Добавил:
Upload Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
closer look at learner autonomy.doc
Скачиваний:
2
Добавлен:
01.07.2025
Размер:
339.46 Кб
Скачать

5. Ideas for further research and Epilogue

5.1 Ideas for further research

The questionnaire items provided in Chapter 4.5 might be used in further research into learner autonomy. However, one needs to bear in mind that with respect to the complexity of the concept (as shown in Chapters 2 and 3), our research was severely limited. We were forced to neglect factors such as personal growth, teaching materials, orientation in aims and activities, flexibility, creativity, risk-taking and making guesses, empathy, cultural understanding or self-appropriation of learning. Although some of these factors did emerge in our study, they were not thoroughly treated.

If, then, one ventures to devise a tool for measuring autonomy based on our research, one needs to understand that it covers the concept only partly. Consequently, another similar research into a number of other factors would need to be undertaken before we could produce a fairly reliable instrument to gauge learners' readiness for independent learning.

5.2 Epilogue

David Little mentions Ivan Illich's idea that a school "institutionalizes values" (1991: 9). Carl Rogers, operating on a necessarily identical mindset, believes that we could easily "do away with teaching. People would get together if they wished to learn" (1969: 154). No doubt these were radical notions, even in the 1960s.

It seems that schools may create a barrier between learning and living, between experience and reality – by taking learning and reflection away from the realm of the students' free choice. However, Rogers's idea is not only a frontal attack at all imaginable educational institutions; in more general terms, it could be conceived of as an attack against all institutions. Schools are gigantic enterprises that tell millions of people what to learn (even at universities, eponyms of free human thought, knowledge is more often transferred than negotiated); consequently, other state (or private) institutions work along very similar lines.

It is our sincere wish that centuries from now, people – going along the line with Illich and Rogers – will knock down all existing institutions that exceed the boundaries of a tiny city state, thus proclaiming themselves free.

6. References:

BENSON, Phil (2001) Teaching and Researching Autonomy in Language Learning, Pearson Education Limited.

BRANDES, Donna, GINNIS, Paul (1986) A Guide to Student-Centred Learning, Simon & Schuster Education.

BUTLER, Yuko Goto (2005) 'Comparative perspectives towards communicative activities among elementary school teachers in South Korea, Japan and Taiwan' Language Teaching Research 9(4): 423-446.

CHRÁSKA, Miroslav (1995) K současným trendům pedagogického výzkumu ve světě, Olomouc: Vydavatelství University Palackého.

CHRÁSKA, Miroslav (1998) Základy výzkumu v pedagogice, Olomouc: Vydavatelství University Palackého.

COTTERALL, Sara (1995) 'Readiness For Autonomy: Investigating Learner Beliefs' System 23(2): 195-205.

COTTERALL, Sara (1999) 'Key variables in language learning: what do learners believe about them?' System 27: 493-513.

CRABBE, David (1993) 'Fostering Autonomy from within the Classroom: The Teacher's Responsibility' System 21(4): 443-452.

DICKINSON, Leslie (1987) Self-Instruction in Language Learning, Cambridge University Press.

DICKINSON, Leslie (1992) Learner Autonomy 2: Learner Training for Language Learning, Dublin, Trinity College: Authentik Language Learning Resources Ltd.

ELLIS, Rod (1985) Understanding Second Language Acquisition, Oxford University Press.

GARCIA, Teresa and PINTRICH, Paul R. (1996) 'The Effects of Autonomy on Motivation and Performance in the College Classroom' Contemporary Educational Psychology 21: 477-486.

GREMMO, Marie-José, RILEY, Philip (1995) 'Autonomy, Self-Direction and Self-Access in Language Teaching and Learning: The History of an Idea' System 23(2): 151-164.

HARGAN, Noeleen (1994) 'Learner Autonomy by Remote Control' System 22(4): 455-462.

HART, Nicholas (2002) 'Intra-group autonomy and authentic materials: a different approach to ELT in Japanese colleges and universities' System 30: 33-46.

HO, Judy and CROOKALL, David (1995) 'Breaking with Chinese cultural traditions: Learner autonomy in English language teaching' System 23(2): 235-243.

HOLEC, Henri (1985) 'Aspects of autonomous learning' in Riley, P. (ed) Discourse and Learning, New York: Longman Group Ltd: 248-282.

HORWITZ, Elaine K. (1999) 'Cultural and situational influences on foreign language learners' beliefs about language learning: a review of BALLI studies' System 27: 557-576.

KENNY, Brian (1993) 'For More Autonomy' System 21(4): 431-442.

KING, Alison (1994) 'Autonomy and Question Asking: The Role of Personal Control in Student-Generated Questioning' Learning and Individual Differences 6(2): 163-185.

LITTLE, David (1991) Learner Autonomy 1: Definitions, Issues and Problems, Dublin, Trinity College: Authentik Language Learning Resources Ltd.

LITTLE, David (1995) 'Learning As Dialogue: The Dependence of Learner Autonomy on Teacher Autonomy' System 23(2): 175-181.

LITTLEWOOD, William (1996) 'Autonomy: An Anatomy and a Framework' System 24(4): 427-435.

MURRAY, Garold L. (1999) 'Autonomy and language learning in a simulated environment' System 27: 295-308.

NUNAN, David (1989) Designing Tasks For the Communicative Classroom, Cambridge University Press.

OXFORD, Rebecca (1989) 'Learning Strategy Inventory For Language Learners', Columbia University: New York. Version 7.0. 28 March 2007

< http://ell.phil.tu-chemnitz.de/cing/frontend/questionnaires/oxford_quest.php>

PERCLOVÁ, Radka (2003) 'Primary and lower-secondary learners’ beliefs about foreign language learning' in Theory and Practice in English Studies, Volume 1. Brno: Masaryk University.

RILEY, Philip (1985) 'Mud and stars: personal constructs, sensitization and learning' in Riley, P. (ed) Discourse and Learning, New York: Longman Group Ltd: 154-169.

RICHARDS, Jack C., ROGERS, Theodore S. (2001) Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching (Second Edition), Cambridge University Press.

ROGERS, Carl R. (1969) Freedom To Learn, Columbus, Ohio: Charles E. Merrill Publishing Company.

SAVIGNON, Sandra J. and WANG, Chaochang (2003) 'Communicative language teaching in EFL contexts: Learner attitudes and perceptions' International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 41(3): 223-249.

SKEHAN, Peter (1989) Individual Differences in Second-Language Learning, London: Edward Arnold.

SMÍŠKOVÁ, Hana (2005) 'Masaryk University Internationalization Project: Learner Beliefs and Expectations' in Theory and Practice in English Studies, Volume 3. Brno: Masaryk University.

TASSINAR (2007) 'Learner autonomy in foreign language learning in higher education: components, descriptors and standards', Learner Autonomy Project Inventory. 23 March 2007

<http://www.hayo.nl/lapi_project.php?project=29>

WENDEN, Anita (1991) Learner Strategies For Learner Autonomy, Prentice Hall Europe.

WHITE, Cynthia (1999) 'Expectations and emergent beliefs of self-instructed language learners' System 27: 443-457.

WRIGHT, Tony (1987) Roles of Teachers and Learners, Oxford University Press.

WU, Xinyi (2003) 'Intrinsic motivation and young language learners: the impact of the classroom environment' System 31: 501-517.

Соседние файлы в предмете [НЕСОРТИРОВАННОЕ]