Добавил:
Upload Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
LECTURE1.doc
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
01.07.2025
Размер:
148.99 Кб
Скачать

3.2. Grammar

One of the main processes in the development of the Germanic morphological system was the change in the word structure. The common Indo-European notional word consisted of three elements: the root, expressing the lexical meaning, the inflexion or ending, showing the grammatical form, and the so-called stem-forming suffix, a formal indicator of the stem type. However, in Germanic languages the stem-forming suffix fuses with the ending and is often no longer visible, thus making the word structure a two-element one. Nevertheless, it should be taken into account when explaining the differences in the categorial forms of words originally having different stem-forming suffixes.

It should also be mentioned that Germanic languages belonged to the synthetic type of form-building, which means that they expressed the grammatical meanings by changing the forms of the word itself resorting to any auxiliary words.

The Germanic nouns had a well-developed case system with four cases (nominative, genitive, dative, accusative) and two number forms (singular and plural). They also had the category of gender (feminine, masculine and neuter). The means of form-building were the endings added to the root/stem of the noun.

The Germanic adjectives had two types of declension, conventionally called strong and weak. Most adjectives could be declined both in accordance with the strong and weak type. Agreeing with the noun in gender, case and noun, the adjective by its type of declension expressed the idea of definiteness (weak declension) or indefiniteness (strong declension), the meaning which was later to become expressed by a grammatical class of words unknown in Common Germanic — the article.

The adjective also had degrees of comparison, the forms of which were im most instances formed with the help of suffixes -iz/oz and -ist/-ost, but there were also instances of suppletivism, i.e. use of different roots for different forms — a means common for many Indo-European languages:

Goth leitils—minniza—minnists (little—less—least)

Rus хороший—лучше—лучший

The Germanic verbs are divided into two principal groups: strong and weak verbs, depending on the way they formed their past tense forms.

The past tense (or preterite) (‘преперит – прошедший) of strong verbs was formed with the help of Ablaut qualitative or quantitative.

Weak verbs expressed preterite with the help of the dental suffix-d/-t. They also had stem-forming suffixes, depending on which they fell into separate classes.

There was also a small group of highly frequent suppletive verbs forming their forms from different roots, the same as in other Indo-European languages:

Goth im (/I/am) Rus есть

was (/I/ was) был

The Germanic verb had a well-developed system of categories, including the category of person (first, second, third), number (singular and plural), tense (past and present, the latter also used for expressing future actions), mood (indicative, imperative and optative - желательный) and voice (only in Gothic—active and mediopassive – мидиэпэсив - среднепассивный). The categorial forms employed synthetic means of form-building.

Соседние файлы в предмете [НЕСОРТИРОВАННОЕ]