- •Your Writing Portfolio
- •Language Biography
- •It should be completed on the basis of self-assessment, peer assessment, expert assessment results according to the specifications of Common European Framework.
- •Letter Writing Assessment Checklist: Assessment of the Structure: Rating Scale Assess your own paper using the following rating scale and answer the questions after it.
- •Assessment Rubric for Letters: Analytical Scale For Self-Assessment or Peer-Assessment
- •Writing Portfolio Assessment: Holistic Scale 1 for Self-Assessment
- •Writing Portfolio Assessment Scale: Holistic Scale 2 for Self-Assessment or Peer-Assessment
- •Writing Portfolio Checklist
- •Writing Portfolio Assessment scale: Integrative Scale for Expert Assessment Name _________________________________ Period__________ Date _________
- •Assessment rubrics of letter writing
- •Integrative Scale: Expert Assessment
Assessment Rubric for Letters: Analytical Scale For Self-Assessment or Peer-Assessment
Criteria |
Proficiency |
Advanced |
Marginal |
Basic |
Organization: Elements & Format
|
Includes all requirements for the type of the requested letter. Content is well organized. |
Includes all the requirements for the type of the requested letter. Content is organized. |
Includes the requirements for the type of the requested letter. but could be better organized.
|
Does not include many elements for the requested type of letter. Content is poorly organized |
Sentences & Paragraphs |
Sentences and paragraphs are complete, well constructed and of varied structure.
|
All sentences and paragraphs are complete and well constructed (no fragments or run-ons). |
Most sentences and paragraphs are complete and well constructed. A few need some work.
|
Many sentences and/or paragraphs need work |
Style and Tone |
Problem and request are presented in a constructive manner. Request is reasonable. |
Problem and request are stated with an appropriate tone. Request is reasonable. |
Tone OR reasonableness of request could be improved.
|
Tone is threatening or otherwise negative. Request is unreasonable OR unclear |
Grammar & Spelling |
There are no errors in grammar or spelling. |
There are 12 errors in grammar and/or spelling. |
There are 34 errors in grammar and/or spelling
|
There are more than 4 errors in grammar and/or spelling. |
Conventions: Capitalization & Punctuation |
There are no errors in capitalization and punctuation |
There are 12 errors in capitalization and punctuation. |
There are 34 errors in capitalization and punctuation.
|
There are more than 4 errors in capitalization and punctuation. |
Conventions: Legibility
|
Typing or writing is legible with no distracting corrections. |
Typing or writing is legible but there are 12 distracting corrections. |
Typing or writing is marginally legible OR there are 34 distracting corrections. |
Typing or writing is not legible OR there are more than 4 distracting corrections. |
Conventions: Neatness
|
Document is clean and neat with no wrinkles. |
Document is generally clean but has some folds or worn edges. |
Document is slightly crumpled or stained.
|
Document is very crumpled or stained. |
Letter Writing Assessment Rubrics: Holistic Scale
|
Holistic Score ____ |
Proficiency |
Advanced |
Marginal |
Basic |
WRITING APPLICATION |
IDEAS/ CONTENT
|
States a clear position or perspective in support of a position or proposal that strongly appeals to the target reader |
States a clear position or perspective in support of a proposition or proposal
|
Position or perspective may not be immediately clear to the reader |
No clear position or proposal |
Reasons and Evidence to achieve the communicative purpose |
• Skillfully describes the points in support of the position, using well-articulated, convincing evidence • Skillfully uses a variety of narrative, Persuasive, other letter writing techniques • Effective use of references embedded within the text |
•Adequately describes the points in support of the position, using logical, well-articulated, documented evidence (supporting arguments, facts, statistics, examples, descriptions) • Sources referenced within the text |
•Supporting points/ evidence is not logical, sufficient, well articulated, or documented |
• Offers little or no supporting points/evidence |
|
Addressing Concerns/ Counter- Arguments
|
Addresses opposing viewpoints and provides details, supporting information, arguments, building an extremely convincing and well focused argument |
Addresses opposing viewpoints and provides arguments, details, supporting information, arguments |
Anticipates few reader concerns and arguments, details, supporting information, arguments |
Does not anticipate reader concerns or counter-arguments |
|
WRITING STRATEGIES |
ORGANIZATION
|
Skillful Structure: • Strong, engaging introduction • Logical and effective sequencing of ideas linked to thesis • Conclusion strongly reinforces thesis and gives closure |
Appropriate structure: • Engaging introduction • Logical sequencing of ideas based on purpose and linked to thesis • Conclusion reinforces thesis and gives closure |
Weak structure: • Introduction, body and/or conclusion may need some revision • Evidence may be isolated facts with weak sequencing |
Little or no structure: • Introduction, body and/or conclusion may not exist or may need major revision |
VOICE |
• Writer’s voice is confident, convincing and imbedded within the textual information • Compels reader to react favorably to writer’s position • Clear sense of purpose and Audience |
• Writer’s voice is confident and convincing • Writer’s reaction and feelings about the thesis are evident • Clear sense of purpose and audience • Consistent point of view
|
• Sense of purpose and/or audience not clear • Straight facts with writer’s voice detached from topic
|
• Unclear or no sense of voice, purpose and audience |
|
WORD AND LANGUAGE CHOICE
|
•Words/ phrases powerfully convey the intended message in a very interesting and precise way • Academic language imbedded throughout text |
• Precise words/phrases get the message across • Uses academic language related to the text
|
• More precise and accurate words are needed to create a clear message |
• Limited vocabulary; words may be used inappropriately |
|
SENTENCE FLUENCY
|
• Purposeful and innovative sentence structure to enhance intended effect • Skillful use of transitions within and across paragraphs |
• Purposeful use of sentence structure to enhance intended effect • Transitions connect ideas within and across paragraphs |
• Some understanding of sentence structure • Limited use of appropriate transitions |
• Little or no sense of sentence structure • Lacks transitions |
|
CONVEN TIONS |
• Shows creativity and flexibility when using conventions to enhance meaning |
• Uses grade level appropriate conventions; errors are minor and do not obscure meaning |
• Uses grade level appropriate conventions; errors occasionally obscure meaning |
• Limited understanding of grade level appropriate conventions |
|
