- •Пояснительная записка
- •Table of contents
- •International communication
- •International communication
- •Independent b1
- •Independent b2
- •1. Matching headings with paragraphs
- •2. Identifying where to find information
- •Incorrect article choice
- •Incorrect omission or inclusion of articles
- •1. Matching headings with paragraphs
- •2. Identifying where to find information
- •3. Reciting and reviewing the text.
- •(Abridged from the Toolkit for transnational communication in Europe. Copenhagen Studies in Bilingualism. University of Copenhagen, 2011)
- •1. Matching headings with paragraphs
- •2. Identifying where to find information
- •3. Reciting and reviewing the text.
- •4. Identifying patterns of text organization.
- •Identify description, step-by-step explanation, directions, comparison and contrast, analysis, analogy, and definition in the following paragraphs:
- •Verb errors involving tense
- •Text 1-4. Receptive multilingualism (Abridged from the Toolkit for transnational communication in Europe. Copenhagen Studies in Bilingualism. University of Copenhagen, 2011)
- •1. Matching headings with paragraphs.
- •2. Identifying where to find information.
- •3. Identifying the key words of the text.
- •4. Identifying patterns of text organization.
- •Identify description, step-by-step explanation, directions, comparison and contrast, analysis, analogy, and definition in the following paragraphs:
- •5. Reviewing and reciting the text.
- •Identify and correct errors involving verbs and verbals
- •(After j. Normann Jørgensen’s and Kasper Juffermans’ sections in the Toolkit for Transnational Communication in Europe. Copenhagen Studies in Bilingualism. University of Copenhagen, 2011)
- •1. Matching headings with paragraphs.
- •2. Identifying where to find information.
- •3. Identifying the key words of the text.
- •4. Identifying patterns of text organization.
- •Identify description, step-by-step explanation, directions, comparison and contrast, analysis, analogy, and definition in the following paragraphs:
- •5. Reviewing and reciting the text.
- •6. What circumstantial evidence can be inferred from the following paragraph:
- •7. Which of the following best describes the organization of the passage?
- •9. What is the author's attitude toward superdiversity and languaging? Answer choices:
- •Incorrect verb forms
- •(After Robert Phillipson’s Lingua franca or lingua frankensteinia? In World Englishes, 27/2, 250-284, 2008)
- •1. Matching headings with paragraphs.
- •2. Identifying where to find indirect information.
- •3. Identifying the key words of the text.
- •4. Identifying patterns of text organization.
- •Identify description, step-by-step explanation, directions, comparison and contrast, analysis, analogy, and definition in the following paragraphs:
- •5. Reviewing and reciting the text.
- •6. What circumstantial evidence can be inferred from the following paragraph:
- •8. What is the author's attitude toward the English language in science and education expressed in the following paragraph?
- •9. Make valid inferences based on the questions:
- •Identify and correct errors involving verbs and verbals
- •Incorrect inclusion or omission of prepositions
- •Identify and correct errors involving prepositions
- •1. A definition of communication
- •2. Major structural components
- •3. What is culture?
- •4. Explaining Culture
- •1. New approach to intercultural understanding.
- •2. Culture as Ways of Thinking, Beliefs and Values
- •3. Culture as Language: The Close Link Between Language and Culture
- •Identify and correct errors involving the wrong word choice
- •Identify and correct errors involving sentence structure
- •Incomplete adjective clauses
- •Identify and correct errors involving types of clauses
- •Identify and correct errors involving adverb clauses
- •In Europe
- •In Sweden
- •Incomplete noun clauses
- •Identify and correct errors involving noun clauses:
- •Incomplete participial phrases
- •Incomplete appositives
- •Incomplete/missing prepositional phrase
- •Identify and correct errors involving incomplete phrases
- •Introduction
- •Informative Abstracts:
- •Tips and Warnings
- •Identify and correct errors involving word order
- •Items involving parallel structures
- •Introduction
- •Implications
- •Identify and correct errors involving subject-verb agreement
- •Text 1-23. Interpreting successful lingua franca interaction (Based on Christiane Meierkord’s analysis of non-native/non-native small talk conversations in English)
- •The data
- •Identify and correct errors involving misplaced modifiers
- •Text 1-24. Bringing europe's lingua franca into the classroom (After an editorial published on guardian.Co.Uk on Thursday 19 April 2001)
- •Issues:
- •Issues:
- •Issues:
- •Issues:
- •Issues:
- •Issues:
- •1. European migrant workers
- •2. Returnees
- •3. Tourism
- •4. The redistribution of poverty
- •5. Expat workers
- •6. Internal migration
- •7. A reserve army of labour offshore
- •1. Communications technology
- •2. Text messaging
- •3. Surveillance society
- •4. Why English is used less . . .
- •5. Independent journalists and bloggers
- •Text 2-4. Polylingualism, multilingualism, plurilingualism
- •1. Borders - Borderlands – Boundaries (after Virginie Mamadouh)
- •3. Tool(s) – Toolkit (after Virginie Mamadouh)
- •1. Could you tell us your background and why you decided to become an educator? (from Ana Wu, City College of San Francisco, esl Instructor)
- •2. From poststructural and postcolonial perspectives, linguistic imperialism could be critiqued by its deterministic and binary divisions; those who colonize and those who are colonized.
- •6. Dr. Phillipson: In the March, 2009 interview Marinus Stephan on this blog, Dr. Stephan
- •8. You have written and discussed very controversial issues. How do you deal with criticism? How do you react to people who disagree with your ideas?
- •1. Interactive communication
- •2. Time and Space
- •3. Fate and Personal Responsibility
- •4. Face and Face-Saving
- •5. Nonverbal Communication
- •6. Summary
- •1. Social interaction.
- •2. Looking Back
- •3. Food for Thought
- •1. Introduction
- •2. Three Decades Have Passed
- •3. Cultural Predestination!
- •4. Individual Values
- •5. Culture Is a Set of Dynamic Processes of Generation and Transformation
- •1. Strong and weak uncertainty-avoidance cultures
- •2. Individualism versus Collectivism, the Case of Japan
- •3. Identity
- •1. Two specific uses of the concept of cultural identity
- •2. The interplay of culture and personality
- •3. The interaction of culture and biology
- •4. Psychosocial patterns of culture
- •5. Motivational needs
- •6. The flexibility of the multicultural personality
- •1. Introduction
- •2. Background: English as the language of publication and instruction
- •3. Methods
- •4. Results
- •4.1 Form of words (Morphology)
- •4.2 Grammar (Syntax)
- •4.3 Attitudes towards English as a Lingua Franca
- •5. Conclusion
- •Text 2-14. A new concept of english?
- •Cambridge English Examinations: Speaking Test
- •1. Basic Interpersonal Communication Skills (bics)
- •Implications for mainstream teachers
- •2. Common underlying proficiency (cup)
- •Implications for mainstream teachers
- •Implications for mainstream teachers
- •4. Additive/subtractive bilingualism
- •Implications for mainstream teachers
- •Introduction
- •Impetus for the study
- •1. Cultural
- •2. Organizational
- •Parts of an Abstract
- •Introduction
- •Interaction between teacher and students
- •Read the introduction section of the article.
- •Read the methods section of the article.
- •Read the discussion section of the article.
- •(Based on Christiane Meierkord’s analysis of non-native-/non-native small talk conversations in English. Continued from Text 1-23)
- •Interpreting lingua franca conversational data
Implications
Let us consider what would happen if the results of this study were extrapolated from a ten-minute presentation to a 45-minute lecture. If the rate of a delivery of a 45-minute lecture is slowed down by 25%, then the lecture will take closer to an hour to finish. If information is omitted from the L2 lecture at the same rates as were found in this study, then a 45-minute lecture could lack as much as 60 pieces of information that would have been mentioned in the lecturer’s first language. The challenges faced by L2 speakers extend beyond the classroom – other measures that could be considered to accommodate them could include variable speaker time at conferences and other gatherings.
The slow-down effect of 20-25% that was found in the study needs to be seen as a conservative estimate, given the facts that the students were relatively fluent speakers of English and had prepared and practiced for their English presentations. Faster lecturing is generally not better, far from it. While teachers using an L2 may be constrained by combinations of their own speaking style and their L2 proficiency, L1 teachers have at least the theoretical possibility of choosing a speaking rate that is appropriate for the audience and context. Yet, this can be extremely difficult to do. Therefore, “training in rate perception and modification should be more rigorously incorporated into teacher training programs” so that teachers can learn to slow down their speech when necessary. Speech engineers could contribute to the pedagogy of public speaking by developing applications that give online feedback on rate of speech, so that speakers could be warned when they begin to speak too quickly. Indeed, present-day dictation software could give this kind of information after the fact, by calculating the words transcribed in relation to the time spent speaking.
EXPLICATION OF KEY FACTS AND IDEAS GIVEN IN THE TEXT, SELECTING KEY WORDS, ABSTRACT WRITING, ORAL PRESENTATION
Instruction: These are guidelines for presentation issues which usually pose a big problem for graduate students and young researchers. This is a collection of data from study materials placed in the Internet without copyright limitations. You are sure to realize that, no matter how brilliant your ideas might be, they will fail to achieve their potential because of your failure to address presentation issues. On reading and understanding the following information your purpose will be to acquire the standard guidelines along which a presentation is built. This will be your goal as a graduate student and beginning researcher.
Many good research papers fail to achieve their potential because of the student's failure to address six important presentation issues: (1) Presentation Format; (2) Grammar and Style; (3) Adequate Research; (4) Citation; (5) Plagiarism; and (6) Field Component.
(1) Presentation Format:
Your professor normally will indicate the type of presentation format preferred for a graduation paper. Your oral presentation is based on the summary of your graduation paper. In general, all papers should be typed, headings and subheadings should be used to indicate the major sections of the paper. Consult with your professor for specific requirements on this issue.
(2) Syntax and Grammar:
There is nothing more frustrating than reading a research paper plagued with vocabulary and syntax errors! In a computerized environment, vocabulary errors and major syntax errors are totally unacceptable.
Read over your presentation text carefully BEFORE you print out the final copy. Have a friend or relative read the paper back to you so you can listen to how it sounds. Watch out for simple language problems. If you are unsure about any grammar or vocabulary issue, consult a writing aid, or ask your professor for help. Remember, it's not only important what you say, but how you say it! The key to a successful paper is to EDIT, EDIT, EDIT!!!
(3) Quality of Research:
A well written and researched paper should draw from accepted academic sources. What are academic sources? Primarily, these are books written by academics and other experts as well as professional journal articles. Academic journal articles are those published in accepted professional journals, usually 10-15 pages in length, with a detailed bibliography, and are usually peer reviewed by other academics and professionals. Check with your professor if you are unsure about a particular journal source. Articles that are NOT considered academic in nature are those published in media magazines that are often anonymous in nature, short in length, and with no cited bibliography. Other NON-JOURNAL sources include statistical abstracts, encyclopedias, reference books, etc. Although these are valid and very useful sources, and should be used in your work, they do not fit the definition of "academic journal articles" for the purpose of a research paper.
Be extremely careful about material read and downloaded from the Internet or any world-wide web source. Most academic journal articles are not available on the web. If you find material on the Web, it must meet the criteria outlined above to qualify as a legitimate academic journal article. All material downloaded from the Web and used in a paper should be checked against other reputable sources. DO NOT try and submit prepackaged research papers downloaded from the Web! You will be caught, you will receive an "F" for the course, and you will be charged with fraud!
(4) Citation:
Your research paper will contain material gained from a variety of academic and non-academic sources. All sources must be clearly and correctly attributed in the text and listed in a Bibliography or Works Cited section at the end of your paper.
(5) Plagiarism:
Plagiarism is a serious problem that is not very well understood by most students. Simply stated, plagiarism is the act of passing someone else's work off as your own or using someone's research without proper citation. Direct plagiarism occurs when a passage is quoted verbatim (word for word).
Indirect plagiarism occurs when the student paraphrases the original work without giving credit to the original author. Paraphrasing means to substitute certain words and to alter some sentences while repeating all the main ideas. Even though the original work was not copied verbatim, the ideas and substance have been copied.
If you use ANY piece of material from a published (or, in certain circumstances, unpublished) source, you MUST provide proper citation. The rules on how to avoid plagiarism can be quite confusing. Consult your professor or a good writing guide on tips to avoid this serious problem. Basically, you should have a citation in every paragraph where you have used material from a published source, including the Internet.
Moreover, EVERY map, table, graphic, or picture that you include from whatever source (even if it's your own material) must have a proper caption and a full citation (i.e. Source: Photograph by the author). DO NOT fill up the paper with lines of direct quotes from material. Put the material in your own words and cite the original source.
If you have more than four lines of direct quotation on any one page in your paper, you probably have too much direct quotation. If in doubt about this, talk to your professor!
Learn the rules NOW!! DO NOT PLAGIARIZE.
(6) Your field Component of the Research Paper:
Finally, we come to the very heart of many research paper problems – the failure to include your field component in the paper. Having your field component does not mean throwing some table in at the end of the research paper!
Your discipline is concerned with definite relationships. Ask yourself at the beginning of the research project what the field component of your paper is going to be. What pattern or process are your investigating? How has it changed? How might it change as the result of some action or process?
Also important to this concept is the "SO WHAT?" question. You must have a good rationale for conducting the research. Why are you researching this topic or issue? Adding to the body of knowledge about a topic, exploring new methodological approaches to a problem or issue, evaluating policy implications for a specific problem, or helping us to understand more fully the complexity of human-environment relationships all are solid rationales for conducting research.
Finally, and above all, you should enjoy your research. Choose issues or problems that really motivate you and challenge you professionally and intellectually. Don't opt for the already hashed-over approach that will bore you to distraction. Address the serious and challenging issues – the reward and satisfaction will be much higher in the long run.
Answer the following questions:
Did your professors indicate the type of presentation format in your research field? If they did, when did you learn about it first?
Are grammar and style criteria important in Ukrainian language papers?
What academic sources do you regularly use?
Do you often download from the Internet?
Do you always check downloaded data against reputable sources?
What is meant by indirect plagiarism?
What is meant by direct plagiarism?
What is meant by a field component of a research paper?
How can you avoid plagiarism in your research paper?
Prepare a 5 minute talk on Rebecca Hincks’ study of oral presentations as a spoken genre.
Section 2. Grammar workout
