|
I.ZhansugurovZhetysuStateUniversity |
QMSZhSUA/EMCD.09-2012 edition 2 |
QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM |
||
Educational and methodical complex |
f.4.09-40 |
|
01.09.2012. |
Faculty of Finance and-economics
Chair of Accounting and auditing
APPROVED
First Vice Rector - Vice Rector
for Academic and Methodical Affairs
__________ Erkinbayeva L.K.
«_____» ______________2014.
EDUCATIONAL AND METHODICAL COMPLEX
Disciplines: Professional-oriented foreign language
Specialty: 5В050800 «Accounting and audit»
Study format: full time
Taldykorgan, 2014
Educational and methodical complex is compiled senior lecturer A. Adamov
based on SOSERK specialty 5В050800 «Accounting and audit» and standard curriculum
(sign of teacher)
Considered at the meeting of chair of teaching and upbringing methods
from «____»__________________, protocol №_________.
Head of chair____________________
Approved by FFE methodological office
«____»____________________, protocol № ________ .
Chairman ofMOof the faculty _________________
|
I.ZhansugurovZhetysuStateUniversity |
QMSZhSUA/EMCD.09-2012 edition 2 |
QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM |
||
Syllabus |
f.4.09-42 |
|
01.09.2012. |
Faculty of Finance and-economics Chair of Accounting and auditing
S Y L L A B U S
on discipline: Professional-oriented foreign language
for specialty 5В050800 «Accounting and audit»
study format: full time
course: 3
semester: 5
the number of credits: 2
total contact hours: 60, including:
lectures: 15
practical lessons: 15
SIWwT: 30
SIW: 30
examination: 5 semester
Taldykorgan, 2014
Evaluation policy
A point-grading letter system of evaluation
Evaluation by letter system |
Digital equivalent |
Percentage |
Evaluation by traditional system |
A |
4,0 |
95-100 |
Excellent |
A- |
3,67 |
90-94 |
|
B+ |
3,33 |
85-89 |
Good |
B |
3,0 |
80-84 |
|
B- |
2,67 |
75-79 |
|
C+ |
2,33 |
70-74 |
Satisfactory |
C |
2,0 |
65-69 |
|
C- |
1,67 |
60-64 |
|
D+ |
1,33 |
55-59 |
|
D |
1 |
50-54 |
|
F |
0 |
0-49 |
Unsatisfactory |
General point system of evaluation
Evaluating position |
Number of assessments for 1-8 weeks |
Number of assessments for 9-15weeks |
Maximum number of points |
Term so exhibiting of points in the electronic journal |
|
Current control |
7 |
7 |
100 points for each evaluation |
Weekly (except the first week) |
|
SIW |
2 |
2 |
100 pointsforeachIW |
4,7,11,14 Weeks |
|
Midterm |
1 |
1 |
100 points for each рубежный контроль |
8 and 15 weeks |
|
Admission rating 1 |
R 1 |
100 |
8 week |
||
Admission rating 2 |
R2 |
100 |
15 week |
||
Admission rating foracademic period |
R = (R1+R2)/2 |
100 |
15week |
||
Examination |
E |
100 |
16-19 weeks |
||
Final grade |
I = R*0.6+E*0.4 |
100 |
|
||
Criteria of evaluation (approximate option for discipline in 2 credits)
Type of control |
Maximumgrade |
Term sofexhibiting of points in the teacher’s journal |
Current control: attendance: 1 hour – 5 points homework performance performance of laboratory lessons activity (answers at lectures...) performance of SIWwT tasks |
100 15 15 15 15 40 |
Oneachweek
|
SIW 1 Task1 Task2 Task3 |
100 30 40 30 |
According to the schedule of SIW tasks delivery |
SIW 2 Task1 Task2 Task3 |
100 30 30 40 |
According to the schedule of SIW tasks delivery |
SIW 3 Task1 Task2 Task3 |
100 20 35 45 |
According to the schedule of SIW tasks delivery |
SIW 4 Task1 Task2 Task3 |
100 30 35 35 |
According to the schedule of SIW tasks delivery |
Midterm1: Defense of the project Project idea Project description Project presentation |
100 10 50 40 |
3 week 6 week 8 week |
Midterm2: Colloquium 1 Question – 1 grade 2 Question – 2 grade 3 Question – 3 grade Final grade: (1 grade + 2 grade + 3 grade)/3 |
100 100 100 100 |
15 week |
*)Contents of SIW tasks are given in the corresponding section of syllabus