
- •English for law students content:
- •Word Study
- •Verb noun (agent) noun (concept)
- •The Long History of the Solicitor
- •Text Study
- •Судебные Инны
- •Text b Judges
- •Dialogue 1. Lawyers who want to start their own practice
- •Dialogue 2. Legal Education
- •Investigate – investigation – investigator; notary – notarized – notarial.
- •Revision Translation
- •Стирание граней между барристерами и солиситорами
- •Grammar section Grammar to be revised: English Tenses (Active Voice)
- •Word Study
- •Verb noun (agent) noun (concept)
- •The Foundation of British Law: Habeas Corpus Act Let the Body Be Brought...
- •Text Study
- •Драконт
- •Text b Sources of Law
- •Text c Advantages and Disadvantages of Case Law
- •Text d Retrospective of British Legislation
- •Text e Early Systems of Law
- •Dialogue 1. Never Leave till Tomorrow …
- •Dialogue 2. At Oxford Law School
- •Revision Translation
- •Grammar section Grammar to be revised: The Passive Voice
- •Word Study
- •Verb noun(agent) noun(concept)
- •Text Study
- •Introduced by
- •Британская Конституция
- •Text b Monarchy in Britain
- •Text c Political Parties
- •Text d Elections in Great Britain
- •Text e Prime Minister
- •Dialogue 1. At the Exam
- •Dialogue 2. The Significance of the Bill of Rights
- •Revision Translation
- •Grammar section Grammar to be revised: the Sequence of Tenses. Reported Speech.
- •Commands, requests, advice
- •Word Study
- •Checks and Balances
- •Text Study
- •The Presidents of the United States
- •Конституция Соединенных Штатов Америки
- •Раздел 8. Конгресс имеет право:
- •Text b System of Government
- •Text c The Legislature
- •Text d Political Parties
- •Text e American President
- •Dialogue 1. After the Seminar
- •Dialogue 2. Similarities and Differences
- •Revision Translation
- •Grammar section Grammar to be revised: Modal Verbs
- •Word Study
- •Text Study
- •Assault
- •Shop-lifting
- •Rioting in Bracknel Continuous
- •Text b What is Criminology?
- •Преступность: врожденное и приобретенное
- •Text c Partakers in a Crime
- •Text d Juvenile Delinquency
- •Text e Kidnap Suspect for Trial
- •Dialogue 1. Stop Rewarding the Criminal
- •Dialogue 2. Crime Rates in Europe
- •Word Study
- •Text Study
- •Text b Police in the usa
- •Text c Scotland Yard
- •Text d Municipal Police
- •Text e. Private Policing in the usa
- •Dialogue 1. An Interview
- •Dialogue 2. Federal Bureau of Investigation
- •Word Study
- •Coroner’s Courts
- •Text Study
- •Text b The British Judicial System
- •The legal system in England and Wales
- •Text c The Role of the Independent Judiciary
- •Судебная система Шотландии
- •Text d The European Court of Human Rights
- •Text e The International Court of Justice
- •Dialogue 1. Consulting a Lawyer
- •Dialogue 2. In Court
- •Revision Translation
- •Word Study
- •Text Study
- •Text b Criminal Procedure
- •Уголовный процесс
- •Text c Trial by Jury
- •Text d The Plea-bargaining Process
- •Text e Evidence
- •Dialogue 1. In the Courtroom
- •Dialogue 2. Gathering Evidence
- •Revision Translation
- •Word Study
- •Text Study
- •Text b Capital Punishment
- •Text c Penal Institutions
- •Text d Women in Prison
- •Text e Correctional Institutions in the usa
- •Dialogue 1. Possible Punishment
- •Dialogue 2. Prisoner’s Life
- •Revision Translation
Dialogue 1. In the Courtroom
Task: read the dialogue, reproduce it a) abridged, b) in the form of a monologue.
Court Clerk: Stephen Vole, you are charged with murdering Emily French on the 14-th day of October. Now say you, Stephen Vole, are you guilty or not guilty?
Vole: Not guilty .
Court Clerk: Members of the Jury! The prisoner stands indicted for that he on the 14-th day of October murdered Emily French. To this indictment he has pleaded ‘not guilty’, and it is your charge to say1, having heard the evidence, whether he be guilty or not.
Judge: Members of the Jury, by the oath which you have just taken you swore to try this case on the evidence. You must shut out from your minds2 everything, except what will take place in this court. (To the prosecutor). You may proceed for the Prosecution, Mr Myers.
Myers: (rising): May it please you, my Lord3. (To the jury): I appear in this case for the Prosecution. And my learned friend Sir Wilfred Robert appears for the Defence. The facts in this case are simple and to a point, not in dispute4. You will hear how the prisoner made the acquaintance of Mrs Emily French, how he was treated by her with kindness. On the night of October the 14-th last between 9:30 and 10:00 Mrs French was murdered. It is the case for the Prosecution that the murder was committed by the prisoner Stephen Vole.
Vole: That’s not true! I didn’t do it!
Myers: Among the witness you will hear police evidence, also the evidence of Mrs French’s housekeeper, and from the medical and laboratory experts, and the evidence of the murdered woman’s solicitor. I will now call Chief Inspector Hearne, Criminal Investigation Department of New Scotland Yard.
Usher: Chief Inspector Hearne! Chief Inspector Hearne!
Hearne: From the body temperature and other factors we placed the time of death at between 9:30 and 10 p.m. Approximately thirty minutes before the housekeeper returned home and called us. Death was instantaneous, caused by one blow from a heavy blunt instrument.
Myers: Were there any signs of struggle?
Hearne: No, just one blow.
Myers: After establishing the cause and the time of death, what did you then do?
Hearne: A search was made. Photographs were taken and the premises were fingerprinted.
Myers: What fingerprints did you discover?
Hearne: I found the fingerprints of Mrs French, those of the housekeeper and some of Leonard Vole.
Myers: What made you think a robbery had been committed? Was any of the murdered woman’s property missing?
Hearne: No, sir. Nothing was missing.
Myers: Will you produce a jacket, Inspector? (a jacket found by the police in Vole’s house and is offered as evidence).
Hearne: Yes, sir.
Myers: Where did you find it, Inspector?
Hearne: In the prisoner’s flat and I handed it to our lab to test for bloodstains.
Myers: And did you find any?
Hearne: Yes, though an attempt had been made to wash them out.
Myers: What tests did the laboratory make?
Hearne: First to determine if the stains were made by human blood, then to classify it by group or type.
Myers: And what was the result?
Hearne: The blood on the jacket and the blood of the dead woman is of the same type.
Myers: Thank you, Inspector. No further questions.
(After A. Christie)
Notes:
It is your charge to say… – ваша обязанность сказать ...
Shut out from your minds – выбросить из головы
May it please you, my Lord – Если Вам угодно, Ваша Светлость
not in dispute – не подлежит обсуждению
Ex. 1. How is the following expressed in the dialogue?
happening at once
to promise formally
to be charged formally with an offence in law
a solemn promise
reason
to answer a charge in court
a person who is present when something happens
that which is owned, possession
words or objects which prove a statement or make a matter more clear
a person with special knowledge or training
a spot
not sharp
to remove by washing
to find out or make certain
to act or behave towards
Ex. 2. Study the dialogue and analyse different ways of addressing people depending on their social status.
Ex. 3. Give Russian equivalents to the following:
to stand indicted for, to plead “not guilty”, to hear the evidence, to take an oath, to proceed for the Prosecution, to appear for the Prosecution (Defence), to treat smb, a laboratory expert, approximately, instantaneous, to be caused by smth, a blunt instrument, to establish a cause, to make a search, a fingerprint, to miss smth, to test for smth, to make an attempt.
Ex. 4. Translate and activate the following sentences in your speech:
1. Он обвиняется в убийстве. 2. Он не признает себя виновным. 3. Заслушав показания свидетелей, они должны сказать, виновен он или нет. 4. Члены суда присяжных заседателей принимают присягу. 5. Факты этого дела просты и обсуждению не подлежат. 6. Время смерти было определено по температуре тела и другим показателям. 7. Был проведен осмотр, сделаны фотографии и взяты отпечатки пальцев. 8. Это не было ограбление, т. к. никакие вещи убитой не пропали. 9. Пиджак был осмотрен в лаборатории на предмет наличия пятен крови. 10. Что было выявлено в лаборатории? 11. Возможно, что кровь, обнаруженная на пиджаке, принадлежала убитой.