- •Welcome to mathematics
- •Пояснительная записка
- •Contents
- •Part a. Introduction to science Unit 1. Mathematics
- •Text 1. Mathematics
- •Unit 2. Basic geometric concepts
- •Text 2. Basic geometric concepts
- •Unit 3. Texts for extracurricular work
- •Prize for Resolution of the Poincare Conjecture Awarded to Dr. Grigoriy Perelman
- •Mathematical finance
- •About a Line and a Triangle
- •Computer Algebra
- •Computer Software in Science and Mathematics
- •The Main Principles of Axiomatic Methods
- •Fields Medal (1650 characters)
- •Mathematical economics
- •A modern view of geometry
- •Mathematical programming
- •Part b. Science itself Unit 4. Did Darwin's Finches Do Math?
- •Text 1. Did Darwin's Finches Do Math?
- •Unit 5. Introduction to computational complexity
- •Text 2. Introduction to computational complexity
- •Unit 6. When you read an article....
- •Text 1. Special Issue Introduction: Algorithmic Game Theory
- •Unit 7. Abstracts
- •Abstract 1. Streaming Computation of Delaunay Triangulations (fragment 1)
- •Abstract 2. Scaling and shear transformations capture beak shape variation in Darwin’s finches
- •Abstract 3. A proof of the Gibbs-Thomson formula in the droplet formation regime (fragment 1)
- •Abstract 4. Nonlinear Cauchy-Kowalewski theorem in extrafunctions
- •Unit 8. Conclusion
- •Streaming Computation of Delaunay Triangulations (fragment 2)
- •Unit 9. Texts for extracurricular work
- •Introduction
- •2. Processing large geometric data sets
- •2.1 Algorithms for large data sets
- •2.2 Delaunay triangulations and large data sets
- •Text 3. A proof of the Gibbs-Thomson formula in the droplet formation regime. The problem (fragment 2) (770 characters) Biskup m, Chayes l. And Kotecky r.
- •Text 4. Sublinear Time Bounds (770 characters) Martin Tompa
- •Appendix Learn to read math symbols
- •Words and words combinations used in the texts
- •Wording of mathematics formulae
- •References
- •Welcome to mathematics
- •Подписано в печать Тираж зкз.
- •625003, Тюмень, Семакова, 10.
Abstract 1. Streaming Computation of Delaunay Triangulations (fragment 1)
Martin Isenburg University of California at Berkeley
Yuanxin Liu University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Jonathan Shewchuk University of California at Berkeley
Jack Snoeyink University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
We show how to greatly accelerate algorithms that compute Delaunay triangulations of huge, well-distributed point sets in 2D and 3D by exploiting the natural spatial coherence in a stream of points. We achieve large performance gains by introducing spatial finalization in to point streams: we partition space into regions, and augment a stream of input points with finalization tags that indicate when a point is the last in its region. By extending an incremental algorithm for Delaunay triangulation to use finalization tags and produce streaming mesh output, we compute a billion-triangle terrain representation for the Neuse River system from 11.2 GB of LIDAR data in 48 minutes using only 70 MB of memory on a laptop with two hard drives. This is a factor of twelve faster than the previous fastest out-of-core Delaunay triangulation software.
CR Categories: I.3.5 [COMPUTER GRAPHICS]: Computational Geometry and Object Modeling-Geometric algorithms
Keywords: geometry processing, Delaunay triangulation, stream processing, TIN terrain model, spatial finalization
Abstract 2. Scaling and shear transformations capture beak shape variation in Darwin’s finches
O. Campаs, R. Mallarino, A. Herrel, A. Abzhanov and M. P. Brenner
Evolution by natural selection has resulted in a remarkable diversity of organism morphologies that has long fascinated scientists and served to establish the first relations among species. Despite the essential role of morphology as a phenotype of species, there is not yet a formal, mathematical scheme to quantify morphological phenotype and relate it to both the genotype and the underlying developmental genetics. Herein we demonstrate that the morphological diversity in the beaks of Darwin’s Finches is quantitatively accounted for by the mathematical group of affine transformations. Specifically, we show that all beak shapes of Ground Finches (genus Geospiza) are related by scaling transformations (a subgroup of the affine group), and the same relationship holds true for all the beak shapes of Tree, Cocos, and Warbler Finches (three distinct genera). This analysis shows that the beak shapes within each of these groups differ only by their scales, such as length and depth, which are genetically controlled by Bmp4 and Calmodulin. By measuring Bmp4 expression in the beak primordia of the species in the genus Geospiza, we provide a quantitative map between beak morphology and the expression levels of Bmp4. The complete morphological variation within the beaks of Darwin’s finches can be explained by extending the scaling transformations to the entire affine group, by including shear transformations. Altogether our results suggest that the mathematical theory of groups can help decode morphological variation, and points to a potentially hierarchical structure of morphological diversity and the underlying developmental processes.
