Добавил:
Upload Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
THE SELF IN INDIAN PHILOSOPHY.doc 1-142 лучший.doc
Скачиваний:
1
Добавлен:
01.07.2025
Размер:
2.82 Mб
Скачать

Introduction

According to $ankara ( 7th/8th century A. D. ) Brahman •is the only, the supreme and the most perfect reality. The world of manifold-ness is said to be existing only from the phenomenal point of view, while from the transcendental point of view, it is without any existence. Again, though the real self or Qtman is identical with Brahman1, the empirical individual selves are mere appearances. It is mdycl, the cosmic nescience, which is responsible for the appearance of the material world and the empirical selves.

TNature of the self

Pure consciousness or caitanya is the essence of the self. It is not the consciousness df any particular form but is pure consciousness or awareness common to all forms of knowledge. And, consciousness being self-luminous, the self is essentially self-luminous. It is pure light or clear radiance which reveals itself even when there is no object. Even in deep sleep and fainting, the self exists, as is inferred from such later recogni­tion as 'I slept happily for a long time' etc2. Pure conscious­ness is identical with existence and bliss. The consception of existence involves the ideas of truth, eternality, immutability and completeness. The self is, therefore, unconditionally true, eternal, unchangeable and self-complete.

•: iiliiil.111

'llit|!:;ii,r III II I •

70

The Self in Indian Philosophy

The self is eternal and exists in all the three points of time-past, present and future. It is kutastha or unchangeable and exists in the same nature for ever. Tn its essence, it is not sub­jected to bondage and sufferings, because it is of the nature of pure knowledge and bliss3. It is omnipresent, universal and infinite, because true consciousness is without any limitation. The self is vibhu or all-pervasive ; it is not conditioned by time and space. It is neither atomic nor intermediary in size. If the self were atomic, it could not pervade all the parts of the boby, and the quality of consciousness could not be perceived in the whole body. Actually, however, consciousness is perceived in the whole body. The self is; therefore, not atomic. Neither can it be regarded as of intermediary size. If it were so, it would be subject to destruction, while all the scrip­tures declare it to be eternal i.e. not subject to origination and destruction4.

The self is one ; it is the same self that exists in all beings. It is out of ignorance that the self is regarded as many or differ­ent in different individuals5.

The self is without any quality ; the qualities that seem to pertain to the self are only apparent. The self is devoid of action, because action involves an idea of change in the sub­ject i. e. the self in which it resides, while the self is changeless. KartTtva or agency and bhoktftva or enjoyment' are not possi­ble in the self, because these characteristics bring with' them the ideas of action and change in the self6.