
- •Cloning
- •Клонування
- •Contents
- •Introduction
- •Part 1. Theoretical basis of cloning
- •Definition of cloning
- •Cloning techniques
- •Examples of cloning animals
- •Human cloning
- •Part 2. Practical application of cloning
- •2.1. Reasons for cloning
- •2.2. Risks of cloning
- •2.3. Computer cloning technologies
- •Part 3. Issues relating to cloning
- •3.2. Cloning Myths
- •Conclusion
- •References
Examples of cloning animals
The first organism to be cloned was a sea urchin, in 1885. The procedure was to shake a two-celled embryo until the cells separated. A frog was the first organism to be cloned using nuclear transfer. A mouse named Fibro helped prove that cloning could be done using cells from males. In 2001 Advanced Cell Technology (ACT) produced the first cloned human embryo. The embryo reached the six cell stage and then stopped dividing.
On July 5, 1996, the most famous sheep in modern history was born, after 276 attempts[10]. Ian Wilmut and a group of Scottish scientists announced that they had successfully cloned a sheep named Dolly.
If you stood Dolly beside a "naturally" conceived sheep, you wouldn't notice any differences between the two. In fact, to pinpoint the only major distinguishing factor between the two, you'd have to go back to the time of conception because Dolly's embryo developed without the presence of sperm. Instead, Dolly began as a cell from another sheep that was fused via electricity with a donor egg. Just one sheep -- no hanky-panky involved.
Two years later, researchers in Japan cloned eight calves from a single cow, but only four survived. Besides cattle and sheep, other mammals that have been cloned from somatic cells include: cat, deer, dog, horse, mule, ox, rabbit and rat. In addition, a rhesus monkey has been cloned by embryo splitting.
While Dolly's birth marked an incredible scientific breakthrough, it also set off questions in the scientific and global community about what -- or who -- might be next to be "duplicated." Cloning sheep and other nonhuman animals seemed more ethically benign to some than potentially cloning people. In response to such concerns in the United States, President Clinton signed a five-year moratorium on federal funding for human cloning the same year of Dolly's arrival.
On December 22, 2001, a kitten named CC made history as the first cat - and the first domestic pet - ever to be cloned. CC and Rainbow, the donor of CC's genetic material, are pictured below. But do you notice something odd about this picture? If CC is a clone - an exact genetic copy - of Rainbow, then why don't they look exactly alike? A clone might not necessarily be a carbon copy of the donor organism. There are at least two reasons: different environmental factors, the organisms would be raised differently, personalities and behaviors would be different, differences in gene activation, X inactivation. The answer lies on the X chromosome. In cats, a gene that helps determine coat color resides on this chromosome. Both CC and Rainbow, being females, have two X chromosomes. (Males have one X and one Y chromosome.) Since the two cats have the exact same X chromosomes, they have the same two coat color genes, one specifying black and the other specifying orange.
So why do they look different?
Very early in her development, each of Rainbow's cells "turned off" one entire X chromosome - and therefore, turned off either the black color gene or the orange one. This process, called X-inactivation, happens normally in females, in order to prevent them from having twice as much X-chromosome activity as males. It also happens randomly, meaning that not every cell turns off the same X chromosome.
As a result, Rainbow developed as a mosaic of cells that had one or the other coat color gene inactivated - some patches of cells specified black, other patches specified orange, and still others specified white, due to more complex genetic events. This is how all calico cats, like Rainbow, get their markings.
CC looks different because the somatic cell that Rainbow donated to create her contained an activated black gene and an inactivated orange gene. What's interesting is that, as CC developed, her cells did not change that inactivation pattern. Therefore, unlike Rainbow, CC developed without any cells that specified orange coat color. The result is CC's black and white tiger-tabby coat.
Rainbow and CC are living proof that a clone will not look exactly like the donor of its genetic material.