- •Theoretical grammar as a Branch of Linguistics.
- •Syntax. The object of study.
- •Morphology and Syntax as two subdivisions of Grammar.
- •4. Phrases. Classification of phrases.
- •5. The notion of a morpheme. Classification of morphemes.
- •6. The sentence and the phrase.
- •7. The connection of Theoretical grammar with other aspects of language study and with important notions of modern linguistic theory.
- •8. The Sentence. Classification of the sentences.
- •9. English morphemic
- •10. The simple sentence. Classification of simple sentence.
- •Interrogative Imperative Exclamatory
- •11. The problem of parts of speech.
- •12. The problems of the simple sentence.
- •13. The problem of notional and formal parts of speech.
- •14. Kernel (basic) sentence and their transforms.
- •15. Descriptive approach to establishing classes of words (Ch. Fries` classification)
- •16. Composite sentences. General characteristic.
- •17. The noun as a part of speech.
- •18. Transformational mechanism of analyzing sentences.
- •19. The noun. The category of number.
- •20. The compound sentence.
- •21. The noun. The problem of the gender.
- •23. The Adjective. The degrees of comparison.
- •24. Complex sentences. Different ways of connection clauses.
- •25. The Pronoun. Classification of pronoun
- •28. Functional sentence perspective.
- •29. The verb as a part of speech. The problem of classification.
- •30. Text linguistics. Its basic unite and types.
- •31. The grammatical category of Tense.
- •32. Oppositional analysis in morphology
- •33. The grammatical category of aspect.
- •35. The grammatical category of time relation.
- •36. The Indicative mood
- •37. The grammatical category of voice.
- •38. The Problem of the Imperative mood.
- •39. The grammatical category of mood. Different conceptions.
- •40. The problem of the Subjunctive mood.
- •41. Functional parts of speech.
18. Transformational mechanism of analyzing sentences.
T. G. approached in the 50th century by N. Chomsky, Z. Herris
T. G. the main idea: any language is not so complicated as it looks on the surface. Any language
Contains a small number of kernel sentences and all others sentences are
Called transforms of the kernel once and they are derived or generated from this kernel sentences with the help of derivation rules.
Problems: two main problems: 1) the establishment of this kernel sentences
2) the establishment of this transformational rules
All transformational mechanism consists of three big levels, there are: 1) Transformation in
Simple sentences
2) Transformation in composite sentences
3) Transformation of nomination
Example: He studies English -------- His studying
The scheme of T. M.
S
NP
S S
The works of the machine the machine does work
The machine`s work Does the machine work?
The machine work What works?
The working machine the machine doesn’t work
For the machine to work the machine didn’t work
The machine working
The machine works
S1 + S2 + S3
The machine works and hums
When the machine works it hums
Working, the machine hums
When working the machine hums
I like when the machine works
If the machine worked!
T. is a rule which allows us to perform a certain change in the kernel sentence. It retains the grammatical and semantic relations of the kernel sentence.
The T. sentences
Ядерные предложения
Ben ran
NVN: Ben sees John
NVprN: Ben looks at John
NisA: Ben is handsome
NisN: ben is a student
NisD: Ben is out
NisprepN: Ben is in the garden
Composite sentence via transformational modal
S1 + S2 __ Compound S3
Example: S1: The man came to the window +___ The man came to the window, and the
S2: The detective saw him detective saw him
S1: We asked for his slides +__ we asked for his slides and he showed us them
S2: He showed us his slides
Complex sentence: S1: He picked up a flower +___ He picked up the flower which had dropped
S2: the flower had dropped
