- •Quiz (20 min)
- •Reading Comprehension
- •Php Programmers, vb Programmers, Web Designers
- •Kkinet php Programmers, vb Programmers, Web Designers
- •The Best Places to Live With an it Degree
- •1.2. 10 It job roles that are hardest to fill
- •1: It trainer
- •2: Project manager
- •3: Cio/cto/director of it/etc.
- •4: Help desk staff
- •7: Technical writer
- •8: Product evangelist
- •1.3. How to Avoid Blowing Your it Job Interview
- •Mistake No. 1: Not asking questions because you already know it all
- •Mistake No. 2: Spewing acronyms
- •Mistake No. 3: It’s all about you
- •Mistake No. 4: Dissing your peeps
- •1.4. Information Technology (it) Interview tipical Questions
- •What are Mobile Payments?
- •1.3. Mobile payments
- •92% With Paypal
- •1.4. Interview with Max Levchin
- •Lesson Thirty-Three. Cloud.
- •1.2. Web design tools
- •1.3. Web design training
- •1.3. Text html
- •Html versions timeline
- •Html draft version timeline
- •Xhtml versions
- •25.4. Html 5 and Semantic Web
Xhtml versions
Main article: XHTML
XHTML is a separate language that began as a reformulation of HTML 4.01 using XML 1.0. It continues to be developed:
XHTML 1.0, published January 26, 2000, as a W3C Recommendation, later revised and republished August 1, 2002. It offers the same three variations as HTML 4.0 and 4.01, reformulated in XML, with minor restrictions.
XHTML 1.1, published May 31, 2001, as a W3C Recommendation. It is based on XHTML 1.0 Strict, but includes minor changes, can be customized, is reformulated using modules from Modularization of XHTML, which was published April 10, 2001, as a W3C Recommendation.
XHTML 2.0 was a working draft, but work on it was abandoned in 2009 in favor of work on HTML5 and XHTML5. XHTML 2.0 was incompatible with XHTML 1.x and, therefore, would be more accurately characterized as an XHTML-inspired new language than an update to XHTML 1.x.
XHTML5, which is an update to XHTML 1.x, is being defined alongside HTML5 in the HTML5 draft.
25.4. Html 5 and Semantic Web
More and more information is created in the Web, especially with the advent of Web 2.0 the user can create their own content through social networks or personal Web sites. It has become increasingly necessary to develop tools that return more accurate results before much irrelevant information that we have on the Web
As Alvarenga tells search engines like Google and Yahoo have many limitations as to efficiently and effectively retrieve the information, because until then the search is based on keywords contained in the texts.
Moreover, another problem lies in the content holders themselves, which are the sites in which prioritizes many more display and formatting of content, so content poorly described and making it impossible for the machine to know the context and the direction in which information was described.
When we do a search you can check the amount of information presented to us. After countless result the user must evaluate this large amount of information and select what is interesting to you.
However, with the advent of HTML5 there is a new scenario where now new elements to structure information with a focus on Semantic Web were created. With that search engines can also benefit from these new features that the web page will bring you.
All these benefits are possible now because the search engines will know every part of the site and it may make inferences on the information in accordance with the meaning and context can offer users more relevant results.
Read more: http://mrbool.com/html5-semantic-web-and-game-development/26357#ixzz2WN6opOX7
Answer the questions:
Which limitations may Google and Yahoo have?
What happened with the advent of HTML5?
Check answers:
Related to efficiency and and effectively retrieve the information.
There is a new scenario where now new elements to structure information with a focus on Semantic Web were created.
Exercise 1. Read the definitions to the given key-terms and analyze the context in which they are used:
Markup language |
is a modern system for annotating a document in a way that is syntactically distinguishable from the text. A number of small and largely unstandardized markup languages have been developed to allow authors to create formatted text via web browsers, for use in wikis and web forums. |
Semantic |
connected with the meanings of words At this point, the argument becomes semantic rather than substantive. |
The World Wide Web Consortium |
is the main international standards organization for the World Wide Web (abbreviated WWW or W3). The World Wide Web Consortium mission is to lead the World Wide Web to its full potential by developing protocols and guidelines that ensure the long term growth of the web. |
Resource Description Framework |
is a family of World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) specifications originally designed as a metadata data model. The W3C published a specification of Resource Description Framework data model and XML syntax as a Recommendation in 1999. |
Microformat |
is a web-based approach to semantic markup which seeks to re-use existing HTML/XHTML tags to convey metadata and other attributes in web pages and other contexts that support (X)HTML, such as RSS. Microformats are the quickest & simplest way to provide an API to the information on your website. |
Markup |
a set of tags assigned to elements of a text to indicate their relation to the rest of the text or dictate how they should be displayed Markup is embedded in text and provides instructions for programs that are to process the text. |
HTML element |
an individual component of an HTML document or "web page", once this has been parsed into the Document Object Model. HTML is composed of a tree of HTML elements and other nodes, such as text nodes. HTML documents are defined by HTML elements. |
Angle brackets |
are often used to enclose highlighted material. Angle brackets are infrequently used to denote words that are thought instead of spoken. |
Exercise 2. Match the words with correct definitions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise 3. Match the definitions with words:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercuse 4. Complete the following table:
HTML versions
|
Possibilities |
HTML 2.0
|
|
HTML 3.2
|
|
HTML 4.0
|
|
HTML 4.01
|
|
HTML 5
|
|
Exercise 5. Write an essay to the forum expressing your opinion on the present applications of HTML 5.
Exercise 6. Don’t translate like this!
I managed Chrome and apps even before Android. Some of our large applications are now written directly to the device — for instance, we have native Gmail apps. But I disagree with the opinion that all of Facebook’s mobile issues can be blamed on HTML 5. I just don’t think that was true. There are other companies with very successful apps that have taken an HTML 5 approach on mobile and done really well. For instance, a lot of magazines have switched from native back to HTML 5 for the mobile apps. Financial Times did it, and they’ve blogged that their user engagement and traction has increased significantly.
Мне удалось добыть хром и придатки к нему еще до андроида. Некоторые из наших больших придатков в настоящее время записывается непосредственно в устройстве - например, у нас есть родные приложения Gmail. Но я не согласен с мнением, что все мобильные вопросы мордокниги, может быть обвинен в HTML 5. Я просто не думаю, что это правда. Есть и другие компании с очень успешных приложений, которые имели HTML 5 подхода на мобильные и сделал очень хорошо. Например, много журналов перешли от родного обратно в HTML 5 для мобильных приложений. Финансовые времена сделали это, и они блоге, что их взаимодействие пользователя и тяги значительно возросло.
Give your translation variant.
