
- •It assumes communicators are isolated individuals.
- •Speech act theory.
- •Performatives vs. Constatives (Non-Performatives)
- •Classification of Speech Acts
- •Indirect Speech Acts
- •Theories of interpersonal communication
- •Uncertainty reduction theory
- •Message design logic
- •Expectancy violation theory
- •Example2
Performatives vs. Constatives (Non-Performatives)
In Austin’s initial work with speech act theory he divided utterances into two types, Performatives and Constatives.
Performatives: Utterances that are used to do things or perform acts.
1. I pronounce you man and wife.
2. I sentence you to 50 years in prison.
3. I promise to drive you to Berlin.
J.Austin initially also believes that performatives can not be verified as true or false.
Constatives: Utterances that can be verified as true or false. These utterances were typically in the form of assertions or statements. “The Neckar River sometimes freezes over”.
Performative Verbs: Many performative utterances also contain performative verbs. The performative verb is one that names the action while performing it. I pronounce, I sentence etc. These verbs are essential for the action to occur. A priest in a catholic wedding could not for example say “You are man and wife”. In place of “I pronounce you man and wife”.
Not every sentence needs a performative verb in order for the action to be carried out. If we leave out the performative verb I promise in the sentence “I promise to drive you to Berlin”, the sentence will still perform the intended action. “I’ll drive you to Berlin”. Performative verbs are usually essential when they are used in the context of ritual behaviors supported by cultural institutions.
Explicit Performative: Sentence that contains a performative verb that makes explicit what kind of act is being performed.
1. The court hereby forbids you to enter your former wife’s house.
Implicit Performatives: Sentence that does not contain a verb that makes explicit what act is being performed.
1. Is there a bank nearby?
Classification of Speech Acts
Based on Austin's (1962), and Searle's (1969) theory, Cohen ( 1996) identifies five categories of speech acts based on the functions assigned to them.
Representatives |
Directives |
Expressives |
Comissives |
Declaratives |
assertions |
suggestions |
apologies |
promises |
decrees |
claims |
requests |
complaint |
threats |
declarations |
reports |
commands |
thanks |
offers |
|
John Searle gives the following classification of illocutionary speech acts:
assertives = speech acts that commit a speaker to the truth of the expressed proposition, e.g. reciting a creed
directives = speech acts that are to cause the hearer to take a particular action, e.g. requests, commands and advice
commissives = speech acts that commit a speaker to some future action, e.g. promises and oaths
expressives = speech acts that express the speaker’s attitudes and emotions towards the proposition, e.g. congratulations, excuses and thanks
declarations = speech acts that change the reality in accord with the proposition of the declaration, e.g. baptisms, pronouncing someone guilty or pronouncing someone husband and wife