal found that a reduction of more than 1.0 x 105 and 4.0 x 105 fold in total chromium and hexavalent chromium concentrations, respectively, was observed by employing steel wool masses as low as 0.4420 g to 30 ml solutions of wastewater [3].the optimum ph for the precipitating chromium from tannery wastewater is 7.7-8.2 with a lime concentration (2g/100ml) and the effective settling rate was 120min. The bioremoval of cr (vi) using actinomycetes is a suitable mean for reducing the tannery wastewater toxicity. The combination between the chemical precipitation and the biological removal of chromium from tanning wastewater make it meet the environment safely
Content
|
Standard references……………………………………………………. |
5 |
|
Definition……………………………………………………………… |
6 |
|
Abbreviations…………………………………………………............. |
7 |
|
Introduction……………………………………………………………. |
8 |
1 |
Leather industry……………………………………………………….. |
11 |
2. 2.1 |
Chromium in leather industry ………………………....................... Environmental considerations…………………………...................... |
17 17 |
3. |
Chromium salts……………………………………………….............. |
22 |
3.1 |
Chemistry of chromium……………………………………………….. |
22 |
3.2 |
Trivalent chromium (cr3+)……………………………………………... |
23 |
4. |
Environmental protection and life safety……………………………... |
55 |
5. |
Economic damage...…………………………………………………. |
64 |
6 |
The calculation of the wastewater …………………………………….. |
68 |
|
Conclusion……………………………………………………………... |
82 |
|
References………………………………………………………........... |
83 |
Standard references
-
Environmental code of the republic of Kazakhstan
Water code of the republic of Kazakhstan
Forest code of the republic of Kazakhstan
State water cadastre
Emission standards determination
Natural resource status standards: subsoil and subsoil use, on wildlife protection, reproduction and use, as well as land, water and forest laws of the republic of Kazakhstan.
Expert council for technical regulation
Introduction of international standards
Environmental labeling
Expert council for technical regulation
Introduction of international standards
Definition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abbreviations
Acd allergic contact dermatitis
Alm alveolar macrophage
Al action level
Apf assigned protection factor
Atsdr agency for toxic substances and disease registry
Bal bronchoalveolar lavage
Bei biological exposure index
Cca chromated copper arsenate
Ci confidence interval
Cpc chemical protective clothing
Cr chromium
Dpc diphenylcarbazide/diphenylcarbazone
Icda international chromium development association
Abbreviations
Anova |
Analysis of variance |
|
Atp |
Adenosine triphosphate |
|
Dc |
Direct current |
|
Dha |
Dehydrogenase activity |
|
Dtpa |
Diethylene triamine pentaacetic acid |
|
Dna |
Deoxyribonucleicacid |
|
Era |
Ecological risk assessment |
|
Gps |
Global positioning system |
|
Hmn |
Human |
|
Ihl |
Inhalation |
|
Ipr |
Intraperitoneal |
|
Int |
P-iodonitrotetrazolium |
|
Ivn |
Intravenous |
|
Jpeg |
Joint photographic experts group |
|
Lc50 |
Lethal concentration 50 percent kill |
|
Lclo |
Lowest published lethal concentration |
|
Ld50 |
Lethal dose 50 percent kill |
|
Ldlo |
Lowest published lethal dose |
|
Lsd |
Least significant difference |
|
Mus |
Mouse |
|
Orl |
Oral |
|
Ppm |
Parts per million |
|
Rat |
Rat |
|
Rbg colour spaces |
Red blue and green |
|
Rna |
Ribonucleicacid |
|
Tlv |
Threshold limit value |
|
Ttc |
Triphenyl teterazolium |
|
Twa |
Time weighted average |
|
Unep |
United nations environmental programme |
|
Usepa |
Environnmental protection agency |
|
Introduction
The actuality of the research: when an animal is alive, its skin is soft, flexible, very tough and hard wearing: it has the ability to allow water vapour to pass out, but it will not allow water in. When the skin dies it loses these characteristics: if it is kept wet it rots, and if it is dried it goes hard and brittle.
The process of tanning is to retain the skin's natural properties, to stabilise its structure and at the same time to chemically process it so it will no longer be subject to putrefecation. Thus leather is animal skin that has been treated such that its natural properties are retained.
Skin is made up of many bundles of interwoven protein fibres which are able to move in relation to one another when the skin is alive. When the skin dies, these fibres tend to shrivel and stick together. Essentially, the purpose of tanning is to permanently fix the fibres apart by chemical treatment, and to lubricate them so they can move in relation to one another.
Well tanned leather, therefore, retains the properties of flexibility, toughness and wear. It also continues to 'breathe', allowing water vapour to pass through but remaining reasonably water-proof. It is this characteristic which accounts for the comfort of genuine leather shoes and clothing.
In addition, the process of tanning imparts the advantage of resistance to heat. This is an important factor in many of the uses of leather. In conjunction with chemical processing, the tanner imparts colour, texture and finish to the leather, to enhance its appearance and suit it to today's fashion requirements.
Use of chemical compounds for chrome treatment is not a new phenomenon. A study conducted by m. Ali awan et al., 2003 identified three aqueous oxidants, namely; hydrogen peroxide, sodium hypochlorite and calcium hypochlorite independently in oxidizing chromium (iii) containing tannery wastewaters to soluble chromate (cro42-) under alkaline conditions. Among those, hydrogen peroxide was potentially a suitable oxidant as it could recover chromate (cro42-) up to 98% (from synthetic cr3+ solution) and 88% (from effluent i). Despite the different experimental conditions (temperatures and oxidation time) for all the three oxidants complete (100%) recovery could not be achieved. The recovery of chromium could help in reducing the possibility of oxidizing cr iii to cr vi (carcinogenic) compound and helps to rescue the financial and environmental cost occurred as a result of its discharge [4]. Other kinds of methods like combined system have to be also tested since it might improve the efficiency of recovering chromium from tanning process. In fact experimental conditions like, temperature, ph, time, need to be controlled to have more efficient recovery.
Chromium is a common pollutant introduced into natural waters due to the discharge of a variety of industrial wastewaters. On the other hand, chromium based catalysts are also usually employed in various chemical processes, including selective oxidation of hydrocarbons. In all over the world, chromium (cr) is dominant in most of the effluent streams as compared to other heavy metal ions[2]. Caio f etal found that a reduction of more than 1.0 x 105 and 4.0 x 105 fold in total chromium and hexavalent chromium concentrations, respectively, was observed by employing steel wool masses as low as 0.4420 g to 30 ml solutions of wastewater [3].the optimum ph for the precipitating chromium from tannery wastewater is 7.7-8.2 with a lime concentration (2g/100ml) and the effective settling rate was 120min. The bioremoval of cr (vi) using actinomycetes is a suitable mean for reducing the tannery wastewater toxicity. The combination between the chemical precipitation and the biological removal of chromium from tanning wastewater make it meet the environment safely [4].the percent removal of metal ions increases to about 99 % with increasing the mgo dose to some limits. The optimum values of mgo doses were found to be 1.5-3.0 g/l. The ph value ranges are 9.5 to 10 with mgo precipitant and ph of 11.5 to 12 with cao precipitant [5][6]. Combinations of ferric chloride and polymer at different ratio will also results in better removal efficiencies of the metals in the range 84 - 97% for total chromium, 69-90% for zinc and 6972% for total iron, also less sludge was produced [7]. There are many factors which affect the efficiency of precipitation (ph, nature and concentration of hazardous substances in water, precipitant dosage, temperature, water balance etc.,). In practice, the optimum precipitant and dosage for a particular application are determined by a “trial and errof’ approach using jar test [8]. Moreover ferrous sulphate requires ph =1for complete reduction as compared to sodium metabisulphite which requires a ph of about
A wide range of physical and chemical processes are available for the removal of cr (vi) from effluents. A major drawback with those treatment systems is sludge production, and, high operational cost and some of them are complicated for management. This actually makes the application of these technologies to be limited only in developed countries. In response to this challenge a different attempt were undertaken to produce a media which was feasible and cost effective to use by the majority. A research was done s. M. Nomanbhay and k. Palanisamy, 2005 by preparing a new composite bio sorbent which has been done by coating chitosan onto acid treated oil palm shell charcoal (ccab). It is an attractive option because of its cost effective treatment system. Among other low cost absorbent identified chitosan has the highest sorption capacity for several metal ions including chrome. Chromium adsorption was influenced by initial ph, agitation, dose of adsorbent and contact time. For instance at a ph of 5 the media managed to treat 92 % of chromium, which is significant. Further control of these environmental conditions in the laboratory may improve its treatment capacity [5].
A comparison study also conducted by leaching raw tannery effluent through mono and mixed columns (different grades) of vermiculite to evaluate their removal efficiency of chromium. The mixed column of vermicu- lite has the highest chromium removal (74.6%) while the mono vermiculite achieved 63.6%. This improvement in chrome removal efficiency is brought by the use of combined medias which increase its adsorption capacity. It was also found out that, it could remove cat ions like ca, na, mg and k. Of course high cat ion exchange helps to make the system more efficient [6].
The aim of the research – work out new methods of treatment water from ion chrome. The results obtained for industrial wastewater after the treatment using sodium hydroxide and calcium hydroxide combination are in par with the synthetic sample results. The sodium hydroxide and calcium hydroxide combination shows the better removal efficiency with less volume of sludge compared to other precipitating agents. Experiments on industrial wastewater show that, removal efficiency is in par with the efficiency obtained for synthetic sample experiments, except for ferric chloride. The cr(iii) removal efficiency using calcium hydroxide and sodium hydroxide combination was found to be 99.7% and with volume of sludge produced as 7 ml/l. On this basis one can conclude that one of chemical promising development in the chemical industry grown .
The object of course work is purification of sewage water from cr (vi) in leather industry.
The subject of the course work is deep sewage treatment conventional chrome tanning in leather production for the purpose of turnaround water supply.
