- •Semey state medical university methodical recommendations for solitary work of the student with the teacher (swst)
- •Semey state medical university Methodical recommendations for solitary work of the student with the teacher (swst)
- •Methodical recommendations for solitary work of the student with the teacher (swst)
- •5. Criteria of execution:
- •7. Criteria of value:
- •8. The literature:
- •9. The control:
- •5. Criteria of execution:
- •7. Criteria of value:
- •8. The literature:
- •9. The control:
- •5. Criteria of execution:
- •7. Criteria of value:
- •8. The literature:
- •5. Criteria of execution:
- •7. Criteria of value:
- •8. The literature:
- •5. Criteria of execution:
- •7. Criteria of value:
- •8. The literature:
- •9. The control:
- •5. Criteria of execution:
- •7. Criteria of value:
- •8. The literature:
- •5. Criteria of execution:
- •7. Criteria of value:
- •8. The literature:
- •5. Criteria of execution:
- •7. Criteria of value:
- •8. The literature:
- •5. Criteria of execution:
- •7. Criteria of value:
- •8. The literature:
- •9. The control:
- •3. The task:
- •5. Criteria of execution:
- •7. Criteria of value:
- •8. The literature:
- •8. The control:
- •5. Criteria of execution:
- •7. Criteria of value:
- •8. The literature:
- •5. Criteria of execution:
- •7. Criteria of value:
- •8. The literature:
- •9. The control:
- •5. Criteria of execution:
- •7. Criteria of value:
- •8. The literature:
- •9. The control:
- •5. Criteria of execution:
- •7. Criteria of value:
- •8. The literature:
- •9. The control:
- •5. Criteria of execution:
- •7. Criteria of value:
- •8. The literature:
8. The literature:
1.Politologiya. Educational-methodical posobie.., 1995.
2 Zerkin D. Fundamentals of Political Science. A course of lectures. Rostov n / d., 1996.
3.Demidov AI, Fedoseyev Fundamentals of Political Science. Moscow, 1995.
4.Osnovy political science. Rate lektsiy.A., 1995.
5.Kozlov GY, Yu Buluktaev Politics. Ouch. Guide - Almaty, 1995.
6.Radugin AA Political science. Ouch. manual for high schools. M., 2001.
7.Bulatova AN, ZN Ismagambetova Political science. Ouch. posobie- Almaty, 2000.
8.Kapesov MK Fundamentals of Political Science. A course of lectures, Almaty, 1995.
9. The control:
Questions:
1. What are the main approaches in defining place and a role of political science among socially-humanitarian disciplines? State their essence.
2. What is the political science as a disciplines and as a science?
3. Name the basic branches of a political science.
4. What is the researching object of these branches?
5. Reveal the connection of political science with philosophy, historical science, sociology, legal disciplines, etc.
1. Theme №2: Comparative political science.
2. The aim: To fix knowledge of students about an object, a subject and becoming of comparative political science.
3. The task: to write an essay on a theme: « Comparative political science » in which it is necessary to define an object and a subject, methods of comparative political science. Except, it is necessary to dwell on history of comparative political science becoming. The volume of an essay is 5-7 pages. Structure of an essay: introduction, the basic part and the conclusion. The introduction includes: the aims, urgency and tasks of a problem, and also defines structure of the essay. In the basic part the student considers questions by the plan, results own judgements on a theme, giving reason for the facts and examples. In conclusion the inferences on the basic judgements are brought. Besides it is necessary to specify the list of the used literature. The task is carried out individually.
4. The form of execution: the oral answer.
5. Criteria of execution:
- It is necessary to open the maintenance of a problem. The task is carried out according to the specified requirements. An essay is carried out on a paper of a format A4, font TNR, size 14, an 1,5 interval. A field: at the left 3,0, on the right-2, from above, from below - 2,0mm. To show the name of a theme, discipline, First name, middle initial, last name of the student, speciality, group.
6. Terms of delivery: 2 week.
7. Criteria of value:
- The task should be executed in time;
- To observe all points of the task performance;
- It is necessary to lead the careful analysis of all questions, which included on structure of the abstract report;
- The brought definitions (definition of concept) should be clearly formulated;
- All conclusions and offers should be argued;
- Don’t exceed quantity of pages from the set volume.
To get of the maximal ball-4, the task should be executed and handed over in time. In case:
- If the abstract report is handed over later first week, the mark will be decreased on 1 point;
- If the abstract report is made without requirements on execution, the mark will be lowered on 1 point;
- If the registration requirements is not observed the mark is decreased on 0, 5 point.
