3. Conclusion.

Student Name:

(Print clearly in capitals)

Pathway Point Code:

Level of Study:

(Indicate Level) | - - - UNDERGRADUATE - - - |

Student Signature:

(Not required if sending this form electronically)

Date of Submission: (Is this work late?)

Module Title:

C&CS L4: Design

Module Code:

4FTC1142

Topic / Assignment / Project Title:

GDI: Critical and Cultural Studies

Weighting:

50%

50%

Submission Deadline:

7^th December, 2015 & 18^th April 2016, before 10:30am (submit via Turnitin)

Tutor:

Sokolnikova Alyona

Assessment Criteria and Feedback:

All marks are provisional and module grades are confirmed only after the Examination Board.

T

()

The normal range of grades used by your tutor to feedback on work as a whole, and against the individual Learning Outcomes as specified below, is between 0 and 90 (out of 100).

* Grades above 90 are reserved for work of truly exceptional quality and are used very sparingly. Grades below 40 indicate failure to meet specified Learning Outcomes.

Fail. Little or Nothing

of Merit (0 - 14)

Clear Fail

(15 – 29)

Marginal Fail

(30 – 39)

Satisfactory

(40 – 49)

Good

(50 – 59)

Very Good

(60 – 69)

Excellent

(70 – 79)

Outstanding

(80 – 90)

Truly Exceptional *

(91 – 100)

Learning Outcomes - Knowledge and Understanding: (Successful students will typically…)

a range of recent and contemporary design practices and histories

x

relationships between a range of recent and contemporary design practices and theoretical, critical, social and cultural frameworks

x

the impact of external factors on contemporary design practices including economic contexts, cultural trends, markets, professional networks and imperatives such as sustainability

x

some of the ways in which students' own practice can be informed by aspects of recent and contemporary design practice, theory and criticism

x

Learning Outcomes - Skills and Attributes: (Successful students will typically…)

demonstrate personal responsibility for their studies including setting goals, managing workloads and meeting deadlines

x

locate research, evaluate and deploy information from a variety of sources using a range of appropriate information technologies

x

identify appropriate questions for enquiry; formulate independent judgements and articulate reasoned arguments

x

effectively communicate ideas and information in visual, oral and/or written forms using appropriate academic conventions

x

Further Detail related to the Learning Outcomes above:

Self Evaluation, Written Feedback from the Student:

Evaluate your work is always difficult. Basically it is difficult because of my desire to compare my work with others. It is difficult and wrong. So I probably will compare this my essay with the previous one. I want to start with the fact that this time I was able to follow the plan and do not write everything at the last moment. That, to my great regret, I did the last time. I think that this time my arguments are much more slender and thoroughly. A theme of my essay was opened to me from different directions along the way and finding new ideas and themes becoming easier from day to day. But this time a have some problems as well. Such as - haste. It happened so that the first body of my work I wrote on the wrong topic, but, because of the amount of time, which I left myself on writing, I rewrite everything on time. I can’t say that this essay I managed very well. Sometimes it disappears meaning, sometimes it breaks, I'm not even sure that there can be mistakes and maybe you find them. I'm even confident that you will. In this essay will be much less mistakes than in the previous one, so in the next one, hopefully, won’t be at all. I think that for me this essay is a step forward and I'm ready to learn from the mistakes, which I made in it. I was ingoing writing it, so I hope you will enjoy it as well.

W

Student Self-Evaluation:

An optional comment by the student on knowledge/skills developed in this assignment, related to assessment criteria.

Formative Progress Report:

What’s going well, what’s not going well, what action is needed to improve.

Summative Report for Individual Assignment:

Performance against assessment criteria, and guidance for improvement.

Summary Report for Module:

Progress and achievement over a period of study, and areas to work on.

Student Self-Evaluation:

An optional comment by the student on knowledge/skills developed in this assignment, related to assessment criteria.

Formative Progress Report:

What’s going well, what’s not going well, what action is needed to improve.

Summative Report for Individual Assignment:

Performance against assessment criteria, and guidance for improvement.

Summary Report for Module:

Progress and achievement over a period of study, and areas to work on.

Grade / Before Any Penalty:

(if applicable)

First Marker’s

Signature:

Moderated By:

(if applicable)

Moderated Date:

(if applicable)

Date:

FINAL GRADE

(Provisional until Boards)

Brief:

Please see your brief for full details.

• Please refer to the assessment criteria for details on how your work will be marked.

Submission Requirements:

Please see your brief for full details.

• A copy of this Assessment Feedback Sheet should be included with your submission, please complete the first box and sign in the space provided, (you may also wish to provide a short Self-Evaluation comment in the box provided.