- •Пояснительная записка
- •Table of contents
- •International communication
- •International communication
- •Independent b1
- •Independent b2
- •1. Matching headings with paragraphs
- •2. Identifying where to find information
- •Incorrect article choice
- •Incorrect omission or inclusion of articles
- •1. Matching headings with paragraphs
- •2. Identifying where to find information
- •3. Reciting and reviewing the text.
- •(Abridged from the Toolkit for transnational communication in Europe. Copenhagen Studies in Bilingualism. University of Copenhagen, 2011)
- •1. Matching headings with paragraphs
- •2. Identifying where to find information
- •3. Reciting and reviewing the text.
- •4. Identifying patterns of text organization.
- •Identify description, step-by-step explanation, directions, comparison and contrast, analysis, analogy, and definition in the following paragraphs:
- •Verb errors involving tense
- •Text 1-4. Receptive multilingualism (Abridged from the Toolkit for transnational communication in Europe. Copenhagen Studies in Bilingualism. University of Copenhagen, 2011)
- •1. Matching headings with paragraphs.
- •2. Identifying where to find information.
- •3. Identifying the key words of the text.
- •4. Identifying patterns of text organization.
- •Identify description, step-by-step explanation, directions, comparison and contrast, analysis, analogy, and definition in the following paragraphs:
- •5. Reviewing and reciting the text.
- •Identify and correct errors involving verbs and verbals
- •(After j. Normann Jørgensen’s and Kasper Juffermans’ sections in the Toolkit for Transnational Communication in Europe. Copenhagen Studies in Bilingualism. University of Copenhagen, 2011)
- •1. Matching headings with paragraphs.
- •2. Identifying where to find information.
- •3. Identifying the key words of the text.
- •4. Identifying patterns of text organization.
- •Identify description, step-by-step explanation, directions, comparison and contrast, analysis, analogy, and definition in the following paragraphs:
- •5. Reviewing and reciting the text.
- •6. What circumstantial evidence can be inferred from the following paragraph:
- •7. Which of the following best describes the organization of the passage?
- •9. What is the author's attitude toward superdiversity and languaging? Answer choices:
- •Incorrect verb forms
- •(After Robert Phillipson’s Lingua franca or lingua frankensteinia? In World Englishes, 27/2, 250-284, 2008)
- •1. Matching headings with paragraphs.
- •2. Identifying where to find indirect information.
- •3. Identifying the key words of the text.
- •4. Identifying patterns of text organization.
- •Identify description, step-by-step explanation, directions, comparison and contrast, analysis, analogy, and definition in the following paragraphs:
- •5. Reviewing and reciting the text.
- •6. What circumstantial evidence can be inferred from the following paragraph:
- •8. What is the author's attitude toward the English language in science and education expressed in the following paragraph?
- •9. Make valid inferences based on the questions:
- •Identify and correct errors involving verbs and verbals
- •Incorrect inclusion or omission of prepositions
- •Identify and correct errors involving prepositions
- •1. A definition of communication
- •2. Major structural components
- •3. What is culture?
- •4. Explaining Culture
- •1. New approach to intercultural understanding.
- •2. Culture as Ways of Thinking, Beliefs and Values
- •3. Culture as Language: The Close Link Between Language and Culture
- •Identify and correct errors involving the wrong word choice
- •Identify and correct errors involving sentence structure
- •Incomplete adjective clauses
- •Identify and correct errors involving types of clauses
- •Identify and correct errors involving adverb clauses
- •In Europe
- •In Sweden
- •Incomplete noun clauses
- •Identify and correct errors involving noun clauses:
- •Incomplete participial phrases
- •Incomplete appositives
- •Incomplete/missing prepositional phrase
- •Identify and correct errors involving incomplete phrases
- •Introduction
- •Informative Abstracts:
- •Tips and Warnings
- •Identify and correct errors involving word order
- •Items involving parallel structures
- •Introduction
- •Implications
- •Identify and correct errors involving subject-verb agreement
- •Text 1-23. Interpreting successful lingua franca interaction (Based on Christiane Meierkord’s analysis of non-native/non-native small talk conversations in English)
- •The data
- •Identify and correct errors involving misplaced modifiers
- •Text 1-24. Bringing europe's lingua franca into the classroom (After an editorial published on guardian.Co.Uk on Thursday 19 April 2001)
- •Issues:
- •Issues:
- •Issues:
- •Issues:
- •Issues:
- •Issues:
- •1. European migrant workers
- •2. Returnees
- •3. Tourism
- •4. The redistribution of poverty
- •5. Expat workers
- •6. Internal migration
- •7. A reserve army of labour offshore
- •1. Communications technology
- •2. Text messaging
- •3. Surveillance society
- •4. Why English is used less . . .
- •5. Independent journalists and bloggers
- •Text 2-4. Polylingualism, multilingualism, plurilingualism
- •1. Borders - Borderlands – Boundaries (after Virginie Mamadouh)
- •3. Tool(s) – Toolkit (after Virginie Mamadouh)
- •1. Could you tell us your background and why you decided to become an educator? (from Ana Wu, City College of San Francisco, esl Instructor)
- •2. From poststructural and postcolonial perspectives, linguistic imperialism could be critiqued by its deterministic and binary divisions; those who colonize and those who are colonized.
- •6. Dr. Phillipson: In the March, 2009 interview Marinus Stephan on this blog, Dr. Stephan
- •8. You have written and discussed very controversial issues. How do you deal with criticism? How do you react to people who disagree with your ideas?
- •1. Interactive communication
- •2. Time and Space
- •3. Fate and Personal Responsibility
- •4. Face and Face-Saving
- •5. Nonverbal Communication
- •6. Summary
- •1. Social interaction.
- •2. Looking Back
- •3. Food for Thought
- •1. Introduction
- •2. Three Decades Have Passed
- •3. Cultural Predestination!
- •4. Individual Values
- •5. Culture Is a Set of Dynamic Processes of Generation and Transformation
- •1. Strong and weak uncertainty-avoidance cultures
- •2. Individualism versus Collectivism, the Case of Japan
- •3. Identity
- •1. Two specific uses of the concept of cultural identity
- •2. The interplay of culture and personality
- •3. The interaction of culture and biology
- •4. Psychosocial patterns of culture
- •5. Motivational needs
- •6. The flexibility of the multicultural personality
- •1. Introduction
- •2. Background: English as the language of publication and instruction
- •3. Methods
- •4. Results
- •4.1 Form of words (Morphology)
- •4.2 Grammar (Syntax)
- •4.3 Attitudes towards English as a Lingua Franca
- •5. Conclusion
- •Text 2-14. A new concept of english?
- •Cambridge English Examinations: Speaking Test
- •1. Basic Interpersonal Communication Skills (bics)
- •Implications for mainstream teachers
- •2. Common underlying proficiency (cup)
- •Implications for mainstream teachers
- •Implications for mainstream teachers
- •4. Additive/subtractive bilingualism
- •Implications for mainstream teachers
- •Introduction
- •Impetus for the study
- •1. Cultural
- •2. Organizational
- •Parts of an Abstract
- •Introduction
- •Interaction between teacher and students
- •Read the introduction section of the article.
- •Read the methods section of the article.
- •Read the discussion section of the article.
- •(Based on Christiane Meierkord’s analysis of non-native-/non-native small talk conversations in English. Continued from Text 1-23)
- •Interpreting lingua franca conversational data
Impetus for the study
The impetus for this research originated from concerns within the organisation itself rather than from my own hypothetical research questions. The GCAE has for some time been concerned about what they referred to as unequal participation of members in meetings.
Some of these concerns are outlined in an extract from an internal report to Groupe members on this issue.
Extract from GCAE internal report “How to Encourage More Active Participation of Non-English Speakers Within the IAA”
Members: French, Swedish, Portuguese, Finnish, Japanese, Spanish.
“I was sitting in one of the IAA Committee meetings and listening to the discussion. Suddenly I thought that the meeting was missing an essential point and I started to plan an intervention. It took a few minutes to prepare myself, especially to find the right English words etc., and suddenly I realised that the discussion had moved on to another subject.”
“I was in the middle of an intervention talking about that interesting subject when in the middle of a sentence I realised that I had forgotten the correct English word to use.”
These are just two of a number of situations a non-native English (NNE) speaker finds himself in every now and then.
Of course, if you are an intrepid speaker you continue with a homemade translation, but we must admit that a fair number of us would more and more hesitate to speak publicly.
Are there any remedies or solutions to this problem that most probably results in a predominance of the Anglo Saxon views being forwarded?
This report highlights some of the concerns felt by GCAE members and illustrates some of the difficulties and frustrations encountered by non-native English speakers in meetings.
The final paragraph suggests an underlying assumption that some of these difficulties result from the dominance of ‘Anglo Saxon’ views in the organization, despite their minority status in terms of numbers of members.
It is interesting to note that some members of the organization had thought about these issues in some depth and come up with their own reasons for such difficulties. These they divided into three subsections: (a) cultural; (b) organization; (c) language barrier. As can be seen from the extract relating to ‘cultural’ issues, reference was made to differences in working styles and the need to give participants an adequate amount of time to respond in meetings, as well as to the tendency to defer to more senior associates.
Extract from GCAE internal report – cultural and organisational factors. Reasons why Non-Native English Speakers do not Play a More Active Part in the IAA
There are a number of reasons why NNE do not play a more active part in the IAA, to mention a few:
1. Cultural
There are differences in working styles and many members must be given enough time to consider the issues in question, perhaps to discuss them with colleagues and then to formulate their reply in an actual meeting. Sometimes you are even used to listening to the more senior ones and accept their proposals etc.
